skip to main content
article
Free Access

The Quadtree and Related Hierarchical Data Structures

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 June 1984Publication History
First page image

References

  1. ABEL, D. J. 1984. A B+-tree structure for large quadtrees. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 27, 1 (July), 19-31.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. ABEL, D. J., AND SMITH J. L. 1983. A data structure and algorithm based on a linear key for a rectangle retrieval problem. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 24, 1 (Oct.), 1-13.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. AHO, A. V., HOPCROFT, J. E., AND ULLMAN, J. D. 1974. The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. AHUJA, N. 1983. On approaches to polygonal decomposition for hierarchical image representation. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 24, 2 (Nov.) 200-214.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. AHUJA, N., AND NASH, C. 1984. Octree representations of moving objects. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 26, 2 (May), 207-216.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ANOERSON, D. P. 1983. Techniques for reducing pen plotting time. ACM Trans. Gr. 2, 3 (July), 197- 212.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. BALLARI), D. H. 1981. Strip trees: A hierarchical representation for curves. Commun. A CM 24, 5 (May), 310~321. See also corrigendum, Commun. ACM 25, 3 (Mar. 1982), 213.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. BELL, S. B. M., DiAZ, B. M., HOLROYD, F., AND JACKSON, M. J. 1983. Spatially referenced methods of processing raster and vector data. Image Vision Comput. 1, 4 (Nov.), 211-220.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. BENTLEY, J. L, 1975a. A survey of techniques for fixed radius near neighbor searching. SLAC Rep. No. 186, Stanford Linear Accelerator CenU~r, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., Aug.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. BENTLEY, J. L. 1975b. Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching. Commun. ACM 18, 9 (Sept.), 509-517.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. BENTLEY, J. L., ANO FaIEOMAN, J. H. 1979. Data structures for range searching. ACM Comput. Surv. 11, 4 (Dec.), 397-409.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. BENTLEY, J. L., AND STANAT, D. F. 1975. Analysis of range searches in quad trees. Inf. Process. Lett. 3, 6 (july), 170-173.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. BESSLICH, P. W. 1982. Quadtree construction of binary images by dyadic array transformations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Processing (Las Vegas, Nev., June). }EEE, New York, pp. 550-554.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. BLUM, H. 1967. A transformation for extracting new descriptors of shape. In Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form, W. Wathen-Dunn, Ed. M.l.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 362-380.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. BROOKS, R. A., AND LOZANO-PEREZ, T. 1983. A subdivision algorithm in configuration space for findpath with rotation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Karlsruhe, West Germany, Aug.). Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif., pp. 799-806.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. BURKHARDT, W. A. 1983. Interpolation-based index maintenance. BIT 23, 3, 274-294.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. BURT, P. J. 1980. Tree and pyramid structures for coding hexagonally sampled binary images. Cornput. Graphics Image Process. 14, 3 (Nov.), 249- 270.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. BURT, P. J., HONO, T. H., AND ROSENrELO, A. 1981. Segmentation and estimation of image region properties through cooperative hierarchical computation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. ! I, 12 (Dec.), 802-809.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. BURTON, W. 1977. Representation of many-sided polygons and polygonal lines for rapid processing, Commun. ACM 20, 3 (Mar.), 166-171.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. BURTON, F. W., AND KOLLIAS, J. G. 1983. Comment on the explicit quadtree as a structure for computer graphics. Comput. J. 26, 2 (May), 188.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. CARLSON, W. E. 1982. An algorithm and data structure for 3D object synthesis using surface patch intersections. Comput. Gr. S{GGRAPH 82 Conf. Proc. 16, 3, 255-264.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. CHIEN, C. H., AND AGGARWAL, J. K. 1984. A normalized quadtree representation. Cornput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 26, 3 (June), 331-346.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. COHEN, E., LYCHE, T., AND RIESENFELD, R. 1980. Discrete B-splines and subdivision techniques in computer-aided geometric design and computer graphics. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 14, 3 (Oct.), 87-111.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. COMER, D. 1979. The ubiquitous B-tree. ACM Comput~ Surv. 11, 2 (June), 121-137.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. CONNOLLY, C. I. 1984. Cumulative generation of octree models from range data. In Proceedings o{ the International Conference on Robotics (Atlanta, Ga., Mar.). IEEE, New York, pp. 25-32.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. COOK, B. G. 1978. The structural and algorithmic basis of a geographic data base. In Proceedings o{ the First International Advanced Study Symposiurn on Topological Data Structures for Geographic Information Systems, G. Dutton, Ed., Harvard Papers on Geographic Information Systems, HaL- vard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. CREUTZBURC,, E. 1981. Complexities of quadtrees and the structure of pictures. Tech. Rep. N/81/ 74, Computer Science Dept., Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, East Germany.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. DAVIS, L. S., AND ROUSSOPOULOS, N. 1980. Approximate pattern matching in a pattern database system. Inf Syst. 5, 2, 107-119.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. DECOULON, F., AND JOHNSEN, U. 1976. Adaptive block schemes for source coding of black-andwhite facsimile. Electron. Lett. 12, 3, 61-62. See also erratum, Electron. Lett. 12, 6 (1976), 152.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. DEFLORIANI, L., FALCiDIENO, B., NAGY, G., AND PIENOW, C. 1982. Yet another method for triangulation and contouring for automated cartography. In Proceedings of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (Hollywood, Fla.), F. S. Cardwell, R. Black, and B. M. Cole, Eds. American Society of Photogrammetry, pp. 101-110.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. DEMILLO, R. A., EISENSTAT, S. C., AND LIPTON, R. J. 1978. Preserving average proximity in arrays. Commun. ACM 21, 3 (Mar.), 228-231.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. DOCTOR, L. J., AND TO,BOa(;, J. G. 1981. Display techniques for octree-encoded objects. IEEE Comput. Gr. Appl. 1, 1 (July), 39-46.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. DUDA, R. O., AND HART, P. E. 1973. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. DYER, C. R. 1980. Computing the Ruler number of an image from its quadtree. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 13, 3 (July), 270-276.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. DYER, C. R. 1981. A VLSI pyramid machine for parallel image processing, in Proceedings o{ the IEEE Conference on Pattern Recognition and linage Processing (Dallas, Tex.). IEEE, New York, pp. 381-386.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. DYER, C. R. 1982. The space efficiency of quadtrees. Comput. Gr. Image Process. I9, 4 (Aug.), 335-348.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. DYER, C. R., ROSENFELO, A., AND SAMET, H. t980. Region representation: Boundary codes from quadtrees. Commun. ACM 23, 3 (Mar.), 171- 179.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. EASTMAN, C. M. 1970. Representations for space planning. Commun. ACM 13, 4 (Apr.), 242-250.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. EDELSBRUNNER, H. 1984. Key-problems and keymethods in computational geometry. In Proceedings of the Symposium of Theoretical Aspects o{ Computer Science (Paris, France), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 166. Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 1-13.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. EDELSBRUNNER, H., AND VAN LEEUWEN, J. 1983. Multidimensional data structures and algorithms: A bibliography. Rep. F104, Institute for Information Processing, Technical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, Jan.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. EDELSBRUNNER, H., GUIBAS, L. J., AND STOLFI, J. 1985. Optimal point location in a monotone subdivision. SIAM J. Comput. in press.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. FAGIN, R., NIEVERGELT, J., PIPPENGER, N., AND STRONC~, H. R. 1979. Extendible hashing--A fast access method for dynamic files. A CM Trans. Database Syst. 4, 3 (Sept.), 315-344.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. FAUGERAS, O. D., ^~D PONCE, J. 1983. Prism trees: A hierarchical representation for 3-d objects. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Karlsruhe, West Germany, Aug.). Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif., pp. 982-988.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. FAUGERAS, O. D., HESF. RT, M., MUSSL P., a~r~ BOIS- 8ONNAT, J. D. 1984. Polyhedral approximation of 3-d objects without holes. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 25, 2 (Feb.), 169-183.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. FAVERJON, B. 1984. Obstacle avoidance using an octree in the configuration space of a manipulator. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics (Atlanta, Ga., Mar.). IEEE, New York, pp. 504-512.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. FINKEL, R. A., ANn BENTLEY, J. L. 1974. Quad trees: A data structure for retrieval on composite keys. A cta Inf. 4, 1, 1-9.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. FREOKIN, E. 1960. Trie memory. Cornmun. ACM 3, 9 (Sept.), 490-499.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. FREEMAN, H. 1974. Computer processing of linedrawing images. ACM Comput. Surv. 6, i (Mar.), 57-97.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. FRIEDMAN, J. H., BENTLEY, J. L., AND FINKEL, R. A. 1977. An algorithm for finding best matches in logarithmic expected time. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 3, 3 (Sept.), 209-226.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. GARGANTINI, I. 1982a. An effective way to represent quadtrees. Comrnun. ACM 25, 12 (Dec.), 9015-910.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. GARGANTINI, I. 1982b. Linear octtrees for fast processing of three dimensional objects. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 20, 4 (Dec.), 365-374.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. GARGANTINI, I. 1983. Translation, rotation, and superposition of linear quadtrees. Int. J. Man- Mach. Stud. 18, 3 (Mar.), 253-263.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. GASTON, P. C., ANt} LOzANO-PEREZ, T. 1984. Tactile recognition and localization using object models: The case of polyhedra on a plane. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal Mach. lnte!l. 6, 3 (May), 257-266.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. GIBSON, L., A~O LVCAS, D. 1982. Vectorization of raster images using hierarchical methods. Comput. Gr. Image Proces& 20, 1 (Sept.), 82-89.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. GILLESPtE, R., AND DAVIS, W. A. 1981. Tree data structures for graphics and image processing. In Proceedings of the 7th Con/erence of the Canadian Man-Computer Communications Society (Waterloo, Canada, June), pp. 155-161.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. GOMEZ, D., AND GUZMAN, A. 1979. Digital model for three-dimensional surface representation. Gee-Process. 1, 53-70.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. GROSKY, W. I., ANn Jam, R. 1983. Optimal quadtrees for image segments. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal Mach. InteU. 5, 1 (Jan.), 77--83.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. HARARY, F. 1969. Graph Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. HERTEL, S., AND MEHLHORN, K. 1983. Fast triangulation of simple polygons. In Proceedings of the 1983 International Foundations of Computation Theory Conference (Borgholm, Sweden, Aug.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 158. Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 207-218.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. HINRICHS, K., ^No NmWRt~ELT, J. 1983. The Grid File: A data structure to support proximity queries on spatial objects. Rep. 54, Institut fur Informatik, ETH, Zurich, July.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. HOARE, C. A. R. 1972. Notes on data structuring. In Structured Programming, O. J. Dahl, E. W, Dijkstra, and C. A. R. i-{oare, Eds. Academic Press, London, p. 154.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. HOROWlTZ, S. L., AND PAVLIDIS, T. 1976. Picture segmentation by a tree traversal algorithm. J. A CM 23, 2 (Apr.), 368-388.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. HUFFMAN, D. A. 1952. A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes. Proc. IRE 40, 9 (Sept.), 1098-1101.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. HUNTER, G. M. 1978. Efficient computation and data structures for graphics. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. HUNTER, G. M., A~D STF. IC, LI?Z, K. 1979a. Operations on images using quad trees. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. {ntell. 1, 2 (Apr.), 145-153.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. HUNTER, G. M., A~D STEIGL1TZ, K. 1979b. Linear transformation of pictures represented by quad trees. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 10, 3 (July), 289-296.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. IBRAHIM, H. A. H. 1984. The connected component labeling algorithm on the NON-VON supercompurer. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control (Annapolls, Md., Apr.). IEEE, New York, pp. 37-45.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. ISMAIL, M. G. B., AND STEELE, R. 1980, Adaptive pel location coding for bilevel facsimile signals. Electron. Lett. 16, (May), 361-363]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. JACKINS, C., AND TANIMOTO, S. L. 1980. Oct-trees and their use in representing three-dimensional objects. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 14, 3 (Nov.), 249-270.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. JACKINS, C., ^~o TA~tMOTO, S. L. 1983. Quad-trees, oct-trees, and k-trees-oA generalized approach to recursive decomposition of Euclidean space. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. IntelL 5, 5 (Sept.), 533-539.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. JONES, L., AND IYEN(~AR, $. S. 1984. Space and time efficient virtual quadtrees. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. InteU. 6, 2 (Mar.), 244-247.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. KAWAGUCHI, E., AbJD ENDO, T. 1980. On a method of binary picture representation and its application to data compression. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2, 1 (Jan.), 27-35.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. KAWAGUCHI, E., ENDO, T., AND YOKOTA, M. 1980. DF-expression of binary-valued picture and its relation to other pyramidal representations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Miami Beach, Fla., Dec.). IEEE, New York, pp, 822-827.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. KAWAGUCHI, E., ENDO, T., AND MATSUNAGA, J. 1983. Depth-first expression viewed from digital picture processing. IEEE Trar~. Pattern Anal Mach. lntelt. 5, 4 (July), 373-384,]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. KEDEM, G. 1981. The Quad-CIF tree: A data structure for hierarchical on-line algorithms. Tech. Pep. 91, Computer Science Dept., The University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, Sept.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. KELLY, M. D. 1971. Edge detection in pictures by computer using planning. Mach. Intell. 6, 397- 409.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. KIRKPATRICK, D.r 1983. Optimal search in planar sub&visions. SlAM J. Comput. 12, I (Feb.), 28- 35.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. KLINGER, A. 1971. Patterns and search statistics. In Optimizing Methods in Statistics, J. S. Rustagi, Ed, Academic Press, New York, pp. 303-337.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. KLINGER, A., AND DYER, C. R. 1976. Experiments in picture representation using regular decomposition. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 5, 1 (Mar), 68- 105.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. KLINGER, A., AND RHODES, M. L. 1979. Organization and access of image data by areas. IEEE Trans. Pattern AnaI. Mach. Intell. 1, 1 (Jan.), 50- 60.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. KNOTT, G. D. 1971. Expandable open addressing hash table storage and retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGFIDET Workshop on Data Description, Access, and Control (San Diego, Calif,, Nov.). ACM, New York, pp. 187-206.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. KNOWLTON, K. 1980. Progressive transmission of grey-scale and binary pictures by simple, efficient, and lossless encoding schemes. Prec. IEEE 68, 7 (July), 885-896.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. KNUTH, D. E. 1973. The Art of Computer Programruing, vol. 3, Sorting and Searching. Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. KNUTH, D. E. 1975. The Art of Computer Programming, vol. 1, Fundamental Algorithms, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. LAUZON, J. P., MARK, D. M., KIKUCHi, L., A~O GUE- WRA, J. A. 1984. Two-dimensional run-encoding for quadtree representation. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Geography, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. LEE, D. T., AND SHACTER, B. J. 1980. Two algorithms for constructing a Delaunay triangulation. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sc~ 9, 3 (June), 219-242.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. LEE, D. T., ANn WONTS, C. K. 1977. Worst-case analysis for region and partial region searches in multidimensional binary search trees and quad trees. Acta Inf. 9~ 1, 23-29.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. LETELIER, P. 1983. Transmission d'images ~ bas dbit pour un syst~me de communication t~14phonique adapt~ aux sourds. Th~se de docteur-ing6nieur, Universit~ de Paris-Sud, Paris, Sept.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. LI, M., GROSKY, W. I., AND JAIN, R. 1982. Normalized quadtrees with respect to translations. Comput. Gr. Image Procezs. 20, 1 (Sept.), 72-81.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. LIIN, J. 1973. General methods for parallel searching. Tech. Rep. 81, Digital Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., May.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. LIPTON, R. J., AND TARJAN, R. E. 1977. Application of a planar separator theorem. {n Proceedings of the 18th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (Providence, R. I., Oct.). IEEE, New York, pp. 162-170.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. LITWIN, W. 1980. Linear hashing: A new tool for lr~le and table addressing. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Montreal, Oct.). IEEE, New York, pp. 212-223.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. LOZANO-PEREZ, T. 1981. Automatic planning of manipulator transfer movements. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 11, 10 (Oct.), 681--698.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. LUMIA, R. 1983. A new three-dimensional connected components algorithm. Cornput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 23, 2 (Aug.), 207-217.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. LUMIA, R., SHAPmO, L., At~o Zu~qmA, O. 1983. A new connected components algorithm for virtual memory computers. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 22~ 2 (May), 287-300.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. MARTIN, J. J. 1982. Organization of geographical data with quad trees and least square approximatlon. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Processing (Las Vegas, Nev., Junel. IEEE, New York, pp. 458- 463.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. MATSUYAMA, T., HAD, L. V., AND NAGAO, M. 1984. A file organization for geographic information systems based on spatial proximity. Cornput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 26, 3 (June), 303- 318.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. MCCLUSKEY, E. J. 1965. Introduction to the Theory of Switching Circuits. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 60-61.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. MCKEOWN, D. M., JR., AND DENLINOER, J. L. 1984. Map-guided feature extraction from aerial imagery. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Corn. puter Vision: Representation and Control (Annapolis, Md., Apr.). {EEE, New York, pp. 205-213.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. MEACHER, D. 1982. Geometric modeling using octree encoding. Comput. Gr. ~mage Process. t9, 2 (June), 129-147.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. MERRETT, T. H. 1978. Multidimensional paging for efficient database querying. {n Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data (Milan, Italy, June), pp. 277-289.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. MERRETT, T. H., ANO OTOO, E. J. 1981. Dynamic multipaging: A storage structure for large shared data banks. In Improving Database Usability and Responsiveness, P. Scheuermann, Ed. Academic Press, New York, pp. 237-254.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. MERRILL, R. D. 1973. Representations of contours and regions for efficient computer search. Cornmun. ACM 16, 2 (Feb.), 69-82.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. MILFORD, D. J., AND WILLIS, P. C. 1984. Quad encoded display. IEE Proc. 131, E3 (May), 70- 75.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. MINSKY, M., AND PAPERT, S. 1969. Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. MORTON, G. M. 1966. A computer oriented geodetic data base and a new technique in file sequencing. Unpublished manuscript, iBM, Ltd., Ottawa, Canada.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. MUDUR, S. P., AND KOPARKAR, P. A. 1984. Interval methods for processing geometric objects. IEEE Comput. Gr. AppL 4, 2 (Feb.), 7-17.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. NAGY, G., AND WAGLE, $. 1979. Geographic data processing. ACM Cornput. Surv. 11, 2 (June), 139- 181.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. NIEVERGELT, J., AND PREPARATA, F. P. 1982. Planesweep algorithms for intersecting geometric figures. Commun. ACM 25, 10 (Oct.), 739-746.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. NIEVERGELT, J., H{NTERBERGER, H., AND SEVCIK, K. C. 1984. The Grid File: An adaptable, symmetric multikey fie structure. A CM Trans. Database Syst. 9, 1 (Mar.), 38-71.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. NILSSON, N. J. 1969. A mobile automaton: An application of artificial intelligence techniques. In Proceedings of the 1st international Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Washington D.C.). Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif., pp. 509-520.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. OLIVER, M. A., AND WISEMAN, N. E. 1983a, Operations on quadtree-encoded images. Comput. J. 26, i (Feb.), 83-91.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  113. OLIVER, M. A., AND WISEMAN, N. E. 1983b. Operations on quadtree leaves and related image areas. Comput. J. 26, 4 (Nov.), 375-380.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. OMOLAYOLE, J. O., AND KLINGER, A. 1980. A hierarchical data structure scheme for storing pictures. In Pictorial Information Systems, S. K. Chang and K. S. Fu, Eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1980.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. ORE.NSTEIN, J. A. 1982. Multidimensional tries used for associative searching. Inf. Process. Lett. 14, 4 (June), 150-157.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. ORENSTEIN, J. A. 1983. A dynamic hash file for random and sequential accessing. In Proceedings of the 6~h International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Florence, italy, Oct.). IEEE, New York, pp. 132-141.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. ORESTEIN, J. A., AND M~RREVT, T. H. 1984. A class of data structures for associative searching, In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGACT-SIG- MOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (Waterloo, Ontario, Apr.). ACM, New York, pp. 181-190.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. O'ROURKE, J. 1981. Dynamically quantized spaces for focusing the Hough Transform. In Proceedings o{ the 6th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vancouver, B.C., Aug.). Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif., pp. 737-739.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. O'ROURKE, J., AND SLOAN, K. R., JR. 1984. Dynamic quantization: Two adaptive data structures for multidimensional squares. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Math. Intell 6, 3 (May), 266- 280.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. OUKSEL, M., AND SCHEUERMANN, P. 1983. Storage mappings for multidimensional linear dynamic hashing, in Proceedings o/ the 2nd A CM SI- GA CT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Databo~se Systems (Atlanta, Ga., Mar.). ACM, New York, pp. 90-105.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. OVRRMARS, M. H. 1983. The Design of Dynamic Data Structures, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 156. Springer-Verlag, New York.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. OVERMARS, M. H., ANb VAN LEEUWEN, J. 1982. Dynamic multi-dimensional data structures based on quad- and k-d trees. Acta Inf. 17, 3, 267-285.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. PETERS, F. 1984. An algorithm for transformations of pictures represented by quadtrees, Dept. of Mathematics and Computing Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. PEUCKER, T. 1976. A theory of the cartographic line, int. Yearb. Cartogr. 16, 34--43.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. PEUQUET, D. J. 1979. Raster processing: An alternative approach to automated cartographic data handling. Am. Cartogr. 2 {Apr.), 129-239.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  126. PEUQUET, D. J. 1983. A hybrid data structure for the storage and manipulation of very large spatial data sets. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 24, I (Oct.), 14-27.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. PFALTZ, J. L., AND ROSENFELD, A. 1967. Computer representation of planar regions by their skeletons. Commun. ACM t0, 2 (Feb.), 119-122.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. PIETIKAINEN, M., ROSENFELD, A., AND WALTER, I. 1982. Split-and-link algorithms for image segmentation. Pattern Recognition 15, 4, 287-298.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  129. RAMAN, V., AND IYENGAR, S. S. 1983. Properties and applications of forests of quadtrees for pictorial data representation. BIT 23, 4, 472-486.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. RANADE, S. 1981. Use of quadtrees for edge enhancemeat. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. 11, 5 (May), 370-373.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. RANADE, S., ANO SHeEtER, M. 1981. Using quadtrees to smooth images. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 11, 5 (May), 373-376.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. RANADE, S., ROSENFELD, A., AND PREWITT, J. M. S, 1980. Use of quadtrees for image segmentation. TR-878, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Md., Feb.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. RANADE, $., ROSENFELD, A., AND SAMET, H. 1982. Shape approximation using quadtrees. Pattern Recognition 15, 1, 31-40.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  134. REDDY, D. R., AND RUBIN, S. 1978. Representation of three-dimensional objects. CMU-CS-78-113, Computer Science Dept., Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Apr.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. REQUICHA, A. A. G. 1980. Representations of rigid solids: Theory, methods, and systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 12, 4 (Dec.), 437-464.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. RHEINBOLDT, W. C., AND MESZTENY{, C. K. 1980. On a data structure for adaptive finite element mesh refinements. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 6, 2 (June), 166+187.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  137. RISEMAN, E. M., AND ARBIB, M. A. 1977. Computational techniques in the visual segmentation of static scenes. Comput. Gr~ Image Process. 6, 3 (June), 221-276.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. ROSENSON, J. T. 1981. The k-d-B-tree: A search structure for large multidimensional dynamic indexes. In Proceedings of the SIGMOD Conference (Ann Arbor, Mich., Apr.). ACM, New York, pp. 10-18.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. ROSENFELD, A., ED. 1983. Muitiresolution Image Processing and Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. ROSENFELD, A. 1984. Picture processing 1984. Cornput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 26, 3 (June), 347- 384.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. ROSENFELD, A., ANO KAK, A. C. 1982. Digital Picture Processing, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. ROSENFELD, A., A~D PFALTZ, J. L. 1966. Sequential operations in digital image processing. J. ACM 13, 4 (Oct.), 471-494.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. ROSENFELD, A., SAME?, H., SHArrr. lt, C., A~o WEB- BER, R. E. 1982. Application of hierarchical data structures to geographical information systems. TR-1197, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, iV{&, June.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. ROSENFELO, A., S^MET, H., SI~ArF~R, C., A~o WEB- BER, R. E. 1983. Application of hierarchical data structures to geographical information systerns phase II. TR-1327, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, Md., Sept.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. ROTH, S. D. 1982. Ray casting for modeling solids. Comput. Gr. Image Process. {8, 2 (Feb.), 109-144.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  146. RUTOWTZ, D. 1968. Data structures for operations on digital images. In Pictorial Pattern Recognition, G. C. Cheng et al., Eds. Thompson Book Co., Washington D.C., pp. 105-133.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. SAMET, H. 1980a. Region representation: Quadtrees from boundary codes. Cornmun. A CM 23, 3 (Mar.), 163-170.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  148. SAMET, H. 1980b, Region representation: Quadtrees from binary arrays. Comput. Gr. Image Process. t3, 1 (May), 88-93.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  149. SAMET, H. 1980c. Deletion in two-dimensional quad trees. Commun. ACM 23, 12 (Dec.), 703-710.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  150. SAMET, H. 1981a. An algorithm for converting rasters to quadtrees. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mech. lnteU. 3, 1 (Jan.), 93-95.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  151. SAMET, H. 1981b. Connected component labeling using quadtrees. J. ACM 28, 3 (July), 487-501.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  152. SAMET, H. 1981c. Computing perimeters of images represented by quadtrees. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mactr lntell. 3, 6 (Nov.), 683-687.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. SAMET, H. 1982a. Neighbor finding techniques for images represented by quadtrees. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 18, 1 (Jan.), 37~57.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  154. SAMET, H. 1982b. Distance transform for images represented by quadtrees, iEEE Trans. Pattern Anal Mech. lntell. 4, 3 (May), 298-303.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  155. SAMET, H. 1983. A quadtree medial axis transform. Commun. ACM 26, 9 (Sept.), 680-693. See also corrigendum, Commun. ACM 27, 2 (Feb. 1984), 151.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  156. SAMET, H. 1984. Algorithms for ~he conversion of quadtrees to rasters. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 26, 1 (Apr.), 1-16.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  157. SAMET, H. 1985a. A top-down quadtree traversal algorithm. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mech. Intell. 7, 1 (Jan.) in press. Also TR-1237, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. SAMET, }H. 1985b. Reconstruction of quadtrees from quadtree medial axis transforms. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 29, 2 (Feb.) in press. Also TR- 1224, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  159. SAMET, H. 1985c. Data structures for quadtree approximation and compression. Commun. A CM 28 in press. Also TR-1209, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. SAMET, H., AND KRISHNAMURTHY, E. V. 1983. A quadtree-based matrix manipulation system. Unpublished manuscript of work in progress.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  161. SAMET, H., AND ROSENFELD, A. 1980. Quadtree structures for image processing. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Miami Beach, Fla., Dec.). IEEE, New York, pp. 815-818.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  162. SAMET, H., aND SHAFFER, C. A. 1984. A model for the analysis of neighbor finding in pointer-based quadtrees. TR-t432, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, Md., Aug.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  163. SAMET, H., A~D TAMbIINE~I, M. 1984. Efficient image component labeling. TR-1420, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, Md., July.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  164. SAMET, H., AND TAMMINEN, M. 1985. Computing geometric properties of images represented by linear quadtrees. IEEE Trar~. Pattern Anal Mech. lntetl. 7, 1 (Jan.) in press. Also TR-1359, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. SAMET, H., AND WEBBER, R. E. 1982. On encoding boundaries with quadtrees. TR-1162, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, Md., Feb.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  166. SAMET, H., AND WEBBER, R. E. 1983. Using quadtrees to represent polygonal maps. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 83 (Washington, DC, June). IEEE, New York, pp. 127-132. Also TR-1372, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. SAMET, H., ANO WEBBER, R. E. 1984. On encoding boundaries with quadtrees. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mech. InteU. 6, 3 (May), 365-369.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. SHAMOS, M. L, 1978. Computational geometry. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. SHAMOS, M. I., ANn HOE'/, D. 1975. Closest-point problems. In Proceedings o/ the 16th Annual Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (Berkeley, Calif., Oct.). IEEE, New York, pp. 151-162.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. SHNEIER, M. 198Ia. Calculations of geometric properties using quadtrees. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 16, 3 (July), 296-302.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. SHNEIER, M. 1981b. Path-length distances for quadtrees. Inf. Sci. 23, I (Feb.), 49-67.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  172. SHNEIER, M. 1981c. Two hierarchical linear feature representations: Edge pyramids and edge quadtrees. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 17, 3 (Nov.), 211-224.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  173. SLOAN, K. R., JR. 1981. Dynamically quantized pyramids. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vancouver, B.C., Aug.). Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif., pp. 734-736.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  174. SLOAN, K. R., JR., AND TANIMOTO, S. L. 1979. Progressive refinement of raster images. 1EEE Trans. Comput. 28, 11 (Nov.), 871-874.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  175. SRIHARI, S. N. 1981. Representation ofthree-dimensional digital images. ACM Comput. Surv. 13, 1 (Dec.), 399-424.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  176. SUTHERLAND, I. E., SPROULL, R. F., AND SCHU- MACKER, g. A. 1974. A characterization of ten hidden-surface algorithms. ACM Comput. Surv. 6, 1 (Mar.), 1-55.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  177. TAMMINgN, M. 1981. The EXCELL method for eL ficient geometric access to data. Acta Potytech. Scand. Mathematics and Computer Science Series No. 34, Helsinki,]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. TAMMINEN, M. 1982. Hidden lines using the EX- CELL method. Comput. Gr. Forum l 1, 3, 96-105.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  179. TAMMINRN, M. 1983. Performance analysis of cell based geometric file organizations. Comput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 24, 2 (Nov.), 168-181.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  180. TAMMINEN, M. 1984a. Comment on quad- and octtrees. Commun. ACM 27, 3 (Mar.), 248-249.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  181. TAMMIN~2N, M. 1984b. Encoding pixel trees. Cornput. Vision Gr. Image Process. 28, 1 (Oct.), 44-57.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  182. TAMMiNEN, M., AND SAMET, H. 1984. Efficient octree conversion by connectivity labeling. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 84 Conference (Minneapolis, Minn., July). ACM, New York, pp. 43-51.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  183. TANIMOTO, S. 1976. Pictorial feature distortion in a pyramid. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 5, 3 (Sept.), 333-352.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  184. TANIMOTO, S. 1979. Image transmission with gross information first. Comput. Graph. Image Process. 9, 1 (Jan.), 72-76.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  185. TANIMOTO, S., AND KLINGER, A. EDS. 1980. Structured Computer Vision. Academic Press, New York.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  186. TANIMOTO, S., AND PAVLIDIS, T. 1975. A hierarchical data structure for picture processing. Comput. Gr. Image Process. 4, 2 (June), 104-119.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  187. TARJAN, R. E. 1975. Efficiency of a good but not linear set union algorithm. J. ACM 22, 2 (Apr.), 215-225.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  188. TOUSSAINT, G. T. 1980. Pattern recognition and geometrical complexity. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Miami Beach, Fla., Dec.). IEEE, New York, pp. 1324-1346.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  189. TROPF, H., AND Ht~RZOG, H. 1981. Multidimensional range search in dynamically balanced trees. Angew. Inf. 2, 71-77.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. TUCKER, L. W. 191Ma. Control strategy for an expert vision system using quadtree refinement. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control (Annapolis, Md., Apr.). IEEE, New York, pp. 214-218.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  191. TUCKER, L. W. 1984b. Computer vision using quadtree refinement. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Polytechnic Institute of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y., May.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  192. UHR, L. 1972. Layered "recognition cone" networks that preprocess, classify, and describe, iEEE Trans. Compu~ 21, 7 (July), 758-768.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  193. UNNIKRISHNAN, A., ANo VENKATESH, Y. V. 1984. On the conversion of raster to linear quadtrees. Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, May.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  194. V^N L~.UWEN, J., AND WOOD, D. 1981. The measure problem for rectangular ranges in d-space. J. Algorithms 2, 3 (Sept.), 282-300.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  195. VAN LIEROP, M. L. P. 1984. Transformations on pictures represented by leafcodes. Dept. of Math. emetics and Computing Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  196. WARNOCg;, J. L. 1969. A hidden surface algorithm for computer generated half tone pictures. TR 4- 15, Computer Science Dept., University of Utah, Salt Lake City, June.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  197. WEBBER, R. E. 1984. Analysis of quadtree algorithms. Ph.D. dissertation, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, Md., Mar. Also TR-1376, Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland.]] Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  198. WEBER, W. 1978. Three types of map data structures, their ANDs and NOTs, and a possible OR. In Proceedings of the 1st International Advanced Study Symposium on Topological Data Structures for Geographic In{ormation Systems, G. Dutton, Ed. Harvard Papers on Geographic Information Systems, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  199. WILLARD, D. E. 1982. Polygon retrieval. SIAM J. Comput. 1I, I (Feb.), 149-165.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  200. WOODWARK, J. R. 1982. The explicit quadtree as a structure for computer graphics. Comput. J. 25, 2 (May), 235-238.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  201. WU, A. Y., HON(~, T. H., AND ROSENFELO, A. 1982. Threshold selection using quadtrees. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal Mach. InteU. 4, 1 (Jan.), 90-94.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  202. YAMAGUCHi, K., KUNII, T. L., FUJIMURA, K., AND TORIYA, H. 1984. Octree-relateddata structures and algorithms. IEEE Comput. Gr. Appl. 4, 1 (Jan.), 53-59.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  203. YAU, M. 1984. Generating quadtrees of cross-sections from octrees. Comput. Vision Gr. image Process. 27, 2 (Aug.), 211-238.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  204. YAU, M., A~D SP~Agl, S. N. 1983. A hierarchical data structure for multidimensional digital iraages. Commun. ACM 26, 7 (July), 504-515.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  205. YERRY, M. A., A~D SHEPARD, M. S. 1983. A modified quadtree approach to finite element mesh generation, iEEE Cornput. Gr. AppL 3, I (Jan./ Feb.), 39-46.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Quadtree and Related Hierarchical Data Structures

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image ACM Computing Surveys
                ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 16, Issue 2
                June 1984
                161 pages
                ISSN:0360-0300
                EISSN:1557-7341
                DOI:10.1145/356924
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 1984 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 June 1984
                Published in csur Volume 16, Issue 2

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • article

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader