skip to main content
research-article

BehaviorNet: A Fine-grained Behavior-aware Network for Dynamic Link Prediction

Published:08 January 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Dynamic link prediction has become a trending research subject because of its wide applications in the web, sociology, transportation, and bioinformatics. Currently, the prevailing approach for dynamic link prediction is based on graph neural networks, in which graph representation learning is the key to perform dynamic link prediction tasks. However, there are still great challenges because the structure of graphs evolves over time. A common approach is to represent a dynamic graph as a collection of discrete snapshots, in which information over a period is aggregated through summation or averaging. This way results in some fine-grained time-related information loss, which further leads to a certain degree of performance degradation. We conjecture that such fine-grained information is vital because it implies specific behavior patterns of nodes and edges in a snapshot. To verify this conjecture, we propose a novel fine-grained behavior-aware network (BehaviorNet) for dynamic network link prediction. Specifically, BehaviorNet adapts a transformer-based graph convolution network to capture the latent structural representations of nodes by adding edge behaviors as an additional attribute of edges. GRU is applied to learn the temporal features of given snapshots of a dynamic network by utilizing node behaviors as auxiliary information. Extensive experiments are conducted on several real-world dynamic graph datasets, and the results show significant performance gains for BehaviorNet over several state-of-the-art (SOTA) discrete dynamic link prediction baselines. Ablation study validates the effectiveness of modeling fine-grained edge and node behaviors.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Chen Jie, Ma Tengfei, and Xiao Cao. 2018. FastGCN: Fast learning with graph convolutional networks via importance sampling. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 30–May 3, 2018, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=rytstxWAW.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Chen Jinyin, Wang Xueke, and Xu Xuanheng. 2021. GC-LSTM: Graph convolution embedded LSTM for dynamic network link prediction. Applied Intelligence (2021), 116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Chen Ming, Wei Zhewei, Huang Zengfeng, Ding Bolin, and Li Yaliang. 2020. Simple and deep graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13–18 July 2020, Virtual Event(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 119). PMLR, 17251735. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/chen20v.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Dey Rahul and Salem Fathi M.. 2017. Gate-variants of Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural networks. In IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, MWSCAS 2017, Boston, MA, USA, August 6–9, 2017. IEEE, 15971600. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Fey Matthias and Lenssen Jan E.. 2019. Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch geometric. In ICLR Workshop on Representation Learning on Graphs and Manifolds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Gong Jibing, Wang Shen, Wang Jinlong, Feng Wenzheng, Peng Hao, Tang Jie, and Yu Philip S.. 2020. Attentional graph convolutional networks for knowledge concept recommendation in MOOCs in a heterogeneous view. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 7988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Gong Liyu and Cheng Qiang. 2019. Exploiting edge features for graph neural networks. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2019, Long Beach, CA, USA, June 16–20, 2019. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, 92119219. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Goyal Palash, Kamra Nitin, He Xinran, and Liu Yan. 2018. DynGEM: Deep embedding method for dynamic graphs. CoRR abs/1805.11273 (2018). arXiv:1805.11273 http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Grover Aditya and Leskovec Jure. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 13–17, 2016, Krishnapuram Balaji, Shah Mohak, Smola Alexander J., Aggarwal Charu C., Shen Dou, and Rastogi Rajeev (Eds.). ACM, 855864. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Hamilton William L., Ying Zhitao, and Leskovec Jure. 2017. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4–9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, Guyon Isabelle, Luxburg Ulrike von, Bengio Samy, Wallach Hanna M., Fergus Rob, Vishwanathan S. V. N., and Garnett Roman (Eds.). 10241034. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/5dd9db5e033da9c6fb5ba83c7a7ebea9-Abstract.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Han Zhen, Ma Yunpu, Wang Yuyi, Günnemann Stephan, and Tresp Volker. 2020. Graph Hawkes neural network for forecasting on temporal knowledge graphs. In Conference on Automated Knowledge Base Construction, AKBC 2020, Virtual, June 22–24, 2020, Das Dipanjan, Hajishirzi Hannaneh, McCallum Andrew, and Singh Sameer (Eds.). DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Isella Lorenzo, Stehlé Juliette, Barrat Alain, Cattuto Ciro, Pinton Jean-François, and Broeck Wouter Van den. 2011. What’s in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology 271, 1 (2011), 166180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Kazemilari Mansooreh and Djauhari Maman Abdurachman. 2015. Correlation network analysis for multi-dimensional data in stocks market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 429 (2015), 6275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Kingma Diederik P. and Ba Jimmy. 2015. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7–9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, Bengio Yoshua and LeCun Yann (Eds.). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Kipf Thomas N. and Welling Max. 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. (2017). https://openreview.net/forum?id=SJU4ayYgl.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Klicpera Johannes, Bojchevski Aleksandar, and Günnemann Stephan. 2019. Predict then propagate: Graph neural networks meet personalized PageRank. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6–9, 2019. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1gL-2A9Ym.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Klimt Bryan and Yang Yiming. 2004. The Enron corpus: A new dataset for email classification research. In Machine Learning: ECML 2004, 15th European Conference on Machine Learning, Pisa, Italy, September 20–24, 2004, Proceedings(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3201), Boulicaut Jean-François, Esposito Floriana, Giannotti Fosca, and Pedreschi Dino (Eds.). Springer, 217226. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Knyazev Boris, Augusta Carolyn, and Taylor Graham W.. 2021. Learning temporal attention in dynamic graphs with bilinear interactions. PLOS ONE 16, 3 (032021), 118. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Kumar Srijan, Hooi Bryan, Makhija Disha, Kumar Mohit, Faloutsos Christos, and Subrahmanian V. S.. 2018. REV2: Fraudulent user prediction in rating platforms. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2018, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA, February 5–9, 2018, Chang Yi, Zhai Chengxiang, Liu Yan, and Maarek Yoelle (Eds.). ACM, 333341. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Kumar Srijan, Zhang Xikun, and Leskovec Jure. 2019. Predicting dynamic embedding trajectory in temporal interaction networks. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, KDD 2019, Anchorage, AK, USA, August 4–8, 2019, Teredesai Ankur, Kumar Vipin, Li Ying, Rosales Rómer, Terzi Evimaria, and Karypis George (Eds.). ACM, 12691278. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Li Guohao, Müller Matthias, Thabet Ali K., and Ghanem Bernard. 2019. DeepGCNs: Can GCNs go as deep as CNNs?. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2019, Seoul, Korea (South), October 27 - November 2, 2019. IEEE, 92669275. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Li Juzheng, Zhu Jun, and Zhang Bo. 2016. Discriminative deep random walk for network classification. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2016, August 7–12, 2016, Berlin, Germany, Volume 1: Long Papers. The Association for Computer Linguistics. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Liu J., Xu C., Yin C., Wu W., and Song Y.. 2020. K-Core based temporal graph convolutional network for dynamic graphs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering01 (2020), 11. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Liu Zhining, Zhou Dawei, Zhu Yada, Gu Jinjie, and He Jingrui. 2020. Towards fine-grained temporal network representation via time-reinforced random walk. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2020, The Tenth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2020, New York, NY, USA, February 7–12, 2020. AAAI Press, 49734980. https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/AAAI/article/view/5936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Ma Yao, Guo Ziyi, Ren Zhaochun, Tang Jiliang, and Yin Dawei. 2020. Streaming graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2020, Virtual Event, China, July 25–30, 2020, Huang Jimmy, Chang Yi, Cheng Xueqi, Kamps Jaap, Murdock Vanessa, Wen Ji-Rong, and Liu Yiqun (Eds.). ACM, 719728. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Natarajan Nagarajan and Dhillon Inderjit S.. 2014. Inductive matrix completion for predicting gene-disease associations. Bioinform. 30, 12 (2014), 6068. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Nguyen Duc Duy and Wei Guo-Wei. 2019. AGL-score: Algebraic graph learning score for protein-ligand binding scoring, ranking, docking, and screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 7 (2019), 32913304. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Nguyen Giang Hoang, Lee John Boaz, Rossi Ryan A., Ahmed Nesreen K., Koh Eunyee, and Kim Sungchul. 2018. Continuous-time dynamic network embeddings. In Companion of The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018, WWW 2018, Lyon , France, April 23–27, 2018, Champin Pierre-Antoine, Gandon Fabien, Lalmas Mounia, and Ipeirotis Panagiotis G. (Eds.). ACM, 969976. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Noble Caleb C. and Cook Diane J.. 2003. Graph-based anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA, August 24–27, 2003, Getoor Lise, Senator Ted E., Domingos Pedro M., and Faloutsos Christos (Eds.). ACM, 631636. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Opsahl Tore and Panzarasa Pietro. 2009. Clustering in weighted networks. Soc. Networks 31, 2 (2009), 155163. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Panzarasa Pietro, Opsahl Tore, and Carley Kathleen M.. 2009. Patterns and dynamics of users’ behavior and interaction: Network analysis of an online community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 5 (2009), 911932.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Pareja Aldo, Domeniconi Giacomo, Chen Jie, Ma Tengfei, Suzumura Toyotaro, Kanezashi Hiroki, Kaler Tim, Schardl Tao B., and Leiserson Charles E.. 2020. EvolveGCN: Evolving graph convolutional networks for dynamic graphs. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2020, The Tenth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2020, New York, NY, USA, February 7–12, 2020. AAAI Press, 53635370. https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/AAAI/article/view/5984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] Peng Hao, Li Jianxin, Yan Hao, Gong Qiran, Wang Senzhang, Liu Lin, Wang Lihong, and Ren Xiang. 2020. Dynamic network embedding via incremental skip-gram with negative sampling. Science China Information Sciences 63, 10 (2020), 119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Peng Hao, Yang Renyu, Wang Zheng, Li Jianxin, He Lifang, Philip S. Yu, Zomaya Albert Y., and Ranjan Rajiv. 2021. Lime: Low-cost and incremental learning for dynamic heterogeneous information networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 71, 3 (2021), 628642.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. [35] Perozzi Bryan, Al-Rfou Rami, and Skiena Steven. 2014. DeepWalk: Online learning of social representations. In The 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD’14, New York, NY, USA - August 24–27, 2014, Macskassy Sofus A., Perlich Claudia, Leskovec Jure, Wang Wei, and Ghani Rayid (Eds.). ACM, 701710. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. [36] Rossi Emanuele, Chamberlain Ben, Frasca Fabrizio, Eynard Davide, Monti Federico, and Bronstein Michael M.. 2020. Temporal graph networks for deep learning on dynamic graphs. CoRR abs/2006.10637. arXiv:2006.10637 https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10637.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Rossi Ryan A. and Ahmed Nesreen K.. 2015. The network data repository with interactive graph analytics and visualization. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, January 25–30, 2015, Austin, Texas, USA, Bonet Blai and Koenig Sven (Eds.). AAAI Press, 42924293. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI15/paper/view/9553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Rozemberczki Benedek, Scherer Paul, He Yixuan, Panagopoulos George, Riedel Alexander, Astefanoaei Maria, Kiss Oliver, Beres Ferenc, Lopez Guzman, Collignon Nicolas, and Sarkar Rik. 2021. PyTorch geometric temporal: Spatiotemporal signal processing with neural machine learning models. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 45644573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. [39] Sankar Aravind, Wu Yanhong, Gou Liang, Zhang Wei, and Yang Hao. 2020. DySAT: Deep neural representation learning on dynamic graphs via self-attention networks. In WSDM’20: The Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Houston, TX, USA, February 3–7, 2020, Caverlee James, Hu Xia (Ben), Lalmas Mounia, and Wang Wei (Eds.). ACM, 519527. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. [40] Seo Youngjoo, Defferrard Michaël, Vandergheynst Pierre, and Bresson Xavier. 2018. Structured sequence modeling with graph convolutional recurrent networks. In Neural Information Processing - 25th International Conference, ICONIP 2018, Siem Reap, Cambodia, December 13–16, 2018, Proceedings, Part I(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11301), Cheng Long, Leung Andrew Chi-Sing, and Ozawa Seiichi (Eds.). Springer, 362373. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Sherstinsky Alex. 2020. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 404 (2020), 132306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Shi Yunsheng, Huang Zhengjie, Feng Shikun, Zhong Hui, Wang Wenjing, and Sun Yu. 2021. Masked label prediction: Unified message passing model for semi-supervised classification. (2021), 15481554. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Skarding Joakim, Gabrys Bogdan, and Musial Katarzyna. 2020. Foundations and modelling of dynamic networks using dynamic graph neural networks: A survey. CoRR abs/2005.07496 (2020). arXiv:2005.07496 https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Sun Li, Zhang Zhongbao, Zhang Jiawei, Wang Feiyang, Peng Hao, Su Sen, and Philip S. Yu. 2021. Hyperbolic variational graph neural network for modeling dynamic graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 43754383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Taheri Aynaz and Berger-Wolf Tanya Y.. 2019. Predictive temporal embedding of dynamic graphs. In ASONAM’19: International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 27–30 August, 2019, Spezzano Francesca, Chen Wei, and Xiao Xiaokui (Eds.). ACM, 5764. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Tang Lei and Liu Huan. 2009. Relational learning via latent social dimensions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Paris, France, June 28–July 1, 2009, IV John F. Elder, Fogelman-Soulié Françoise, Flach Peter A., and Zaki Mohammed Javeed (Eds.). ACM, 817826. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. [47] Thakoor Shantanu, Tallec Corentin, Azar Mohammad Gheshlaghi, Munos Rémi, Velickovic Petar, and Valko Michal. 2021. Bootstrapped representation learning on graphs. CoRR abs/2102.06514 (2021). arXiv:2102.06514 https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06514.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Trivedi Rakshit, Farajtabar Mehrdad, Biswal Prasenjeet, and Zha Hongyuan. 2019. DyRep: Learning representations over dynamic graphs. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6–9, 2019. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=HyePrhR5KX.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. [49] Maaten Laurens Van der and Hinton Geoffrey. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 11 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. [50] Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomez Aidan N., Kaiser Lukasz, and Polosukhin Illia. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4–9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, Guyon Isabelle, Luxburg Ulrike von, Bengio Samy, Wallach Hanna M., Fergus Rob, Vishwanathan S. V. N., and Garnett Roman (Eds.). 59986008. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. [51] Velickovic Petar, Cucurull Guillem, Casanova Arantxa, Romero Adriana, Liò Pietro, and Bengio Yoshua. 2018. Graph attention networks. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 30–May 3, 2018, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJXMpikCZ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. [52] Wang Hui and Le Zichun. 2020. Seven-layer model in complex networks link prediction: A survey. Sensors 20, 22 (2020). DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. [53] Wang Quan, Mao Zhendong, Wang Bin, and Guo Li. 2017. Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 12 (2017), 27242743. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. [54] Wu Felix, Jr. Amauri H. Souza, Zhang Tianyi, Fifty Christopher, Yu Tao, and Weinberger Kilian Q.. 2019. Simplifying graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, 9–15 June 2019, Long Beach, California, USA(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 97), Chaudhuri Kamalika and Salakhutdinov Ruslan (Eds.). PMLR, 68616871. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/wu19e.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. [55] Xie Xiurui, Qu Hong, Liu Guisong, Zhang Malu, and Kurths Jürgen. 2016. An efficient supervised training algorithm for multilayer spiking neural networks. PloS One 11, 4 (2016), e0150329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. [56] Xu Dongkuan, Cheng Wei, Luo Dongsheng, Chen Haifeng, and Zhang Xiang. 2021. InfoGCL: Information-aware graph contrastive learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. [57] Yang Cheng, Liu Zhiyuan, Zhao Deli, Sun Maosong, and Chang Edward Y.. 2015. Network representation learning with rich text information. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 25–31, 2015, Yang Qiang and Wooldridge Michael J. (Eds.). AAAI Press, 21112117. http://ijcai.org/Abstract/15/299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. [58] Yang Chaoqi, Wang Ruijie, Yao Shuochao, Liu Shengzhong, and Abdelzaher Tarek F.. 2020. Revisiting “Over-smoothing” in deep GCNs. CoRR abs/2003.13663 (2020). arXiv:2003.13663 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13663.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. [59] Yang Zhihu, Li Zhi, and Wang Long. 2020. Evolution of cooperation in a conformity-driven evolving dynamic social network. Appl. Math. Comput. 379 (2020), 125251. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. [60] Yun Seongjun, Jeong Minbyul, Kim Raehyun, Kang Jaewoo, and Kim Hyunwoo J.. 2019. Graph transformer networks. (2019), 1196011970. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/9d63484abb477c97640154d40595a3bb-Abstract.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. [61] Zhang Si, Tong Hanghang, Xu Jiejun, and Maciejewski Ross. 2019. Graph convolutional networks: A comprehensive review. Computational Social Networks 6, 1 (2019), 123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Zhao Lingxiao and Akoglu Leman. 2020. PairNorm: Tackling oversmoothing in GNNs. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26–30, 2020. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id=rkecl1rtwB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. [63] Zheng Li, Li Zhenpeng, Li Jian, Li Zhao, and Gao Jun. 2019. AddGraph: Anomaly detection in dynamic graph using attention-based temporal GCN. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2019, Macao, China, August 10–16, 2019, Kraus Sarit (Ed.). ijcai.org, 44194425. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. [64] Zhou Le-kui, Yang Yang, Ren Xiang, Wu Fei, and Zhuang Yueting. 2018. Dynamic network embedding by modeling triadic closure process. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), the 30th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-18), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 2–7, 2018, McIlraith Sheila A. and Weinberger Kilian Q. (Eds.). AAAI Press, 571578. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/16572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. [65] Zhou Tao. 2021. Progresses and challenges in link prediction. CoRR abs/2102.11472 (2021). arXiv:2102.11472 https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11472.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. [66] Zhu Dingyuan, Cui Peng, Zhang Ziwei, Pei Jian, and Zhu Wenwu. 2018. High-order proximity preserved embedding for dynamic networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 30, 11 (2018), 21342144. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. [67] Zhu Linhong, Guo Dong, Yin Junming, Steeg Greg Ver, and Galstyan Aram. 2016. Scalable temporal latent space inference for link prediction in dynamic social networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28, 10 (2016), 27652777. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. BehaviorNet: A Fine-grained Behavior-aware Network for Dynamic Link Prediction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on the Web
        ACM Transactions on the Web  Volume 18, Issue 2
        May 2024
        378 pages
        ISSN:1559-1131
        EISSN:1559-114X
        DOI:10.1145/3613666
        • Editor:
        • White Ryen
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 January 2024
        • Online AM: 19 January 2023
        • Accepted: 3 December 2022
        • Revised: 21 October 2022
        • Received: 24 January 2022
        Published in tweb Volume 18, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text