skip to main content
10.1145/364338.364395acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi3dConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Virtual clay: a real-time sculpting system with haptic toolkits

Published:01 March 2001Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.R. Balakrishnan, G. Fitzmaurice, G. Kurtenbach, and K. Singh. Exploring interactive curve and surface manipulation using a bend and twist sensitive input strip. In Proceedings of the 1999 ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pages 111-118, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.D. Baraff and A. Witkin. Dynamic simulation of nonpenetrating flexible bodies. In Computer Graphics (SIG- GRAPH 92 Proceedings), volume 26, pages 303-308, July 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.D. Baraff and A. Witkin. Large steps in cloth simulation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 98 Proceedings), pages 43- 54, July 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.E. Catmull and J. Clark. Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes. Computer Aided Design, 10:350-355, Sept. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.G. Celniker and D. Gossard. Deformable curve and surface finite elements for free-form shape design. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 91 Proceedings), pages 257-266, July 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.F. Dachille IX, H. Qin, A. Kaufman, and J. El-Sana. Haptic sculpting of dynamic surfaces. In Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pages 103-110, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.T. DeRose, M. Kass, and T. Truong. Subdivision surfaces in character animation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 98 Proceedings), pages 85-94, July 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.H. Hoppe, T. DeRose, T. Duchamp, M. Halstead, H. Jin, J. McDonald, J. Schweitzer, and W. Stuetzle. Piecewise smooth surface reconstruction. In Computer Graphics (SIG- GRAPH 94 Proceedings), pages 295-302, July 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.D. L. James and D. K. Pai. ARTDEFO: Accurate Real Time Deformable Objects. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 99 Proceedings), pages 65-72, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.K. I. Joy and R. MacCracken. The refinement rules for Catmull-Clark solids. Technical Report CSE-96-1, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, Feb. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.R. MacCracken and K. I. Joy. Free-form deformations with lattices of arbitrary topology. In Computer Graphics (SIG- GRAPH 96 Proceedings), pages 181-188, August 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.C. Mandal, H. Qin, and B. C. Vemuri. A novel FEM-based dynamic framework for subdivision surfaces. In Proceedings of Solid Modeling '99, pages 191-202, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.K. T. McDonnell and H. Qin. Dynamic sculpting and animation of free-form subdivision solids. In Proceedings of IEEE Computer Animation 2000, pages 126-133, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.D. Metaxas and D. Terzopoulos. Dynamic deformation of solid primitives with constraints. In Computer Graphics (SIG- GRAPH 92 Proceedings), pages 309-312, July 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.T. Miller and R. C. Zeleznik. The design of 3D haptic widgets. In Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pages 97-102, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.M. J. Muuss and L. A. Butler. Combinatorial solid geometry, boundary representations, and n-manifold geometry. In D. F. Rogers and R. A. Earnshaw, editors, State of the Art in Computer Graphics: Visualization and Modeling, pages 185-223. Springer-Verlag, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. 17.A. Pentland and J. Williams. Good vibrations: Modal dynamics for graphics and animation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 89 Proceedings), pages 215-222, July 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.H. Qin, C. Mandal, and B. C. Vemuri. Dynamic Catmull- Clark subdivision surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 4(3):215-229, July 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.H. Qin and D. Terzopoulos. D-NURBS: a physics-based framework for geometric design. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2(1):85-96, Mar. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.M. A. Srinivasan and C. Basdogan. Haptics in virtual environments: taxonomy, research status, and challenges. Computers & Graphics, 21(4):393-404, July 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. 22.D. Terzopoulos and K. Fleischer. Deformable models. The Visual Computer, 4(6):306-331, Dec. 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. 23.D. Terzopoulos and K. Fleischer. Modeling inelastic deformation: viscoelasticity, plasticity, fracture. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 88 Proceedings), pages 269-278, August 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.D. Terzopoulos, J. Platt, A. Barr, and K. Fleischer. Elastically deformable models. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 87 Proceedings), July 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.T. V. Thompson, D. E. Johnson, and E. Cohen. Direct haptic rendering of sculptured models. In Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pages 167-176, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.K. J. Weiler. Topological Structures for Geometric Modeling. PhD thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, August 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.A. Witkin and M. Kass. Spacetime constraints. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 88 Proceedings), volume 22, pages 159-168, Aug. 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Virtual clay: a real-time sculpting system with haptic toolkits

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in
                    • Published in

                      cover image ACM Conferences
                      I3D '01: Proceedings of the 2001 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics
                      March 2001
                      270 pages
                      ISBN:1581132921
                      DOI:10.1145/364338

                      Copyright © 2001 ACM

                      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                      Publisher

                      Association for Computing Machinery

                      New York, NY, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 1 March 2001

                      Permissions

                      Request permissions about this article.

                      Request Permissions

                      Check for updates

                      Qualifiers

                      • Article

                      Acceptance Rates

                      I3D '01 Paper Acceptance Rate31of84submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate148of485submissions,31%

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader