skip to main content
survey

Graph Neural Networks: Taxonomy, Advances, and Trends

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 January 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Graph neural networks provide a powerful toolkit for embedding real-world graphs into low-dimensional spaces according to specific tasks. Up to now, there have been several surveys on this topic. However, they usually lay emphasis on different angles so that the readers cannot see a panorama of the graph neural networks. This survey aims to overcome this limitation and provide a systematic and comprehensive review on the graph neural networks. First of all, we provide a novel taxonomy for the graph neural networks, and then refer to up to 327 relevant literatures to show the panorama of the graph neural networks. All of them are classified into the corresponding categories. In order to drive the graph neural networks into a new stage, we summarize four future research directions so as to overcome the challenges faced. It is expected that more and more scholars can understand and exploit the graph neural networks and use them in their research community.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Paszke Adam, Gross Sam, Massa Francisco, Lerer Adam, Bradbury James, Kileen Gregory Chanan Trevor, Lin Zeming, Gimelshein Natalia, Antiga Luca, Desmaison Alban, Yang Andreas Köpf Edward, Devito Zach, Raison Martin, Tejani Alykhan, Chilamkurthy Sasank, Fang Benoit Steiner Lu, Bai Junjie, and Chintala Soumith. 2019. PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Grover Aditya and Leskovec Jure. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’16). ACM, 855864. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939754 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Rahimi Afshin, Cohn Trevor, and Baldwin Timothy. 2018. Semi-supervised user geolocation via graph convolutional networks. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’18). ACL, 20092019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Fout Alex, Byrd Jonathon, Shariat Basir, and Ben-Hur Asa. 2017. Protein interface prediction using graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc., 65306539. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] Krizhevsky Alex. 2009. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. (2009). https://www.cs.toronto.edu/kriz/learning-features-2009-TR.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Sanchez-Gonzalez Alvaro, Heess Nicolas, Springenberg Jost Tobias, Merel Josh, Riedmiller Martin, Hadsell Raia, and Battaglia Peter. 2018. Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’18), Vol. 80. PMLR, 44704479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Khasahmadi Amir H., Hassani Kaveh, Moradi Parsa, Lee Leo, and Morris Quaid. 2020. Memory-based graph networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Loukas Andreas. 2020. What graph neural networks cannot learn-depth vs width. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Peng Annyun, Poon Hoifung, Quirk Chris, Toutanova Kristina, and Yih Wen-tau. 2017. Cross-sentence N-ary relation extraction with graph LSTMs. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 5 (2017), 101115. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Gamage Anuththari, Chien Eli, Peng Jianhao, and Milenkovic Olgica. 2020. Multi-MotifGAN (MMGAN): Motif-targeted graph generation and prediction. In The IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP’20). IEEE, 41824186. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Jain Ashesh, Zamir Amir R., Savarese Silvio, and Saxena Ashutosh. 2016. Structural-RNN: Deep learning on spatio-temporal graphs. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’16). IEEE, 53085317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomiz Aidan N., Kaiser Lukasz, and Polosukhin Illia. 2017. Attention is all you need. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing (NIPS’17). Curran Associates, Inc., Long Beach, CA, 59986008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Kernighan B. W. and Lin S.. 1970. An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. Bell System Technical Journal 49, 2 (1970), 291307. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb01770.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Lin Bill Yuchen, Chen Xinyue, Chen Jamin, and Ren Xiang. 2019. KagNet: Knowledge-aware graph networks for commonsense reasoning. In The International Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’19). ACL, 28292839.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Yu Bing, Yin Haoteng, and Zhu Zhanxing. 2018. Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks: A deep learning framework for traffic forecasting. In The International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). IJCAI Organization, 36343640. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/505 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Xu Bingbing, Shen Huawei, Cao Qi, Qiu Yunqi, and Cheng Xueqi. 2019. Graph wavelet neural network. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Huang Binxuan and Carley Kathleen. 2019. Syntax-aware aspect level sentiment classification with graph attention networks. In The Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’19). ACL, 54695477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Bojchevski Aleksandar and Günnemann Stephan. 2019. Certifiable robustness to graph perturbations. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19), Vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19] Perozzi Bryan, Ai-Rfou Rami, and Skiena Steven. 2014. DeepWalk: Online learning of social representations. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’14). ACM, 701710. https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623732 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Gulcehre Caglar, Denil Misha, Malinowski Mateusz, Razavi Ali, Pascanu Razvan, Hermann Karl Moritz, Battaglia Peter, Bapst Victor, Raposo David, Santoro Adam, and Freitas Nando de. 2019. Hyperbolic attention networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [21] Yang Carl, Pal Aditya, Zhai Andrew, Pancha Nikil, Han Jiawei, and Rosenberg Charles. 2020. MultiSage: Empowering GCN with contextualized multi-embeddings on web-scale multipartite networks. In The ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’20). ACM, 24342443. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403293Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Yang Carl, Xiao Yuxin, Zhang Yu, Sun Yizhou, and Han Jiawei. 2020. Heterogeneous network representation: A unified framework with survey and benchmark. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.3045924Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Chen Jianfei, Zhu Jun, and Song Le. 2018. Stochastic training of graph convolutional networks with variance reduction. In The 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’18), Vol. 80. PMLR, 942950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Chen Yu, Wu Lingfei, and Zaki Mohammed J.. 2020. GraphFlow: Exploiting conversation flow with graph neural networks for conversational machine comprehension. In The International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’20). IJCAI Organization, 12301236. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/171 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. [25] Hsu Cheng and Li Cheng-Te. 2021. RetaGNN: Relational temporal attentive graph neural networks for holistic sequential recommendation. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’21). 499508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Zhuang Chenyi and Ma Qiang. 2018. Dual graph convolutional networks for graph-based semi-supervised classification. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’18). 499508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. [27] Si Cheyang, Chen Wentao, Wang Wei, Wang Liang, and Tan Tieniu. 2019. An attention enhanced graph convolutional LSTM network for skeleton-based action recognition. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’19). IEEE, 12271236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Zhang Chris, Ren Mengye, and Urtasun Raquel. 2019. Graph hypernetworks for neural architecture search. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Szegedy Christian, Liu Wei, Jia Yangqing, Sermanet Pierre, Reed Scott, Anguelov Dragomir, Erhan Dumitru, Vanhoucke Vincent, and Rabinovich Andrew. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’15). IEEE, 19. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Morris Christopher, Ritzert Martin, Fey Matthias, Hamilton William L., Lenssen Jan Eric, Rattan Gaurav, and Grohe Martin. 2019. Weisfeiler and Leman go neural: Higher-order graph neural networks. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19). Association for the Advance of Artificial Intelligence, 46024609. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33014602 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Zheng Chuanpan, Fan Xiaoliang, Wang Cheng, and Qi Jianzhong. 2020. GMAN: A graph multi-attention network for traffic prediction. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’20). Association for the Advance of Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Wang Chun, Pan Shrui, Long Guodong, Zhu Xingquan, and Jiang Jing. 2017. MGAE: Marginalized graph autoencoder for graph clustering. In The International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’17). ACM, 889898. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132967 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Chung Fan R. K.. 1992. Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Zhang Chuxu, Song Dongjin, Huang Chao, Swami Ananthram, and Chawla Nitesh V.. 2019. Heterogeneous graph neural network. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 793803. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330961Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. [35] Donnat Claire, Zitnik Marinka, Hallac David, and Leskovec Jure. 2018. Learning structural node embeddings via diffusion wavelets. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’18). ACM, 13201329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. [36] Coley Connor W., Jin Wengong, Rogers Luke, Jamison Timothy F., Jaakkola Tommi S., Green William H., Barzilay Regina, and Jensen Klavs F.. 2019. A graph-convolutional neural network model for the prediction of chemical reactivity. Chemical Science 10, 2 (2019), 370377. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SC04228DGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. [37] Mavromatis Costas and Karypis George. 2020. Graph InfoClust: Leveraging cluster-level node information for unsupervised graph representation learning. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.06946v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Cangea Cǎtǎlina, Veličkovič Petar, Jovanović Nikola, Kipf Thomas N., and Liò Pietro. 2018. Towards sparse hierarchical graph classifiers. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.01287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. [39] Wang Daixin, Cui Peng, and Zhu Wenwu. 2016. Structural deep network embedding. In The ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’16). ACM, New York, NY, 12251234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939753 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. [40] Teney Damien, Liu Lingqiao, and Hengel Anton van den. 2017. Graph-structured representations for Visual Question Answering. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’17). IEEE, 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. [41] Busbridge Dan, Sherburn Dane, Cavallo Pietro, and Yhammerla Nils Y.. 2019. Relational graph attention networks. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05811.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. [42] Xu Danfei, Zhu Yuke, Choy Christopher B., and Li Fei-Fei. 2017. Scene graph generation by iterative message passing. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’17). IEEE, 51405419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Beck Daniel, Haffari Gholamreza, and Cohn Trevor. 2018. Graph-to-sequence learning using gated graph neural networks. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’18), Vol. 1. ACL, 273283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Selsam Daniel, Lamm Matthew, Bünz Benedikt, Liang Percy, Moura Leonardo de, and Dill David L.. 2019. Learning a SAT solver from single-bit supervision. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. [45] Zügner Daniel, Akbarnejad Amir, and Günnemann Stephan. 2018. Adversarial attacks on neural networks for graph data. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’18). PMLR, 28472856. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3220078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Zügner Daniel and Günnemann Stephan. 2019. Adversarial attacks on graph neural networks via meta learning. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Zügner Daniel and Günnemann Stephan. 2019. Certifiable robustness and robust training for graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 246256. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330905 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. [48] Duvenaud David, Maclaurin Dougal, Aguilera-Iparraguirre Jorge, Gomez-Bombarelli Rafael, Hirzel Timothy, Aspuru-Guzik Alan, and Adams Ryan P.. 2015. Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’15). Curran Associates, Inc., 22242232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Shuman David I., Narang Sunil K., Frossard Pascal, Ortega Antonio, and Vandergheynst Pierre. 2013. The emerging field of signal processing on graphs: Extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 30, 3 (2013), 8398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Hammond David K., Vandergheynst Pierre, and Gribonval Rémi. 2011. Wavelets on graphs via spectral graph theory. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 30, 2 (2011), 129150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2010.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. [51] Blei David M., Kucukelbir Alp, and McAuliffe Jon D.. 2017. Variational inference: A review for statisticians. Journal of the Americian Statistical Association 112, 518 (2017), 859877. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1285773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Bacciu Davide, Errica Federico, Micheli Alessio, and Podda Marco. 2020. A gentle introduction to deep learning for graphs. Neural Networks 129 (2020), 203221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.06.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. [53] Ghosal Deepanway, Majumder Navonil, Poria Soujanya, Chhaya Niyati, and Gelbukh Alexander. 2019. DialogueGCN: A graph convolutional neural network for emotion recognition in conversation. In The Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’19). ACL, 154164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. [54] Devlin Jacob, Chang Ming-Wei, Lee Kenton, and Toutanova Kristina. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL’19), Vol. 1. ACL, 41714186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. [55] Marcheggiani Diego, Bastings Joost, and Titov Ivan. 2018. Exploiting semantics in neural machine translation with graph convolutional networks. In The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL’18). ACL, 486492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. [56] Zhu Dingyuan, Cui Peng, Wang Daixin, and Zhu Wenwu. 2018. Deep variational network embedding in Wasserstein space. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’18). ACM, 28272836. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3220052 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. [57] Zhu Dingyuan, Zhang Ziwei, Cui Peng, and Zhu Wenwu. 2019. Robust graph convolutional networks against adversarial attacks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 13991407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. [58] Shu Dong Wook, Park Sung Woo, and Kwon Junseok. 2019. 3D point cloud generative adversarial network based on tree structured graph convolutions. In The International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’19). IEEE, 38593868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. [59] Zou Dongmian and Lerman Gilad. 2019. Graph convolutional neural networks via scattering. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 49, 3 (2019), 10461074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2019.06.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. [60] Bahdanau Dzmitry, Cho Kyunghyun, and Bengio Yoshua. 2015. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’15).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. [61] Pineau Edouard and Lara Nathan de. 2019. Variational recurrent neural networks for graph classification. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.02721.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. [62] Hajiramezanali Ehsan, Hasanzadeh Arman, Narayanan Krishna, Duffield Nick, Zhou Mingyuan, and Qian Xiaoning. 2019. Variational graph recurrent neural networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19). Curran Associates, Inc., 1070110711. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. [63] Sun Fan-Yun, Hoffman Jordan, Verma Vikas, and Tang Jian. 2019. InfoGraph: Unsupervised and semi-supervised graph-level representation learning via mutual information maximization. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. [64] Baldassarre Federico and Azizpour Hossein. 2019. Explainability techniques for graph convolutional networks. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. [65] Monti Federico, Boscaini Davide, Masci Jonathan, Rodolà Emanuele, Svoboda Jan, and Bronstein Michael M.. 2017. Geometric deep learning on graphs and manifolds using mixture model CNNs. In The Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’17). IEEE, 54255434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. [66] Such Felipe Petroski, Sah Shagan, Dominguez Miguel, Pillai Suhas, Zhang Chao, Michael Andrew, Cahill Nathan D., and Ptucha Raymond. 2017. Robust spatial filtering with graph convolutional neural networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 11, 6 (2017), 884896.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. [67] Wu Felix, Zhang Tianyi, Souza Amauri Holanda de, Fifty Christopher, Yu Tao, and Weinberger Kilian Q.. 2019. Simplifying graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’19), Vol. 97. PMLR, 68616871.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. [68] Hu Fenyu, Zhu Yanqiao, Wu Shu, Wang Liang, and Tan Tieniu. 2019. Semi-supervised node classification via hierarchical graph convolutional networks. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06667v2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. [69] Yu Fisher and Koltun Vladlen. 2016. Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions. arXiv (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07122v3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. [70] Manessi Franco, Rozza Alessandro, and Manzo Mario. 2020. Dynamic graph convolutional networks. Pattern Recognition 97 (2020), No. 107000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107000Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. [71] Scarselli Franco, Gori Marco, Tsoi Ah Chung, Hagenbuchner Markus, and Monfardini Gabriele. 2008. The graph neural network model. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 20, 1 (2008), 6180. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2008.2005605 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. [72] Scarselli Franco, Gori Marco, Tsoi Ah Chung, Hagenbuchner Markus, and Monfardini Gabriele. 2009. Computational capabilities of graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 20, 1 (2009), 81102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. [73] Gao Hongyang and Ji Shuiwang. 2019. Graph U-Nets. In The International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 97. PMLR, 20832092.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. [74] Gao Yang, Yang Hong, Zhang Peng, Zhou Chuan, and Hu Yue. 2020. Graph neural architecture search. In The International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’20). IJCAI Organization, 14031409. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/195 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. [75] Huang Gao, Liu Zhuang, Maaten Laurens Van Der, and Weinberger Kilian Q.. 2017. Densely connected convolutional networks. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’17). IEEE, 22612269. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. [76] Garg Vikas, Jegelka Stefanie, and Jaakkola Tommi. 2020. Generalization and representational limits of graph neural networks. In The 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’20), Vol. 119. PMLR, 34193430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. [77] Gori Marco, Monfardini Gabriele, and Scarselli Franco. 2005. A new model for learning in graph domains. In The International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’05), Vol. 2. 729734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. [78] Li Guohao, Matthias, Ghanem Bernard, and Koltun Vladlen. 2021. Training graph neural networks with 1000 layers. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’21). PMLR, 338348. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403076Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. [79] Li Guohao, Müller Matthias, Thabet Ali, and Ghanem Bernard. 2019. DeepGCNs: Can GCNs go as deep as CNNs. In The International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’19). IEEE, 92679276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. [80] Maron Haggai, Ben-Hamu Heli, Shamir Nadav, and Lipman Yaron. 2019. Invariant and equivariant graph networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. [81] Dai Hanjun, Li Hui, Tian Tian, Huang Xin, Wang Lin, Zhu Jun, and Song Le. 2018. Adversarial attack on graph structured data. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’18), Vol. 80. PMLR, 11151124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. [82] Zhang Hanlin, Lin Shuai, Liu Weiyang, Zhou Pan, Tang Jian, Liang Xiaodan, and Xing Eric P.. 2020. Iterative graph self-distillation. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12609v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. [83] Yuan Hao, Yu Haiyang, Gui Shurui, and Ji Shuiwang. 2020. Explainability in graph neural networks: A taxonomic survey. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.15445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. [84] Yuan Hao and Ji Shuiwang. 2020. StructPool: Structured graph pooling via conditional random fields. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. [85] Zhu Hao, Lin Yankai, Liu Zhiyuan, Fu Jie, Chua Tat-Seng, and Sun Maosong. 2019. Graph neural networks with generated parameters for relation extraction. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL, 13311339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. [86] Hassani Kaveh and Khasahmadi Amir Hosein. 2020. Contrastive multi-view representation learning on graphs. In The 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 119. PMLR, 41164126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. [87] Chang Heng, Rong Yu, Xu Tingyang, Huang Wenbing, Sojoudi Somayeh, Huang Junzhou, and Zhu Wenwu. 2020. Spectral graph attention network. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. [88] Pei Hongbin, Wei Bingzhe, Chang Kevin Chen-Chuan, Lei Yu, and Yang Bo. 2020. Geom-GCN: Geometric graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. [89] Gao Hongchang, Pei Jian, and Huang Heng. 2019. Conditional random field enhanced graph convolutional neural networks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 276284. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330888 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. [90] Gao Hongyang, Wang Zhengyang, and Ji Shuiwang. 2018. Large-scale learnable graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’18). ACM, 14151424. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219947 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. [91] Hu Weihua, Fey Matthias, Zitnik Marinka, Dong Yuxiao, Ren Hongyu, Liu Bowen, Catasta Michele, and Leskovec Jure. 2020. Open graph benchmark: Datasets for machine learning on graphs. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 2211822133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. [92] Linmei Hu, Yang Tianchi, Shi Chuan, Ji Houye, and Li Xiaoli. 2019. Heterogeneous graph attention networks for semi-supervised short text classification. In The Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’19). ACL, 48214830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. [93] Goodfellow Ian J., Pouget-Abadie Jean, Mirza Mehdi, Xu Bing, Warde-Farley David, Ozair Sherjil, Courville Azron, and Bengio Yoshua. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’14), Vol. 27. 26722680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. [94] Dhillon Inderjit S., Guan Yuqiang, and Kulis Brian. 2004. Kernel k-means, spectral clustering and normalized cuts. In The ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’04), Vol. 32. ACM, 551556. https://doi.org/10.1145/1014052.1014118 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. [95] Dhillon Inderjit S., Guan Yuqiang, and Kulis Brian. 2007. Weighted graph cuts without eigenvectors: A multilevel approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29, 11 (2007), 19441957. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1115 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. [96] Chami Ines, Ying Rex, Re Christopher, and Leskovec Jure. 2019. Hyperbolic graph convolutional neural networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19). Curran Associates, Inc., 48684879. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. [97] Atwood James and Towsley Don. 2016. Diffusion-convolutional neural network. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’16). Curran Associates, Inc., 19932001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. [98] Weston Jason, Bordes Antoine, Chopra Sumit, and Mikolov Tomas. 2015. Towards AI-Complete question answering: A set of prerequisite toy tasks. arXiv (2015). https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05698v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. [99] Kawahara Jeremy, Brown Colin J., Miller Steven P., Booth Brian G., Chau Vann, Grunau Ruth E., Zwicker Jill G., and Hamarneh Ghassan. 2017. BrainNetCNN: Convolutional neural networks for brain networks; towards predicting neurodevelopment. NeuroImage 146 (2017), 10381049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. [100] Schrouff Jessica, Wohlfahrt Kai, Marnette Bruno, and Atkinson Liam. 2019. Inferring Javascript types using graph neural networks. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06707.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. [101] Du Jian, Zhang Shanghang, Wu Guanhang, Moura José M. F., and Kar Soummya. 2018. Topology adaptive graph convolutional networks. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. [102] Shi Jianbo and Malik Jitendra. 2000. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22, 8 (2000), 888905. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.868688 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. [103] Chen Jianfei, Zhu Jun, and Song Le. 2018. Stochastic training of graph convolutional networks with variance reduction. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’18). PMLR, 942950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. [104] Lin Jiangke, Yuan Yi, Shao Tianjie, and Zhou Kun. 2020. Towards high-fidelity 3d face reconstruction from in-the-wild images using graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’20). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  105. [105] Zhang Jiani, Shi Xingjian, Xie Junyuan, Ma Hao, King Irwin, and Yeung Dit-Yan. 2018. GaAN: Gated attention networks for learning on large and spatiotemporal graphs. In The International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’18). PMLR, No. 139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. [106] Yang Jianwei, Lu Jiasen, Lee Stefan, Batra Dhruv, and Parikh Devi. 2018. Graph R-CNN for scene graph generation. In The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV’18). Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. [107] Jiao Yizhou, Xiong Yun, Zhang Jiawei, Zhang Yao, Zhang Tianqi, and Zhu Yangyong. 2021. Sub-graph contrast for scalable self-supervised graph representation learning. In The International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’21). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. [108] Zhang Jiawei, Zhang Haopeng, Xia Congying, and Sun Li. 2020. Graph-Bert: Only attention is needed for learning graph representations. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.05140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. [109] You Jiaxuan, Liu Bowen, Ying Rex, and Pande Vijay. 2018. Graph convolutional policy network for goal-directed molecular graph generation. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19). Curran Assoicates, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 64126422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. [110] You Jiaxuan, Wu Haoze, Barrett Clark, Ramanujan Raghuram, and Leskovec Jure. 2019. G2SAT: Learning to generate SAT formulas. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’18). Curran Associates, Inc., 1055210563. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. [111] You Jiaxuan, Ying Rex, Ren Xiang, Hamilton William L., and Leskovec Jure. 2018. GraphRNN: Generating realistic graphs with deep auto-regressive models. In The International Conference on Machine Learing (ICML’18), Vol. 80. PMLR, 57085717.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. [112] You Jiaxue, Ying Rex, and Leskovec Jure. 2019. Position-aware graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’19), Vol. 97. PMLR, 71347143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. [113] Wei Jiayi, Goyal Maruth, Durrett Greg, and Dilling Isil. 2020. LambdaNet: Probabilistic type inference using graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. [114] Chen Jie, Ma Tengfei, and Xiao Cao. 2018. FastGCN: Fast learning with graph convolutional networks via importance sampling. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. [115] Zhou Jie, Cui Gangqu, Zhang Zhengyan, Yang Cheng, Liu Zhiyuan, and Sun Maosong. 2020. Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. AI Open 1 (2020), 5781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.01.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. [116] Zhou Jie, Han Xu, Yang Cheng, Liu Zhiyuan, Wang Lifeng, Li Changcheng, and Sun Maosong. 2019. GEAR: Graph-based evidence aggregating and reasoning for fact verification. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19). ACL, 892901.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. [117] Qiu Jiezhong, Tang Jian, Ma Hao, Dong Yuxiao, Wang Kuansan, and Tang Jie. 2018. DeepInf: Social influence prediction with deep learning. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’18). 234, 21102119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. [118] Qiu Jiezhong, Chen Qibin, Dong Yuxiao, Zhang Jing, Yang Hongxia, Ding Ming, Wang Kuansan, and Tang Jie. 2020. GCC: Graph contrastive coding for graph neural network pre-training. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’20). ACM, 11501160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. [119] Park Jiwoong, Lee Minsik, Chang Hyung Jin, Lee Kyuewang, and Choi Jin Young. 2019. Symmetric graph convolutional autoencoder for unsupervised graph representation learning. In The International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’19). IEEE, Seoul, Korea, 65196528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  120. [120] Bruna Joan, Zaremba Wojciech, Szlam Arthur, and LeCun Yann. 2014. Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. [121] Klicpera Johannes, Bojchevski Aleksandar, and Günnemann Stephan. 2019. Predict the propagate: Graph neural networks meet personalized pagerank. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. [122] Lee John B., Rossi Ryan A., Kim Sungchul, Ahmed Nesreen K., and Koh Eunyee. 2019. Attention models in graphs: A survey. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 13, 6 (2019), No. 62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. [123] Lee John Boaz, Rossi Ryan, and Kong Xiangnan. 2018. Graph classification using structural attention. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’18). ACM, 16661674. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219980 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. [124] Lafferty John, McCallum Andrew, and Pereira Fernando C. N.. 2001. Conditional random field: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’01), Vol. 97. PMLR, 282289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. [125] Li Juanhui, Ma Yao, Wang Yiqi, Aggarwal Charu, Wang Chang-Dong, and Tang Jiliang. 2020. Graph pooling with representativeness. In the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 20424165. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM50108.2020.00039Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. [126] Wu Jun, He Jingrui, and Xu Jiejun. 2019. DEMO-Net: Degree-specific graph neural networks for node and graph classification. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 406415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. [127] Lee Junhyun, Lee Inyeop, and Kang Jaewoo. 2019. Self-attention graph pooling. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’19), Vol. 97. PMLR, 37343743.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. [128] Gilmer Justin, Schoenholz Samuel S., Riley Patrick F., Vinyals Oriol, and Dahl George E.. 2017. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’17), Vol. 70. PMLR, 12631272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. [129] Tai Kai Sheng, Socher Richard, and Manning Christopher D.. 2015. Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-term memory networks. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’15), Vol. 1. ACL, 15561566.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. [130] He Kaiming, Zhang Xiangyu, Ren Shaoqing, and Sun Jian. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’16). IEEE, 770778. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  131. [131] Zhou Kaixiong, Song Qingquan, Huang Xiao, and Hu Xia. 2019. Auto-GNN: Neural architecture search of graph neural networks. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. [132] Borgwardt Karsten, Ghisu Elisabetta, Llinares-López Felipe, O’Bray Leslie, and Rieck Bastian. 2020. Graph kernels: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 13, 5–6 (2020), 531712. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000076Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  133. [133] Sun Ke, Koniusz Piotr, and Wang Zhen. 2019. Fisher-Bures adversary graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’19). PMLR, No. 161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. [134] Tu Ke, Cui Peng, Wang Xiao, Wang Fei, and Zhu Wenwu. 2018. Structural deep embedding for hyper-networks. In The International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 426433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  135. [135] Tu Ke, Cui Peng, Wang Xiao, and Yu Philip S.. 2018. Deep recursive network embedding with regular equivalence. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’18). ACM, 23572366. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3220068 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. [136] Xu Keyulu, Li Chengtao, Tian Yonglong, Sonobe Tomohiro, Kawarabayashi Ken-ichi, and Jegelka Stefanie. 2018. Representation learning on graphs with jumping knowledge networks. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’18), Vol. 80. PMLR, 54535462.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. [137] Xu Keyulu, Li Jingling, Zhang Mozhi, Du Simon S., Kawarabayashi Ken-ichi, and Jegelka Stefanie. 2020. What can neural networks reason about. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. [138] Xu Keyulu, Hu Weihua, Leskovec Jure, and Jegelka Stefanie. 2019. How powerful are graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. [139] Yoon KiJung, Liao Renjie, Xiong Yuwen, Zhang Lisa, Fetaya Ethan, Urtasun Raquel, Zemel Richard, and Pitkow Xaq. 2018. Inference in probabilistic graphical models by graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’18). Vancouver, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. [140] Weinberger Kilian, Dasgupta Anirban, and Langford John. 2009. Feature hashing for large scale multitask learning. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’09). PMLR, 11131120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1553374.1553516 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  141. [141] Thekumparampil Kiran K., Wang Chong, Oh Sewoong, and Li Lijia. 2018. Attention-based graph neural network for semi-supervised learning. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03735.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. [142] Xu Kun, Wu Lingfei, Wang Zhiguo, Feng Yansong, Witbrock Michael, and Sheinin Vadim. 2018. Graph2Seq: Graph to sequence learning with attention-based neural networks. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.00823.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. [143] Cho Kyunghyun, Merrienboer Bart van, Gulcehre Caglar, Bahdanau Dzmitry, Bougares Fethi, Schwenk Holger, and Bengio Youshua. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In The Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’14). ACL, 17241734. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1179Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  144. [144] Li Pan, Wang Yanbang, Wang Hongwei, and Leskovec Jure. 2020. Distance encoding: Design provably more powerful neural networks for graph representation learning. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’20), Vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 44654478.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. [145] Sun Lichao, Dou Yingtong, Yang Carl, Wang Ji, Yu Philip S., and Li Bo. 2020. Adversarial attack and defense on graph data: A survey. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.10528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. [146] Qiu Lin, Xiao Yunxuan, Qu Yanru, Zhou Hao, Li Lei, Zhang Weinan, and Yu Yong. 2019. Dynamically fused graph network for multi-hop reasoning. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19). ACL, 61406150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. [147] Liu Linfeng and Liu Liping. 2019. Amortized variational inference with graph convolutional networks for gaussian processes. In The International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS’19), Vol. 89. Society for Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 22912300.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. [148] Ma Lingxiao, Yang Zhi, Miao Youshan, Xue Jilong, Wu Ming, Zhou Lidong, and Dai Yafei. 2018. Towards efficient large-scale graph neural network computing. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  149. [149] Zhao Lingxiao and Akoglu Leman. 2020. PairNorm: Tackling oversmoothing in GNNs. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  150. [150] Li Linjie, Gan Zhe, Cheng Yu, and Liu Jingjing. 2019. Relation-aware graph attention network for visual question answering. In The International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’19). IEEE, 1031310322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  151. [151] Landrieu Loic and Boussaha Mohamed. 2019. Point Cloud over Segmentation with graph-structured deep metric learning. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’19). IEEE, 74407449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. [152] Tiao Louis, Elinas Pantelis, Nguyen Harrison, and Bonilla Edwin V.. 2019. Variational spectral graph convolutional networks. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01852v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. [153] Ruiz Luana, Gama Fernando, and Ribeiro Alejandro. 2019. Gated graph convolutional recurrent neural networks. In The European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO’19). IEEE, 15. https://doi.org/10.23919/EUSIPCO.2019.8902995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  154. [154] Prates Marcelo, Avelar Pedro H. C., Lemos Henrique, Lamb Luis C., and Vardi Moshe Y.. 2019. Learing to solve NP-Complete problems: A graph neural network for decision TSP. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 47314738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  155. [155] Zitnik Marnka, Agrawal Monica, and Leskovec Jure. 2018. Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks. Bioinformatics 34, 13 (2018), i457–i466. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  156. [156] Simonovsky Martin and Komodakis Nikos. 2017. Dynamic edge-conditioned filters in convolutional neural networks on graphs. In The Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’17). IEEE, 2938. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  157. [157] Simonovsky Martin and Komodakis Nikos. 2018. GraphVAE: Towards generation of small graphs using variational autoencoders. In The International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN’18), Vol. 11139. 412422. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01418-6_41Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  158. [158] Niepert Mathias, Ahmed Mohamed, and Kutzkov Konstantin. 2016. Learning convolutional neural networks for graphs. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICLR’16), Vol. 48. 20142023. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  159. [159] Fey Matthias and Lenssen Jan E.. 2019. Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch Geometric. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. [160] Narasimhan Medhini, Lazebnik Svetlana, and Schwing Alexander G.. 2018. Out of the box: Reasoning with graph convolution nets for factual visual question answering. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’18). Curran Associates, Inc., 26542665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  161. [161] Zhu Meiqi, Wang Xiao, Shi Chuan, Ji Houye, and Cui Peng. 2021. Interpreting and unifying graph neural networks with an optimization framework. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’21), Vol. 80. 12151226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  162. [162] Liu Meng, Gao Hongyang, and Ji Shuiwang. 2020. Towards deeper graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’20). 417, 338348. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403076Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  163. [163] Qu Meng, Bengio Yoshua, and Tang Jian. 2019. GMNN: Graph markov neural networks. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’19), Vol. 97. PMLR, 52415250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  164. [164] Mesquita Diego, Souza Amauri H., and Kaski Samuel. 2020. Rethinking pooling in graph neural networks. In The International Conference Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’20), Vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 22202231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. [165] Defferrard Michaël, Bresson Xavier, and Vandergheynst Pierre. 2016. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’16), Curran Associates, Inc.38443852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  166. [166] Bronstein Michael M., Bruna Joan, LeCun Yan, Szlam Arthur, and Vandergheynst Pierre. 2017. Geometric deep learning: Going beyond Euclidean data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 34, 4 (2017), 1842.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  167. [167] Henaff Mikael, Bruna Joan, and LeCun Yan. 2015. Deep convolutional networks on graph-structured data. arXiv (2015). https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. [168] Allamanis Miltiadis, Brockschmidt Marc, and Khademi Mahmoud. 2018. Learning to represent programs with graphs. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. [169] Ding Ming, Zhou Chang, Chen Qibin, Yang Hongxia, and Tang Jie. 2019. Cognitive graph for multi-hop reading comprehension at scale. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19). ACL, 26942703.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. [170] Tu Ming, Wang Guangtao, Huang Jing, Tang Yun, He Xiaodong, and Zhou Bowen. 2019. Multi-hop reading comprehension across multiple documents by reasoning over heterogeneous graphs. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19). ACL, 27042713.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. [171] Wang Minjie, Yu Lingfan, Zheng Da, Gan Quan, Gai Yu, Ye Zihao, Li Mufei, Zhou Jinjing, Huang Qi, Ma Chao, Huang Ziyue, Guo Qipeng, Zhang Hao, Lin Haibin, Zhao Junbo, Li Jinyang, Smola Alexander, and Zhang Zheng. 2019. Deep graph library: Towards efficient and scalable deep learning on graphs. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR Workshop’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  172. [172] Zhang Muhan and Chen Yixin. 2018. Link prediction based on graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’18). Curran Associates, Inc., 51715181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  173. [173] Zhang Muhan, Cui Zhicheng, Neumann Marion, and Chen Yixin. 2018. An end-to-end deep learning architecture for graph classification. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 44384445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  174. [174] Yadati Naganand, Nimishakavi Madhav, Yadav Prateek, Nitin Vikram, Louis Anand, and Talukdar Partha. 2019. HyperGCN: A new method for training graph convolutional networks on hypergraphs. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19). Curran Associates, Inc., 15111522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  175. [175] Yadati Naganand, Gao Tingran, Asoodeh Shahab, Talukdar Partha, and Louis Anand. 2021. Graph neural networks for soft semi-supervised learning on hypergraphs. In The Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD’21). Springer, 447458. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75762-5_36Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  176. [176] Watters Nicholas, Tacchetti Andrea, Weber Théophane, Pascanu Razvan, Battaglia Peter, and Zoran Daniel. 2017. Visual interaction networks: Learning a physics simulator from video. In The International Conference on Neural Inforamtion Processing Systems (NIPS’17). Curran Associates, Inc., 45394547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  177. [177] Cao Nicola De and Kipf Thomas N.. 2018. MolGAN: An implicit generative model for small molecular graphs. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. [178] Cao Nicola De, Aziz Wilker, and Titov Ivan. 2019. Question answering by reasoning across documents with graph convolutional networks. In The Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL’19). ACL, 23062317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  179. [179] Keriven Nicolas and Peyré Gabriel. 2019. Universal invariant and equivariant graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19). Curran Associates, Inc., 70927101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  180. [180] Navarin Nicoló, Tran Dinh V., and Sperduti Alessandro. 2018. Pre-training graph neural networks with kernels. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.06930v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  181. [181] Dehmamy Nima, Barabasi Albert-Laszlo, and Yu Rose. 2019. Understanding the representation power of graph neural networks in learning graph topology. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19). Curran Associates, Inc., 1541315423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  182. [182] Zhang Ningyu, Deng Shuming, Sun Zhanlin, Wang Guanying, Chen Xi, Zhang Wei, and Chen Huajun. 2019. Long-tail relation extraction via knowledge graph embeddings and graph convolution networks. In The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL’19). ACL, 30163025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  183. [183] Ronneberger Olaf, Fischer Philipp, and Brox Thomas. 2015. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In The International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention (MCCAI’15). 234241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  184. [184] Shchur Oleksandr, Mumme Maximilian, Bojchevski Aleksandar, and Günnemann Stephan. 2019. Pitfalls of graph neural network evaluation. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.05868.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. [185] Ulutan Oytun, Iftekhar A. S. M., and Manjunath B. S.. 2020. VSGNet: Spatial attention network for detecting human object interactions using graph convolutions. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’20). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  186. [186] Barceló Pablo, Kostylev Egor V., Monet Mikael, Pérez Jorge, Reutter Juan, and Silva Juan Pablo. 2020. The logical expressiveness of graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  187. [187] Corcoran Padraig. 2019. Function space pooling for graph convolutional networks. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  188. [188] Chan Pak K., Schlag M. D. F., and Zien Z. Y.. 1994. Spectral K-way ratio-cut partitioning and clustering. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 13, 9 (1994), 10881096. https://doi.org/10.1109/43.310898 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  189. [189] Almasan Paul, Suárez-Varela José, Badia-Sampera Arnau, Rusek Krzysztof, Barlet-Ros Pere, and Cabellos-Aparicio Albert. 2019. Deep reinforcement learning meets graph neural networks: Exploring a routing optimization use case. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.07421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. [190] Han Peng, Yang Peng, Zhao Peilin, Shang Shuo, Liu Yong, Zhou Jiayu, Gao Xin, and Kalnis Panos. 2019. GCN-MF: Disease-gene association identification by graph convolutional networks and matrix factorization. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 705713. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  191. [191] Veličkovič Petar, Cucurull Guillem, Casanova Arantxa, Romero Adriana, Liò Pietro, and Bengio Yoshua. 2018. Graph attention networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  192. [192] Veličkovič Petar, Fedus William, Hamilton William L., Liò Pietro, Bengio Yoshua, and Hjelm R Devon. 2019. Deep graph infomax. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  193. [193] Battaglia Peter, Pascanu Razvan, Lai Matthew, Rezende Danilo Jimenez, and Kavukcuoglu Koray. 2016. Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’16). Curran Associates, Inc., 45024510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  194. [194] Meltzer Peter, Mallea Marcelo Daniel Gutierrez, and Bentley Peter J.. 2019. PiNet: A permutation invariant graph neural network for graph classification. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.03046.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  195. [195] Battaglia Peter W., Hamrick Jessica B., Bapst Victor, Sanchez-Gonzalez Alvaro, Zambaldi Vinicius, Malinowski Mateusz, Tacchetti Andrea, Raposo David, Santoro Adam, Faulkner Ryan, Gulcehre Caglar, Song Francis, Ballard Andrew, Gilmer Justin, Dahl George E., Vaswani Ashish, Allen Kelsey, Nash Charles, Langston Victoria, Dyer Chris, Heess Nicolas, Wierstra Daan, Kohli Pushmeet, Botvinick Matt, Vinyals Oriol, Li Yujia, and Pascanu Razvan. 2018. Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  196. [196] Pope Phillip E., Kolouri Soheil, Rostami Mohammad, Martin Charles E., and Hoffmann Heiko. 2019. Explainability methods for graph convolutional networks. In The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’19). IEEE, 1077210781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  197. [197] Li Qimai, Han Zhichao, and Wu Xiaoming. 2018. Deeper insights into graph convolutional networks for semi-supervised learning. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 35383545. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  198. [198] Neal Radford M. and Hinton Geoffrey E.. 1998. A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse and other variants. Learning in Graphical Models 89 (1998), 355368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_12 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  199. [199] You Renchun, Guo Zhiyao, Cui Lei, Long Xiang, Bao Yingze, and Wen Shilei. 2020. Cross-modality attention with semantic graph embedding for multi-label classification. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’20). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  200. [200] Liao Renjie, Brockschmidt Marc, Tarlow Daniel, Gaunt Alexander L., Urtasun Raquel, and Zemel Richard. 2018. Graph partition neural networks for semi-supervised classification. In The International Conference on Learning Representations Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  201. [201] Liao Renjie, Zhao Zhizhen, Urtasun Raquel, and Zemel Richard. 2019. LanczosNet: Multi-scale deep graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  202. [202] Ying Rex, You Jiaxuan, Morris Christopher, Ren Xiang, Hamilton William L., and Leskovec Jure. 2018. Hierarchical graph representation learning with differentiable pooling. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’18). Curran Associates, Inc., 48054815. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  203. [203] Wilson Richard C., Hancock Edwin R., Pekalska Elżbieta, and Duin Robert P. W.. 2014. Spherical and hyperbolic embeddings of data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence 36, 11 (2014), 22552269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2316836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  204. [204] Koncel-Kedziorski Rik, Bekal Dhanush, Luan Yi, Lapata Mirella, and Hajishirzi Hannaneh. 2019. Text generation from knowledge graphs with graph transformers. In The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL’19), Vol. 1. ACL, 22842293. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1238Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  205. [205] Kondor Risi, Hy Truong Son, Pan Horace, Anderson Brandon M., and Trivedi Shubhendu. 2018. Covariant compositional networks for learning graphs. In The International Conference on Learning Representations Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  206. [206] Levie Ron, Monti Federico, Bresson Xavier, and Bronstein Michael M.. 2019. CayleyNets: Graph convolutional neural networks with complex relational spectral filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 67, 1 (2019), 97109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  207. [207] Dai Rui, Xu Shenkun, Gu Qian, Ji Chenguang, and Liu Kaikui. 2020. Hybrid spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks: Improving traffic prediction with navigation data. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’20). ACM, 30743082. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403358Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  208. [208] Li Ruoyu, Wang Sheng, Zhu Feiyun, and Huang Junzhou. 2018. Adaptive graph convolutional neural networks. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18). Associations for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 35463553. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330925 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  209. [209] Murphy Ryan, Srinivasan Balasubramaniam, Rao Vinayak, and Ribeiro Bruno. 2019. Relational pooling for graph representations. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’19), Vol. 97. PMLR, 46634673.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  210. [210] Sato Ryoma. 2020. A survey on the expressive power of graph neural networks. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04078.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  211. [211] Sato Ryoma, Yamada Makoto, and Kashima Hisashi. 2019. Approximation ratios of graph neural networks for combinatorial problems. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19). Curran Associates, Inc., 40814090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  212. [212] Abu-EL-Haija Sami, Kapoor Amol, Perozzi Bryan, and Lee Joonseok. 2019. N-GCN: Multi-scale graph convolution for semi-supervised node classification. In The Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’19). PMLR, No. 310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  213. [213] Abu-EL-Haija Sami, Perozzi Bryan, Kapoor Amol, Alipourfard Nazanin, Lerman Kristina, Harutyunyan Hrayr, Steeg Greg Ver, and Galstyan Aram. 2019. MixHop: Higher-order graph convolutional architectures via sparsified neighborhood mixing. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’19), Vol. 97. PMLR, 2129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  214. [214] Sabour Sara, Frosst Nicholas, and Hinton Geoffrey E.. 2017. Dynamic routing between capsules. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’17), Vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 38563866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  215. [215] Verma Saurabh and Zhang Zhili. 2018. Graph capsule convolutional neural networks. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.08090.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  216. [216] Lerique Se}bastien, Abitol Jacob Levy, and Karsai Márton. 2020. Joint embedding of structure and features via graph convolutional networks. Applied Network Science 5, 2020 (2020), No. 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0237-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  217. [217] Hochreiter Sepp and Schmidhuber Jürgen. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation 9, 8 (1997), 17351780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  218. [218] Fan Shaohua, Zhu Junxiong, Han Xiaotian, Shi Chuan, Hu Linmei, Ma Biyu, and Li Yongliang. 2019. Metapath-guided heterogeneous graph neural network for intent recommendation. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 24782486. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330673 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  219. [219] Cao Shaosheng, Lu Wei, and Xu Qiongkai. 2016. Deep neural networks for learning graph representations. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’16). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 11451152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  220. [220] Hu Shengding, Qu Meng, Liu Zhiyuan, and Tang Jian. 2020. Transfer active learning for graph neural networks. OpenReview (2020). https://openreview.net/forum?id=BklOXeBFDS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  221. [221] Guo Shengnan, Lin Youfang, Feng Ning, Song Chao, and Wan Huaiyu. 2019. Attention based spatial-temporal graph convolutional networks for traffic flow forecasting. In The International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 922929. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301922 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  222. [222] Zhang Shichang, Hu Ziniu, Subramonian Arjun, and Sun Yizhou. 2021. Motif-driven contrastive learning of graph representations. arXiv (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12533v2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  223. [223] Pan Shirui, Hu Ruiqi, Long Guodong, Jiang Jing, Yao Lina, and Zhang Chengqi. 2018. Adversarially regularized graph autoencoder for graph embedding. In The International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). IJCAI Organization, 26092615. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  224. [224] Chen Shizhe, Jin Qin, Wang Peng, and Wu Qi. 2020. Say as you wish: Fine-grained control of image caption generation with abstract scene graphs. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’20). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  225. [225] Wu Shu, Tang Yuyuan, Zhu Yanqiao, Wang Liang, Xie Xing, and Tan Tieniu. 2019. Session-based recommendation with graph neural networks. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 346353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  226. [226] Yan Sijie, Xiong Yuanjun, and Lin Dahua. 2018. Spatial temporal graph convolutional networks for skeleton-based action recognition. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 74447452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  227. [227] Ktena Sofia Ira, Parisot Sarah, Ferrante Enzo, Rajchl Martin, Lee Matthew, Glocker Ben, and Ruekert Daniel. 2017. Distance metric learning using graph convolutional networks: Application to functional brain networks. In The International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’17). 469477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  228. [228] He Songtao, Bastani Favyen, Jagwani Satvat, Park Edward, Abbar Sofiane, Alizadeh Mohammad, Balakrishnan Hari, Chawla Sanjay, Madden Samuel, and Sadeghi Mohammad Amin. 2020. RoadTagger: Robust road attribute inference with graph neural networks. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’20). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  229. [229] Kearnes Steven, McCloskey Kevin, Berndl Marc, Pande Vijay S., and Riley Patrick F.. 2016. Molecular graph convolutions: Moving beyond fingerprints. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 30, 8 (2016), 595608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-9938-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  230. [230] Rhee Sungmin, Seo Seokjun, and Kim Sun. 2018. Hybrid approach of relation network and localized graph convolutional filtering for breast cancer subtype classification. In The International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). IJCAI Organization, 35273534. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/490 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  231. [231] Gui Tao, Zou Yicheng, Zhang Qi, Peng Minlong, Fu Jinlan, Wei Zhongyu, and Huang Xuanjing. 2019. A lexicon-based graph neural network for Chinese NER. In The Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’19). ACL, 10401050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  232. [232] Ma Tengfei, Shang Junyuan, and Sun Jimeng. 2019. CGNF: Conditional graph neural fields. OpenReview (2019). https://openreview.net/forum?id=ryxMX2R9YQ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  233. [233] Nguyen Thien Huu and Grishman Ralph. 2018. Graph convolutional networks with argument-aware pooling for event detection. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 59005907. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  234. [234] Elsken Thomas, Metzen Jan Hendrik, and Hutter Frank. 2019. Neural architecture search: A survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research 20 (2019), 121. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb01770.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  235. [235] Kipf Thomas N., Pol Elise van der, and Welling Max. 2020. Contrastive learning of structured world models. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  236. [236] Kipf Thomas N. and Welling Max. 2016. Variational graph auto-encoders. arXiv (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  237. [237] Kipf Thomas N. and Welling Max. 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  238. [238] Wang Tinghuai, Wang Guangming, Tan Kuan Eeik, and Tan Donghui. 2020. Spectral pyramid graph attention network for hyperspectral image classification. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  239. [239] Wang Tingwu, Liao Renjie, Ba Jimmy, and Fidler Sanja. 2018. NerveNet: Learning structured policy with graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  240. [240] Pham Trang, Tran Truyen, Phung Dinh, and Venkatesh Svetha. 2017. Column networks for collective classification. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’17). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 24852491. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  241. [241] Fu Tsu-Jui, Li Peng-Hsuan, and Ma Wei-Yun. 2019. GraphRel: Modeling text as relational graphs for joint entity and relation extraction. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19). ACL, 14091418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  242. [242] Derr Tyler, Ma Yao, and Tang Jiliang. 2018. Signed graph convolutional network. In The International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’18). IEEE, 929934. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2018.00113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  243. [243] Alon Uri and Yahav Eran. 2020. On the bottleneck of graph neural networks and its practical implications. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05205v2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  244. [244] Zayats Victoria and Ostendorf Mari. 2018. Conversation modeling on Reddit using a graph-structured LSTM. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 6 (2018), 121132. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  245. [245] Dwivedi Vijay Prakash, Joshi Chaitanya K., Laurent Thomas, Bengio Yoshua, and Bresson Xavier. 2020. Benchmarking graph neural networks. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  246. [246] Kannala Juho and Tang Jian. 2019. GraphMix: Regularized training of graph neural networks for semi-supervised learning. arXiv(2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11715v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  247. [247] Massa Vincenzo Di, Monfardini Cabriele, Sarti Lorenzo, Scarselli Franco, Maggini Marco, and Gori Marco. 2006. A comparison between recursive neural networks and graph neural networks. In The International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’06). IEEE, 778785. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2006.246763Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  248. [248] Minh Volodymyr, Heess Nicolas, Graves Alex, and Kavukcuoglu Koray. 2014. Recurrent models of visual attention. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’14), Vol. 2. Curran Associates, Inc., 22042212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  249. [249] Li Wei, Xu Jingjing, He Yancheng, Yan Shengli, Wu Yunfang, and Sun Xu. 2019. Coherent comments generation for Chinese articles with a graph-to-sequence model. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19). ACL, Florence, Italy, 48434852.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  250. [250] Liu Wei and Chawla Sanjay. 2009. A game theoretical model for adversarial learning. In The International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDM Workshop’09). IEEE, 2530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  251. [251] Hu Weihua, Liu Bowen, Gomes Joseph, Zitnik Marinka, Liang Percy, Pande Vijay S., and Leskovec Jure. 2020. Strategies for pre-training graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  252. [252] Chiang Weilin, Liu Xuanqing, Si Si, Li Yang, Bengio Samy, and Hsieh Cho-Jui. 2019. Cluster-GCN: An efficient algorithm for training deep and large graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 257266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  253. [253] Huang Wenbing, Zhang Tong, Rong Yu, and Huang Junzhou. 2018. Adaptive sampling towards fast graph representation learning. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’18). Curran Associates, Inc., 45634572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  254. [254] Yu Wenchao, Zheng Cheng, and Cheng Wei. 2018. Learning deep network representations with adversarially regularized autoencoders. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’18). ACM, 26632671. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3220000 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  255. [255] Jin Wengong, Barzilay Regina, and Jaakkola Tommi. 2018. Junction tree variational autoencoder for molecular graph generation. In The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’18), Vol. 80. PMLR, 23232332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  256. [256] Zhu Wenwu, Wang Xin, and Cui Peng. 2020. Deep learning for learning graph representations. Deep Learning: Concepts and Architectures 866 (2020), 169210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31756-0_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  257. [257] Hamilton William L., Ying Rex, and Leskovec Jure. 2017. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’17). Curran Associates, Inc., 10241034. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  258. [258] Kool Wouter, Hoof Herke van, and Welling Max. 2019. Attention, learn to solve routing problems. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19). https://openreview.net/forum?id=ByxBFsRqYm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  259. [259] Wang Xiang, He Xiangnan, Cao Yixin, Liu Meng, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2019. KGAT: Knowledge graph attention network for recommendation. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 950958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  260. [260] Huang Xiao, Song Qingquan, Li Yuening, and Hu Xia. 2019. Graph recurrent networks with attributed random walks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 732740. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330941 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  261. [261] Liu Xiao, Luo Zhunchen, and Huang Heyan. 2018. Jointly multiple events extraction via attention-based graph information aggregation. In The Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’18). ACL, 12471256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  262. [262] Shen Xiao and Chung Fulai. 2020. Deep network embedding for graph representation learning in signed networks. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 50, 4 (2020), 15561568. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2018.2871503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  263. [263] Wang Xiao, Ji Houye, Shi Chuan, Wang Bai, Cui Peng, Yu Philip S., and Ye Yanfang. 2018. Heterogeneous graph attention network. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’18). 20222032. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313562 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  264. [264] Wang Xiao, Wang Ruijia, Shi Chuan, Song Guojie, and Li Qingyong. 2020. Multi-component graph convolutional collaborative filtering. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’20). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  265. [265] Liang Xiaodan, Lin Liang, Shen Xiaohui, Feng Jiashi, Yan Shuicheng, and Xing Eric P.. 2017. Interpretable structure-evolving LSTM. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’17). IEEE, 10101019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  266. [266] Liang Xiaodan, Shen Xiaohui, Feng Jiashi, Lin Liang, and Yan Shuicheng. 2016. Semantic object parsing with graph LSTM. In The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV’16). Springer, 125143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  267. [267] Guo Xiaojie, Wu Lingfei, and Zhao Liang. 2018. Deep graph translation. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  268. [268] Wang Xiaolong, Girshick Ross, Gupta Abhinav, and He Kaiming. 2018. Non-local neural networks. In The International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’18). IEEE, 77947803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  269. [269] Xu Xiaoran, Feng Wei, Jiang Yunsheng, Xie Xiaohui, Sun Zhiqing, and Zhang Zhihong. 2020. Dynamically pruned message passing networks for large-scale knowledge graph reasoning. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  270. [270] Liu Xien, You Xinxin, Zhang Xiao, Wu Ji, and Lv Ping. 2020. Tensor graph convolutional networks for text classification. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.05313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  271. [271] Jiang Xin, Cheng Kewei, Jiang Song, and Sun Yizhou. 2019. Chordal-GCN: Exploiting sparsity in training large-scale graph convolutional networks. OpenReview (2019). https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJl05AVtwB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  272. [272] Zhang Xinyi and Chen Lihui. 2019. Capsule graph neural network. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  273. [273] Qiu Xipeng, Sun TianXiang, Xu YiGe, Shao Yunfan, Dai Ning, and Huang Xuanjing. 2020. Pre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey. Science China Technological Sciences 63 (2020), 18721897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1647-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  274. [274] Yang Carl, Zhuang Peiye, Shi Wenhan, Luu Alan, and Li Pan. 2019. Conditional structure generation through graph variational generative adversarial nets. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19), Vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  275. [275] LeCun Yann, Bottou Léon, Bengio Yoshua, and Haffner Patrick. 2009. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. The IEEE 86, 11 (2009), 22778–2324. https://www.cs.toronto.edu/kriz/learning-features-2009-TR.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  276. [276] Zhu Yanqiao, Xu Yichen, Yu Feng, Wu Shu, and Wang Liang. 2020. CAGNN: Cluster-aware graph neural networks for unsupervised graph representation learning. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01674.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  277. [277] Ma Yao, Wang Suhang, Aggarwal Charu C., Yin Dawei, and Tang Jiliang. 2019. Multi-dimensional graph convolutional networks. In The SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM’19). SIAM, 657665. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975673.74Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  278. [278] Ma Yao, Wang Suhang, Aggarwal Charu C., and Tang Jiliang. 2019. Graph convolutional networks with EigenPooling. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’19). ACM, 723731. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330982 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  279. [279] Mao Yao, Guo Ziyi, Ren Zhaochun, Zhao Eric, Tang Jiliang, and Yin Dawei. 2020. Streaming graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’20). ACM, Virtual Event, 719728. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397271.3401092 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  280. [280] Xie Yaochen, Xu Zhao, Wang Zhengyang, and Ji Shuiwang. 2021. Self-supervised learning of graph neural networks: A unified review. arXiv (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10757v2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  281. [281] Luo Yawei, Guan Tao, Yu Junqing, Liu Ping, and Yang Yi. 2020. Every node counts: Self-ensembling graph convolutional networks for semi-supervised learning. Pattern Recognition 106 (2020), No. 107451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  282. [282] Hoshen Yedid. 2017. VAIN: Attentional multi-agent predictive modeling. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’17). Curran Associates, Inc., 26982708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  283. [283] Shen Yelong, Chen Jianshu, Huang Po-Sen, Guo Yuqing, and Gao Jianfeng. 2018. M-Walk: Learning to walk over graphs using monte carlo tree search. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’18). Curran Associates, Inc., 67866797. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  284. [284] Feng Yifan, You Haoxuan, Zhang Zizhao, Ji Rongrong, and Gao Yue. 2019. Hypergraph neural networks. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 35583565. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013558 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  285. [285] Dong Yihe, Sawin Will, and Bengio Yoshua. 2020. HNHN: Hypergraph networks with hyperedge neurons. arXiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  286. [286] Li Yikang, Quyang Wanli, Zhou Bolei, Shi Jianping, Zhang Chao, and Wang Xiaogang. 2018. Factorizable Net: An efficient subgraph-based framework for scene graph generation. In The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV’18). Springer, Munich, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  287. [287] Wei Yinwei, Wang Xiang, Nie Liqiang, He Xiangnan, Hong Richang, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2019. MMGCN: Multi-modal graph convolution network for personalized recommendation of micro-video. In The International Conference on Multimedia (MM’19). ACM, 14371445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  288. [288] Xie Yiqing, Li Sha, Yang Carl, Wong Raymond Chi-Wing, and Han Jiawei. 2020. When do GNNs work: Understanding and improving neighborhood aggregation. In The International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’20). IJCAI Organization, 13031309. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/181 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  289. [289] Liu Yixin, Pan Shirui, Jin Ming, Zhou Chuan, Xia Feng, and Yu Philip S.. 2021. Graph self-supervised learning: A survey. arXiv (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00111v1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  290. [290] Zhang Yizhou, Xiong Yun, Kong Xiangnan, Li Shanshan, Mi Jinhong, and Zhu Yangyong. 2018. Deep collective classification in heterogeneous information networks. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’18). 399408. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186106 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  291. [291] Liu Yongfei, Wan Bo, Zhu Xiaodan, and He Xuming. 2020. Learning cross-modal context graph for visual grounding. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’20). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  292. [292] You Yuning, Chen Tianlong, Sui Yongduo, Chen Ting, Wang Zhangyang, and Shen Yang. 2020. Graph contrastive learning with augmentations. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’20), Vol. 33. Curran Associates, Inc., 58125823.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  293. [293] Seo Youngjoo, Defferrard Michaël, Vandergheynst Pierre, and Bresson Xavier. 2018. Structured sequence modeling with graph convolutional recurrent networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP’18), Vol. 11301. 362373. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04167-0_33Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  294. [294] Cao Yu, Fang Meng, and Tao Dacheng. 2019. BAG: Bi-directional attention entity graph convolutional network for multi-hop reasoning question answering. In The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL’19). ACL, 357362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  295. [295] Chen Yu, Wu Lingfei, and Zaki Mohammed J.. 2020. Reinforcement learning based graph-to-sequence model for natural question generation. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  296. [296] Jin Yu and JaJa Joseph F.. 2018. Learning graph-level representations with recurrent neural networks. arXiv (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.07683.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  297. [297] Rong Yu, Huang Wenbing, Xu Tingyang, and Huang Junzhou. 2020. DropEdge: Towards deep graph convolutional networks on node classification. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  298. [298] Zhou Yu, Huang Jianbin, Sun Heli, Sun Yizhou, Qiao Shaojie, and Wambura Stephen. 2019. Recurrent meta-structure for robust similarity measure in heterogeneous information networks. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 13, 6 (2019), No. 64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364226 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  299. [299] Li Yuan, Liang Xiaodan, Hu Zhiting, Chen Yinbo, and Xing Eric P.. 2019. Graph transformer. OpenReview (2019). https://openreview.net/forum?id=HJei-2RcK7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  300. [300] Lu Yuanfu, Jiang Xunqiang, Fang Yuan, and Shi Chuan. 2021. Learning to pre-train graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’21). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  301. [301] Wang Yue, Sun Yongbin, Liu Ziwei, Sarma Sanjay E., and Bronstein Michael M.. 2019. Dynamic graph CNN for learning on point clouds. ACM Transactions on Graphics 38, 5 (2019), No. 146. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326362 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  302. [302] Zhang Yue, Liu Qi, and Song Linfeng. 2018. Sentence-State LSTM for text representation. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’18), Vol. 1. ACL, 317327. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1030Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  303. [303] Li Yujia, Tarlow Daniel, Brockschmidt Marc, and Zemel Richard. 2016. Gated graph sequence neural networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’16). Caribe Hilton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  304. [304] Li Yujia, Vinyals Oriol, Dyer Chris, Pascanu Razvan, and Battaglia Peter. 2018. Learning deep generative models of graphs. In The International Conference on Learning Representations Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  305. [305] Cai Yujun, Ge Liuhao, Liu Jun, Cai Jianfei, Cham Tat-Jen, Yuan Junsong, and Thalmann Nadia Magnenat. 2019. Exploiting spatial-temporal relationships for 3d pose estimation via graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’19). IEEE, 22722281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  306. [306] Yun Seongjun, Jeong Minbyul, Kim Raehyun, Kang Jaewoo, and Kim Hyunwoo J. 2019. Graph transformer networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19), Vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  307. [307] Bai Yunsheng, Ding Hao, Bian Song, Chen Ting, Sun Yizhou, and Wang Wei. 2019. SimGNN: A neural network approach to fast graph similarity computation. In The International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’19). ACM, 384392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  308. [308] Zhang Yuyu, Chen Xinshi, Yang Yuan, Ramamurthy Arun, Li Bo, Qi Yuan, and Song Le. 2020. Efficient probabilistic logic reasoning with graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20). Addis Ababa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  309. [309] Chen Yuzhou, Gel Yulia R., and Avrachenkov Konstanin. 2020. Fractional graph convolutional networks (FGCN) for semi-supervised learning. (2020). https://openreview.net/forum?id=BygacxrFwS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  310. [310] Zhang Muhan, Jiang Shali, Cui Zhicheng, Garnett Roman, and Chen Yixin. 2019. D-VAE: A variational autoencoder for directed acyclic graphs. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19), Vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  311. [311] Peng Zhen, Huang Wenbing, Luo Minnan, Zheng Qinghua, Rong Yu, Xu Tingyang, and Huang Junzhou. 2020. Graph representation learning via graphical mutual information maximization. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’20). 259270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  312. [312] Zhang Zhen, Yang Hongxia, Bu Jiajun, Zhou Sheng, Yu Pinggang, Zhang Jianwei, Ester Martin, and Wang Can. 2018. ANRL: Attributed network representation learning via deep neural networks. In The International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’18). IJCAI Organization, 31553161. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/438 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  313. [313] Zhang Zhihong, Chen Dongdong, Wang Jianjia, Bai Lu, and Hancock Edwin R.. 2019. Quantum-based subgraph convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognition 88, 2019 (2019), 3849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.11.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  314. [314] Zhang Zhihong, Chen Dongdong, Wang Zeli, Li Heng, Bai Lu, and Hancock Edwin R.. 2019. Depth-based subgraph convolutional auto-encoder for network representation learning. Pattern Recognition 90 (2019), 363376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2019.01.045Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  315. [315] Guo Zhijiang, Zhang Yan, and Lu Wei. 2019. Attention guided graph convolutional networks for relation extraction. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’19). ACL, 241251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  316. [316] Deng Zhijie, Dong Yinpeng, and Zhu Jun. 2019. Batch virtual adversarial training for graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Machine Learning Workshop. PMLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  317. [317] Ying Zhitao, Bourgeois Dylan, You Jiaxuan, Zitnik Marinka, and Leskovec Jure. 2019. GNNExplainer: Generating explanations for graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19). Curran Associates, Inc., 92449255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  318. [318] Zhu Yanqiao, Xu Yichen, Yu Feng, Liu Qiang, Wu Shu, and Wang Liang. 2021. Graph contrastive learning with adaptive augmentation. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’21). Ljubljana, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  319. [319] Li Zhuwen, Chen Qifeng, and Koltun Vladlen. 2018. Combinatorial optimization with graph convolutional networks and guided tree search. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’18). Curran Associates, Inc., 573–546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  320. [320] Hu Ziniu, Fan Changjun, Chen Ting, Chang Kai-Wei, and Sun Yizhou. 2019. Pre-training graph neural networks for generic structural feature extraction. arXiv (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13728.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  321. [321] Hu Ziniu, Fan Changjun, Chen Ting, Chang Kai-Wei, and Sun Yizhou. 2019. Unsupervised pre-training of graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Learning Representations Workshop. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13728.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  322. [322] Hu Ziniu, Dong Yuxiao, Wang Kuansan, Chang Kai-Wei, and Sun Yizhou. 2020. GPT-GNN: Generative pre-training of graph neural networks. In The International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD’20). ACM, 11571167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403237Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  323. [323] Hu Ziniu, Dong Yuxiao, Wang Kuansan, and Sun Yizhou. 2020. Heterogeneous graph transformer. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW’20). Taipei, 27042710. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380027 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  324. [324] Liu Ziqi, Chen Chaochao, Li Longfei, Zhou Jun, Li Xiaolong, Song Le, and Qi Yuan. 2019. GeniePath: Graph neural networks with adaptive receptive paths. In The Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’19). Association for the Advances of Artificial Intelligence, 44244431. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  325. [325] Zhang Ziwei, Cui Peng, and Zhu Wenwu. 2020. Deep learning on graphs: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 34, 1 (2020), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.2981333Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  326. [326] Wu Zonghan, Pan Shirui, Chen Fengwen, Long Guodong, Zhang Chengqi, and Yu Philip S.. 2021. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32, 1 (2021), 424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  327. [327] Zou Difan, Hu Ziniu, Wang Yewen, Jiang Song, Sun Yizhou, and Gu Quanquan. 2019. Layer-dependent importance sampling for training deep and large graph convolutional networks. In The International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurPS’19), Vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Graph Neural Networks: Taxonomy, Advances, and Trends

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
        ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 13, Issue 1
        February 2022
        349 pages
        ISSN:2157-6904
        EISSN:2157-6912
        DOI:10.1145/3502429
        • Editor:
        • Huan Liu
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 January 2022
        • Accepted: 1 October 2021
        • Revised: 1 August 2021
        • Received: 1 December 2020
        Published in tist Volume 13, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • survey
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format