skip to main content
10.1145/3485447.3512264acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

“This is Fake! Shared it by Mistake”:Assessing the Intent of Fake News Spreaders

Published:25 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Individuals can be misled by fake news and spread it unintentionally without knowing it is false. This phenomenon has been frequently observed but has not been investigated. Our aim in this work is to assess the intent of fake news spreaders. To distinguish between intentional versus unintentional spreading, we study the psychological explanations of unintentional spreading. With this foundation, we then propose an influence graph, using which we assess the intent of fake news spreaders. Our extensive experiments show that the assessed intent can help significantly differentiate between intentional and unintentional fake news spreaders. Furthermore, the estimated intent can significantly improve the current techniques that detect fake news. To our best knowledge, this is the first work to model individuals’ intent in fake news spreading.

References

  1. Anton Abilov, Yiqing Hua, Hana Matatov, Ofra Amir, and Mor Naaman. 2021. VoterFraud2020: A Multi-modal Dataset of Election Fraud Claims on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 15. 901–912.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alan Akbik, Tanja Bergmann, Duncan Blythe, Kashif Rasul, Stefan Schweter, and Roland Vollgraf. 2019. FLAIR: An Easy-to-Use Framework for State-of-the-Art NLP. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Demonstrations). 54–59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blake E Ashforth and Fred Mael. 1989. Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review 14, 1 (1989), 20–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Iz Beltagy, Matthew E Peters, and Arman Cohan. 2020. Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05150(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alessandro Bessi, Fabio Petroni, Michela Del Vicario, Fabiana Zollo, Aris Anagnostopoulos, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015. Viral Misinformation: The Role of Homophily and Polarization. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. 355–356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lawrence E Boehm. 1994. The Validity Effect: A Search for Mediating Variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, 3 (1994), 285–293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Sonia Castelo, Thais Almeida, Anas Elghafari, Aécio Santos, Kien Pham, Eduardo Nakamura, and Juliana Freire. 2019. A Topic-Agnostic Approach for Identifying Fake News Pages. In Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 975–980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 785–794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lu Cheng, Ruocheng Guo, Kai Shu, and Huan Liu. 2021. Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 148–157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jacob Cohen. 1960. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 1 (1960), 37–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Emilio Ferrara. 2020. What types of COVID-19 conspiracies are populated by Twitter bots?First Monday6(2020). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i6.10633Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jonathan L Freedman and David O Sears. 1965. Selective exposure. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. Elsevier, 57–97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael A Hogg. 2020. Social Identity Theory. Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Timur Kuran and Cass R Sunstein. 1999. Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation. Stanford Law Review 51, 4 (1999), 683–768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. David MJ Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1094–1096.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Yichuan Li, Bohan Jiang, Kai Shu, and Huan Liu. 2020. MM-COVID: A Multilingual and Multimodal Data Repository for Combating COVID-19 Disinformation. arxiv:2011.04088 [cs.SI]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Stephan Lewandowsky, Cass R Sunstein, and Ralph Hertwig. 2020. How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online. Nature Human Behaviour 4, 11 (2020), 1102–1109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Drew B Margolin, Aniko Hannak, and Ingmar Weber. 2018. Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect?Political Communication 35, 2 (2018), 196–219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Miriam J Metzger, Ethan H Hartsell, and Andrew J Flanagin. 2020. Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research 47, 1 (2020), 3–28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sendhil Mullainathan and Andrei Shleifer. 2005. The market for news. American Economic Review 95, 4 (2005), 1031–1053.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Raymond S Nickerson. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2, 2 (1998), 175–220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. James W Pennebaker, Ryan L Boyd, Kayla Jordan, and Kate Blackburn. 2015. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordon Pennycook, Tyrone D Cannon, and David G Rand. 2018. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147, 12 (2018), 1865.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gordon Pennycook, Ziv Epstein, Mohsen Mosleh, Antonio A Arechar, Dean Eckles, and David G Rand. 2021. Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature 592, 7855 (2021), 590–595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Verónica Pérez-Rosas, Bennett Kleinberg, Alexandra Lefevre, and Rada Mihalcea. 2018. Automatic Detection of Fake News. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 3391–3401.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Shengsheng Qian, Jinguang Wang, Jun Hu, Quan Fang, and Changsheng Xu. 2021. Hierarchical Multi-modal Contextual Attention Network for Fake News Detection. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 153–162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hannah Rashkin, Eunsol Choi, Jin Yea Jang, Svitlana Volkova, and Yejin Choi. 2017. Truth of Varying Shades: Analyzing Language in Fake News and Political Fact-Checking. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2931–2937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 3973–3983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Mohsen Sayyadiharikandeh, Onur Varol, Kai-Cheng Yang, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2020. Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifiers. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2725–2732.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Dietram A Scheufele and Nicole M Krause. 2019. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 16(2019), 7662–7669.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Chengcheng Shao, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Onur Varol, Kai-Cheng Yang, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2018. The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications 9, 1 (2018), 4787.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kai Shu, Limeng Cui, Suhang Wang, Dongwon Lee, and Huan Liu. 2019. dEFEND: Explainable Fake News Detection. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 395–405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Panayiotis Smeros, Carlos Castillo, and Karl Aberer. 2019. SciLens: Evaluating the Quality of Scientific News Articles Using Social Media and Scientific Literature Indicators. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 1747–1758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Kate Starbird. 2019. Disinformation’s spread: bots, trolls and all of us. Nature 571, 7766 (2019), 449–450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention Is All You Need. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 5998–6008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Nguyen Vo and Kyumin Lee. 2018. The Rise of Guardians: Fact-checking URL Recommendation to Combat Fake News. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. 275–284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1146–1151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jiang Wang, Yang Song, Thomas Leung, Chuck Rosenberg, Jingbin Wang, James Philbin, Bo Chen, and Ying Wu. 2014. Learning fine-grained image similarity with deep ranking. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1386–1393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Yaqing Wang, Fenglong Ma, Zhiwei Jin, Ye Yuan, Guangxu Xun, Kishlay Jha, Lu Su, and Jing Gao. 2018. EANN: Event Adversarial Neural Networks for Multi-Modal Fake News Detection. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 849–857.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Piotr A Woźniak, Edward J Gorzelańczyk, and Janusz A Murakowski. 1995. Two components of long-term memory. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 55, 4 (1995), 301–305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Da Yin, Tao Meng, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2020. SentiBERT: A Transferable Transformer-Based Architecture for Compositional Sentiment Semantics. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 3695–3706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Chuxu Zhang, Dongjin Song, Chao Huang, Ananthram Swami, and Nitesh V Chawla. 2019. Heterogeneous graph neural network. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 793–803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Jiaxuan Zhang, Sarah Ita Levitan, and Julia Hirschberg. 2020. Multimodal Deception Detection Using Automatically Extracted Acoustic, Visual, and Lexical Features. In INTERSPEECH. 359–363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Xin Zhang, Ding-Ding Han, Ruiqi Yang, and Ziqiao Zhang. 2017. Users’ participation and social influence during information spreading on Twitter. PloS one 12, 9 (2017), e0183290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Xinyi Zhou, Apurva Mulay, Emilio Ferrara, and Reza Zafarani. 2020. ReCOVery: A Multimodal Repository for COVID-19 News Credibility Research. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 3205–3212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Xinyi Zhou, Jindi Wu, and Reza Zafarani. 2020. SAFE: Similarity-Aware Multi-Modal Fake News Detection. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Vol. 12085. Nature Publishing Group, 354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Xinyi Zhou and Reza Zafarani. 2020. A survey of fake news: Fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 53, 5 (2020), 1–40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. “This is Fake! Shared it by Mistake”:Assessing the Intent of Fake News Spreaders
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WWW '22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
            April 2022
            3764 pages
            ISBN:9781450390965
            DOI:10.1145/3485447

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 April 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format