skip to main content
10.1145/3531028.3531043acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design of 0.6v 0.01mm2 Sub Sampling PLL Based On Dynamic Double Loops

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to solve the power consumption and cost problems caused by the massive nodes of the Internet of things chip, a new sub sampling PLL circuit is proposed in this paper. The circuit uses dynamic double loop technology to solve the harmonic locking problem of sub sampling, uses leakage compensation technology to reduce the capacitance area, and uses high matching sub sampling charge pump technology to reduce spurious. The test results show that when the output frequency is 1920MHz, the RMS jitter is less than 2.5ps, the power consumption is 0.8mW at 0.6V power supply voltage, and the area is only 105μm×95μm, which meets the clock requirements of the Internet of things chip system.

References

  1. Cheng, Kuo-Hsing, "A 0.5-V 0.4–2.24-GHz inductorless phase-locked loop in a system-on-chip." IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 58.5 (2010): 849-859Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Liu B, Zhang Y, Qiu J, A fully synthesizable fractional-N MDLL with zero-order interpolation-based DTC nonlinearity calibration and two-step hybrid phase offset calibration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 2020, 68(2): 603-616.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Liu B, Zhang Y, Qiu J, A fully-synthesizable fractional-N injection-locked PLL for digital clocking with triangle/sawtooth spread-spectrum modulation capability in 5-nm CMOS[J]. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Letters, 2020, 3: 34-37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lee M, Kim S, Park H J, A 0.0043-mm 2 0.3–1.2-V frequency-scalable synthesized fractional-N digital PLL with a speculative dual-referenced interpolating TDC[J]. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2018, 54(1): 99-108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Zhu J, Choi W S, Hanumolu P K. A 0.016 mm 2 0.26-$ \ mu $ W/MHz 60–240-MHz Digital PLL With Delay-Modulating Clock Buffer in 65 nm CMOS[J]. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2019, 54(8): 2186-2194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Adesina N O, Srivastava A, Khan A U, An Ultra-Low Power MOS2 Tunnel Field Effect Transistor PLL Design for IoT Applications[C] 2021 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS). IEEE, 2021: 1-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Park B, Kwon K. 2.4-GHz Bluetooth low energy receiver employing new quadrature low-noise amplifier for low-power low-voltage IoT applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2020, 69(3): 1887-1895.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Z. Zhang, J. Yang, L. Liu, P. Feng, J. Liu, and N. Wu, “A 0.9–2.25-GHz sub-0.2-mW/GHz compact low-voltage low-power hybrid digital PLL with loop bandwidth-tracking technique,” IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 933–944, May 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T.-H. Tsai, R.-B. Sheen, C.-H. Chang, and R. B. Staszewski, “A 0.2 GHz to 4 GHz hybrid PLL (ADPLL/charge-pump-PLL) in 7 nm FinFET CMOS featuring 0.619 PS integrated jitter and 0.6 US settling time at 2.3 mW,” in Symp. VLSI Circuits Dig. Tech. Papers, Jun. 2018, pp. 183–184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Pourmousavian, F.-W. Kuo, T. Siriburanon, M. Babaie, and R. B. Staszewski, “A 0.5-V 1.6-mW 2.4-GHz fractional-N all-digital PLL for Bluetooth LE with PVT-insensitive TDC using switched capacitor doubler in 28-nm CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2572–2583, Sep. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gao X , Klumperink E , Socci G , Spur Reduction Techniques for Phase-Locked Loops Exploiting A Sub-Sampling Phase Detector[J]. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2010, 45(9):1809-1821.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Szortyka V , Shi Q , Raczkowski K , 21.4 A 42mW 230fs-jitter sub-sampling 60GHz PLL in 40nm CMOS[C]// Solid-state Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiang B, Fan Y, Ayers J, A 0.5 V-to-0.9 V 0.2 GHz-to-5GHz ultra-low-power digitally-assisted analog ring PLL with less than 200ns lock time in 22nm FinFET CMOS technology[C]//2020 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). IEEE, 2020: 1-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan, , “Digital Leakage Compensation for a Low-Power and Low Jitter 0.5-to-5GHz PLL in 10nm FinFET CMOS Technology”, ISSCC, pp. 320-321, Feb. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Lee, , “A 0.3-to-1.2V Frequency-Scalable Fractional-N ADPLL with a Speculative Dual-Referenced Interpolating TDC”, ISSCC, pp. 122- 123, Feb. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. Elkholy, S. Saxena, R. K. Nandwana, A. Elshazly, and P. K. Hanumolu, “A 2.0-5.5 GHz wide bandwidth ring-based digital fractional-N PLL with extended range multi-modulus divider,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1771–1784, Dec. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Moon J W, Choi K C, Choi W Y. A 0.4-V, 90∼350-MHz PLL With an Active Loop-Filter Charge Pump[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 2014, 61(5): 319-323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICECC '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control Engineering
    March 2022
    154 pages
    ISBN:9781450395847
    DOI:10.1145/3531028

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format