skip to main content
10.1145/3532106.3533478acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Blockchain and Cryptocurrency in Human Computer Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a systematic literature review of cryptocurrency and blockchain research in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) published between 2014 and 2021. We aim to provide an overview of the field, consolidate existing knowledge, and chart paths for future research. Our analysis of 99 articles identifies six major themes: (1) the role of trust, (2) understanding motivation, risk, and perception of cryptocurrencies, (3) cryptocurrency wallets, (4) engaging users with blockchain, (5) using blockchain for application-specific use cases, and (6) support tools for blockchain. We discuss the focus of the existing research body and juxtapose it to the changing landscape of emerging blockchain technologies to highlight future research avenues for HCI and interaction design. With this review, we identify key aspects where interaction design is critical for the adoption of blockchain systems. Doing so, we provide a starting point for new scholars and designers and help them position future contributions.

References

  1. Aydin Abadi, Jin Xiao, Roberto Metere, and Richard Shillcock. 2021. ValuED: A Blockchain-based Trading Platform to Encourage Student Engagement in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/na2quGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Svetlana Abramova, Artemij Voskobojnikov, Konstantin Beznosov, and Rainer Böhme. 2021. Bits Under the Mattress: Understanding Different Risk Perceptions and Security Behaviors of Crypto-Asset Users. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 692, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Antonio Welligton S. Abreu, Emanuel F. Coutinho, and Carla I. M. Bezerra. 2020. A Blockchain-Based Architecture for Query and Registration of Student Degree Certificates. In Proceedings of the 14th Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures, and Reuse (Natal, Brazil) (SBCARS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3425269.3425285Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 179–211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Emad Almutairi and Shiroq Al-Megren. 2019. Usability and Security Analysis of the KeepKey Wallet. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOC.2019.8751451Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Omar Alqaryouti, Nur Siyam, Zainab Alkashri, and Khaled Shaalan. 2020. Cryptocurrency Usage Impact on Perceived Benefits and Users’ Behaviour. In Information Systems(Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing), Marinos Themistocleous and Maria Papadaki (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44322-1_10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Omar Alqaryouti, Nur Siyam, Zainab Alkashri, and Khaled Shaalan. 2020. Users’ Knowledge and Motivation on Using Cryptocurrency. In Information Systems(Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing), Marinos Themistocleous and Maria Papadaki (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44322-1_9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Abdulla Alshamsi and Prof. Peter Andras. 2019. User perception of Bitcoin usability and security across novice users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 126 (2019), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.02.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mehmet Aydin Baytaş, Aykut Coşkun, Asim Evren Yantaç, and Morten Fjeld. 2018. Towards Materials for Computational Heirlooms: Blockchains and Wristwatches. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196778Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Juan Benet. 2018. What Exactly is Web3? by Juan Benet at Web3 Summit 2018 (Video). Retrieved 2021-12-13 from https://youtu.be/l44z35vabvA (Video).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nicola J. Bidwell, Chris Elsden, Ludwig Trotter, Josh Hallwright, Sadie Moore, Kate Jeite-Delbridge, Mike Harding, Peter Shaw, Nigel Davies, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2021. A Right Time to Give: Beyond Saving Time in Automated Conditional Donations. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 49, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. John Brooke. 1996. SUS: a ’quick and dirty’ usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry(1996), 189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Karoline Busse, Mohammad Tahaei, Katharina Krombholz, Emanuel von Zezschwitz, Matthew Smith, Jing Tian, and Wenyuan Xu. 2020. Cash, Cards or Cryptocurrencies? A Study of Payment Culture in Four Countries. In 2020 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS PW). 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSPW51379.2020.00035Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Vitalik Buterin 2013. Ethereum white paper. GitHub repository 1(2013), 22–23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Irvin Steve Cardenas and Jong Hoon Kim. 2018. Robot-Human Agreements and Financial Transactions Enabled by a Blockchain and Smart Contracts. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 337–338. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3177818Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Irvin Steve Cardenas and Jong-Hoon Kim. 2020. Robonomics: The Study of Robot-Human Peer-to-Peer Financial Transactions and Agreements. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3380735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. You-Ping Chen and Ju-Chun Ko. 2019. CryptoAR Wallet: A Blockchain Cryptocurrency Wallet Application That Uses Augmented Reality for On-Chain User Data Display. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Taipei, Taiwan) (MobileHCI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 39, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338286.3344386Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. You-Ping Chen and Ju-Chun Ko. 2020. The Impact of AR Filter Combines Blockchain Virtual Online Pets and brings Blockchain into our lives. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Taiwan (ICCE-Taiwan). 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-Taiwan49838.2020.9258040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Chun-Wei Chiang, Eber Betanzos, and Saiph Savage. 2018. Exploring Blockchain for Trustful Collaborations between Immigrants and Governments. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188660Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Chun-Wei Chiang, Eber Betanzos, and Saiph Savage. 2019. The Challenges and Trends of Deploying Blockchain in the Real World for the Users’ Need. Journal of Cyberspace Studies 3, 2 (2019), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcss.2019.72454Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nazli Cila, Gabriele Ferri, Martijn de Waal, Inte Gloerich, and Tara Karpinski. 2020. The Blockchain and the Commons: Dilemmas in the Design of Local Platforms. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376660Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Coinmarketcap. 2022. Top 100 Cryptocurrencies by Market Capitalization. Retrieved Feb 7, 2022 from https://coinmarketcap.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. ConsenSys. 2021. Web 3 Report Q3 2021. ConsenSys. Retrieved 2022-02-11 from https://consensys.net/reports/web3-report-q3-2021/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Karlene Cousins, Hemang Subramanian, and Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh. 2019. A Value-sensitive Design Perspective of Cryptocurrencies: A Research Agenda. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 45, 1 (Dec 2019). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04527Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Barnaby Craggs and Awais Rashid. 2019. Trust Beyond Computation Alone: Human Aspects of Trust in Blockchain Technologies. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS). 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIS.2019.00011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Fred D Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly (1989), 319–340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Raynor de Best. 2022. Bitcoin Market Dominance. Statista. Retrieved 2022-02-11 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1269669/bitcoin-dominance-historical-development/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Chris Dixon and Eddy Lazzarin. 2020. The Crypto Price-Innovation Cycle. Andreessen Horowitz. Retrieved 2021-12-13 from https://a16z.com/2020/05/15/the-crypto-price-innovation-cycle/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelisiwe Peaceness Dlamini, Mfundo Shakes Scott, and Kishor Krishnan Nair. 2017. Development of an SMS system used to access Bitcoin wallets. In 2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23919/ISTAFRICA.2017.8102316Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Janna Lynn Dupree, Richard Devries, Daniel M. Berry, and Edward Lank. 2016. Privacy Personas: Clustering Users via Attitudes and Behaviors toward Security Practices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5228–5239. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Susen Döbelt and Maria Kreußlein. 2020. Peer-to-Peer Traded Energy: Prosumer and Consumer Focus Groups about a Self-consumption Community Scenario. In HCI International 2020 - Posters(Communications in Computer and Information Science), Constantine Stephanidis and Margherita Antona (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50726-8_17Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Dmitry Efanov and Pavel Roschin. 2018. The all-pervasiveness of the blockchain technology. Procedia Computer Science 123 (2018), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Chris Elsden, Inte Gloerich, Anne Spaa, John Vines, and Martijn de Waal. 2019. Making the Blockchain Civic. Interactions 26, 2 (Feb 2019), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3305364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Chris Elsden, Arthi Manohar, Jo Briggs, Mike Harding, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2018. Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Chris Elsden, Kate Symons, Raluca Bunduchi, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2019. Sorting Out Valuation in the Charity Shop: Designing for Data-Driven Innovation through Value Translation. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 109 (nov 2019), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Chris Elsden, Kate Symons, Chris Speed, John Vines, and Anne Spaa. 2019. Searching for an OxChain: Co-designing blockchain applications for charitable giving. Ubiquity: The Journal of Pervasive Media 6, 1 (Nov 2019), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1386/ubiq_00002_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Chris Elsden, Ludwig Trotter, Mike Harding, Nigel Davies, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2019. Programmable Donations: Exploring Escrow-Based Conditional Giving. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300609Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Shayan Eskandari, David Barrera, Elizabeth Stobert, and Jeremy Clark. 2015. A First Look at the Usability of Bitcoin Key Management. Proceedings 2015 Workshop on Usable Security (2015). https://doi.org/10.14722/usec.2015.23015Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Shayan Eskandari, Jeremy Clark, and Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj. 2016. Buy Your Coffee with Bitcoin: Real-World Deployment of a Bitcoin Point of Sale Terminal. In 2016 Intl IEEE Conferences on Ubiquitous Intelligence Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Cloud and Big Data Computing, Internet of People, and Smart World Congress (UIC/ATC/ScalCom/CBDCom/IoP/SmartWorld). 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC-ScalCom-CBDCom-IoP-SmartWorld.2016.0073Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Youssef Faqir-Rhazoui, Miller-Janny Ariza-Garzón, Javier Arroyo, and Samer Hassan. 2021. Effect of the Gas Price Surges on User Activity in the DAOs of the Ethereum Blockchain. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451755Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Anton Fedosov, Agon Bexheti, Egor Ermolaev, and Marc Langheinrich. 2018. Sharing Physical Objects Using Smart Contracts. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct(Barcelona, Spain) (MobileHCI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236112.3236162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Md Sadek Ferdous, Farida Chowdhury, and Madini O. Alassafi. 2019. In Search of Self-Sovereign Identity Leveraging Blockchain Technology. IEEE Access 7(2019), 103059–103079. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2931173Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Silke Finken and Louisa Heiduk. 2021. Factors influencing the acceptance of proximity mobile payment in Germany: The example of Apple Pay. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems 15, 1 (2021), 92–108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Marcus Foth. 2017. The Promise of Blockchain Technology for Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) (OZCHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152771.3156168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Allan Fowler and Johanna Pirker. 2021. Tokenfication - The Potential of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) for Game Development. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450337.3483501Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Michael Froehlich, Philipp Hulm, and Florian Alt. 2021. Under Pressure. A User-Centered Threat Model for Cryptocurrency Owners. In 2021 the 4th International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications (Xi’an, China) (ICBTA 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510487.3510494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Michael Froehlich, Charlotte Kobiella, Albrecht Schmidt, and Florian Alt. 2021. Is It Better With Onboarding? Improving First-Time Cryptocurrency App Experiences. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Michael Froehlich, Maurizio Raphael Wagenhaus, Albrecht Schmidt, and Florian Alt. 2021. Don’t Stop Me Now! Exploring Challenges Of First-Time Cryptocurrency Users. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Michael Fröhlich, Felix Gutjahr, and Florian Alt. 2020. Don’t Lose Your Coin! Investigating Security Practices of Cryptocurrency Users. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1751–1763. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Xianyi Gao, Gradeigh D. Clark, and Janne Lindqvist. 2016. Of Two Minds, Multiple Addresses, and One Ledger: Characterizing Opinions, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Bitcoin Across Users and Non-Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1656–1668. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Leonhard Glomann, Maximilian Schmid, and Nika Kitajewa. 2020. Improving the Blockchain User Experience - An Approach to Address Blockchain Mass Adoption Issues from a Human-Centred Perspective. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering(Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing), Tareq Ahram (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_60Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Michael Heidt, Arne Berger, and Andreas Bischof. 2019. Blockchain and Trust: A Practice-Based Inquiry. In HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. eCommerce and Consumer Behavior(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Fiona Fui-Hoon Nahand Keng Siau (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22335-9_10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Michael Heidt, Andreas Bischof, and Arne Berger. 2019. Interactional Aesthetics of Blockchain Technology. In HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. eCommerce and Consumer Behavior(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Fiona Fui-Hoon Nahand Keng Siau (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22335-9_9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Sara Heitlinger, Lara Houston, Alex Taylor, and Ruth Catlow. 2021. Algorithmic Food Justice: Co-Designing More-than-Human Blockchain Futures for the Food Commons. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 305, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Mitchell Hentges, Sheldon Roddick, and Haytham Elmiligi. 2017. Fambit: A Promising Solution to Support Open Educational Resources Initiatives. In Proceedings of the 22nd Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (Abbotsford, BC, Canada) (WCCCE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3085585.3085589Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Tani Hossain, Tasniah Mohiuddin, A. M. Shahed Hasan, Muhammad Nazrul Islam, and Syed Akhter Hossain. 2021. Designing and Developing Graphical User Interface for the MultiChain Blockchain: Towards Incorporating HCI in Blockchain. In Intelligent Systems Design and Applications(Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing), Ajith Abraham, Vincenzo Piuri, Niketa Gandhi, Patrick Siarry, Arturas Kaklauskas, and Ana Madureira (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71187-0_41Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Huawei Huang, Wei Kong, Sicong Zhou, Zibin Zheng, and Song Guo. 2021. A Survey of State-of-the-Art on Blockchains: Theories, Modelings, and Tools. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 2, Article 44 (mar 2021), 42 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Johannes Huebner, Remo Manuel Frey, Christian Ammendola, Elgar Fleisch, and Alexander Ilic. 2018. What People Like in Mobile Finance Apps: An Analysis of User Reviews. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Cairo, Egypt) (MUM 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282894.3282895Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Sinh Huynh, Kenny Tsu Wei Choo, Rajesh Krishna Balan, and Youngki Lee. 2019. CryptoCurrency Mining on Mobile as an Alternative Monetization Approach. In Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) (HotMobile ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301293.3302372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Karim Jabbar and Pernille Bjørn. 2018. Infrastructural Grind: Introducing Blockchain Technology in the Shipping Domain. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3148345Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Karim Jabbar and Pernille Bjørn. 2019. Blockchain Assemblages: Whiteboxing Technology and Transforming Infrastructural Imaginaries. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300496Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Eaman Jahani, Peter M. Krafft, Yoshihiko Suhara, Esteban Moro, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2018. ScamCoins, S*** Posters, and the Search for the Next BitcoinTM: Collective Sensemaking in Cryptocurrency Discussions. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 79 (nov 2018), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274348Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Hyeji Jang, Sung H. Han, and Ju Hwan Kim. 2020. User Perspectives on Blockchain Technology: User-Centered Evaluation and Design Strategies for DApps. IEEE Access 8(2020), 226213–226223. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042822Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Hyeji Jang, Sung H. Han, Ju Hwan Kim, and Kimin Kown. 2020. Identifying and Improving Usability Problems of Cryptocurrency Exchange Mobile Applications Through Heuristic Evaluation. In Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology(Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing), Tareq Ahramand Christianne Falcão (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Hyeji Jang, Sung H. Han, Ju Hwan Kim, and Kimin Kwon. 2021. Usability Evaluation for Cryptocurrency Exchange. In Convergence of Ergonomics and Design(Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing), Alma Maria Jennifer Gutierrez, Ravindra S. Goonetilleke, and Rex Aurellius C. Robielos (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 192–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63335-6_20Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Ali Kazerani, Domenic Rosati, and Brian Lesser. 2017. Determining the Usability of Bitcoin for Beginners Using Change Tip and Coinbase. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication(Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) (SIGDOC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3121113.3121125Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Denisa Reshef Kera, Petr Šourek, Mateusz Kraiński, Yair Reshef, Juan Manuel Corchado Rodríguez, and Iva Magdalena Knobloch. 2019. Lithopia: Prototyping Blockchain Futures. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312896Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Evan Kereiakes, Marco Di Maggio Do Kwon, and Nicholas Platias. 2019. Terra money: Stability and adoption.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Irni Eliana Khairuddin and Corina Sas. 2019. An Exploration of Bitcoin Mining Practices: Miners’ Trust Challenges and Motivations. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300859Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Irni Eliana Khairuddin, Corina Sas, Sarah Clinch, and Nigel Davies. 2016. Exploring Motivations for Bitcoin Technology Usage. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2872–2878. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892500Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Irni Eliana Khairuddin, Corina Sas, and Chris Speed. 2019. BlocKit: A Physical Kit for Materializing and Designing for Blockchain Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1449–1462. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322370Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Duoaa Khalifa, Nadya Abdel Madjid, and Davor Svetinovic. 2019. Trust Requirements in Blockchain Systems: A Preliminary Study. In 2019 Sixth International Conference on Software Defined Systems (SDS). 310–313. https://doi.org/10.1109/SDS.2019.8768490Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Hafiz M Mudassar Khan, Waqas Saeed, M Waseem Iqbal, Akbar Ali, Maria Zuraiz, M Naveed Shahzad, and M Ahmed. 2021. The Promises of Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies Technology for Architecture and Interaction Design. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering 10, 3(2021), 2651–2657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Christoph Kinkeldey, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Tanja Blascheck, and Petra Isenberg. 2022. BitConduite: Exploratory Visual Analysis of Entity Activity on the Bitcoin Network. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 42, 1 (2022), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2021.3070303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Megan Knittel, Shelby Pitts, and Rick Wash. 2019. ”The Most Trustworthy Coin”: How Ideological Tensions Drive Trust in Bitcoin. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 36 (nov 2019), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359138Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Megan L. Knittel and Rick Wash. 2019. How ”True Bitcoiners” Work on Reddit to Maintain Bitcoin. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312969Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Peter M. Krafft, Nicolas Della Penna, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2018. An Experimental Study of Cryptocurrency Market Dynamics. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174179Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Katharina Krombholz, Aljosha Judmayer, Matthias Gusenbauer, and Edgar Weippl. 2017. The Other Side of the Coin: User Experiences with Bitcoin Security and Privacy. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Jens Grossklagsand Bart Preneel (Eds.). Springer, 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54970-4_33Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Ponnurangam Kumaraguru and Lf Cranor. 2005. Privacy indexes: A survey of westin’s studies. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University Tech. rep., December(2005), 1–22. http://repository.cmu.edu/isr%5Cnhttp://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/CMU-ISRI-05-138.pdf%5Cnhttp://repository.cmu.edu/isr/856/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Kimin Kwon, Sung H. Han, Hyeji Jang, and Ju Hwan Kim. 2021. Usability in a Token-Based Ecosystem. In Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology(Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems), Tareq Z. Ahram and Christianne S. Falcão (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 880–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80091-8_104Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Minha Lee, Lily Frank, and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2021. Brokerbot: A Cryptocurrency Chatbot in the Social-technical Gap of Trust. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30, 1 (2021), 79–117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Younghwa Lee, Kenneth A Kozar, and Kai RT Larsen. 2003. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for information systems 12, 1(2003), 50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Caitlin Lustig. 2019. Intersecting Imaginaries: Visions of Decentralized Autonomous Systems. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 210 (Nov 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Caitlin Lustig and Bonnie Nardi. 2015. Algorithmic authority: The case of Bitcoin. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 743–752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Julia Magas. 2020. Women in Blockchain: Has Gender Distribution Come to the Crypto Market?Retrieved 2022-02-11 from https://cointelegraph.com/news/women-in-crypto-has-gender-consensus-come-to-the-marketGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Alexandra Mai, Katharina Pfeffer, Matthias Gusenbauer, Edgar Weippl, and Katharina Krombholz. 2020. User Mental Models of Cryptocurrency Systems - A Grounded Theory Approach. In Sixteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2020). USENIX Association, 341–358. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2020/presentation/maiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Arthi Manohar and Jo Briggs. 2018. Designing InWith Black Box Technologies and PD. DRS Biennial Conference Series (Jun 2018). https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2018/researchpapers/170Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Jens Mattke, Christian Maier, and Lea Reis. 2020. Is Cryptocurrency Money? Three Empirical Studies Analyzing Medium of Exchange, Store of Value and Unit of Account. In Proceedings of the 2020 on Computers and People Research Conference (Nuremberg, Germany) (SIGMIS-CPR’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3378539.3393859Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Deborah Maxwell, Chris Speed, and Dug Campbell. 2015. ’Effing’ the Ineffable: Opening up Understandings of the Blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference (Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom) (British HCI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 208–209. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Arne Meeuw, Sandro Schopfer, Benjamin Ryder, and Felix Wortmann. 2018. LokalPower: Enabling Local Energy Markets with User-Driven Engagement. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Eva Meyer, Isabell M Welpe, and Philipp G Sandner. 2021. Decentralized Finance—A systematic literature review and research directions. Available at SSRN 4016497(2021). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4016497Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, and Lesley A Stewart. 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews 4, 1 (2015), 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Md Moniruzzaman, Farida Chowdhury, and Md Sadek Ferdous. 2020. Examining Usability Issues in Blockchain-Based Cryptocurrency Wallets. In Cyber Security and Computer Science(Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Touhid Bhuiyan, Md. Mostafijur Rahman, and Md. Asraf Ali (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52856-0_50Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Gianmaria Del Monte, Diego Pennino, and Maurizio Pizzonia. 2020. Scaling Blockchains without Giving up Decentralization and Security: A Solution to the Blockchain Scalability Trilemma. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems (London, United Kingdom) (CryBlock ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410699.3413800Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Nitin Naik and Paul Jenkins. 2020. uPort Open-Source Identity Management System: An Assessment of Self-Sovereign Identity and User-Centric Data Platform Built on Blockchain. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE). 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE49799.2020.9272223Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review(2008), 21260.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’90). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Viktor Nikolouzou Evgenia, Paggio and Dekker Marnix. 2021. Digital Identity: Leveraging the SSI Concept to Build Trust. Technical Report. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Bettina Nissen, Larissa Pschetz, Dave Murray-Rust, Hadi Mehrpouya, Shaune Oosthuizen, and Chris Speed. 2018. GeoCoin: Supporting Ideation and Collaborative Design with Smart Contracts. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173737Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Kevin O’Leary, Philip O’Reilly, Joseph Feller, Rob Gleasure, Shanping Li, and Jerry Cristoforo. 2017. Exploring the Application of Blockchain Technology to Combat the Effects of Social Loafing in Cross Functional Group Projects. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (Galway, Ireland) (OpenSym ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125433.3125464Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Say Keat Ooi, Chai Aun Ooi, Jasmine A. L. Yeap, and Tok Hao Goh. 2021. Embracing Bitcoin: users’ perceived security and trust. Quality & Quantity 55, 4 (Aug 2021), 1219–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01055-wGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. Andreea-Elena Panait. 2020. Is the user identity perception influenced by the blockchain technology?. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI). 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI49825.2020.9280530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Erik Pescara, Ilya Fillipov, and Michael Beigl. 2019. StockSense: A Wrist-Worn Vibrotactile Display for Tracking Volatile Markets. In Proceedings of the 10th Augmented Human International Conference 2019 (Reims, France) (AH2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311823.3311834Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Ingrid Pettersson, Florian Lachner, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Andreas Butz. 2018. A Bermuda Triangle? A Review of Method Application and Triangulation in User Experience Evaluation. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174035Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Serguei Popov. 2018. The tangle. White paper 1, 3 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Larissa Pschetz, Billy Dixon, Kruakae Pothong, Arlene Bailey, Allister Glean, Luis Lourenço Soares, and Jessica A. Enright. 2020. Designing Distributed Ledger Technologies for Social Change: The Case of CariCrop. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. punk6529. 2021. A Guide to NFT Twitter Terminology. Retrieved 2022-02-11 from https://www.one37pm.com/nft/art/nft-twitter-meanings-definitionsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Bagus Anugrah Ramadhan and Billy Muhamad Iqbal. 2018. User Experience Evaluation on the Cryptocurrency Website by Trust Aspect. In 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS), Vol. 3. 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIBMS.2018.8550019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  110. Anita Ramaswamy and Natasha Mascarenhas. 2021. ConstitutionDAO’s bold crypto bid for US Constitution falls short. Retrieved 2022-02-11 from https://techcrunch.com/2021/11/18/constitutiondaos-bold-crypto-bid-for-us-constitution-falls-short/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Jonathan Rankin, Chris Elsden, Ian Sibbald, Alan Stevenson, John Vines, and Chris Speed. 2020. PizzaBlock: Designing Artefacts and Roleplay to Understand Decentralised Identity Management Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1593–1606. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. Ronald W Rogers. 1975. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The journal of psychology 91, 1 (1975), 93–114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. John Rooksby and Kristiyan Dimitrov. 2019. Trustless education? A blockchain system for university grades1. Ubiquity: The Journal of Pervasive Media 6, 1 (Nov 2019), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1386/ubiq_00010_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Corina Sas and Irni Eliana Khairuddin. 2015. Exploring Trust in Bitcoin Technology: A Framework for HCI Research. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (Parkville, VIC, Australia) (OzCHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Corina Sas and Irni Eliana Khairuddin. 2017. Design for Trust: An Exploration of the Challenges and Opportunities of Bitcoin Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6499–6510. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025886Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Sabrina Scuri, Gergana Tasheva, Luísa Barros, and Nuno Jardim Nunes. 2019. An HCI Perspective on Distributed Ledger Technologies for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), David Lamas, Fernando Loizides, Lennart Nacke, Helen Petrie, Marco Winckler, and Panayiotis Zaphiris (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29387-1_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Aamna Al Shehhi, Mayada Oudah, and Zeyar Aung. 2014. Investigating factors behind choosing a cryptocurrency. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 1443–1447. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058877Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  118. Maria Shen and Avichal Garg. 2022. Developer Report 2021. Electric Capital. Retrieved 2022-02-11 from https://github.com/electric-capital/developer-reports/blob/master/dev_report_2021_updated_012622.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Quinten Stokkink and Johan Pouwelse. 2018. Deployment of a Blockchain-Based Self-Sovereign Identity. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData). 1336–1342. https://doi.org/10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00230Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Yujing Sun, Hao Xiong, Siu Ming Yiu, and Kwok Yan Lam. 2019. BitVis: An Interactive Visualization System for Bitcoin Accounts Analysis. In 2019 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT). 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVCBT.2019.000-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Melanie Swan. 2015. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy(1st ed.). O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Ella Tallyn, Larissa Pschetz, Rory Gianni, Chris Speed, and Chris Elsden. 2018. Exploring Machine Autonomy and Provenance Data in Coffee Consumption: A Field Study of Bitbarista. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 170 (nov 2018), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274439Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. Ella Tallyn, Joe Revans, Evan Morgan, Keith Fisken, and Dave Murray-Rust. 2021. Enacting the Last Mile: Experiences of Smart Contracts in Courier Deliveries. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 639, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445525Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Ella Tallyn, Joe Revans, Evan Morgan, and Dave Murray-Rust. 2020. GeoPact: Engaging Publics in Location-Aware Smart Contracts through Technological Assemblies. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  125. Sean Tan, Sourav S Bhowmick, Huey Eng Chua, and Xiaokui Xiao. 2020. LATTE: Visual Construction of Smart Contracts. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGMOD ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2713–2716. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318464.3384687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  126. Atima Tharatipyakul and Suporn Pongnumkul. 2021. User Interface of Blockchain-Based Agri-Food Traceability Applications: A Review. IEEE Access 9(2021), 82909–82929. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085982Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. Natkamon Tovanich, Nicolas Heulot, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Petra Isenberg. 2021. Visualization of Blockchain Data: A Systematic Review. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 7(2021), 3135–3152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2963018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  128. Ludwig Trotter, Mike Harding, Chris Elsden, Nigel Davies, and Chris Speed. 2020. A Mobile Platform for Event-Driven Donations Using Smart Contracts. In Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications(Austin, TX, USA) (HotMobile ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3376897.3379161Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  129. Ludwig Trotter, Mike Harding, Peter Shaw, Nigel Davies, Chris Elsden, Chris Speed, John Vines, Aydin Abadi, and Josh Hallwright. 2020. Smart Donations: Event-Driven Conditional Donations Using Smart Contracts On The Blockchain. In 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Sydney, NSW, Australia) (OzCHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 546–557. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  130. Ultrasound.money. 2022. Ultra Sound Awakening – track ETH become ultra sound. Retrieved 2022-02-11 from https://ultrasound.money/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Artemij Voskobojnikov, Svetlana Abramova, Konstantin Beznosov, and Rainer Boehme. 2021. Non-Adoption of Crypto-Assets: Exploring the Role of Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Risk. ECIS 2021 Research Papers9 (2021). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Artemij Voskobojnikov, Borke Obada-Obieh, Yue Huang, and Konstantin Beznosov. 2020. Surviving the Cryptojungle: Perception and Management of Risk Among North American Cryptocurrency (Non)Users. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Joseph Bonneau and Nadia Heninger (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 595–614.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. Artemij Voskobojnikov, Oliver Wiese, Masoud Mehrabi Koushki, Volker Roth, and Konstantin (Kosta) Beznosov. 2021. The U in Crypto Stands for Usable: An Empirical Study of User Experience with Mobile Cryptocurrency Wallets. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 642, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445407Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  134. Sören Wallbach, Roland Lehner, Konstantin Roethke, Ralf Elbert, and Alexander Benlian. 2020. Trust-Building Effects of Blockchain Features – An Empirical Analysis of Immutability, Traceability and Anonymity. ECIS 2020 Research Papers (Jun 2020). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2020_rp/182Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Tim Weingaertner, Rahul Rao, Jasmin Ettlin, Patrick Suter, and Philipp Dublanc. 2018. Smart Contracts Using Blockly: Representing a Purchase Agreement Using a Graphical Programming Language. In 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT). 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVCBT.2018.00012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  136. Stephen John Matthew C. Wenceslao and Maria Regina Justina E. Estuar. 2019. Using CTAKES to Build a Simple Speech Transcriber Plugin for an EMR. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics 2019 (Xiamen, China) (ICMHI 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340037.3340044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. Jacob O. Wobbrock and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Research Contributions in Human-Computer Interaction. Interactions 23, 3 (apr 2016), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2907069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Gavin Wood. 2016. Polkadot: Vision for a heterogeneous multi-chain framework. White Paper 21(2016), 2327–4662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Jia-zhi Xia, Yu-hong Zhang, Hui Ye, Ying Wang, Guang Jiang, Ying Zhao, Cong Xie, Xiao-yan Kui, Sheng-hui Liao, and Wei-ping Wang. 2020. SuPoolVisor: a visual analytics system for mining pool surveillance. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 21, 4 (Apr 2020), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1900532Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Anatoly Yakovenko. 2018. Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain v0. 8.13. Whitepaper (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Xuanwu Yue, Xinhuan Shu, Xinyu Zhu, Xinnan Du, Zheqing Yu, Dimitrios Papadopoulos, and Siyuan Liu. 2019. BitExTract: Interactive Visualization for Extracting Bitcoin Exchange Intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1(2019), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864814Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. Liudmila Zavolokina, Noah Zani, and Gerhard Schwabe. 2019. Why Should I Trust a Blockchain Platform? Designing for Trust in the Digital Car Dossier. In Extending the Boundaries of Design Science Theory and Practice(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Bengisu Tulu, Soussan Djamasbi, and Gondy Leroy (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. Liudmila Zavolokina, Noah Zani, and Gerhard Schwabe. 2020. Designing for Trust in Blockchain Platforms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management(2020), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3015359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  144. Rui Zhang, Rui Xue, and Ling Liu. 2019. Security and Privacy on Blockchain. ACM Comput. Surv. 52, 3, Article 51 (jul 2019), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316481Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. Zengsheng Zhong, Shuirun Wei, Yeting Xu, Ying Zhao, Fangfang Zhou, Feng Luo, and Ronghua Shi. 2020. SilkViser: A Visual Explorer of Blockchain-based Cryptocurrency Transaction Data. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST50239.2020.00014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Blockchain and Cryptocurrency in Human Computer Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader