skip to main content
10.1145/3495243.3517024acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

MilliMirror: 3D printed reflecting surface for millimeter-wave coverage expansion

Published:14 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Next generation wireless networks embrace mmWave technology for its high capacity. Yet, mmWave radios bear a fundamental coverage limitation due to the high directionality and propagation artifacts. In this paper, we explore an economical paradigm based on 3D printing technology for mmWave coverage expansion. We propose MilliMirror, a fully passive metasurface, which can reshape and resteer mmWave beams to anomalous directions to illuminate the coverage blind spots. We develop a closed-form model to efficiently synthesize the MilliMirror design with thousands of unit elements and across a wide frequency band. We further develop an economical process based on 3D printing and metal deposition to fabricate MilliMirror. Our field test results show that MilliMirror can effectively fill the coverage holes and operate transparently to the standard mmWave beam management protocols.

References

  1. Omid Abari, Dinesh Bharadia, Austin Duffield, and Dina Katabi. 2017. Enabling High-Quality Untethered Virtual Reality. In In Proceedings of USENIX NSDI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Federico Agnoletto, Pau Castells, Emanuel Kolta, and Dennisa Nichiforov-Chuang. 2020. The economics of mmWave 5G: An assessment of total cost of ownership in the period to 2025. GSMA Intelligence (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Airfide. 2021. Airfide, a 5G Sorfware Company. https://airfidenet.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Abdulrahman Ahmed Ghaleb Amer, Syarfa Zahirah Sapuan, Nasimuddin Nasimuddin, Arokiaswami Alphones, and Nabiah Binti Zinal. 2020. A comprehensive review of metasurface structures suitable for RF energy harvesting. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 76433--76452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Venkat Arun and Hari Balakrishnan. 2020. RFocus: Beamforming using thousands of passive antennas. In In Proceedings of USENIX NSDI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. VS Asadchy, Ana Díaz-Rubio, SN Tcvetkova, D-H Kwon, Amr Elsakka, Mohamed Albooyeh, and SA Tretyakov. 2017. Flat engineered multichannel reflectors. APS Physical Review X 7, 3 (2017), 031046.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. IEEE Standards Association. 2012. IEEE Standards 802.11ad-2012: Enhancements for Very High Throughput in the 60 GHz Band.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D Berry, R Malech, and W Kennedy. 1963. The reflectarray antenna. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 11, 6 (1963), 645--651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Michael Boyarsky, Timothy Sleasman, Mohammadreza F Imani, Jonah N Gollub, and David R Smith. 2021. Electronically steered metasurface antenna. Nature Scientific reports 11, 1 (2021), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bao-Jie Chen, Huan Yi, Kung Bo Ng, Shi-Wei Qu, and Chi Hou Chan. 2016. 3D printed reflectarray antenna at 60 GHz. In In Proceedings of IEEE ISAP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lili Chen, Wenjun Hu, Kyle Jamieson, Xiaojiang Chen, Dingyi Fang, and Jeremy Gummeson. 2021. Pushing the physical limits of iot devices with programmable metasurfaces. In In Proceedings of USENIX NSDI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Youji Cong, Guonian Wang, and Zhengdong Qi. 2015. A pattern synthesis method for large planar antenna array. Progress in Electromagnetics Research M 43 (2015), 147--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. CJ Davenport and JM Rigelsford. 2014. Slanted-comb frequency selective surface for use in reducing specular scatter for TM polarization. In Proceedings of IEEE LAPC.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Paul I Deffenbaugh, Thomas M Weller, and Kenneth H Church. 2015. Fabrication and microwave characterization of 3-D printed transmission lines. IEEE Microwave and wireless components letters 25, 12 (2015), 823--825.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Sanjay Kumar Dubey and Debasis Mandal. 2021. Digitally Controlled Steered Dual Beam Pattern Synthesis of a Rectangular Planar Array Antenna in a Range of Azimuth Plane Using Evolutionary Algorithms. EMW Progress In Electromagnetics Research C 114 (2021), 185--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Manideep Dunna, Chi Zhang, Daniel Sievenpiper, and Dinesh Bharadia. 2020. ScatterMIMO: Enabling virtual MIMO with smart surfaces. In In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mario D'Auria, William J Otter, Jonathan Hazell, Brendan TW Gillatt, Callum Long-Collins, Nick M Ridler, and Stepan Lucyszyn. 2015. 3-D printed metal-pipe rectangular waveguides. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology 5, 9 (2015), 1339--1349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Caroline Gabriel. 2020. Verizon lines up three partners to address the mmWave 5G coverage challenge. https://rethinkresearch.biz/articles/verizon-lines-three-partners-address-mmwave-5g-coverage-challenge/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Dongxing Gao, Rui Yang, Dong Li, Jiacheng Li, Zhenya Lei, and Fushun Zhang. 2018. Meta-surface based convex reflectors for generating highly directive pencil-beams and fan-beams. OSA Optical Materials Express 8, 5 (2018), 1359--1367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Marco Giordani, Michele Polese, Arnab Roy, Douglas Castor, and Michele Zorzi. 2018. A tutorial on beam management for 3GPP NR at mmWave frequencies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 21, 1 (2018), 173--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Thomas H Hand, Jonah Gollub, Soji Sajuyigbe, David R Smith, and Steven A Cummer. 2008. Characterization of complementary electric field coupled resonant surfaces. AIP Applied Physics Letters 93, 21 (2008), 212504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Saif Hannan, Mohammad Tariqul Islam, Ali F Almutairi, and Mohammad Rashed Iqbal Faruque. 2020. Wide bandwidth angle-and polarization-insensitive symmetric metamaterial absorber for X and Ku band applications. Nature Scientific Reports 10, 1 (2020), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Randy L Haupt. 2010. Antenna arrays: a computational approach. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. HP. 2021. HP 3D High Reusability PA 12. https://www.materialise.com/en/manufacturing/materials/pa-12-mjf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Chongwen Huang, Sha Hu, George C Alexandropoulos, Alessio Zappone, Chau Yuen, Rui Zhang, Marco Di Renzo, and Merouane Debbah. 2020. Holographic MIMO surfaces for 6G wireless networks: Opportunities, challenges, and trends. IEEE Wireless Communications 27, 5 (2020), 118--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Yi Huang and Kevin Boyle. 2008. Antennas: from theory to practice. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruey Bing Hwang. 2000. Scattering characteristics of two-dimensionally periodic impedance surface. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 48, 10 (2000), 1521--1527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Robert W. Heath Jr. 2019. Going Toward 6G [From the Editor]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 36, 3 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. KEYCOM. 2021. Frequency change Method, Free Space Type Dielectric Constant, Dielectric Loss Tangent, Transmission attenuation (Permittivity, Dk/Df) Measurement equipment. https://www.keycom.co.jp/eproducts/dps/dps10/page.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohammad Khalaj-Amirhosseini. 2020. Phase-only synthesis of planar arrays using autocorrelation matching method. Wiley International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 30, 5 (2020), 22153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wahab Khawaja, Ozgur Ozdemir, Yavuz Yapici, Fatih Erden, and Ismail Guvenc. 2020. Coverage Enhancement for NLOS mmWave Links Using Passive Reflectors. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. B Langen, G Lober, and W+ Herzig. 1994. Reflection and transmission behaviour of building materials at 60 GHz. In In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Wireless Networks-Catching the Mobile Future.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jean-Jacques Laurin et al. 2013. Specular reflection analysis for off-specular reflectarray antennas. IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation 61, 7 (2013), 3575--3581.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wonwoo Lee, Semin Jo, Kanghyeok Lee, Hong Soo Park, Junhyuk Yang, Ha Young Hong, Changkun Park, Sun K Hong, and Hojin Lee. 2021. Single-layer phase gradient mmWave metasurface for incident angle independent focusing. Scientific reports 11, 1 (2021), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhuqi Li, Can Wu, Sigurd Wagner, James C Sturm, Naveen Verma, and Kyle Jamieson. 2021. REITS: Reflective Surface for Intelligent Transportation Systems. In In Proceedings of ACM HotMobile.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zhuqi Li, Yaxiong Xie, Longfei Shangguan, Rotman Ivan Zelaya, Jeremy Gummeson, Wenjun Hu, and Kyle Jamieson. 2019. Towards programming the radio environment with large arrays of inexpensive antennas. In In Proceedings of USENIX NSDI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. John Nolan, Kun Qian, and Xinyu Zhang. 2021. RoS: Passive Smart Surface for Roadside-to-Vehicle Communication. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Andreas E Olk, Pierre EM Macchi, and David A Powell. 2020. High-efficiency refracting millimeter-wave metasurfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 68, 7 (2020), 5453--5462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Open Signal. 2020. Quantifying the mmWave 5G Experience in the US. https://www.opensignal.com/2021/04/28/quantifying-the-mmwave-5g-experience-in-the-us.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. James M Ortega and Werner C Rheinboldt. 2000. Iterative solution of nonlinear equations in several variables. SIAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Jae-Yong Park, Wonil Seo, Sehoon Yoo, and Young-Ho Kim. 2017. Effect of Cu electroplating parameters on microvoid formation and high-speed shear strength in Sn-3.0 Ag-0.5 Cu/Cu joints. Elsevier Journal of Alloys and Compounds 724 (2017), 492--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Zhangyou Peng, Linxiao Li, Miao Wang, Zhonghao Zhang, Qi Liu, Yang Liu, and Ruoran Liu. 2016. An Effective Coverage Scheme With Passive-Reflectors for Urban Millimeter-Wave Communication. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15 (2016), 398--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Reza Rofougaran. 2021. 5G mmWave Mobility Powered by Movandi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FnWOHG64Gw.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Miguel Ruphuy and Carlos E Saavedra. 2021. 3D printed millimeter-wave beam-steering reflector using dielectric fluids. JOSA A 38, 2 (2021), 237--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Aman Samaiyar, Ahmed H Abdelrahman, and Dejan S Filipovic. 2018. Iterative Phase Correction Technique for Design of Non-Conventional Reflectarray Antennas. In In Proceedings of IEEE AP-S/URSI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Diptiranjan Samantaray and Somak Bhattacharyya. 2020. A gain-enhanced slotted patch antenna using metasurface as superstrate configuration. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 68, 9 (2020), 6548--6556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. B Schultz. 2013. 802.11 ad-WLAN at 60 GHz-A technology introduction. Rohde & Schwarz (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Virendra V Singh, Fernando Soto, Kevin Kaufmann, and Joseph Wang. 2015. Micromotor-based energy generation. Angewandte Chemie 127, 23 (2015), 7000--7003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Siradel. 2021. Vocano 5G: Propagation Modeling for 5G Network Planning. https://www.siradel.com/solutions/software/volcano-5g/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Elahe Soltanaghaei, Akarsh Prabhakara, Artur Balanuta, Matthew Anderson, Jan M Rabaey, Swarun Kumar, and Anthony Rowe. 2021. Millimetro: mmWave retro-reflective tags for accurate, long range localization. In In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Ylo E. Stahler. 1963. Corner Reflectors as Elements Passive Communication Satellites. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace 1, 2 (1963), 161--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. StrataSys. 2021. VeroClear. https://www.stratasys.com/materials/search/veroclear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. 3D Systems. 2021. VisiJet M3 Crystal. https://www.3dsystems.com/materials/visijet-m3-crystal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Xin Tan, Zhi Sun, Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, and Josep M Jornet. 2018. Enabling indoor mobile millimeter-wave networks based on smart reflect-arrays. In In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Mac E Van Valkenburg. 2001. Reference data for engineers: radio, electronics, computers and communications. Newnes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Hiroki Wakatsuchi, Sanghoon Kim, Jeremiah J Rushton, and Daniel F Sievenpiper. 2013. Waveform-dependent absorbing metasurfaces. APS Physical review letters 111, 24 (2013), 245501.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Song Wang, Jingqi Huang, Xinyu Zhang, Hyoil Kim, and Sujit Dey. 2020. X-Array: Approximating Omnidirectional Millimeter-Wave Coverage Using an Array of Phased Arrays. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Galen Watts. 2015. A surface treatment for non-specular reflection. In Proceedings of IEEE AP-S/URSI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Teng Wei and Xinyu Zhang. 2017. Pose Information Assisted 60 GHz Networks: Towards Seamless Coverage and Mobility Support. In In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Teng Wei, Anfu Zhou, and Xinyu Zhang. 2017. Facilitating Robust 60 GHz Network Deployment by Sensing Ambient Reflectors. In Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Tim Williams. 2016. EMC for product designers. Newnes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Xi Xiong, Justin Chan, Ethan Yu, Nisha Kumari, Ardalan Amiri Sani, Changxi Zheng, and Xia Zhou. 2017. Customizing indoor wireless coverage via 3D-fabricated reflectors. In In Proceedings of ACM BuildSys.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Huan Yi, Shi-Wei Qu, Kung-Bo Ng, Chi Hou Chan, and Xue Bai. 2015. 3-D printed millimeter-wave and terahertz lenses with fixed and frequency scanned beam. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 64, 2 (2015), 442--449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. R. Ivan Zelaya, William Sussman, Jeremy Gummeson, Kyle Jamieson, and Wenjun Hu. 2021. LAVA: Fine-Grained 3D Indoor Wireless Coverage for Small IoT Devices. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Hanting Zhao, Ya Shuang, Menglin Wei, Tie Jun Cui, Philipp Del Hougne, and Lianlin Li. 2020. Metasurface-assisted massive backscatter wireless communication with commodity Wi-Fi signals. Nature communications 11, 1 (2020), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Renjie Zhao, Timothy Woodford, Teng Wei, Kun Qian, and Xinyu Zhang. 2020. M-cube: A millimeter-wave massive MIMO software radio. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MilliMirror: 3D printed reflecting surface for millimeter-wave coverage expansion

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiCom '22: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking
          October 2022
          932 pages
          ISBN:9781450391818
          DOI:10.1145/3495243

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 October 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader