Naz Zarreen Zarreen Oishie
- Markus Borg, Oscar Svensson, Kristian Berg, and Daniel Hansson. 2019. SZZ Unleashed: An Open Implementation of the SZZ Algorithm - Featuring Example Usage in a Study of Just-in-Time Bug Prediction for the Jenkins Project. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques for Software Quality Evaluation (Tallinn, Estonia) (MaLTeSQuE 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340482.3342742Google Scholar
Digital Library
- G. Catolino. 2017. Just-In-Time Bug Prediction in Mobile Applications: The Domain Matters!. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 4th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft). 201–202.Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Catolino, D. Di Nucci, and F. Ferrucci. 2019. Cross-Project Just-in-Time Bug Prediction for Mobile Apps: An Empirical Assessment. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 6th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft). 99–110.Google Scholar
- Takafumi Fukushima, Yasutaka Kamei, Shane McIntosh, Kazuhiro Yamashita, and Naoyasu Ubayashi. 2014. Studying just-in-time defect prediction using cross-project models. Empirical Software Engineering 21 (05 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597075Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Kamei, T. Fukushima, S. McIntosh, K. Yamashita, N. Ubayashi, and A. E. Hassan. 2016. Studying just-in-time defect prediction using cross-project models. Empirical Software Engineering 21, 5 (2016), 2072–2106.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Kamei, E. Shihab, B. Adams, A. E. Hassan, A. Mockus, A. Sinha, and N. Ubayashi. 2013. A large-scale empirical study of just-in-time quality assurance. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 39, 6 (2013), 757–773.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chaiyakarn Khanan, Worawit Luewichana, Krissakorn Pruktharathikoon, Jirayus Jiarpakdee, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Morakot Choetkiertikul, Chaiyong Ragkhitwetsagul, and Thanwadee Sunetnanta. 2020. JITBot: An Explainable Just-in-Time Defect Prediction Bot. In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering(Virtual Event, Australia) (ASE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1336–1339. https://doi.org/10.1145/3324884.3415295Google ScholarDigital Library
- NI of Standards and Technology. 2002. The economic impacts of inadequate infrastructure for software testing. (2002).Google Scholar
- Christoffer Rosen, Ben Grawi, and Emad Shihab. 2015. Commit guru: analytics and risk prediction of software commits. 966–969. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786805.2803183Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Yang, D. Lo, X. Xia, Y. Zhang, and J. Sun. 2015. Deep Learning for Just-in-Time Defect Prediction. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security. 17–26.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Commit-Checker: A human-centric approach for adopting bug inducing commit detection using machine learning models
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
An efficient software transactional memory using commit-time invalidation
CGO '10: Proceedings of the 8th annual IEEE/ACM international symposium on Code generation and optimizationTo improve the performance of transactional memory (TM), researchers have found many eager and lazy optimizations for conflict detection, the process of determining if transactions can commit. Despite these optimizations, nearly all TMs perform one ...
DeepBugs: a learning approach to name-based bug detection
Natural language elements in source code, e.g., the names of variables and functions, convey useful information. However, most existing bug detection tools ignore this information and therefore miss some classes of bugs. The few existing name-based bug ...
Comments