skip to main content
article
Free Access

A geometric characterization of parametric cubic curves

Published:01 July 1989Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze planar parametric cubic curves to determine conditions for loops, cusps, or inflection points. By expressing the curve to be analyzed as a linear combination of control points, it can be transformed such that three of the control points are mapped to specific locations on the plane. We call this image curve the canonical curve. Affine maps do not affect inflection points, cusps, or loops, so the analysis can be applied to the canonical curve instead of the original one. Since the first three points are fixed, the canonical curve is completely characterized by the position of its fourth point. The analysis therefore reduces to observing which region of the canonical plane the fourth point occupies. We demonstrate that for all parametric cubes expressed in this form, the boundaries of these regions are tonics and straight lines. Special cases include Bézier curves, B-splines, and Beta-splines. Such a characterization forms the basis for an easy and efficient solution to this problem.

References

  1. 1 BARTELS, R. H., BEATTY, ,J. C., AND BARSKY, B. A. An Introduction to Splines For Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling. Morgan-Kaufmann, Palo Alto, Calif. 1987. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 BIER, E., AND STONE, M. Isnap-dragging. Comput. Graph. 20,4 (Aug. 1986), 233-240. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 BOEHM, W., FARIN, G., ANI) KAHMANN, J. A survey of curve and surface methods in CAGD. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 1, 1 (July 1984), l-60. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 FARIN, G. Curves and Surfuces for Computer Aided Geometric Design. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla. 1987. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 FORREST, A. R. Shape classification of the non-rational twisted cubic curve in terms of Bezier polygons. CAD Group Document No. 52, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, Dec. 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 FORREST, A. R. The twisted cubic curve: A computer-aided geometric design approach. Comput. Aided Des. 12, 4 (July 1980), 165-172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 PATTERSON, R. R. Parametric cubits as algebraic curves. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 5 (1988), 139-159. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 PENNA, M. A., AND PATTERSON, R. R. Projective Geometry and Its Applications to Computer Graphics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 PIER, K., BIER, E., AND STONE, M. An Introduction to Gargoyle: An interactive illustration tool. In Document Manipulation-Typography, Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Document Manipulation-Typography (EP88) (Nice, France, Apr. 20-22, 1988). Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 223-238. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 STONE, M. C., AND DEROSE, T. D. Characterizing cubic Bezier curves. Tech. Rep. EDL-88-8, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif., Dec. 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 SU, B., AND LIU, D. An affine invarient and its application in computational geometry. Scientia Sinica (Series A) 24, 3 (Mar. 1983), 259-267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 WANG, C. Y. Shape classification of the parametric cubic curve and parametric B-spline cubic curve. Comput. Aided Des. 13, 4 (1981), 199-206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A geometric characterization of parametric cubic curves

          Recommendations

          Reviews

          Patrick Gilles Maillot

          The authors present an analysis of planar parametric cubic curves to determine conditions for loops, cusps, or inflection points. In an introduction, the authors present the main justification and application for their research: automobile body design and aerodynamics. Another domain of interest for such a characterization, not mentioned in this paper, is the rendering of “fat curves” or curves with an arbitrary width, where the characterization of the curve is used to determine how the curve has to be decomposed into pieces that can be rendered separately. The authors also present some previous related work and specify that their results can be applied to non-rational curves. They do not give a reason for this limitation, and I regret that they did not give a characterization of the rational curves as well, or at least a study of the complexity involved. Stone and DeRose present their study in three steps. The first step is a review of previous work that gives an easily understandable base for nonspecialists. The limitation of their study to non-rational curves also helps. The second step proposes a characterization of Bezier curves in detail; it is followed by step three, a study of the region decomposition of the curve. A separate paragraph treats the degenerate forms of Bezier curves in a very descriptive way. The use of figures is helpful in visualizing the effect of the displacement of one control point of the curve. The authors generalize their study to characterize other curve types, including B-splines, Catmull-Rom splines, and Beta-splines. They show that all variations of a fourth point, the three other remaining fixed, can be obtained by a projective transformation of a figure studied in the case of Bezier curves. The mathematical study leads to a two-dimensional projective transformation, which is more intuitive for graphics users than the previous nonlinear characterization schemes. This paper presents a very intuitive and interesting approach to the characterization of curve complexity. The mathematical notation used in this work is consistent. The use of figures, as well as the organization of the different sections of the paper, make it easy to understand. It represents a good contribution to the graphics community, and provides a clear vision of non-rational curve complexity characterization.

          Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

          Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
            ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 8, Issue 3
            July 1989
            108 pages
            ISSN:0730-0301
            EISSN:1557-7368
            DOI:10.1145/77055
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 1989 ACM

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 1989
            Published in tog Volume 8, Issue 3

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader