skip to main content
article
Free Access

Evaluation of a Test Set for Stiff ODE Solvers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 1981Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 CURTIS, A.R. The FACSIMILE numerical integrator for stiff initial value problems. In Computational Techniques for Ordinary Differential Equations, I. Gladwell and D. K. Sayers (Eds.), Academic Press, London, 1980, pp. 47-82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 CURTIS, A.R. Solution of large, stiff initial value problems--The state of the art. In Numerical Software--Needs and Availability, D. Jacobs (Ed.), Academic Press, London, 1978, pp. 257-278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 EDSBERG, L. Numerical methods for mass action ldnetics. In Numerical Methods for Differential Systems, L. Lapidns and W. E. Schiesser (Eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1976, pp. 181-195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 ENRIGHT, W.H. Using a testing'package for the automatic assessment of numerical methods for O.D.E.'s. In Performance Evaluation of Numerical Software, L. D. Fosdick (Ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 199-213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 ENRIGHT, W.H. Improving the efficiency of matrix operations in the numerical solution of stiff ordinary differential equations. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 4, 2 (June 1978), 127-136. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 ENRIGHT, W.H., AND HULL, T.E. Comparing numerical methods for the solution of stiff systems of ODEs arising in chemistry. In Numerical Methods for Differential Systems, L. Lapidus and W. E. Schiesser (Eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1976, pp. 45-66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 ENRIGHT, W.H., HULL, T.E., ANY LINDBERG, B. Comparing numerical methods for stiff systems of O.D.E.'s. BIT 15 (1975), 10-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 GEAR, C.W. Initial value problems: Practical theoretical developments. Rep. UIUCDCS-R-79- 962, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. Illinois, Urbana, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 GEAR, C.W. The automatic integration of stiff ordinary differential equations. In Proc. IFIP Congr. 1968, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969, pp. 187-193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 HINDMARSH, A.C., AND BYRNE, G.D. Applications of EPISODE. In Numerical Methods for Differential Systems, L. Lapidns and W. E. Schiesser (Eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1976, pp. 147-166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 HULL, T.E, ENRIGHT, W.H., FELLEN, B.M., AND SEDGWICK, A.E. Comparing numerical methods for ordinary differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 9 (1972), 603-637.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 JENSEN, P.S. Stiffly stable methods for undamped second order equations of motion. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 13 (1976), 549-563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 KROGH, F.T. On testing a subroutine for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations. J. ACM 20, 4 (Oct. 1973), 545-562. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 PETZOLD, L. Automatic selection of methods for solving stiff and nonstiff systems of ordinary differential equations. Rep. SAND80-8230, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, Calif., 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 PETZOLD, L.R. An efficient numerical method for highly oscillatory ordinary differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 18 (1981), 455-479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 RATLIFF, K. A comparison of techniques for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations. Rep. No. 274, Dept. Computer Science, Univ. Illinois, Urbana, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 ROBERTSON. H.H. The solution of a set of reaction rate equations. In Numerical Analysis, An Introduction, J. Walsh (Ed.), Academic Press, London, 1966, pp. 178-182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 SHAMPINE L.F. Stiffness and nonstiff differential equation solvers, II: Detecting stiffness with Runge-Kutta methods. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 3, 1 (March 1977), 44-53. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 SHAMPINE L.F. Lipschitz constants and robust ODE codes. In Computational Methods in Nonlinear Mechanics, J. T. Oden (Ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 427-449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 SHAMPINE L.F. Implementation of Rosenbrock methods. Rep. SAND80-2367, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, N. Mex., 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 SHAMPINE, L.F., AND HIEBERT, K.L. Detecting stiffness with the Fehlberg (4,5) formulas. Comp. & Maths. with Applics. 3 (1977), 41-46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 SHAMPINE L.F., WATTS, H.A., AND DAVENPORT, S.M. Solving nonstiff ordinary differential equations--The state of the art. SIAM Rev. 18 (1976), 376-411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 VILLADSEN, J., AND MICHELSEN, M.L. Solution of Differential Equation Models by Polynomial Approximation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N,J., 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 WILLOUGHBY, R.A. (Ed.) Stiff Differential Systems. Plenum Press, New York, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of a Test Set for Stiff ODE Solvers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
        ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software  Volume 7, Issue 4
        Dec. 1981
        141 pages
        ISSN:0098-3500
        EISSN:1557-7295
        DOI:10.1145/355972
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 1981 ACM

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 1981
        Published in toms Volume 7, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader