skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585865acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Studying Children’s Object Interaction in Virtual Reality: A Manipulative Gesture Taxonomy for VR Hand Tracking

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a taxonomy for the classification of children’s gestural input elicited from spatial puzzle play in VR hand tracking. The taxonomy builds on the existing manipulative gesture taxonomy in human-computer interaction, and offers two main analytical categories; Goal-directed actions and Hand kinematics as complementary dimensions for analysing gestural input. Based on our study with eight children (aged between 7-14), we report the qualitative results for describing the categories for analysis and quantitative results for their frequency in occurring in children’s interaction with the objects during the spatial task. This taxonomy is an initial step towards capturing the complexity of manipulative gestures in relation to mental rotation actions, and helps designers and developers to understand and study children’s gestures as an input for object interaction as well as an indicator for spatial thinking strategies in VR hand tracking systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585865-video-preview.mp4

mp4

7 MB

3544549.3585865-talk-video.mp4

mp4

5.2 MB

References

  1. Dimitra Anastasiou, Valérie Maquil, Eric Ras, and Mehmetcan Fal. 2016. Design implications for a user study on a tangible tabletop. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 499–505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jakki O Bailey and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2017. Immersive virtual reality and the developing child. In Cognitive development in digital contexts. Elsevier, 181–200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gökçe Elif Baykal, I Veryeri Alaca, Asim Evren Yantaç, and Tilbe Göksun. 2018. A review on complementary natures of tangible user interfaces (TUIs) and early spatial learning. International journal of child-computer interaction 16 (2018), 104–113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gökçe Elif Baykal, Ali Leylekoğlu, Can Bora Sezer, and Işıl Oygür. 2022. Studying Children’s Manipulative Gestures in Spatial Puzzle Play with VR Hand Tracking: Analysis of Goal-directed Actions. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. 1–2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gökçe Elif Baykal, Maarten Van Mechelen, Tilbe Göksun, and Asim Evren Yantaç. 2019. Embedded figures in stories (EFiS): A method to observe preschoolers’ interactions with spatial manipulatives. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 21 (2019), 121–129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shimmila Bhowmick, Keyur Sorathia, and Pratul Chandra Kalita. 2021. Understanding Gesture Performance for Object Selection in VR: Classification and Taxonomy of Gestures in HCI. In India HCI 2021. 90–93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Eunjung Choi, Heejin Kim, and Min K Chung. 2014. A taxonomy and notation method for three-dimensional hand gestures. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 44, 1 (2014), 171–188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Andrew Clark, Anban W Pillay, and Deshendran Moodley. 2020. A system for pose analysis and selection in virtual reality environments. In Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2020. 210–216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Stacy B Ehrlich, Susan C Levine, and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2006. The importance of gesture in children’s spatial reasoning.Developmental psychology 42, 6 (2006), 1259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2015. From action to abstraction: Gesture as a mechanism of change. Developmental review 38 (2015), 167–184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kara M Gregory, An Sook Kim, and Alice Whiren. 2003. The effect of verbal scaffolding on the complexity of preschool children’s block constructions. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Celeste Groenewald, Craig Anslow, Junayed Islam, Chris Rooney, Peter J Passmore, and BL Wong. 2016. Understanding 3D mid-air hand gestures with interactive surfaces and displays: a systematic literature review. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Jennifer M Zosh, Helen Shwe Hadani, Roberta M Golinkoff, Kevin Clark, Chip Donohue, and Ellen Wartella. 2022. A whole new world: Education meets the metaverse. Policy (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Maria Karam 2005. A taxonomy of gestures in human computer interactions. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. The Language Archive Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. 2022. ELAN (Version 6.4). (2022). https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elanGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Joseph Maxwell. 1992. Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research. Harvard Educational Review 62 (01 1992), 279–300.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Philipp Mayring. 2000. Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], http://qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-e/2-00inhalt-e.htm 1 (06 2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Joan McComas, Jayne Pivik, and Marc Laflamme. 1998. Children’s transfer of spatial learning from virtual reality to real environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1, 2 (1998), 121–128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jess McIntosh, Charlie McNeill, Mike Fraser, Frederic Kerber, Markus Löchtefeld, and Antonio Krüger. 2016. EMPress: Practical hand gesture classification with wrist-mounted EMG and pressure sensing. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2332–2342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D McNeill. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: Univ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nora S Newcombe and Thomas F Shipley. 2015. Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. Springer, 179–192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Vladimir I Pavlovic, Rajeev Sharma, and Thomas S. Huang. 1997. Visual interpretation of hand gestures for human-computer interaction: A review. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 19, 7 (1997), 677–695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Francis KH Quek. 1994. Toward a vision-based hand gesture interface. In Virtual reality software and technology. World Scientific, 17–31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Amber Solomon, Mark Guzdial, Betsy DiSalvo, and Ben Rydal Shapiro. 2018. Applying a gesture taxonomy to introductory computing concepts. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 250–257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. David H Uttal, David I Miller, and Nora S Newcombe. 2013. Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: Links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics?Current Directions in Psychological Science 22, 5 (2013), 367–373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Dylan Yamada-Rice, Faisal Mushtaq, Adam Woodgate, D Bosmans, A Douthwaite, I Douthwaite, W Harris, R Holt, D Kleeman, J Marsh, 2017. Children and virtual reality: Emerging possibilities and challenges. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ying Yin. 2012. A hierarchical approach to continuous gesture analysis for natural multi-modal interaction. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction. 357–360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Studying Children’s Object Interaction in Virtual Reality: A Manipulative Gesture Taxonomy for VR Hand Tracking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2023
      3914 pages
      ISBN:9781450394222
      DOI:10.1145/3544549

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format