skip to main content
research-article
Open Access
Best Paper

Reflect, not Regret: Understanding Regretful Smartphone Use with App Feature-Level Analysis

Published:18 October 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Digital intervention tools against problematic smartphone usage help users control their consumption on smartphones, for example, by setting a time limit on an app. However, today's social media apps offer a mix of quasiessential and addictive features in an app (e.g., Instagram has following feeds, recommended feeds, stories, and direct messaging features), which makes it hard to apply a uniform logic for all uses of an app without a nuanced understanding of feature-level usage behaviors. We study when and why people regret using different features of social media apps on smartphones. We examine regretful feature uses in four smartphone social media apps (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and KakaoTalk) by utilizing feature usage logs, ESM surveys on regretful use collected for a week, and retrospective interviews from 29 Android users. In determining whether a feature use is regretful, users considered different types of rewards they obtained from using a certain feature (i.e., social, informational, personal interests, and entertainment) as well as alternative rewards they could have gained had they not used the smartphone (e.g., productivity). Depending on the types of rewards and the way rewards are presented to users, probabilities to regret vary across features of the same app. We highlight three patterns of features with different characteristics that lead to regretful use. First, "following"-based features (e.g., Facebook's News Feed and Instagram's Following Posts and Stories) induce habitual checking and quickly deplete rewards from app use. Second, recommendation-based features situated close to actively used features (e.g., Instagram's Suggested Posts adjacent to Search) cause habitual feature tour and sidetracking from the original intention of app use. Third, recommendation-based features with bite-sized contents (e.g., Facebook's Watch Videos) induce using "just a bit more," making people fall into prolonged use. We discuss implications of our findings for how social media apps and intervention tools can be designed to reduce regretful use and how feature-level usage information can strengthen self-reflection and behavior changes.

References

  1. [n.d.]. Digital Wellbeing. https://www.android.com/digital-wellbeing/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n.d.]. Read time. https://help.medium.com/hc/en-us/articles/214991667-Read-timeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2020. Use Screen Time on your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208982Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2021. Social Media Fact Sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/?menuItem=3814afe3-3f3c-4623-910b-8a6a37885ab8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. George Ainslie. 1975. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 82, 4 (1975), 463.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. George Ainslie and Richard J Herrnstein. 1981. Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior, Vol. 9, 4 (1981), 476--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Betsy Atkins. 2019. Are Super Apps The Future? Forbes (Sept. 2019). https://www.forbes.com/sites/betsyatkins/2019/09/03/are-super-apps-the-future/'sh=6cfd39896fd5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nikola Banovic, Christina Brant, Jennifer Mankoff, and Anind Dey. 2014. ProactiveTasks: the short of mobile device use sessions. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services - MobileHCI '14. ACM Press, Toronto, ON, Canada, 243--252. https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628380Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological., Harris Cooper, Paul M. Camic, Debra L. Long, A. T. Panter, David Rindskopf, and Kenneth J. Sher (Eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, 57--71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Harry Brignull. [n.d.]. Dark Patterns. https://darkpatterns.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yunhwan Chae. 2020. S. Koreans spent nearly 30 hours on YouTube in Sept. : data. Yonhap News Agency (Oct. 2020). https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20201008003900320Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Clement. 2019. Most popular mobile social networking apps in the United States as of September 2019, by average session duration. Technical Report. Statista, United States. https://www.statista.com/statistics/579411/top-us-social-networking-apps-ranked-by-session-length/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kakao Corporation. [n.d.]. KakaoTalk. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kakao.talkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Shirley Cramer and Becky Inkster. 2017.. https://www.rsph.org.uk/our-work/campaigns/status-of-mind.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Android Developers. 2021. android.accessibilityservice. https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/accessibilityservice/package-summaryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nir Eyal. 2020. Want to Design User Behavior? Pass the 'Regret Test' First. https://www.nirandfar.com/regret-test/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Barney G Glaser and Anselm L Strauss. 1967. Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research .Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alexis Hiniker, Sungsoo (Ray) Hong, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016a. MyTime: Designing and Evaluating an Intervention for Smartphone Non-Use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 4746--4757. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858403Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alexis Hiniker, Shwetak N. Patel, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016b. Why would you do that? predicting the uses and gratifications behind smartphone-usage behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, Heidelberg Germany, 634--645. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971762Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Daniel Hintze, Philipp Hintze, Rainhard D. Findling, and René Mayrhofer. 2017. A Large-Scale, Long-Term Analysis of Mobile Device Usage Characteristics. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 1, 2 (June 2017), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3090078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. 1982. The simulation heuristic. In Judgment under Uncertainty 1 ed.), Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 201--208. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477.015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Colin Yoon-seung Kang. 2018. KakaoTalk continues to dominate mobile messenger market. http://yna.kr/AEN20180627005100320Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaejeung Kim, Chiwoo Cho, and Uichin Lee. 2017. Technology Supported Behavior Restriction for Mitigating Self-Interruptions in Multi-device Environments. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130932Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jaejeung Kim, Hayoung Jung, Minsam Ko, and Uichin Lee. 2019 a. GoalKeeper: Exploring Interaction Lockout Mechanisms for Regulating Smartphone Use. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 3, 1 (March 2019), 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314403Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jaejeung Kim, Joonyoung Park, Hyunsoo Lee, Minsam Ko, and Uichin Lee. 2019 b. LocknType: Lockout Task Intervention for Discouraging Smartphone App Use. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300927Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kris N Kirby, Nancy M Petry, and Warren K Bickel. [n.d.]. Heroin Addicts Have Higher Discount Rates for DelayedRewards Than Non-Drug-Using Controls. ( [n.,d.]), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Minsam Ko, Seungwoo Choi, Koji Yatani, and Uichin Lee. 2016. Lock n' LoL: Group-based Limiting Assistance App to Mitigate Smartphone Distractions in Group Activities. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 998--1010. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Minsam Ko, Kyong-Mee Chung, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, Christian Heizmann, Jinyoung Jeong, Uichin Lee, Daehee Shin, Koji Yatani, and Junehwa Song. 2015. NUGU: A Group-based Intervention App for Improving Self-Regulation of Limiting Smartphone Use. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15. ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1235--1245. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675244Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Konrad Kollnig, Siddhartha Datta, and Max Van Kleek. 2021. I Want My App That Way: Reclaiming Sovereignty Over Personal Devices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Geza Kovacs, Zhengxuan Wu, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2018. Rotating Online Behavior Change Interventions Increases Effectiveness But Also Increases Attrition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per B. Brockhoff, and Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 82, 13 (2017), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Simone Lanette, Phoebe K. Chua, Gillian Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2018. How Much is 'Too Much'?: The Role of a Smartphone Addiction Narrative in Individuals' Experience of Use. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274370Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Janette Lehmann, Mounia Lalmas, Elad Yom-Tov, and Georges Dupret. 2012. Models of User Engagement. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, David Hutchison, Takeo Kanade, Josef Kittler, Jon M. Kleinberg, Friedemann Mattern, John C. Mitchell, Moni Naor, Oscar Nierstrasz, C. Pandu Rangan, Bernhard Steffen, Madhu Sudan, Demetri Terzopoulos, Doug Tygar, Moshe Y. Vardi, Gerhard Weikum, Judith Masthoff, Bamshad Mobasher, Michel C. Desmarais, and Roger Nkambou (Eds.). Vol. 7379. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 164--175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--31454--4_14 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Alexandra W Logue. 1988. Research on self-control: An integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 11, 4 (1988), 665--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Graham Loomes and Robert Sugden. 1982. Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty. The Economic Journal, Vol. 92, 368 (Dec. 1982), 805. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232669Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Kai Lukoff, Ulrik Lyngs, Himanshu Zade, J Vera Liao, James Choi, Kaiyue Fan, Sean A Munson, and Alexis Hiniker. 2021. How the Design of YouTube Influences User Sense of Agency. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445467Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kai Lukoff, Cissy Yu, Julie Kientz, and Alexis Hiniker. 2018. What Makes Smartphone Use Meaningful or Meaningless? Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 2, 1 (2018), 1--26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3191754Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ulrik Lyngs, Reuben Binns, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2018. "So, Tell Me What Users Want, What They Really, Really Want!". In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1--10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188397Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Ulrik Lyngs, Kai Lukoff, Petr Slovak, Reuben Binns, Adam Slack, Michael Inzlicht, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2019. Self-Control in Cyberspace: Applying Dual Systems Theory to a Review of Digital Self-Control Tools. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ulrik Lyngs, Kai Lukoff, Petr Slovak, William Seymour, Helena Webb, Marina Jirotka, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2020. 'I Just Want to Hack Myself to Not Get Distracted': Evaluating Design Interventions for Self-Control on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376672Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Antti Oulasvirta, Tye Rattenbury, Lingyi Ma, and Eeva Raita. 2012. Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 16, 1 (Jan. 2012), 105--114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412--2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Howard Rachlin. 1989. Judgment, decision, and choice: A cognitive/behavioral synthesis. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Howard Rachlin and Leonard Green. 1972. Commitment, choice and self-control 1. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, Vol. 17, 1 (1972), 15--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Byron Reeves, Thomas Robinson, and Nilam Ram. 2020. Time for the Human Screenome Project. Nature, Vol. 577 (Jan 2020), 314--317. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00032--5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Jerry B. Richards, Lan Zhang, Suzanne H. Mitchell, and Harriet de Wit. 1999. DELAY OR PROBABILITY DISCOUNTING IN A MODEL OF IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR: EFFECT OF ALCOHOL. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Vol. 71, 2 (March 1999), 121--143. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1999.71--121Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. John Rooksby, Parvin Asadzadeh, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2016. Personal Tracking of Screen Time on Digital Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 284--296. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858055Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Colleen Saffrey, Amy Summerville, and Neal J. Roese. 2008. Praise for regret: People value regret above other negative emotions. Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 32, 1 (March 2008), 46--54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008--9082--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Choonsung Shin and Anind K. Dey. 2013. Automatically detecting problematic use of smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing - UbiComp '13. ACM Press, Zurich, Switzerland, 335. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493443Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jonathan A. Tran, Katie S. Yang, Katie Davis, and Alexis Hiniker. 2019. Modeling the Engagement-Disengagement Cycle of Compulsive Phone Use. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19. ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300542Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. José P Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark patterns in the design of games. In Foundations of Digital Games 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Xiaoyi Zhang, Lilian de Greef, Amanda Swearngin, Samuel White, Kyle Murray, Lisa Yu, Qi Shan, Jeffrey Nichols, Jason Wu, Chris Fleizach, Aaron Everitt, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2021. Screen Recognition: Creating Accessibility Metadata for Mobile Applications from Pixels. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445186Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reflect, not Regret: Understanding Regretful Smartphone Use with App Feature-Level Analysis

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
            Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW2
            CSCW2
            October 2021
            5376 pages
            EISSN:2573-0142
            DOI:10.1145/3493286
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 October 2021
            Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader