skip to main content
10.1145/513800.513811acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network

Published:09 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates two fundamental characteristics of a wireless multi -hop network: its minimum node degree and its k--connectivity. Both topology attributes depend on the spatial distribution of the nodes and their transmission range. Using typical modeling assumptions :--- :a random uniform distribution of the nodes and a simple link model :--- :we derive an analytical expression that enables the determination of the required range r0 that creates, for a given node density ρ, an almost surely k--connected network. Equivalently, if the maximum r0 of the nodes is given, we can find out how many nodes are needed to cover a certain area with a k--connected network. We also investigate these questions by various simulations and thereby verify our analytical expressions. Finally, the impact of mobility is discussed.The results of this paper are of practical value for researchers in this area, e.g., if they set the parameters in a network--level simulation of a mobile ad hoc network or if they design a wireless sensor network.

References

  1. B. M. Leiner, D. L. Nielson, and F. A. Tobagi, eds., Proceedings of the IEEE, Special issue on Packet Radio Networks, vol. 75, Jan. 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Z. J. Haas, M. Gerla, D. B. Johnson, C. E. Perkins, M. B. Pursley, M. Steenstrup, and C.-K. Toh, eds., IEEE Journal on Sel. Areas in Comm., Special issue on Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 17, Aug. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Kermani and N. H. Vaidya, eds., IEEE Personal Comm., Special issue on Advances in Mobile Ad Hoc Networking, Feb. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. E. Perkins, ed., Ad Hoc Networking. Addison--Wesley, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. J. Pottie and W. J. Kaiser, "Wireless integrated network sensors," Comm. of the ACM, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y.-D. Lin and Y.-C. Hsu, "Multihop cellular: A new architecture for wireless communications," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, (Tel Aviv, Israel), Mar. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. Kellerer, C. Bettstetter, C. Schwingenschlögl, P. Sties, K.-E. Steinberg, and H.-J. Vögel," (Auto)Mobile communication in a heterogeneous and converged world," IEEE Pers. Comm., Dec. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Hartenstein, B. Bochow, A. Ebner, M. Lott, M. Radimirsch, and D. Vollmer, "Position--aware ad hoc wireless networks for inter--vehicle communications: The Fleetnet project," in Proc. ACM Intern. Symp. on Mobile Ad Hoc Netw. and Comp. (MobiHoc), (Long Beach, CA), Oct. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Ramanathan and R. Rosales-Hain, "Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, (Tel Aviv, Israel), Mar. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Wattenhofer, L. Li, P. Bahl, and Y.-M. Wang, "Distributed topology control for power efficient operation in multihop wireless ad hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, (Anchorage, Alaska), Apr. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Santi, D. M. Blough, and F. Vainstein, "A probabilistic analysis for the radio range assignment problem in ad hoc networks," in Proc. ACM Intern. Symp. on Mobile Ad Hoc Netw. and Comp. (MobiHoc), (Long Beach, CA), Oct. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Diestel, Graph Theory. Springer, 2nd ed., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B. Bollobás, Modern Graph Theory. Springer, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. A. C. Cressie, Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H. Takahi and L. Kleinrock, "Optimal transmission ranges for randomly distributed packet radio terminals," IEEE Trans. on Comm., Mar. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Papoulis, Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. McGraw--Hill, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Matsumoto and T. Nishimura, "Mersenne twister: A 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudorandom number generator," ACM Trans. on Modeling and Computer Simulation, Jan. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Bettstetter and O. Krause, "On border effects in modeling and simulation of wireless ad hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE Intern. Conf. on Mobile and Wireless Comm. Netw. (MWCN), (Recife, Brazil), Aug. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. K. Marina and S. R. Das, "On-demand multipath distance vector routing in ad hoc networks," in Proc. Intern. Conf. for Network Procotols (ICNP), (Riverside, CA), Nov. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Bollobás, Random Graphs. Academic Press, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Janson, A. Rucinski, T. Luczak, and T. Uczak, Theory of Random Graphs. Wiley, May 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. I. Chlamtac and A. Faragó, "A new approach to the design and analysis of peer--to--peer mobile networks," ACM/Baltzer Wireless Networks, vol. 5, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Díiaz, M. D. Penrose, J. Petit, and M. Serna, "Convergence theorems for some layout measures on random lattice and random geometric graphs," Combinatorics, Probability, and Computing, no. 6, pp. 489--511, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. D. Penrose, "On k--connectivity for a geometric random graph," Wiley Random Structures and Algorithms, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 145--164, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. P. Erdüs and A. Rényi, "On the evolution of random graphs," Publ. Math. Inst. Hungar. Acad. Sci., vol. 5, pp. 17--61, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. C. Bettstetter, "Mobility modeling in wireless networks: Categorization, smooth movement, and border effects," ACM Mobile Computing and Communications Review, vol. 5, no. 3, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y.-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva, "A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols," in Proc. ACM Intern. Conf. on Mobile Comp. and Netw. (MobiCom), (Dallas, TX), Oct. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. E. M. Royer and C. E. Perkins, "Multicast operation of the ad--hoc on--demand distance vector routing protocol," in Proc. ACM Intern. Conf. on Mobile Comp. and Netw. (MobiCom), (Seattle, WA), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. R. Das, C. E. Perkins, and E. M. Royer, "Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks," in Proc. IEEE Infocom, (Tel Aviv, Israel), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. G. Holland and N. H. Vaidya, "Analysis of TCP performance over mobile ad hoc networks," in Proc. ACM Intern. Conf. on Mobile Comp. and Netw. (MobiCom), (Seattle, WA), Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. R. A. Guérin, "Channel occupancy time distribution in a cellular radio system," IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, vol. 36, Aug. 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Y.-C. Cheng and T. G. Robertazzi, "Critical connectivity phenomena in multihop radio models," IEEE Trans. on Communications, vol. 37, July 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. T. K. Philips, S. S. Panwar, and A. N. Tantawi, "Connectivity properties of a packet radio network model," IEEE Trans. on Inform. Theory, Sept. 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. P. Piret, "On the connectivity of radio networks," IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, Sept. 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks," in Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications, pp. 547--566, Birkhauser, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. M. J. B. Appel and R. P. Russo, "The minumum vertex degree of a graph on uniform points in {0,1d}," Adv. in Applied Probability, vol. 29, pp. 582--594, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. J. G. Proakis, E. M. Sozer, J. A. Rice, and M. Stojanovic, "Shallow water acoustic networks," IEEE Personal Communications, Nov. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MobiHoc '02: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
            June 2002
            246 pages
            ISBN:1581135017
            DOI:10.1145/513800

            Copyright © 2002 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 9 June 2002

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            MobiHoc '02 Paper Acceptance Rate22of134submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader