skip to main content
10.1145/3485730.3493450acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Decentralized Federated Learning Framework for the Neighborhood: A Case Study on Residential Building Load Forecasting

Published:15 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The fast-growing trend of Internet of Things (IoT) has provided its users with opportunities to improve user experience such as voice assistants, smart cameras, and home energy management systems. Such smart home applications often require large numbers of diverse training data to accomplish a robust model. As single user may not have enough data to train such a model, users intent to collaboratively train their collected data in order to achieve better performance in such applications, which raise the concern of data privacy protection. Existing approaches for collaborative training need to aggregate data or intermediate model training updates in the cloud to perform load forecasting, which could directly or indirectly cause personal data leakage, alongside with significant communication bandwidth and extra cloud service monetary cost.

In this paper, to ensure the performance of smart home applications as well as the protection of user data privacy, we introduce the decentralized federated learning framework for the neighborhood and show the study on residential building load forecasting application as an example. We present PriResi, a privacy-preserved, communication-efficient and cloud-service-free load forecasting system to solve the above problems in a residential building. We first introduce a decentralized federated learning framework, which allows the residents to process all collected data locally on the edge by broadcasting the model updates between the smart home agent in each residence. Second, we propose a gradient selection mechanism to reduce the number of aggregated gradients and the frequency of gradient broadcasting to achieve communication-efficient and high prediction results. The real-word dataset experiments show that our method can achieve 97% of load forecasting accuracy while preserving residences' privacy. We believe that our proposed decentralized federated learning framework can be widely used in other smart home applications as well.

References

  1. [Accessed in JUL. 2021]. Energy Star: Save Energy. https://www.energystar.gov/buildings/ ([Accessed in JUL. 2021]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [Accessed in JUL. 2021]. Help Net Security. https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2020/01/28/accessing-cloud-services/ ([Accessed in JUL. 2021]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [Accessed in JUL. 2021]. Pecan Street dataset. https://www.pecanstreet.org/dataport/about/ ([Accessed in JUL. 2021]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [Accessed in JUL. 2021]. RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS FACTSHEET. http://css.umich.edu/factsheets/ ([Accessed in JUL. 2021]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Y. Agarwal, B. Balaji, and R. Gupta. 2010. Occupancy-driven energy management for smart building automation. In Proc. of the 2nd ACM workshop on embedded sensing systems for energy-efficiency in building.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. U. Matchi Aivodji, S. Gambs, and A. Martin. 2019. IOTFLA: A secured and privacy-preserving smart home architecture implementing federated learning. In 2019 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Al Faruque and K. Vatanparvar. 2015. Energy management-as-a-service over fog computing platform. IEEE internet of things journal (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Chang, W. Chiu, H. Sun, and C. Chen. 2018. User-centric multiobjective approach to privacy preservation and energy cost minimization in smart home. IEEE Systems Journal (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Chou and N. Truong. 2019. Cloud forecasting system for monitoring and alerting of energy use by home appliances. Applied Energy (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. US DOE. 2015. An assessment of energy technologies and research opportunities. Quadrennial Technology Review. United States Department of Energy (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yaochen Hu, Di Niu, Jianming Yang, and Shengping Zhou. 2019. FDML: A collaborative machine learning framework for distributed features. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2232--2240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Javed, H. Larijani, A. Ahmadinia, and D. Gibson. 2016. Smart random neural network controller for HVAC using cloud computing technology. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Z. Kong, W.and Dong and Y. Jia. 2017. Short-term residential load forecasting based on LSTM recurrent neural network. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Y. Lu, X. Huang, Y. Dai, S. Maharjan, and Y. Zhang. 2019. Blockchain and federated learning for privacy-preserved data sharing in industrial IoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. X. Luo, L. Oyedele, and A. Ajayi. 2019. Development of an IoT-based big data platform for day-ahead prediction of building heating and cooling demands. Advanced Engineering Informatics (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, and S. Hampson. 2017. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. Petersen and F. Voigtlaender. 2018. Optimal approximation of piecewise smooth functions using deep ReLU neural networks. Neural Networks (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bipartisan Policy. 2020. Annual Energy Outlook. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Y. Saputra, D. Hoang, and E. Nguyen, D. and Dutkiewicz. 2019. Energy demand prediction with federated learning for electric vehicle networks. In 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Soliman, T. Abiodun, and T. Hamouda. 2013. Smart home: Integrating internet of things with web services and cloud computing. In 2013 IEEE 5th International conference on cloud computing technology and science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Taik and S. Cherkaoui. 2020. Electrical Load Forecasting Using Edge Computing and Federated Learning. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. Tom, S. Sankaranarayanan, and J. Rodrigues. 2019. Smart Energy Management and Demand Reduction by Consumers and Utilities in an IoT-Fog-Based Power Distribution System. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. N. Tran and A. Bao, W. and Zomaya. 2019. Federated learning over wireless networks: Optimization model design and analysis. In 2019 IEEE INFOCOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. N. Truong, J. McInerney, and L. Tran-Thanh. 2013. Forecasting multi-appliance usage for smart home energy management. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International joint conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Wang, T. Tuor, T. Salonidis, K. K. Leung, C. Makaya, T. He, and K. Chan. 2019. Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. L. Yang, X. Chen, J. Zhang, and H. Poor. 2014. Optimal privacy-preserving energy management for smart meters. In 2014-IEEE INFOCOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Y. Ye, S. Li, F. Liu, Y. Tang, and W. Hu. 2020. EdgeFed: Optimized Federated Learning Based on Edge Computing. IEEE Access (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. K. Zhou, C. Fu, and S. Yang. 2016. Big data driven smart energy management: From big data to big insights. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Decentralized Federated Learning Framework for the Neighborhood: A Case Study on Residential Building Load Forecasting

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SenSys '21: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
        November 2021
        686 pages
        ISBN:9781450390972
        DOI:10.1145/3485730

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 November 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        SenSys '21 Paper Acceptance Rate25of139submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader