skip to main content
10.1145/545056.545061acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Automating supply-chain management

Published:15 July 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores a linguistic approach to coordination modeling as a formal basis for supply-chain management (SCM) in manufacturing. The approach promotes the interchange of standard documents: enterprises need only describe their supply processes using OAG business object documents and UML interaction diagrams. Our methodology and tools analyze the documents and interactions in terms of four linguistic primitives and convert the diagrams into specifications and implementations of software agents. The agents then cooperate in automating the resultant supply chain. We evaluate our methodology in the context of several industrial scenarios. We conclude that supply-chain automation using software-agent technology is feasible.

References

  1. T.J. Becker, "Putting a Price on Supply Chain Problems: Study Links Supply Chain Glitches with Falling Stock Prices," Georgia Tech Research News, December 12, 2000]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler, and Ora Lassila, "The Semantic Web," Scientific American, May 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Dellarocas and M. Klein, "A Knowledge-Based Approach for Designing Robust Business Processes," in Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, W.van der Aalst et al., eds., Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1806, pp. 50--65, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chrysanthos Dellarocas, Mark Klein, and Juan Antonio Rodriguez-Aguilar, "An Exception-Handling Architecture for Open Electronic Marketplaces of Contract Net Software Agents," Proceedings International Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM Press, October 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mark Greaves, Heather Holmback, and Jeffrey Bradshaw, "What Is a Conversation Policy?" Proceedings of Workshop on Specifying and Implementing Conversation Policies, Autonomous Agents '99, Seattle, WA, May 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Gruninger, "PSL Interoperability Example," Technical Report, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, December 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael Gruninger, "Classes of Goals and Constraints," Technical Report, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, September 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Michael N. Huhns and Munindar P. Singh, "Managing Heterogeneous Transaction Workflows with Cooperating Agents," in Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications and Markets, N. R. Jennings and M. J. Wooldridge, editors, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998, pp. 219--240.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Michael N. Huhns and Larry M. Stephens, "Automating Supply Chains," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 5, no. 4, July-August 2001, pp. 90--93.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nenad Ivezic, Mario Barbacci, Don Libes, Tom Potok, and John Robert, "An Analysis of a Supply Chain Management Agent Architecture," in Proceedings 4th International Conference on Multiagent Systems, IEEE Computer Society Press, July 2000, pp 401--402.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kuldeep Kumar, "Technology for Supporting Supply-Chain Management," CACM, vol. 44, no. 6, June 2001, pp. 58--61.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Open Applications Group, "Plug and Play Business Software Integration," http://www.openapplications.org/downloads/whitepapers/whitepaperdocs/whitepaper.htm, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Steve Osborn, "The Role of Agents in Business-to-Business (B2B) Electronic Commerce," www.agentlink.org http://www.agentlink.org, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H. Van Dyke Parunak, "Visualizing Agent Conversations: Using Enhanced Dooley Graphs for Agent Design and Analysis," in Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Multiagent Systems, AAAI Press, 1996, pp. 275--282.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Munindar P. Singh, "Synthesizing Coordination Requirements for Heterogeneous Autonomous Agents," Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2000, pp. 107--132.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Peter Wegner, "Why Interaction is More Powerful Than Algorithms," CACM, Vol. 40, No. 5, May 1997, pp. 80--91.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Automating supply-chain management

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AAMAS '02: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 3
      July 2002
      451 pages
      ISBN:1581134800
      DOI:10.1145/545056

      Copyright © 2002 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 July 2002

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader