skip to main content
10.1145/3597066.3597079acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

On the Order of Power Series and the Sum of Square Roots Problem

Published:24 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on the study of the order of power series that are linear combinations of a given finite set of power series. The order of a formal power series, known as , is defined as the minimum exponent of x that has a non-zero coefficient in f(x). Our first result is that the order of the Wronskian of these power series is equivalent up to a polynomial factor, to the maximum order which occurs in the linear combination of these power series. This implies that the Wronskian approach used in (Kayal and Saha, TOCT’2012) to upper bound the order of sum of square roots is optimal up to a polynomial blowup. We also demonstrate similar upper bounds, similar to those of (Kayal and Saha, TOCT’2012), for the order of power series in a variety of other scenarios. We also solve a special case of the inequality testing problem outlined in (Etessami et al., TOCT’2014).

In the second part of the paper, we study the equality variant of the sum of square roots problem, which is decidable in polynomial time due to (Blömer, FOCS’1991). We investigate a natural generalization of this problem when the input integers are given as straight line programs. Under the assumption of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis (GRH), we show that this problem can be reduced to the so-called “one dimensional” variant. We identify the key mathematical challenges for solving this “one dimensional” variant.

References

  1. Eric Allender, Peter Buergisser, Johan Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, and Peter Bro Miltersen. 2009. On the Complexity of Numerical Analysis. SIAM J. Comput. 38, 5 (2009), 1987–2006. https://doi.org/10.1137/070697926 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1137/070697926Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Eric Bach and Jeffrey Shallit. 1996. Algorithmic Number Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Baker. 1998. Logarithmic forms and the abc- conjecture. De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 37–44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Baker and G. Wüstholz. 1993. Logarithmic forms and group varieties.Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 442 (1993), 19–62. http://eudml.org/doc/153550Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nikhil Balaji, Klara Nosan, Mahsa Shirmohammadi, and James Worrell. 2022. Identity Testing for Radical Expressions. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (Haifa, Israel) (LICS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531130.3533331Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Johannes Blömer. 1991. Computing Sums of Radicals in Polynomial Time. In 32nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1-4 October 1991. IEEE Computer Society, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1991.185434Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Johannes Blömer. 1998. A Probabilistic Zero-Test for Expressions Involving Roots of Rational Numbers. In Algorithms — ESA’ 98, Gianfranco Bilardi, Giuseppe F. Italiano, Andrea Pietracaprina, and Geppino Pucci (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 151–162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lenore Blum, Felipe Cucker, Michael Shub, and Steve Smale. 1997. Complexity and Real Computation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Eric Boniface, Wei Deng, and J. Maurice Rojas. 2022. Trinomials and Deterministic Complexity Limits for Real Solving. arXiv:2202.06115Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alin Bostan and Philippe Dumas. 2010. Wronskians and linear independence. The American Mathematical Monthly 117, 8 (2010), 722–727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Richard P Brent. 1976. Fast multiple-precision evaluation of elementary functions. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 23, 2 (1976), 242–251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kousha Etessami, Alistair Stewart, and Mihalis Yannakakis. 2014. A Note on the Complexity of Comparing Succinctly Represented Integers, with an Application to Maximum Probability Parsing. ACM Trans. Comput. Theory 6, 2 (2014), 9:1–9:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601327Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. R. Garey, R. L. Graham, and D. S. Johnson. 1976. Some NP-Complete Geometric Problems. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA) (STOC ’76). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/800113.803626Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Neeraj Kayal and Chandan Saha. 2012. On the Sum of Square Roots of Polynomials and Related Problems. ACM Trans. Comput. Theory 4, 4, Article 9 (nov 2012), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2382559.2382560Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Martin Kneser. 1975. Lineare Abhängigkeit von Wurzeln. Acta Arithmetica 26, 3 (1975), 307–308. http://eudml.org/doc/205320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Pascal Koiran. 2019. Root separation for trinomials. Journal of Symbolic Computation 95 (2019), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2019.02.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gregorio Malajovich. 2001. An Eective Version of Kronecker’s Theorem on Simultaneous Diophantine Approximation. Technical Report. Technical report, City University of Hong Kong.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jianbo Qian and Cao An Wang. 2006. How much precision is needed to compare two sums of square roots of integers?Inform. Process. Lett. 100, 5 (2006), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2006.05.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jean-Pierre Serre. 1981. Quelques applications du théoreme de densité de Chebotarev. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 54 (1981), 123–201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Peter Stevenhagen and Hendrik Willem Lenstra. 1996. Chebotarëv and his density theorem. The Mathematical Intelligencer 18, 2 (1996), 26–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M Voorhoeve and A.J Van Der Poorten. 1975. Wronskian determinants and the zeros of certain functions. Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings) 78, 5 (1975), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/1385-7258(75)90050-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. On the Order of Power Series and the Sum of Square Roots Problem

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ISSAC '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation
        July 2023
        567 pages
        ISBN:9798400700392
        DOI:10.1145/3597066

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 July 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate395of838submissions,47%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)88
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format