skip to main content
article
Free Access

Design implications of a task-driven approach to unstructured cognitive tasks in office work

Published:01 July 1985Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Previous research in modeling office activities has been primarily oriented toward office work that is structured and organized. In this paper we report on efforts to develop a new methodology for needs assessment evaluation. We use the Critical Task Method to identify the “bottleneck cognitive tasks” of principals with an unstructured work profile. Data were collected on the computer-support needs of faculty researchers, and the findings indicate that a “knowledge-based” design offers the most promise for delivering effective support. In addition, the systems design suggests the integration of text, data, voice, and images.

References

  1. 1 ALLEN, R.B. Composition and editing of text. Ergonomics 24, 8 (1981), 611-622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 ALLEN, R.B. Cognitive factors in human interaction with computers. Behav. Inf. Technol. 1, 3 (1982), 257-278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 BAUMANN, L.S., AND COOP, R.D. Automated workflow control: A key to office productivity. In Proceedings of the National Computer Conference. AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1980, pp. 549-554.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 BLOOM, B. (Ed.) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook IBCognitive Domain~ McKay, New York, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 BONCZEK, R.H., HOLSAPPLE, C.W., AND WHINSTON, A.B. Foundations of Decision Support Systems. Academic Press, New York, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 BRmHTMAN, H.J., AND HARMS, S.E. An exploratory study of DSS design and use. DSS-82 Transaction {June 1982), 170-181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 BUCKLEY, J., BUCKLE~, M., AND CHIANG, H.-F. Research Methodology and Business Decisions. National Association of Accountants, New York, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 CARD, S.K., MORAN, T.P., AND NEWELL, A. Computer text editing: An information processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology 12, {1980), 32-74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 CONRATH, D.W. Measuring the impact of office automation technology: Needs, methods, and consequences. Presented at the Symposium on Automated Office Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 CONRATH, D.W., IRVING, R.H., THACHENKARY, C.S., ZANETTI, C. with collaboration of RAT, H.C., AND WRIGHT, W.M. Measuring office activity for Burotique: Data collection instruments and procedures. In N. Naffah (Ed.), Office Information Systems, North-Holland, New York, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 COOK, C.L. Streamlining office procedures--An analysis using the information control net model. In Proceedings of the National Computer Conference. AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 1980, pp. 555-565.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 CROFT, W.B., AND LEFKOWITZ, L.S. Task support in an office system. ACM Trans. Off. Inf. Syst. 2, 3 (July 1984), 197-212. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 DRUCKER, P.F. The Effective Executive. Harper and Row, New York, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 ELLIS, C.A., AND NUTT, G.J. Computer science and office information systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 12, 1 (Mar. 1980), 27-60. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 FOX, M.S. The intelligent management system: An overview. In H.G. Sol (Ed.), Processing and Tools for Decision Support, North-Holland, New York, 1983, 105-130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 GALITZ, W.O. Human Factors in Office Automation. Life Office Management Association, Atlanta, Ga., 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 GINZBERC,, M. A process approach to management science implementation. Ph.D. Dissertation, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass., 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 GOULD, J.D. Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In L.W. Gregg and E.R. Steinberg (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Writing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1980, pp. 97-127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 GOULD, J.D., AND BOLES, S.J. Human factors challenges in creating a principal support system--The speech filing system approach. ACM Trans. Off. Inf. Syst. 1, 4 (Oct. 1983), 273- 298. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 HAMMER, J.M., AND ROUSE, W.B. Analysis and modelling of freeform text editing behaviour. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, 1978, pp. 659-664.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 HARRIS, S.E., AND BRIGHTMAN, H.J. Determining principal support system requirements: Methodology and support models. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM-SIGOA Conference on Office Information Systems 5, 1-2 (June 1984), pp. 59-79. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 NISBETT, R., AND DECAMP, W.T. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84, 8 (1977), 231-259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 PANKO, R.R. Rethinking office automation. Administrative Manage. 43, 7 {July 1982). 22-24, 71-72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 PANKO, R.R. 38 offices: Analyzing needs in individual offices. ACM Trans. Off. Inf. Syst. 2, 3 (1984), 26-234. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 ROCKART, J.F. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Bus. Rev. 57, 2 (Mar- Apr. 1979), 81-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26 SXMON, H.A. The New Science of Management Decision, rev. ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1977. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27 SIRBU, M., SCHOCICHET, S., KUNIN, J., HAMMER, M., AND SUTHERLAND, J. OAM: An office analysis methodology. In the 1982 AFIPS Office Automation Conference Digest. AFIPS Press, Reston, Va., 317-330.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28 STEINER, G., AND MINER, J. Management Policy and Strategy. Macmillan, New York, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29 UNLIG, R.P., FARBER, D.J., AND BAIR, J.H. The Office of the Future. North-Holland, New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 WHALEN, T. Fuzzy knowledge based system in management. Human Syst. Manage. 4 (1984), 263-274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design implications of a task-driven approach to unstructured cognitive tasks in office work

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
                  ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 3, Issue 3
                  July 1985
                  81 pages
                  ISSN:1046-8188
                  EISSN:1558-2868
                  DOI:10.1145/4229
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 1985 ACM

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 July 1985
                  Published in tois Volume 3, Issue 3

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • article

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader