skip to main content
10.1145/3581784.3607105acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancing Adaptive Physics Refinement Simulations Through the Addition of Realistic Red Blood Cell Counts

Published:11 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Simulations of cancer cell transport require accurately modeling mm-scale and longer trajectories through a circulatory system containing trillions of deformable red blood cells, whose intercellular interactions require submicron fidelity. Using a hybrid CPU-GPU approach, we extend the advanced physics refinement (APR) method to couple a finely-resolved region of explicitly-modeled red blood cells to a coarsely-resolved bulk fluid domain. We further develop algorithms that: capture the dynamics at the interface of differing viscosities, maintain hematocrit within the cell-filled volume, and move the finely-resolved region and encapsulated cells while tracking an individual cancer cell. Comparison to a fully-resolved fluid-structure interaction model is presented for verification. Finally, we use the advanced APR method to simulate cancer cell transport over a mm-scale distance while maintaining a local region of RBCs, using a fraction of the computational power required to run a fully-resolved model.

References

  1. Denis Wirtz, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos, and Peter C Searson. The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nature Reviews Cancer, 11(7):512--522, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Michael J Mitchell, Elizabeth Wayne, Kuldeepsinh Rana, Chris B Schaffer, and Michael R King. Trail-coated leukocytes that kill cancer cells in the circulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(3):930--935, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ragav Sharma and Sandeep Sharma. Physiology, blood volume. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Daniel F Puleri, Sayan Roychowdhury, Peter Balogh, John Gounley, Erik W Draeger, Jeff Ames, Adebayo Adebiyi, Simbarashe Chidyagwai, Benjamín Hernández, Seyong Lee, et al. High performance adaptive physics refinement to enable large-scale tracking of cancer cell trajectory. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), pages 230--242. IEEE, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gregory Herschlag, John Gounley, Sayan Roychowdhury, Erik W Draeger, and Amanda Randles. Multi-physics simulations of particle tracking in arterial geometries with a scalable moving window algorithm. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), pages 1--11. IEEE, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Peng Wang, Tom Abel, and Ralf Kaehler. Adaptive mesh fluid simulations on gpu. New Astronomy, 15(7):581--589, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Alan C Calder, BC Curts, LJ Dursi, Bruce Fryxell, Greg Henry, P MacNece, Kevin Olson, P Ricker, Robert Rosner, Francis X Timmes, et al. High-performance reactive fluid flow simulations using adaptive mesh refinement on thousands of processors. In SC'00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, pages 56--56. IEEE, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Amanda Peters Randles, Vivek Kale, Jeff Hammond, William Gropp, and Efthimios Kaxiras. Performance analysis of the lattice Boltzmann model beyond Navier-Stokes. In Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS), 2013 IEEE 27th International Symposium on, pages 1063--1074. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Amanda Randles, Erik W Draeger, and Peter E Bailey. Massively parallel simulations of hemodynamics in the primary large arteries of the human vasculature. J Comp Sci, 9:70--75, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. John Gounley, Erik W Draeger, and Amanda Randles. Immersed Boundary Method Halo Exchange in a Hemodynamics Application. LNCS, pages 441--455, 2019. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jeff Ames, Daniel F Puleri, Peter Balogh, John Gounley, Erik W Draeger, and Amanda Randles. Multi-gpu immersed boundary method hemodynamics simulations. Journal of Computational Science, page 101153, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shiyi Chen and Gary D Doolen. Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech, 30(1):329--364, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. John Gounley, Erik W Draeger, and Amanda Randles. Numerical simulation of a compound capsule in a constricted microchannel. Procedia Comput Sci, 108: 175--184, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Walter, A.-V. Salsac, D. Barthès-Biesel, and P. Le Tallec. Coupling of finite element and boundary integral methods for a capsule in a Stokes flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, pages n/a-n/a, 2010. ISSN 00295981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fehmi Cirak, Michael Ortiz, and Peter Schroder. Subdivision surfaces: a new paradigm for thin-shell finite-element analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 47(12): 2039--2072, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ou-Yang Zhong-Can and Wolfgang Helfrich. Bending energy of vesicle membranes: General expressions for the first, second, and third variation of the shape energy and applications to spheres and cylinders. Physical Review A, 39(10):5280, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Peter Balogh and Prosenjit Bagchi. A computational approach to modeling cellular-scale blood flow in complex geometry. J Comp Phys, 334:280--307, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Marianna Pepona, John Gounley, and Amanda Randles. Effect of constitutive law on the erythrocyte membrane response to large strains. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 132:145--160, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Charles S Peskin. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica, 11:479--517, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Wai-Hung Liu and Andrew H Sherman. Comparative analysis of the cuthill-mckee and the reverse cuthill-mckee ordering algorithms for sparse matrices. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 13(2):198--213, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Axel R Pries, D Neuhaus, and P Gaehtgens. Blood viscosity in tube flow: dependence on diameter and hematocrit. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 263(6):H1770--H1778, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yuan-cheng Fung. Biomechanics: circulation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Axel R Pries, Timothy W Secomb, P Gaehtgens, and JF Gross. Blood flow in microvascular networks. experiments and simulation. Circulation research, 67(4): 826--834, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. R. Skalak, A. Tozeren, R. P. Zarda, and S. Chien. Strain Energy Function of Red Blood Cell Membranes. Biophysical Journal, 13(3):245--264, 1973. ISSN 00063495. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Abhishek Jain and Lance L Munn. Determinants of leukocyte margination in rectangular microchannels. PloS one, 4(9):e7104, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Josephine Shaw Bagnall, Sangwon Byun, Shahinoor Begum, David T Miyamoto, Vivian C Hecht, Shyamala Maheswaran, Shannon L Stott, Mehmet Toner, Richard O Hynes, and Scott R Manalis. Deformability of tumor cells versus blood cells. Scientific reports, 5(1):1--11, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Timm Krüger, David Holmes, and Peter V Coveney. Deformability-based red blood cell separation in deterministic lateral displacement devices---a simulation study. Biomicrofluidics, 8(5):054114, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sayan Roychowdhury, John Gounley, and Amanda Randles. Evaluating the influence of hemorheological parameters on circulating tumor cell trajectory and simulation time. In Proceedings of the Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference, pages 1--10, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing Adaptive Physics Refinement Simulations Through the Addition of Realistic Red Blood Cell Counts

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SC '23: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis
          November 2023
          1428 pages
          ISBN:9798400701092
          DOI:10.1145/3581784

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 November 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,516of6,373submissions,24%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)216
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader