skip to main content
10.1145/3524383.3524447acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating Chinese College Students’ Cognitive Load in a Gamified Foreign Language Class: A Pilot Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, gamification has gained popularity in the educational context. A considerable body of research has explored effects of this innovative instructional method on students. However, limited studies investigated how gamification design exerts influence on students’ cognitive load in language learning. In order to have a better understanding of the influence of gamification design in a foreign language class, this pilot study incorporates different game elements into instructions and activities in an English course at a Chinese university and examines students’ perceived cognitive load through semi-structured interviews. The research findings indicate that the complicated game rules and learning tasks exerted extra cognitive load, while the paper-pen based game operation did not. The findings and implications are discussed from the perspective of instructional design and gamification implementation.

References

  1. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek ’11), September 28 - 30, 2011, Tampere, Finland. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Yang Chen. 2018. Understanding how educational gamification impacts users’ behavior: A theoretical analysis. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET '18), January 6 - 8, 2018, Osaka, Japan. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 154-159. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178158.3178188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Michael D. Hanus and Jesse Fox. 2015. Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education. 80 (Jan. 2015), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Rob van Roy and Bieke Zaman. 2018. Need-supporting gamification in education: An assessment of motivational effects over time. Computers & Education. 127 (Aug. 2018), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hua Yin and Yang Chen. 2020. How gamification affects students’ engagement and language learning beliefs in pre-class learning of flipped EFL courses: A theoretical analysis. In Proceedings of the 2020 The 2nd World Symposium on Software Engineering (WSSE 2020), September 25 - 27, 2020, Chengdu, China. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1145/3425329.3425372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zamzami Zainuddin, Muhammad Shujahat, Hussein Haruna, and Samuel Kai Wah Chu. 2020. The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education. 145 (Oct. 2020), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Christopher Groening and Carmen Binnewies. 2019. “Achievement unlocked!” – The impact of digital achievements as a gamification element on motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior. 97 (Aug. 2019), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Biyun Huang, Khe Foon Hew, and Chung Kwan Lo. 2019. Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments. 27, 8 (2019), 1106-1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zamzami Zainuddin, Samuel Kai Wah Chu, Muhammad Shujahat, and Corinne Jacqueline Perera. 2020. The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review. 30 (Jun. 2020), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Claudia Schrader and Theo Bastiaens. 2012. Learning in educational computer games for novices: The impact of support provision types on virtual presence, cognitive load, and learning outcomes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 13 (May. 2012), 206-227. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/49713/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Anja Hawlitschek and Sven Joeckel. 2017. Increasing the effectiveness of digital educational games: The effects of a learning instruction on students’ learning, motivation and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior. 72 (July. 2017), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.040Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ulaş İli̇c and Yavuz Akbulut. 2019. Effect of disfluency on learning outcomes, metacognitive judgments and cognitive load in computer assisted learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior. 99 (Oct. 2019), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chin-Wen Liao, Ching-Huei Chen, and Sie-Jhih Shih. 2019. The interactivity of video and collaboration for learning achievement, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and behavior patterns in a digital game-based learning environment. Computers & Education. 133 (May. 2019), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Luying Zhang and Yang Chen. 2021. Examining the effects of gamification on Chinese college students’ foreign language anxiety: a preliminary exploration. In Proceedings of the 2021 The 4th International Conference on Big Data and Education (ICBDE'21), February 3 - 5, 2021, London, United Kingdom. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451400.3451401Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Paul A. Kirschner. 2002. Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction. 12 (Feb. 2002), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tamara van Gog, Fred Paas, and John Sweller. 2010. Cognitive load theory: advances in research on worked examples, animations, and cognitive load measurement. Educational Psychology Review. 22 (Oct. 2010), 375-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9145-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Paul Chandller and John Sweller. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8 (1991), 293-332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. John Sweller, Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer, and Fred G. W. C. Paas. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10 (Sept. 1998), 251-296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wen-Hao Huang. 2011. Evaluating learners’ motivational and cognitive processing in an online game-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior. 27 (Mar. 2011), 694-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Duygu Mutlu-Bayraktar, Veysel Cosgun, and Tugba Altan. 2019. Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 141 (Nov. 2019), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103618Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Øistein Anmarkruda, Anette Andresena, and Ivar Bråten. 2019. Cognitive load and working memory in multimedia learning: Conceptual and measurement issues. Educational Psychologist. 54 (Feb. 2019), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1554484Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Roland Brunken, Jan L. Plass, and Detlev Leutner. 2003. Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist. 38 (2003), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. G. Korakakis, E. A. Pavlatou, J. A. Palyvos, and N. Spyrellis. 2009. 3D visualization types in multimedia applications for science learning: A case study for 8th grade students in Greece. Computers & Education. 52 (Feb. 2009), 390-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kevin Werbach and Dan Hunter. 2012. For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Wharton Digital Press. Philadelphia, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Luis de-Marcos, Eva Garcia-Lopez, and Antonio Garcia-Cabot. 2016. On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers & Education. 95 (April. 2016), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Vladan Devedžić and Jelena Jovanović. 2015. Developing open badges: A comprehensive approach. Educational Technology Research & Development. 63 (May. 2015), 603-620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9388-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu Ding, ChanMin Kim, and Michael Orey. 2020. Design of gamified asynchronous online discussions. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 29 (Aug. 2020), 631-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1801495Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ana Carolina Tomé Klock, Isabela Gasparini, Marcelo Soares Pimenta, and Juho Hamari. 2020. Tailored gamification: A review of literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 144 (Dec. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102495Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Steve Nebel, Sascha Schneider, and Günter Daniel Rey. 2016. From duels to classroom competition: Social competition and learning in educational videogames within different group sizes. Computers in Human Behavior. 55 (Feb. 2016), 384-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.035Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Gabriel Barata, Sandra Gama, Manuel J. Fonseca, and Daniel Gonçalves. 2013. Improving student creativity with gamification and virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Gamification '13), October 2 - 4, 2013, Toronto Ontario, Canada. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Xiaolan Peng, Hui Chen, Lan Wang, Feng Tian, and Hongan Wang. 2020. Talking head-based L2 pronunciation training: Impact on achievement emotions, cognitive load, and their relationships with learning performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 36 (Jun. 2020), 1487-1502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1752476Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Investigating Chinese College Students’ Cognitive Load in a Gamified Foreign Language Class: A Pilot Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBDE '22: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Big Data and Education
      February 2022
      465 pages
      ISBN:9781450395793
      DOI:10.1145/3524383

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format