skip to main content
research-article

DMGF-Net: An Efficient Dynamic Multi-Graph Fusion Network for Traffic Prediction

Published:14 April 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Traffic prediction is the core task of intelligent transportation system (ITS) and accurate traffic prediction can greatly improve the utilization of public resources. Dynamic interaction of multiple spatial relationships will influence the accuracy of traffic prediction. However, many existing methods only consider static spatial relationships, which restricts the accuracy of the prediction. To address the above problem, in this article, we propose the Dynamic Multi-Graph Fusion Network (DMGF-Net) to model the spatial-temporal correlations in traffic network. In the DMGF-Net, the fusion graph is designed to leverage and extract the various spatial correlations between different regions by fusing spatial graph, semantic graph, and spatial-semantic graph. Further, to dynamically learn the importance of different neighbors, we design the Dynamic Spatial-Temporal Unit (DSTU), which can adjust the aggregation weights of different neighbors by combining the convolution operation and the attention mechanism. It can selectively aggregate spatial-temporal features from different neighbors. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate that effectiveness of our model, especially on PEMS08, our model achieves an increase of about 8.55% and 7.55% in terms of MAE and RMSE than the static model STGCN.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Bai L., Yao L., Li C., Wang X., and Wang C.. 2020. Adaptive graph convolutional recurrent network for traffic forecasting. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Bai L., Yao L., Kanhere S., Wang X., and Sheng Q.. 2019. Stg2seq: Spatial-temporal graph to sequence model for multi-step passenger demand forecasting. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Cho Kyunghyun, van Merriënboer Bart, Gulcehre Caglar, Bahdanau Dzmitry, Bougares Fethi, Schwenk Holger, and Bengio Yoshua. 2014. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 1724–1734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Yao Huaxiu, Wu Fei, Ke Jintao, Tang Xianfeng, Jia Yitian, Lu Siyu, Gong Pinghua, Li Zhenhui, Ye Jieping, and Chuxing Didi. 2018. Deep multi-view spatial-temporal network for taxi demand prediction. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2018 (2018), 2588–2595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Liu Hui, Hong Tian qi, and Yan Fei Li. 2012. Comparison of two new ARIMA-ANN and ARIMA-Kalman hybrid methods for wind speed prediction. Applied Energy 98 (2012), 415–424.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Geng X., Li Y., Wang L., Zhang L., Yang Q., Ye J., Liu Y.. 2019. Spatiotemporal multi-graph convolution network for ride-hailing demand forecasting. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Guo S., Lin Y., Feng N., Song C., and Wan H.. 2019. Attention based spatial-temporal graph convolutional networks for traffic flow forecasting. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Zhang Junbo, Zheng Yu, Qi Dekang, Li Ruiyuan, and Yi Xiuwen. 2016. DNN-based prediction model for spatio-temporal data. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (Burlingame, California) (SIGSPACIAL’16).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Sun J., Zhang J., Li Q., Yi X., Liang Y., and Zheng Y.. 2020. Predicting citywide crowd flows in irregular regions using multi-view graph convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 34, 5 (2020), 2348–2359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Li Yaguang, Yu Rose, Shahabi Cyrus, and Liu Yan. 2018. Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: Data-driven traffic forecasting. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Zhao Ling, Song Yujiao, Zhang Chao, Liu Yu, Wang Pu, Lin Tao, Deng Min, and Li Haifeng. 2020. T-GCN: A temporal graph convolutional network for traffic prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 21, 9 (2020), 3848–3858.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Lu B., Gan X., Jin H., Fu L., and Zhang H.. 2020. Spatiotemporal adaptive gated graph convolution network for urban traffic flow forecasting. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Voort Mascha Van Der, Dougherty Mark, and Watson Susan. 1996. Combining kohonen maps with ARIMA time series models to forecast traffic flow. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 4, 5 (1996), 307–318Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Lippi Marco, Bertini Matteo, and Frasconi Paolo. 2013. Short-term traffic flow forecasting: An experimental comparison of time-series analysis and supervised learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 14, 2 (2013), 871–882.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Jiang Renhe, Song Xuan, Huang Dou, Song Xiaoya, Xia Tianqi, Cai Zekun, Wang Zhaonan, Kim Kyoung-Sook, and Shibasaki Ryosuke. 2019. DeepUrbanEvent: A system for predicting citywide crowd dynamics at big events. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2114–2122. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Guo Shengnan, Lin Youfang, Li Shijie, Chen Zhaoming, and Wan Huaiyu. 2019. Deep spatial-temporal 3D convolutional neural networks for traffic data forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20, 10 (2019), 3913–3926.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. [17] Wang Leye, Geng Xu, Ma Xiaojuan, Liu Feng, and Yang Qiang. 2019. Cross-city transfer learning for deep spatio-temporal prediction. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’19). AAAI Press, 1893–1899.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Fang Shen, Zhang Qi, Meng Gaofeng, Xiang Shiming, and Pan Chunhong. 2019. GSTNet: Global Spatial-Temporal Network for traffic flow prediction. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-19. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. 228–2293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Song C., Lin Y., Guo S., and Wan H.. 2020. Spatial-temporal synchronous graph convolutional networks: A new framework for spatial-temporal network data forecasting. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Drucker H., Burges C. J., Kaufman L., A. Smola J., and Vapnik V.. 1997. Support vector regression machines. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 155–161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [21] Wu Z., Pan S., Long G., Jiang J., and Zhang C.. 2019. Graph wavenet for deep spatial-temporal graph modeling. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Wang Y., Gao Z., Long M., Wang J., and Yu P. S.. 2018. PredRNN++: Towards a resolution of the deep-in-time dilemma in spatiotemporal predictive learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23] Chen Weiqi, Chen Ling, Xie Yu, Cao Wei, Gao Yusong, and Feng Xiaojie. 2020. Multi-range attentive bicomponent graph convolutional network for traffic forecasting. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 34, 4 (2020), 3529–3536.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Yu B., Yin H., and Zhu Z.. 2018. Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks: A deep learning framework for traffic forecasting. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Zhang J., Zheng Y., and Qi D.. 2017. Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Zhang C., J J.. Yu Q., and Liu Y.. 2019. Spatial-temporal graph attention networks: A deep learning approach for traffic forecasting. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 166246–166256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Zheng C., Fan X., Wang C., and Qi J.. 2019. GMAN: A graph multi-attention network for traffic prediction. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Hamilton J. D.. 1994. Time series analysis, Vol. 2. Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Huang Rongzhou, Huang Chuyin, Liu Yubao, Dai Genan, and Kong Weiyang. 2020. LSGCN: Long short-term traffic prediction with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’20). Article 326, 2355–2361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Mengzhang Li and Zhanxing Zhu. 2021. Spatial-temporal fusion graph neural networks for traffic flow forecasting. In Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, A Virtual Conference. 4189–4196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31] Fang Z., Long Q., Song G., and Xie K.. 2021. Spatial-temporal graph ode networks for traffic flow forecasting. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 364–373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Shreshth Tuli, Matthew Wilkinson R., and Chris Kettell. 2022. RadNet: Incident prediction in spatio-temporal road graph networks using traffic forecasting. IJCAI DSO Workshop (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Lohrasbinasab Iraj, Shahraki Amin, Taherkordi Amir, and Jurcut Anca Delia. 2022. From statistical-to machine learning-based network traffic prediction. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies 33, 4 (2022), e4394. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [34] Simonovsky M. and Komodakis N.. 2017. Dynamic edgeconditioned filters in convolutional neural networks on graphs. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3693–3702.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Hochreiter S. and Schmidhuber J.. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735–1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Feng X., Guo J., Qin B., Liu T., and Liu Y.. 2017. Effective deep memory networks for distant supervised relation extraction. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 19–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. DMGF-Net: An Efficient Dynamic Multi-Graph Fusion Network for Traffic Prediction

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
            ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data  Volume 17, Issue 7
            August 2023
            319 pages
            ISSN:1556-4681
            EISSN:1556-472X
            DOI:10.1145/3589018
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 14 April 2023
            • Online AM: 3 March 2023
            • Accepted: 23 February 2023
            • Revised: 20 February 2023
            • Received: 30 July 2022
            Published in tkdd Volume 17, Issue 7

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)565
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)44

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Full Text

          View this article in Full Text.

          View Full Text

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format