skip to main content
10.1145/3485447.3512246acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

VICTOR: An Implicit Approach to Mitigate Misinformation via Continuous Verification Reading

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

We design and evaluate VICTOR, an easy-to-apply module on top of a recommender system to mitigate misinformation. VICTOR takes an elegant, implicit approach to deliver fake-news verifications, such that readers of fake news can continuously access more verified news articles about fake-news events without explicit correction. We frame fake-news intervention within VICTOR as a graph-based question-answering (QA) task, with Q as a fake-news article and A as the corresponding verified articles. Specifically, VICTOR adopts reinforcement learning: it first considers fake-news readers’ preferences supported by underlying news recommender systems and then directs their reading sequence towards the verified news articles. To verify the performance of VICTOR, we collect and organize VERI, a new dataset consisting of real-news articles, user browsing logs, and fake-real news pairs for a large number of misinformation events. We evaluate zero-shot and few-shot VICTOR on VERI to simulate the never-exposed-ever and seen-before conditions of users while reading a piece of fake news. Results demonstrate that compared to baselines, VICTOR proactively delivers 6% more verified articles with a diversity increase of 7.5% to over 68% of at-risk users who have been exposed to fake news. Moreover, we conduct a field user study in which 165 participants evaluated fake news articles. Participants in the VICTOR condition show better exposure rates, proposal rates, and click rates on verified news articles than those in the other two conditions. Altogether, our work demonstrates the potentials of VICTOR, i.e., combat fake news by delivering verified information implicitly.

References

  1. Davey Alba and Kate Conger. 2020. Twitter moves to target fake videos and photos (Accessed Sept 5, 2020). https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/04/technology/twitter-fake-videos-photos-disinformation.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cristian Bravo-Lillo, Lorrie Cranor, Saranga Komanduri, Stuart Schechter, and Manya Sleeper. 2014. Harder to ignore? Revisiting pop-up fatigue and approaches to prevent it. In 10th Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2014). 105–111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chia-Wei Chen, Sheng-Chuan Chou, Chang-You Tai, and Lun-Wei Ku. 2019. Phrase-Guided Attention Web Article Recommendation for Next Clicks and Views. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. 315–324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Katherine Clayton, Spencer Blair, Jonathan A Busam, Samuel Forstner, John Glance, Guy Green, Anna Kawata, Akhila Kovvuri, Jonathan Martin, Evan Morgan, 2019. Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political Behavior (2019), 1–23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Rajarshi Das, Shehzaad Dhuliawala, Manzil Zaheer, Luke Vilnis, Ishan Durugkar, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Alexander J. Smola, and Andrew McCallum. 2018. Go for a Walk and Arrive at the Answer: Reasoning Over Paths in Knowledge Bases using Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1711.05851(2018). arxiv:1711.05851http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05851Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. CoRR abs/1810.04805(2018). arXiv:1810.04805http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mehrdad Farajtabar, Jiachen Yang, Xiaojing Ye, Huan Xu, Rakshit Trivedi, Elias Khalil, Shuang Li, Le Song, and Hongyuan Zha. 2017. Fake news mitigation via point process based intervention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07823(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mingkun Gao, Ziang Xiao, Karrie Karahalios, and Wai-Tat Fu. 2018. To label or not to label: The effect of stance and credibility labels on readers’ selection and perception of news articles. ACM CHI 2, CSCW (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R Kelly Garrett and Brian E Weeks. 2013. The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1047–1058.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mahak Goindani and Jennifer Neville. 2020. Social reinforcement learning to combat fake news spread. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 1006–1016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Qingyuan Gong, Yang Chen, Xinlei He, Zhou Zhuang, Tianyi Wang, Hong Huang, Xin Wang, and Xiaoming Fu. 2018. DeepScan: Exploiting deep learning for malicious account detection in location-based social networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 56, 11 (2018), 21–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. David J Hauser and Norbert Schwarz. 2016. Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior research methods 48, 1 (2016), 400–407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alan G Hawkes. 1971. Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58, 1 (1971), 83–90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Comput. 9, 8 (Nov. 1997), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jooyeon Kim, Behzad Tabibian, Alice Oh, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez. 2018. Leveraging the Crowd to Detect and Reduce the Spread of Fake News and Misinformation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Marina Del Rey, CA, USA) (WSDM ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159734Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Justin Kosslyn and Cong Yu. 2017. Fact check now available in Google search and news around the world (Accessed Sept 5, 2020). https://www.blog.google/products/search/fact-check-now-available-google-search-and-news-around-world/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yi-Ju Lu and Cheng-Te Li. 2020. GCAN: Graph-aware Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Fake News Detection on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.48Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Neil A Macmillan and C Douglas Creelman. 2004. Detection theory: A user’s guide. Psychology press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sina Mohseni, Eric Ragan, and Xia Hu. 2019. Open Issues in Combating Fake News: Interpretability as an Opportunity. arxiv:1904.03016 [cs.SI]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nam P. Nguyen, Guanhua Yan, My T. Thai, and Stephan Eidenbenz. 2012. Containment of Misinformation Spread in Online Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (Evanston, Illinois) (WebSci ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380718.2380746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gordon Pennycook and Tyrone Cannon. 2018. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology General (06 2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2958246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Gordon Pennycook, Jonathon McPhetres, Yunhao Zhang, Jackson G Lu, and David G Rand. 2020. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science 31, 7 (2020), 770–780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Gordon Pennycook and David G Rand. 2019. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 7 (2019), 2521–2526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Guy Rosen, Katie Harbath, Nathaniel Gleicher, and Rob Leathern. 2019. Helping to protect the 2020 US elections (Accessed Sept 5, 2020). https://about.fb.com/news/2019/10/update-on-election-integrity-efforts/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Haeseung Seo, Aiping Xiong, and Dongwon Lee. 2019. Trust It or Not: Effects of Machine-Learning Warnings in Helping Individuals Mitigate Misinformation. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (WebSci ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292522.3326012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Karishma Sharma, Feng Qian, He Jiang, Natali Ruchansky, Ming Zhang, and Yan Liu. 2019. Combating fake news: A survey on identification and mitigation techniques. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 3(2019), 1–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kai Shu, H Russell Bernard, and Huan Liu. 2019. Studying fake news via network analysis: detection and mitigation. In Emerging Research Challenges and Opportunities in Computational Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, 43–65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kai Shu, Deepak Mahudeswaran, Suhang Wang, and Huan Liu. 2019. Hierarchical Propagation Networks for Fake News Detection: Investigation and Exploitation. CoRR abs/1903.09196(2019). arxiv:1903.09196http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.09196Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kai Shu, Amy Sliva, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. 2017. Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 19, 1 (Sept. 2017), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jeff Smith, Grace Jackson, and Seetha Raj. 2017. Designing against misinformation (Accessed Sept 5, 2020). https://medium.com/facebook-design/designing-against-misinformation-e5846b3aa1e2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Richard S. Sutton and Andrew G. Barto. 2018. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction(second ed.). The MIT Press. http://incompleteideas.net/book/the-book-2nd.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Yaqing Wang, Weifeng Yang, Fenglong Ma, Jin Xu, Bin Zhong, Qiang Deng, and Jing Gao. 2020. Weak Supervision for Fake News Detection via Reinforcement Learning. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2020, The Tenth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2020, New York, NY, USA, February 7-12, 2020. AAAI Press, 516–523. https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/AAAI/article/view/5389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Tao Qi, and Yongfeng Huang. 2021. Empowering News Recommendation with Pre-Trained Language Models. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Virtual Event, Canada) (SIGIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1652–1656. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404835.3463069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Liang Wu, Fred Morstatter, Xia Hu, and Huan Liu. 2016. Mining misinformation in social media. Big Data in Complex and Social Networks(2016), 123–152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yikun Xian, Zuohui Fu, S. Muthukrishnan, Gerard de Melo, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2019. Reinforcement Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Explainable Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Paris, France) (SIGIR’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. VICTOR: An Implicit Approach to Mitigate Misinformation via Continuous Verification Reading
                Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  WWW '22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
                  April 2022
                  3764 pages
                  ISBN:9781450390965
                  DOI:10.1145/3485447

                  Copyright © 2022 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 25 April 2022

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article
                  • Research
                  • Refereed limited

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

                  Upcoming Conference

                  WWW '24
                  The ACM Web Conference 2024
                  May 13 - 17, 2024
                  Singapore , Singapore

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader

                HTML Format

                View this article in HTML Format .

                View HTML Format