skip to main content
10.1145/513800.513821acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Approximating minimum size weakly-connected dominating sets for clustering mobile ad hoc networks

Published:09 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a series of approximation algorithms for finding a small weakly-connected dominating set (WCDS) in a given graph to be used in clustering mobile ad hoc networks. The structure of a graph can be simplified using WCDS's and made more succinct for routing in ad hoc networks. The theoretical performance ratio of these algorithms is O(ln Δ) compared to the minimum size WCDS, where Δ is the maximum degree of the input graph. The first two algorithms are based on the centralized approximation algorithms of Guha and Khuller cite guha-khuller-1998 for finding small connected dominating sets (CDS's). The main contribution of this work is a completely distributed algorithm for finding small WCDS's and the performance of this algorithm is shown to be very close to that of the centralized approach. Comparisons between our work and some previous work (CDS-based) are also given in terms of the size of resultant dominating sets and graph connectivity degradation.

References

  1. Baruch Awerbuch, Yi Du, Bilal Khan, and Yuval Shavitt. Routing through networks with hierarchical topology aggregation. In IEEE ISCC'98 , pages 406--412, Athens, Greece, June 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dennis Baker, Anthony Ephremides, and Julia A. Flynn. The design and simulation of a mobile radio network with distributed control. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, SAC-2(1):226--237, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Banerjee and S. Khuller. A clustering scheme for hierarchical routing in wireless networks. Technical Report CS-TR-4103, University of Maryland, College Park, February 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Basagni. Distributed clustering for ad hoc networks. In Proc. ISPAN'99 Int. Symp. on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks, pages 310--315, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Bettstetter and R. Krausser. Scenario-based stability analysis of the distributed mobility-adaptive clustering (dmac) algorithm. In Proc. ACM MobiHoc 2001, pages 232--241, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Josh Broch, David A. Maltz, David B. Johnson, Yih-Chun Hu, and Jorjeta Jetcheva. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, ACM, Dallas, TX, October 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Geng Chen and Ivan Stojmenovic. Clustering and routing in mobile wireless networks. Technical Report TR-99-05, SITE, June 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. I. Chlamtac and A. Farago. A new approach to the design and analysis of peer-to-peer mobile networks. Wireless Networks, 5:149--156, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bevan Das and Vaduvur Bharghavan. Routing in ad-hoc networks using minimum connected dominating sets. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC'97), June 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. E. Dunbar, J. W. Grossman, J. H. Hattingh, S. T. Hedetniemi, and A. A. McRae. On weakly-connected domination in graphs. Discrete Math., 167/168:261--269, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. G. Gallager, P. A. Humblet, and P. M. Spira. A distributed algorithm for minimum-weight spanning tree. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 5(1):66--77, January 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. L. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mario Gerla and Jack Tzu-Chieh Tsai. Multicluster, mobile, multimedia radio network. Wireless Networks, 1:255--265, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sudipto Guha and Samir Khuller. Approximation algorithms for connected dominating sets. Algorithmica, 20(4):374--387, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Teresa W. Haynes, Stephen T. Hedetniemi, and Peter J. Slater. Fundamentals of Domination in graphs. Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Krishna, N. H. Vaidya, M. Chatterjee, and D. K. Pradhan. A cluster-based approach for routing in dynamic networks. Computer Communication Review, 49:49--64, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Elizabeth M. Royer and Chai-Keong Toh. A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communications, pages 46--55, 4 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jie Wu and Hailan Li. On calculating connected dominating set for efficient routing in adGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Approximating minimum size weakly-connected dominating sets for clustering mobile ad hoc networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MobiHoc '02: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
            June 2002
            246 pages
            ISBN:1581135017
            DOI:10.1145/513800

            Copyright © 2002 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 9 June 2002

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            MobiHoc '02 Paper Acceptance Rate22of134submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader