skip to main content
10.1145/365024.365300acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Text input for mobile devices: comparing model prediction to actual performance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to obtain performance data for entering text on a mobile phone in order to compare it to performance predictions based on two different mathematical models. Speed data was obtained for two text input methods, T9 Text Input and Multi-tap. While the direction of the results was the same for both the performance data and both model predicitons (with predictive text entry being faster than Multi-tap text entry), the results for all three differed in magnitude. Suggestions for this discrepancy are provided. In addition, in order to help shape future models, additional results are presented for both input methods to show how both accuracy and speed performance varies based on user experience and text subject matter.

References

  1. 1.Buckingham, S. An introduction to the short message service, Mobile Lifestreams Limited, www.gsmworld.com/technology/sms_success.html (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A. The psychology of human-computer interaction, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Dunlop, M. D., and Crossan, A. Dictionary based text entry method for mobile phones, in Second Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices(Edinburgh, Scotland August 1999), 5-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Dunlop, M. D., and Crossan, A. Predictive text entry methods for mobile phones. Personal Technologies, (2000), 134-143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5.GSM Association Press Release. G-Mail growth: Global surge continues. GSM Association, Avoca Court, Temple Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. www.gsmworld.com. (2000)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Grover, D.L., King, M.T., and Kushler, C. A. Patent No. US5818437, Reduced keyboard disambiguating computer. Tegic Communications, Inc., Seattle (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Silfverberg, M., MacKenzie, I.S., & Korhonen, P. Predicting Text Entry Speed on Mobile Phones, in Proceedings of CHI '00 (The Hague, Amsterdam, April 2000), ACM Press, 9-16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Text input for mobile devices: comparing model prediction to actual performance

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            March 2001
            559 pages
            ISBN:1581133278
            DOI:10.1145/365024

            Copyright © 2001 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 March 2001

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '01 Paper Acceptance Rate69of352submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader