skip to main content
10.1145/379437.379662acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Music-notation searching and digital libraries

Published:01 January 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Almost all work on music information retrieval to date has concentrate d on music in the audio and event (normally MIDI) domains. However, music in the form of notation, especially Conventional Music Notation (CMN), is of much interest to musically-trained persons, both amateurs and professionals, and searching CMN has great value for digital music libraries. One obvious reason little has been done on music retrieval in CMN form is the overwhelming complexity of CMN, which requires a very substantial investment in programming before one can even begin studying music IR. This paper reports on work adding music-retrieval capabilities to Nightingale©, an existing professional-level music-notation editor.

References

  1. 1.AMNS (2000). Nightingale. http://www.ngale.com .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Bainbridge, D. (1998). MELDEX: A Web-based Melodic Index Service. In Hewlett & Selfridge-Field, op. cit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Bello, J.P., Monti, G., and Sandler, M. (2000). Techniques for Automatic Music Transcription. Read at the First International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval; available at http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/music2000 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Byrd, D. (1984). Music Notation by Computer. PhD dissertation, Indiana University (available from UMI, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Byrd, D. (1994). Music Notation Software and Intelligence. Computer Music Journal 18(1), pp. 17- 20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.Byrd, D. and Crawford, T. (2001). Problems of Music Information Retrieval in the Real World. To appear in Information Processing and Management. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Castan, G. (2001). Musical notation codes. http://www.s-line. de/homepages/gerd_castan/compmus/notationform ats_e.html .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Choudhury, G.S., Droetboom, M., DiLauro, T., Fujinaga, I., and Harrington, B. (2000). Optical Music Recognition System within a Large-Scale Digitization Project. Read at the First International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval; available at http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/music2000 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Coda (2000). About Finale for Macintosh (Coda Music Technology).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Crawford, T., Iliopoulos, C.S., and Raman, R. (1998). String-Matching Techniques for Musical Similarity and Melodic Recognition. In Hewlett and Selfridge-Field, op. cit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Dovey, M. (1999). A matrix based algorithm for locating polyphonic phrases within a polyphonic musical piece. In Proceedings of AISB '99 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Musical Creativity. Edinburgh, Scotland: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Hewlett, W., and Selfridge-Field, E., eds. (1998). Melodic Similarity: Concepts, Procedures, and Applications (Computing in Musicology 11) (MIT Press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Huron, D. (1998). Humdrum and Kern: Selective Feature Encoding. In Hewlett & Selfridge-Field, op. cit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.ISMIR (2000). International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval. http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/music2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.LaVine, K. (2000). Personal communication, May 2, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.McNab, R., Smith, S., Bainbridge, D., and Witten, I. (1997). The New Zealand Digital Library MELody InDEX. DLib Magazine, May 1997; at http://www.dlib.org. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.O'Maidin, D. (1995). "A Programmer's Environment for Music Analysis". Technical Report UL-CSIS-95-1, Department of Computer Science, University of Limerick, Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.O'Maidin, D. (1998). "A Geometrical Algorithm for Melodic Difference." In Hewlett & Selfridge-Field, op. cit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.OMRAS (2000). Online Music Recognition and Searching. http://www.omras.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Rastall, R. (1982). The Notation of Western Music (St. Martin's Press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Read, G. (1969). Music Notation, 2 nd ed. (Crescendo).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Ross, T. (1970). The Art of Music Engraving and Processing (Hansen).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Sadie, S., ed. (1980). The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians (Macmillan).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Music-notation searching and digital libraries

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              JCDL '01: Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
              January 2001
              481 pages
              ISBN:1581133456
              DOI:10.1145/379437

              Copyright © 2001 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 January 2001

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              JCDL '01 Paper Acceptance Rate76of250submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader