skip to main content
10.1145/3565474.3569068acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

RadNet: a testbed for mmwave radar networks

Published:06 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Human sensing with millimeter waves (mmWaves) is rapidly gaining momentum. In particular, mmWave radars are becoming the technology of choice in applications like contactless vital signs monitoring, people tracking, or activity recognition, when preserving the users privacy is a concern. However, single mmWave radar sensors have limited range (up to 6--8 m) and are affected by occlusions. For this reason, covering medium to large indoor spaces requires the deployment of multiple radar devices, i.e., radar networks. Because of the complexity of reflections produced by people moving in real life environments, the development and validation of algorithms for mmWave radar networks can only be fulfilled through extensive experimental campaigns. In this work, we present RadNet, the first experimental testbed for the easy deployment and testing of radar network algorithms. We describe its architecture and functioning and we show experimental results of a multi-radar people tracking algorithm implemented on the RadNet experimental platform.

References

  1. Syed Aziz Shah and Francesco Fioranelli. 2019. Rf sensing technologies for assisted daily living in healthcare: a comprehensive review. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 34, 11, 26--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Giacomo Paterniani, Daria Sgreccia, Alessandro Davoli, Giorgio Guerzoni, Pasquale Di Viesti, Anna Chiara Valenti, Marco Vitolo, Giorgio Matteo Vitetta, and Giuseppe Boriani. 2022. Radar-based Monitoring of Vital Signs: A Tutorial Overview, (Mar. 2022). https://www.techrxiv.org/articles/preprint/Radar-based_Monitoring_of_Vital_Signs_A_Tutorial_Overview/19212918.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jacopo Pegoraro and Michele Rossi. 2021. Real-time people tracking and identification from sparse mm-wave radar point-clouds. IEEE Access 9, 78504--78520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Marco Canil, Jacopo Pegoraro, and Michele Rossi. 2022. Millitrace-ir: contact tracing and temperature screening via mmwave and infrared sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top, 16, 2, 208--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Akash Deep Singh, Sandeep Singh Sandha, Luis Garcia, and Mani Srivastava. 2019. Radhar: human activity recognition from point clouds generated through a millimeter-wave radar. In Proc. ACM mmNets. Los Cabos, Mexico, 51--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Peijun Zhao, Chris Xiaoxuan Lu, Jianan Wang, Changhao Chen, Wei Wang, Niki Trigoni, and Andrew Markham. 2019. Mid: tracking and identifying people with millimeter wave radar. In Proc. of IEEE DCOSS. Santorini, Greece, 33--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Anish Shastri, Marco Canil, Jacopo Pegoraro, Paolo Casari, and Michele Rossi. 2022. Mmscale: self-calibration of mmwave radar networks from human movement trajectories. In Proc. of IEEE RadarConf22. New York, USA, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jacopo Pegoraro, Marco Canil, Anish Shastri, Paolo Casari, and Michele Rossi. 2022. Oracle: occlusion-resilient and self-calibrating mmwave radar network for people tracking. (2022). https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Demetrio Gubelli, Oleg A. Krasnov, and Olexander Yarovyi. 2013. Ray-tracing simulator for radar signals propagation in radar networks. In Proc. of EuRAD. Nuremberg, Germany, 73--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shobha Sundar Ram and Hao Ling. 2008. Simulation of human microdopplers using computer animation data. In Proc. of IEEE RadarConf. Rome, Italy, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Akash Deep Singh, Shobha Sundar Ram, and Shelly Vishwakarma. 2018. Simulation of the radar cross-section of dynamic human motions using virtual reality data and ray tracing. In Proc. of IEEE RadarConf. Oklahoma City, USA, 1555--1560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yoshana Deep, Patrick Held, Shobha Sundar Ram, Dagmar Steinhauser, Anshu Gupta, Frank Gruson, Andreas Koch, and Anirban Roy. 2020. Radar cross-sections of pedestrians at automotive radar frequencies using ray tracing and point scatterer modelling. IET Radar, Sonar Navig., 14, (June 2020), 833--844(11), 6, (June 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alex Berson. 1996. Client/Server Architecture (2nd Ed.) McGraw-Hill, Inc., USA. ISBN: 0070056641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Behrouz A. Forouzan and Sophia Chung Fegan. 2002. TCP/IP Protocol Suite. (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN: 0072460601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Anish Shastri, Neharika Valecha, Enver Bashirov, Harsh Tataria, Michael Lentmaier, Fredrik Tufvesson, Michele Rossi, and Paolo Casari. 2022. A review of millimeter wave device-based localization and device-free sensing technologies and applications. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., 24, 3, 1708--1749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sujeet Milind Patole, Murat Torlak, Dan Wang, and Murtaza Ali. 2017. Automotive radars: a review of signal processing techniques. IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 34, 2, 22--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Zhen Meng, Song Fu, Jie Yan, Hongyuan Liang, Anfu Zhou, Shilin Zhu, Huadong Ma, Jianhua Liu, and Ning Yang. 2020. Gait recognition for co-existing multiple people using millimeter wave sensing. In number 01. New York, USA, (Apr. 2020), 849--856.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jörg Sander, and Xiaowei Xu. 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proc. of AAAI KDD-96. Portland, Oregon, 226--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. E. Kalman. 1960. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Journal of Basic Eng., 82, 1, (Mar. 1960), 35--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Thomas Wagner, Reinhard Feger, and Andreas Stelzer. 2017. Radar signal processing for jointly estimating tracks and micro-doppler signatures. IEEE Access 5, 1220--1238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Chee-Yee Chong, S. Mori, W.H. Barker, and Kuo-Chu Chang. 2000. Architectures and algorithms for track association and fusion. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 15, 1, 5--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. K.C. Chang, R.K. Saha, and Y. Bar-Shalom. 1997. On optimal track-to-track fusion. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 33, 4, 1271--1276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Keni Bernardin, Alexander Elbs, and Rainer Stiefelhagen. 2006. Multiple object tracking performance metrics and evaluation in a smart room environment. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Wkshp. on Vis. Surveillance number 91. Vol. 90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. RadNet: a testbed for mmwave radar networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          EmergingWireless '22: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Emerging Topics in Wireless
          December 2022
          35 pages
          ISBN:9781450399340
          DOI:10.1145/3565474

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 December 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)144
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader