skip to main content
10.1145/375735.376422acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Interaction patterns and observable commitments in a multi-agent trading scenario

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 May 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a formal semantics for the protocol diagrams (interaction patterns) of AUML (Agent Unified Modelling Language). We connect this proposal with a general framework for defining the semantics of ACLs (Agent Communication Languages). We then show that protocol diagrams should be parameterised with observable commitments: additional specification of the expected outcomes and normative positions resulting from the use of the protocol. A complete axiomatisation of a contract-net protocol is given, and animated to show how the agents comply with expected replies and respecting the norms. We conclude that this approach to `socialising' interaction between agents is important for developing open agent systems and potentially useful in standardisation.

References

  1. 1.B.Bauer,J.Muller,and J.Odell.An extension of UML by protocols for multiagent interaction.In Proceedings ICMAS-2000 ,pages 207 -214.IEEE Computer Society,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.F.Dignum,D.Morley,E.Sonenberg,and L.Cavedon. Towards socially sophisticated bd agents.In Proceedings ICMAS-2000 ,pages 111 -118.IEEE Computer Society,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.FIPA.Communicative act library speci .cation.FIPA (Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents), Document XC00037,http://www.pa.org,1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.FIPA.Interaction protocol library speci .cation.FIPA (Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents), Document XC00025,http://www.pa.org,2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.A.Jones and M.Sergot.A formal characterisation of institutionalized power.Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics ,4(3):429 -455,1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.J.Pitt.An operational semantics for ntentional speci .cations of agent behaviour in communication protocols.In M.Greaves,editor,Proceedings AA2000 Workshop on Agent Languages and Conversation Policies ,pages pp31 -40.Barcelona,1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.J.Pitt,F.Guerin,and C.Stergiou.Protocols and intentional speci .cations of multi-party agent conversations for brokerage and auctions.In Proceedings Autonomous Agents 2000 ,pages 269 -276. ACM Press,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.J.Pitt and A.Mamdani.A protocol-based semantics for an agent communication language.In Proceedings 16th International Joint Conference on Arti .cial Intelligence IJCAI '99 ,pages 485 -491. Morgan-Kaufmann,1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.J.Searle.Speech Acts:An Essay in the Philosphy of Language .Cambridge University Press,1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.M.Singh.A social semantics for agent communication languages.In F.Dignum and M.Greaves,editors, Issues in Agent Communication ,pages 31 -45. Springer Verlag,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.M.Witkowski and J.Pitt.Objective trust-based agents:Trust and trustworthiness in a multi-agent trading society.In Proceedings ICMAS-2000 ,pages 463 -464.IEEE Computer Society,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interaction patterns and observable commitments in a multi-agent trading scenario

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            AGENTS '01: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents
            May 2001
            662 pages
            ISBN:158113326X
            DOI:10.1145/375735

            Copyright © 2001 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 May 2001

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            AGENTS '01 Paper Acceptance Rate66of248submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate182of599submissions,30%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader