skip to main content
10.1145/3568294.3580085acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

A Social Robot for Explaining Medical Tests and Procedures: An Exploratory Study in the Wild

Published:13 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Healthcare professionals often have little time to explain medical tests and procedures. Social robots capable of verbal dialogues may contribute to informing patients and the public in general about such tests and procedures, for example in general practitioner or hospital waiting rooms, nursery homes, as well as in public spaces. As an example of latter, an exploratory study was conducted at the Lowlands music festival in August 2022. A social robot explained a blood pressure measurement and a grip strength measurement to participants. Participants were asked to value the expected clarity of the explanation before the explanation, the experienced clarity after the robot explanation but before the actual physical measurements, and after the physical measurements. 172 participants completed the interaction (99 female, 57 male, 8 non-binary, 8 undisclosed). The mean interaction duration was 2.02 minutes (SD=0.40 minutes). Participants found the explanation after the interaction with Pepper clearer than they expected beforehand. Participants found the clarity of the explanation, after they had actually undergone the physical examination, even higher than before the physical examination. This study indicates that social robots are potentially useful to explain medical tests and procedures.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

HRI23_lbr1083.mp4

mp4

100.2 MB

References

  1. M. Deveugele, A. Derese, A. van den Brink-Muinen, J. Bensing, and J. D. Maeseneer, "Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries', BMJ, vol. 325, no. 7362, p. 472, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7362.472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. "List of medical tests and diagnostic procedures | Britannica'. https://www.britannica.com/topic/list-of-medical-tests-and-diagnostic-procedures-2074273 (accessed Nov. 26, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Buchan, J. Campbell, I. Dhillon, and A. Charlesworth, "Labour market change and the international mobility of health workers', The Health Foundation, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, "World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423)'. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. F. Ebert, L. Huibers, B. Christensen, and M. B. Christensen, "Paper- or web-based questionnaire invitations as a method for data collection: cross-sectional comparative study of differences in response rate, completeness of data, and financial cost', Journal of medical Internet research, vol. 20, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.2196/jmir.8353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. I. Watkins and B. Xie, "eHealth Literacy Interventions for Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature', Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 16, no. 11, p. e225, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.4017/gt.2014.13.02.206.00 10.2196/jmir.3318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. B. Price, "Managing patients' anxiety about planned medical interventions', Nursing Standard (2014+), vol. 31, no. 47, p. 53, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Boumans, F. van Meulen, K. Hindriks, M. Neerincx, and M. Olde Rikkert, "A Feasibility Study of a Social Robot Collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measurements from Older Adults', International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 259--266, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12369-019-00561-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. Shi, S. Satake, T. Kanda, and H. Ishiguro, "How would store managers employ social robots?', in 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2016, pp. 519--520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Abdi, A. Al-Hindawi, T. Ng, and M. P. Vizcaychipi, "Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care', BMJ Open, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e018815, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. Bemelmans, G. J. Gelderblom, P. Jonker, and L. De Witte, "Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness', Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 114--120, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Broekens, M. Heerink, H. Rosendal, and others, "Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review', Gerontechnology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 94--103, 2009, doi: 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. N. Gasteiger, K. Loveys, M. Law, and E. Broadbent, "Friends from the Future: A Scoping Review of Research into Robots and Computer Agents to Combat Loneliness in Older People', Clinical interventions in aging, vol. 16, p. 941, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Kachouie, S. Sedighadeli, R. Khosla, and M.-T. Chu, "Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review', International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 369--393, 2014, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2013.873278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. E. Mordoch, A. Osterreicher, L. Guse, K. Roger, and G. Thompson, "Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: A literature review', Maturitas, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 14--20, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Shishehgar, D. Kerr, and J. Blake, "A Systematic Review of Research into how Robotic Technology can help older people', Smart Health, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.smhl.2018.03.002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. H. Robinson, B. MacDonald, and E. Broadbent, "The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review', International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 575--591, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. A. Neerincx et al., "Socio-Cognitive Engineering of a Robotic Partner for Child's Diabetes Self-Management', Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 6, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G. Ferrante et al., "Social robots and therapeutic adherence: A new challenge in pediatric asthma?', Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, vol. 40, pp. 46--51, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. K. Ishiguro, S. Minamino, J. Kawahara, and Y. Majima, "Development of a robot intervention program in medication instruction at a pharmacy', in 2018 7th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 2018, pp. 954--955.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. V. Tao, K. Moy, and V. A. Amirfar, "A little robot with big promise may be future of personalized health care', Pharmacy Today, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 38, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ptdy.2016.08.022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. F. Hegel, C. Muhl, B. Wrede, M. Hielscher-Fastabend, and G. Sagerer, "Understanding Social Robots', in 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, Feb. 2009, pp. 169--174. doi: 10.1109/ACHI.2009.51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. design & interaction Fabrique [brands, "A Campingflight to Lowlands Paradise', Lowlands 2022 | A Campingflight to Lowlands Paradise. https://lowlands.nl/over-lowlands/ (accessed Nov. 25, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. K. Pandey and R. Gelin, "A mass-produced sociable humanoid robot: pepper: the first machine of its kind', IEEE Robot Autom Mag, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 40--48, 2018, doi: 10.1109/MRA.2018.2833157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. Sauro and J. R. Lewis, Quantifying the User Experience - Practical Statistics for User Research, 2nd edition. Morgan Kaufman, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. D. Tedesco and T. Tullis, "A comparison of methods for eliciting post-task subjective ratings in usability testing', Usability Professionals Association (UPA), vol. 2006, pp. 1--9, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J.A. Mann, B.A. MacDonald, I.H.Kuo, X. Li, E. Broadbent, "People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions', Comput Hum Behav 43:112--117, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.029.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. B. Price, "Managing patients' anxiety about planned medical interventions', Nursing Standard (2014+), vol. 31, no. 47, p. 53, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Social Robot for Explaining Medical Tests and Procedures: An Exploratory Study in the Wild

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2023
      612 pages
      ISBN:9781450399708
      DOI:10.1145/3568294

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 March 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader