skip to main content
10.1145/74382.74431acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

An efficient two-dimensional layout compaction algorithm

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 June 1989Publication History

ABSTRACT

A new heuristic two-dimensional symbolic layout-compaction approach is developed. After conventional one-dimensional compaction steps, all the components on the critical paths that define the height or width of the given layout are found and rearranged to reduce the layout size. During this process, constraints in both x and y directions are considered and pitch-matching of ports for hierarchical compaction can be achieved to reduce the amount of the design data. This approach generated the smallest area for several examples we have tried when compared with other published results. The expected run time can be bounded by Ο(T1), where T1 is the run time of a typical one-dimensional compactor.

References

  1. Boy87.D. Boycr, "Symbolic Layout Compaction Benchmarks," International Conference on Computer Design, pp 186- 191,209 - 217, October 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BuNe87.J. Burns and A. Newton, "Efficient Constraint Generation for Hierarchical Compaction," International Conference on Computer Design, pp 197 - 200, October 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho85.Y. E. Cho, "A Subjective Review of Compaction," Proceedings of 22nd Design Automation Conference, I~P 396 - 404, June 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. CrVa87.W. Crocker, R. Varadarjan, and C. Lo, "MACS: a Module Assembly and Compaction System," International Conference on Computer Design, pp 205 - 208, October 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hsu79.M. Y. Hsueh, "Symbolic Layout and Compaction," U.C.Berkeley, UCB/ERL Report M79/80, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. LiWo83.Y. Liao and C. K. Wong, "An Algorithm to Compact a VLSI Symbohc Layout with Mixed Constraints," IEEE Transactions on CAD of 1CAS, Vol. 2, No. 2, April 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. KeWa84.G. Kedem and H. Watanabe, "Graph-Optimization Techniques for IC Layout and Compaction," IEEE Transactions on CAD of lCAS Vol. 3, No. 1, January 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. SaPa82.S. Sastry and A. Parker, "The Complexity of Two- Dimensional Compaction of VLSI Layouts," International Conference on Circuits and Computers, pp 402-406, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ScLi83.M. Schlag, Y. 7_. Liao, and C. K. Wrong, "An Algorithm for Optimal Two-Dimensional Compaction of VLSI Layouts," Integration, pp 179 - 209, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. ShSa86.H. Shin, A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelll, and C. Sequin, "Twodimensional Compaction by Zone-Refining," Proceedings of 23rd Design Automation Conference, pp 115 - 122, June 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tar83.R.E. Tarjan, "Data Structures and Network Algorithms," CBMS 44, SIAM, pp 97-111, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. TaWe87.D. Tan and N. Weste, "Virtual Grid Symbolic Layout 1987," International Conference on Computer Design, pp 192 - 196, October 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. WoMa83.W. Wolf, R. Mathews, J. Newkirk, and R. Dutton, "Two- Dimensional Compaction Strategies", Proceedings of Int. Conf. on CAD, pp 90 .- 91, t983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An efficient two-dimensional layout compaction algorithm

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            DAC '89: Proceedings of the 26th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
            June 1989
            839 pages
            ISBN:0897913108
            DOI:10.1145/74382

            Copyright © 1989 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 June 1989

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            DAC '89 Paper Acceptance Rate156of465submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

            Upcoming Conference

            DAC '24
            61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
            June 23 - 27, 2024
            San Francisco , CA , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader