skip to main content
10.1145/638249.638277acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people

Published:08 July 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe why designers need to look beyond the twin aims of designing for the 'typical' user and designing "prostheses". Making accessible interfaces for older people is a unique but many-faceted challenge. Effective applications and interface design needs to address the dynamic diversity of the human species. We introduce a new design paradigm, Design for Dynamic Diversity, and suggest a methodology to assist its achievement, User Sensitive Inclusive Design.To support our argument for a new form of design we report experimentation, which indicates that older people have significantly different and dynamically changing needs. We also put forward initial solutions for Designing for Dynamic Diversity, where memory, vision and confidence provide the parameters for discussion, and illustrate the importance of User Sensitive Inclusive Design in establishing a framework for the operation of Design for Dynamic Diversity.

References

  1. Alm, N. (1994). "Ethical Issues in AAC research" in "Methodological Issues in Research in Augmentative and Alternative Communication" eds Brodin,J & Ajessibm E.B. (eds) Proc. Third ISAAC Research Symposium. Jonkoping, University Press, Sweden pp 98--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balandin, S. & Raghavendra, P (1999). "Challenging Oppression: Augmented Communicators' involvement in AAC Research" in Augmentative and Alternative Communication, new directions in research and practice" ed. Loncke, F.T., Clibbens,J., Arvidson, H.H. & Lloyd, L.L. Whurr, London.pp262--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Beirmann, A.W. (1997). "More than Screen Deep -"Towards an Every-Citizen Interface to the National Information Infrastructure," Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington D.C. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gregor, P & Newell, A.F. (1999) The application of computing technology to interpersonal communication at the University of Dundee's Department of Applied Computing, Technology and Disability, 10 (1999) pp 107--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hypponen, H., (1999). The Handbook on Inclusive Design for Telematics Applications, Siltasaarenkatu 18A, 00531 Helsinki, Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ISO 13407:1999(E). Human-centred design processes for interactive systems, International Organisation for Standards.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. McGregor, A., (1995). A voice for the future. Proceedings of the European Conference on the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology (ECART '95). 10--13 October 1995, Lisbon. Lisbon, Portugal: National Secretariat of Rehabilitation. pp 127--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Newell, A.F., (1995), Extra-ordinary Human Computer Operation, in "Extra-ordinary Human-Computer Interactions" by A. D. N. Edwards (Ed.), Cambridge University Press 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Newell, A.F. & Gregor, P., (1997). Human computer interfaces for people with disabilities, in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Helander, M., Landauer, T.K. and Prabhu, P. (eds), Elsevier Science BV, (ISBN 0 444 81862 6) pp 813--824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Newell, A.F., (1998). Assistive Technology Research and Technological Development. In Improving the Quality of Life for the European Citizen, eds Placencia Porrero, I, & Ballabio E. Assistive Technology Research Series, Vol 4, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp xlvii--liii.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Newell, A.F. & Cairns, A.Y., (1993). Designing for extra-ordinary users, Ergonomics in Design, Oct 1993, 10--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Newell A.F. & Gregor P., (2000) "User Sensitive Inclusive Design - in search of a new paradigm, Proc A.C.M. Conference on Universal Usability, Washington, DC Nov. 2000, pp39--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering, (1993). London Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Preece, J., (1994). A guide to usability - human factors in computing, Addison Wesley & Open University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shneiderman, B., (1992). Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley Reading, Massachusetts 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sleeman, K.D., (1998). Disability's New Paradigm, Implications for Assistive Technology and Universal Design. In Improving the Quality of Life for the European Citizen, eds Placencia Porrero, I, & Ballabio E. Assistive Technology Research Series, Vol 4, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp xx--xxiv.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Stephanidis, C., (2001) User Interfaces for All. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Websites focussed on Universal Design include: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/ud/ud.html, http://www.stakes.fi/include http://www.trace.wisc.edu, http://www.w3.org/WAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zajicek M., Arnold A., (1999), The 'Technology Push' and The User Tailored Information Environment, 5th European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics, Workshop on 'User interfaces for all ', Dagstuhl, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zajicek M. & Hall, S., (2000), 'Solutions for elderly visually impaired people using the Internet', HCI 2000, Sunderland.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zajicek, M, Morrissey, W., (2001), 'Spoken Message Length for Older Adults, Proc. INTERACT'2001, pp 789--790.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zajicek M., Morrissey W., (2001), 'Speech output for older visually impaired adults', Proc. IHM-HCI 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zajicek M., Wheatley B., Winstone-Partridge C., (1998), Improving the Performance of the Tourism and Hospitality Industry in the Thames Valley, Technical report no. CMS-TR-99-04, School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Czaja, S., Clark, C., Weber, R., Nachbar, D., 1990, Computer communication among older adults, Proc. Of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 33rd Annual Meeting, pp 146--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          Assets '02: Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies
          July 2002
          238 pages
          ISBN:1581134649
          DOI:10.1145/638249

          Copyright © 2002 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 July 2002

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Assets '02 Paper Acceptance Rate31of76submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader