skip to main content
10.1145/3530190.3542932acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompassConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Demo: The DIMPACT Tool for Environmental Assessment of Digital Services

Published:29 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the DIMPACT /dimpækt/ tool for environmental assessments of digital services. The tool enables digital media providers to calculate energy consumption and associated environmental impact across the entire product system, including datacentres, networks and user devices. It is based on accepted standard methodologies and applies state-of-the-art research. The DIMPACT tool is used by major media organisations for environmental reporting and to support development of strategies to reduce environmental impact. It has significantly advanced the knowledge of carbon emissions of video streaming. The tool is part of the wider DIMPACT project of companies that collaborate to exchange knowledge, engage suppliers and expand the scope of the tool. In this text we provide an overview of workings of tool and its methodological foundation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

COMPASS_Demo_01_Schien_2022-06-29.mp4

mp4

106.2 MB

References

  1. Joshua Aslan, Kieren Mayers, Jonathan G. Koomey, and Chris France. 2018. Electricity intensity of internet data transmission untangling the estimates. Journal of Industrial Ecology 22, 4 (2018), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12630Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Carbon Trust. 2021. Carbon impact of video streaming. Technical Report. https://prod-drupal-files.storage.googleapis.com/documents/resource/public/Carbon-impact-of-video-streaming.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carbon Trust and Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI). 2017. GHG Protocol ICT Sector Guidance. Technical Report. https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/GHGP-ICTSG - ALL Chapters.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Google. 2021. Google Cloud Carbon Footprint. https://cloud.google.com/carbon-footprintGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ICTFootprint.EU. 2018. ICTFootprint.EU Self-Assessment Tool. https://ictfootprint.eu/en/self-assessment-toolGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. International Organization For Standardization. 2006. ISO 14044: Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jens Malmodin and Dag Lund. 2018. The Energy and Carbon Footprint of the Global ICT and E+M Sectors 2010 – 2015. (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093027Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. David Mytton. 2020. Assessing the suitability of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol for calculation of emissions from public cloud computing workloads. Journal of Cloud Computing 9, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-020-00185-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Netflix. 2021. The True Climate Impact of Streaming. https://about.netflix.com/en/news/the-true-climate-impact-of-streamingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chris Preist, Daniel Schien, and Paul Shabajee. 2019. Evaluating Sustainable Interaction Design of Digital Services: The Case of YouTube. In CHI’19 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300627Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Daniel Schien, Paul Shabajee, Jigna Chandaria, Dan Williams, and Chris Preist. 2021. Using behavioural data to assess the environmental impact of electricity consumption of alternate television service distribution platforms. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 91, September (2021), 106661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106661Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Daniel Schien, Paul Shabajee, James Wickenden, Tristan Warren, and Chris Preist. 2022. Demo: The EAM Environmental Modelling and Assessment Toolkit. In ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS). Seattle, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530190.3542933Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shibsted. 2021. Shibsted Environmental Report 2021. https://static.schibsted.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/07102011/Sustainability-Report-2021-FINAL.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    COMPASS '22: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
    June 2022
    710 pages
    ISBN:9781450393478
    DOI:10.1145/3530190

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 June 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • demonstration
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate25of50submissions,50%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)47
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format