skip to main content
10.1145/383059.383068acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Statistical bandwidth sharing: a study of congestion at flow level

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 August 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we study the statistics of the realized throughput of elastic document transfers, accounting for the way network bandwidth is shared dynamically between the randomly varying number of concurrent flows. We first discuss the way TCP realizes statistical bandwidth sharing, illustrating essential properties by means of packet level simulations. Mathematical flow level models based on the theory of stochastic networks are then proposed to explain the observed behavior. A notable result is that first order performance (e.g., mean throughput) is insensitive with respect both to the flow size distribution and the flow arrival process, as long as "sessions" arrive according to a Poisson process. Perceived performance is shown to depend most significantly on whether demand at flow level is less than or greater than available capacity. The models provide a key to understanding the effectiveness of techniques for congestion management and service differentiation.

References

  1. 1.E.Altman,C.Barakat,and K.Avrachenkov.A stochastic model of tcp/ip with stationary random losses.In Proc.of ACM SIGCOMM '00 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.F.Baskett,K.M.Chandy R.R.Muntz,and F.G. Pallacios.Open,closed and mixed networks of queues with di .erent classes of customers.Journal of ACM 22 pages 248 260,1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.S.Ben Fredj,S.Oueslati-Boulahia,and J.W.Roberts. Measurement-based admission control for elastic tra .c.In Proceedings of ITC17 September 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.A.Berger and Y.Kogan.Dimensioning bandwidth for elastic tra .c in high-speed data networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Networks 8(5):643 654,October 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.D.Bertsekas and R.Gallager.Data Networks . Prentice-Hall International,1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.T.Bonald and L.Massouli~.Impact of fairness on internet performance.In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS '01 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.T.Bonald,A.Prouti~re,G.R~gni~,and J.W.Roberts.Insensitivity results in statistical bandwidth sharing.In Proceedings of ITC17 September 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.T.Bu and D.Towsley.Fixed point approximations for TCP behavior in an aqm network.In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS '01 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.J.W.Cohen.The multiple phase service network with generalized processor sharing.In Acta Informatica pages 245 284,1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.M.Crovella and A.Bestravos.Self-similarity in world wide web tra .c:Evidence and possible cause.In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS '96 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.G.De Veciana,T.J.Lee,and T.Konstantopoulos. Stability and performance analysis of networks supporting services with rate control -could the internet be unstable?In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '99 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.D.P.Heyman,T.V.Lakshman,and A.L.Neidhardt. New method for analyzing feedback protocols with applications to engineering web tra .c over the internet.In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS '97 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.G.Fayolle,A.de la Fortelle,J-M.Lasgouttes, L.Massouli~,and J.W.Roberts.Best-e .ort networks: modeling and performance analysis via large networks asymptotics.In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '01 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.G.Fayolle,I.Mitrani,and R.Iasnogorodski.Sharing a processor among many classes.Journal of the ACM 27:519 -532,1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.A.Feldman.Characteristics of TCP connection arrivals.K.Park,W.Willinger,editors,Self-similar network tra .c and performance evaluation J.Wiley &Sons,2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.A.Feldman,A.Gilbert,P.Huang,and W.Willinger. Data networks as cascades:Explaining the multifractal nature of internet WAN tra .c.In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM '98 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.A.Feldman,A.Gilbert,P.Huang,and W.Willinger. Dynamics of IP tra .c:A study of the role of variability and the impact of control.In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM '99 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.A.Jean-Marie and P.Robert.On the transient behavior of the processor sharing queue.Queueing Systems Theory and Applications 17:129 -136,1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.F.P.Kelly.Reversibility and Stochastic Networks .J. Wiley &Sons,1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.F.P.Kelly A.Maulloo,and D.Tan.Rate control for communication networks:shadow prices,proportional fairness and stability.Journal of the Operational Research Society 49,1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21.A.A.Kherani and A.Kumar.Performance analysis of TCP with nonpersistent sessions.Preprint available at http://ece.iisc.ernet.in/anurag/Anurag Kumar.html, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.L.Kleinrock.Queueing Systems,Volume 2 .J.Wiley &Sons,1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.L.Massouli~ and J.W.Roberts.Arguments in favor of admission control for TCP .ows.In P.Key and D.Smith,editors,Teletra .c Engineering in a Competitive Worl ,Proceedings of ITC 16 ,pages 33 -44.Elsevier,1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.L.Massouli~ and J.W.Roberts.Bandwidth sharing: objectives and algorithms.In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '99 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.L.Massouli~ and J.W.Roberts.Bandwidth sharing and admission control for elastic tra .c. Telecommunication Systems 15:185 -201,2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.J.Mo and J.Walrand.Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control.In Proceedings of SPIE '98 International Symposium on Voice,Video and Data Communications 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.C.J.Nuzman,I.Saniee,W.Sweldens,and A.Weiss. A compound model of tcp arrivals.In Proceedings of ITC Seminar on IP Tra .c Modeling Monterey 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.V.Paxson and S.Floyd.Wide-area tra .c:The failure of poisson modeling.IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 3(3):226 -255,1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.J.W.Roberts and S.Oueslati-Boulahia.Quality of service by .ow-aware networking.Phil.Trans.R. Soc.London A 358:2197 -2207,2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.M.Vojnovic,J.-Y.Le Boudec,and C.Boutremans. Global fairness of additive-increase and multiplicative-decrease with heterogeneous roundtrip times.In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '00 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Statistical bandwidth sharing: a study of congestion at flow level

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCOMM '01: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
        August 2001
        298 pages
        ISBN:1581134118
        DOI:10.1145/383059
        • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 31, Issue 4
          Proceedings of the 2001 SIGCOMM conference
          October 2001
          275 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/964723
          Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2001 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 August 2001

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGCOMM '01 Paper Acceptance Rate23of252submissions,9%Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader