skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

"How over is it?" Understanding the Incel Community on YouTube

Published:18 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

YouTube is by far the largest host of user-generated video content worldwide. Alas, the platform has also come under fire for hosting inappropriate, toxic, and hateful content. One community that has often been linked to sharing and publishing hateful and misogynistic content are the Involuntary Celibates (Incels), a loosely defined movement ostensibly focusing on men's issues. In this paper, we set out to analyze the Incel community on YouTube by focusing on this community's evolution over the last decade and understanding whether YouTube's recommendation algorithm steers users towards Incel-related videos. We collect videos shared on Incel communities within Reddit and perform a data-driven characterization of the content posted on YouTube.

Among other things, we find that the Incel community on YouTube is getting traction and that, during the last decade, the number of Incel-related videos and comments rose substantially. We also find that users have a 6.3% chance of being suggested an Incel-related video by YouTube's recommendation algorithm within five hops when starting from a non Incel-related video. Overall, our findings paint an alarming picture of online radicalization: not only Incel activity is increasing over time, but platforms may also play an active role in steering users towards such extreme content.

References

  1. Swati Agarwal and Ashish Sureka. 2014. A Focused Crawler for Mining Hate and Extremism Promoting Videos on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Stephane J. Baele, Lewys Brace, and Travis G. Coan. 2019. From "Incel" to "Saint": Analyzing the violent worldview behind the 2018 Toronto attack. In Terrorism and Political Violence. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nadia Bashir. 2018. Doing Research in Peoples' Homes: Fieldwork, Ethics and Safety--On the Practical Challenges of Researching and Representing Life on the Margins. In Qualitative Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jason Baumgartner, Savvas Zannettou, Brian Keegan, Megan Squire, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2020. The Pushshift Reddit Dataset. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. BBC. 2018. How rampage killer became misogynist “hero”. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43892189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbara Beale, Rose Cole, Sharon Hillege, Rose McMaster, and Sue Nagy. 2004. Impact of In-depth Interviews on the Interviewer: Roller Coaster Ride. In Nursing & health sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Zack Beauchamp. 2018. Incel, the misogynist ideology that inspired the deadly Toronto attack, explained. https://www.vox.com/world/2018/4/25/17277496/incel-toronto-attack-alek-minassian.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nicholas Blagden and Sarah Pemberton. 2010. The Challenge in Conducting Qualitative Research With Convicted Sex Offenders. In The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mélissa Blais and Francis Dupuis-Déri. 2012. Masculinism and the Antifeminist Countermovement. In Social Movement Studies. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jack Bratich and Sarah Banet-Weiser. 2019. From Pick-Up Artists to Incels: Con(fidence) Games, Networked Misogyny, and the Failure of Neoliberalism. In International Journal of Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Leyland Cecco. 2019. Toronto van attack suspect says he was 'radicalized' online by 'incels'. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/27/alek-minassian-toronto-van-attack-interview-incels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Southern Poverty Law Center. 2019. Male Supremacy. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/male-supremacy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Anirudh Srinivasan, Adam Glynn, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert. 2017. You Can't Stay Here: The Efficacy of Reddit's 2015 Ban Examined Through Hate Speech. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Matteo Cinelli, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. 2021. The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Allie Conti. 2018. Learn to Decode the Secret Language of the Incel Subculture. https://www.vice.com/en/article/7xmaze/learn-to-decode-the-secret-language-of-the-incel-subculture.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jesselyn Cook. 2018. Inside Incels' Looksmaxing Obsession: Penis Stretching, Skull Implants And Rage. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/incels-looksmaxing-obsession_n_5b50e56ee4b0de86f48b0a4f.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep Neural Networks for YouTube Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. David Dittrich, Erin Kenneally, et al. 2012. The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. Technical Report. US Department of Homeland Security.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nicola Döring and M Rohangis Mohseni. 2019. Male Dominance and Sexism on YouTube: Results of Three Content Analyses. In Feminist Media Studies. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. The Fifth Estate. 2019. Why incels are a 'real and present threat' for Canadians. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/incel-threat-canadians-fifth-estate-1.4992184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tracie Farrell, Miriam Fernandez, Jakub Novotny, and Harith Alani. 2019. Exploring Misogyny Across the Manosphere in Reddit. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Warren Farrell. 1996. The Myth of Male Power. Berkeley Publishing Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ronald A Fisher. 1922. On the Interpretation of χ 2 From Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (1922).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Joseph L Fleiss. 1971. Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters. In Psychological bulletin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Theodoros Giannakopoulos, Aggelos Pikrakis, and Sergios Theodoridis. 2010. A Multimodal Approach to Violence Detection in Video Sharing Sites. In 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Debbie Ging. 2019. Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. In Men and Masculinities. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Google Developers. 2020. YouTube Data API. https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lise Gotell and Emily Dutton. 2016. Sexual Violence in the “Manosphere”: Antifeminist Men's Rights Discourses on Rape. In International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. Queensland University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Christine Hauser. 2017. Reddit bans "Incel" group for inciting violence against women. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/09/technology/incels-reddit-banned.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Bruce Hoffman, Jacob Ware, and Ezra Shapiro. 2020. Assessing the Threat of Incel Violence. In Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhané Hunte and Kerstin Engström. 2019. “Female Nature, Cucks, and Simps”: Understanding Men Going Their Own Way as Part of the Manosphere. Master's thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Eslam Hussein, Prerna Juneja, and Tanushree Mitra. 2020. Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Incels Wiki. 2019 a. Blackpill. https://incels.wiki/w/Blackpill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Incels Wiki. 2019 b. Incel Forums Term Glossary. https://incels.wiki/w/Incel_Forums_Term_Glossary.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Incels Wiki. 2019 c. The Incel Wiki. https://incels.wiki.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sylvia Jaki, Tom De Smedt, Maja Gwó'zd'z, Rudresh Panchal, Alexander Rossa, and Guy De Pauw. 2019. Online Hatred of Women in the Incels.me Forum: Linguistic Analysis and Automatic Detection. In Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Shan Jiang, Ronald E Robertson, and Christo Wilson. 2019. Bias Misperceived: The Role of Partisanship and Misinformation in YouTube Comment Moderation. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jonas Kaiser and Adrian Rauchfleisch. 2018. Unite the right? How YouTube's recommendation algorithm connects the US Far-Right. In D&S Media Manipulation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Kathleen E Kiernan. 1988. Who Remains Celibate?. In Journal of Biosocial Science. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. In Biometrics. JSTOR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Jie Liang Lin. 2017. Antifeminism Online: MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way). JSTOR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Digital Media Literacy. 2021. What is an echo chamber? https://edu.gcfglobal.org/en/digital-media-literacy/what-is-an-echo-chamber/1/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Enrico Mariconti, Guillermo Suarez-Tangil, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nicolas Kourtellis, Ilias Leontiadis, Jordi Luque Serrano, and Gianluca Stringhini. 2019. “You Know What to Do”: Proactive Detection of YouTube Videos Targeted by Coordinated Hate Attacks. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Paris Martineau. 2019. YouTube Is Banning Extremist Videos. Will It Work? https://www.wired.com/story/how-effective-youtube-latest-ban-extremism/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis. 2017. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. New York: Data & Society Research Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Adrienne Massanari. 2017. # Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit's Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures. In New Media & Society. Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Frank J Massey Jr. 1951. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit. In Journal of the American statistical Association. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. December Maxwell, Sarah R Robinson, Jessica R Williams, and Craig Keaton. 2020. "A Short Story of a Lonely Guy": A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Involuntary Celibacy Using Reddit. In Sexuality & Culture. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Lauren Menzie. 2020. Stacys, Beckys, and Chads: The Construction of Femininity and Hegemonic Masculinity Within Incel Rhetoric. In Psychology & Sexuality. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Michael A Messner. 1998. The Limits of "The Male Sex Role" An Analysis of the Men's Liberation and Men's Rights Movements' Discourse. In Gender & Society. SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Mozila Foundation. 2019. Got YouTube Regrets? Thousands do! https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/campaigns/youtube-regrets/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Angela Nagle. 2015. An Investigation into Contemporary Online Anti-feminist Movements. Ph.D. Dissertation. Dublin City University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Edward Newell, David Jurgens, Haji Saleem, Hardik Vala, Jad Sassine, Caitrin Armstrong, and Derek Ruths. 2016. User Migration in Online Social Networks: A case study on Reddit during a period of Community Unrest. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Caroline O'Donovan, Charlie Warzel, Logan McDonald, Brian Clifton, and Max Woolf. 2019. We Followed YouTube's Recommendation Algorithm Down The Rabbit Hole. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/carolineodonovan/down-youtubes-recommendation-rabbithole.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Association of Internet Research. 2019. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Abby Ohlheiser. 2018. Inside the online world of "incels," the dark corner of the Internet linked to the Toronto suspect. https://tinyurl.com/incels-link-toronto-suspect.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Raphael Ottoni, Evandro Cunha, Gabriel Magno, Pedro Bernardina, Wagner Meira Jr, and Virg'ilio Almeida. 2018. Analyzing Right-wing YouTube Channels: Hate, Violence and Discrimination. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Kostantinos Papadamou, Antonis Papasavva, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn, Nicolas Kourtellis, Ilias Leontiadis, Gianluca Stringhini, and Michael Sirivianos. 2020. Disturbed YouTube for Kids: Characterizing and Detecting Inappropriate Videos Targeting Young Children. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Eli Pariser. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Rational Wiki. 2019. Incel. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Incel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Jeremy Blackburn, Barry Bradlyn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gianluca Stringhini, Summer Long, Stephanie Greenberg, and Savvas Zannettou. 2021. The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Shagun Jhaver, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gianluca Stringhini, and Robert West. 2020 a. Does Platform Migration Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels. In arXiv preprint 2010.10397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Raphael Ottoni, Robert West, Virg'ilio AF Almeida, and Wagner Meira Jr. 2020 b. Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Caitlin M Rivers and Bryan L Lewis. 2014. Ethical Research Standards in a World of Big Data. In F1000Research, Vol. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Adi Robertson. 2019. Reddit has broadened its anti-harassment rules and banned a major incel forum. https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/30/20891920/reddit-harassment-bullying-threats-new-policy-change-rules-subreddits.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Kevin Roose. 2019. The Making of a YouTube Radical. https://tinyurl.com/nytimes-youtube-radical.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Sdner Sara, Kyung Lah, Steve Almasy, and Ralph Ellis. 2015. Oregon Shooting: Gunman a Student at Umpqua Community College. https://tinyurl.com/umpqua-community-college-shoot.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Christian Stöcker and Mike Preuss. 2020. Riding the Wave of Misclassification: How We End up with Extreme YouTube Content. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Jonathan Stray. 2020. Aligning AI Optimization to Community Well-Being. International Journal of Community Well-Being, Vol. 3, 4 (2020), 443--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Ashish Sureka, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Atul Goyal, and Sidharth Chhabra. 2010. Mining YouTube to Discover Extremist Videos, Users and Hidden Communities. In Asia Information Retrieval Symposium. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Rashid Tahir, Faizan Ahmed, Hammas Saeed, Shiza Ali, Fareed Zaffar, and Christo Wilson. 2019. Bringing the Kid Back into YouTube Kids : Detecting Inappropriate Content on Video Streaming Platforms. In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. The YouTube Team. 2019. Our ongoing work to tackle hate. https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/our-ongoing-work-to-tackle-hate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Zeynep Tufekci. 2018. YouTube, The Great Radicalizer. In The New York Times.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. MK Vijaymeena and K Kavitha. 2016. A Survey on Similarity Measures in Text Mining. In Machine Learning and Applications: An International Journal (MLAIJ).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Matthew Weaver and Steven Morris. 2021. Plymouth gunman: a hate-filled misogynist and `Incel'. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/aug/13/plymouth-shooting-suspect-what-we-know-jake-davison.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Wikipedia. 2019. 2014 Isla Vista Killings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Isla_Vista_killings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Lindsey Wotanis and Laurie McMillan. 2014. Performing Gender on YouTube: How Jenna Marbles Negotiates a Hostile Online Environment. Feminist Media Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Savvas Zannettou, Sotirios Chatzis, Kostantinos Papadamou, and Michael Sirivianos. 2018. The Good, the Bad and the Bait: Detecting and Characterizing Clickbait on YouTube. In 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Zhe Zhao, Lichan Hong, Li Wei, Jilin Chen, Aniruddh Nath, Shawn Andrews, Aditee Kumthekar, Maheswaran Sathiamoorthy, Xinyang Yi, and Ed Chi. 2019. Recommending What Video to Watch Next: A Multitask Ranking System. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Shannon Zimmerman, Luisa Ryan, and David Duriesmith. 2018. Recognizing the violent extremist ideology of 'Incels'. In Women in International Security Policy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "How over is it?" Understanding the Incel Community on YouTube

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
            Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW2
            CSCW2
            October 2021
            5376 pages
            EISSN:2573-0142
            DOI:10.1145/3493286
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 October 2021
            Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader