skip to main content
10.1145/777792.777813acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

New constructions of weak epsilon-nets

Published:08 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

A finite set ? ? Rd is a weak e-net for an n -point set X ? R d (with respect to convex sets) if N intersects every convex set K with | K n X |= en. We give an alternative, and arguably simpler, proof of the fact, first shown by Chazelle et al. [7], that every point set X in R d admits a weak e-net of cardinality O (e -d polylog(1/e)). Moreover, for a number of special point sets (e.g., for points on the moment curve), our method gives substantially better bounds. The construction yields an algorithm to construct such weak eps-nets in time O ( n ln(1e)). We also prove, by a different method, a near-linear upper bound for points uniformly distributed on the (d--1)-dimensional sphere.

References

  1. K. Agarwal and Jivri Matouaek. On range searching with semialgebraic sets. Discrete Comput. Geom., 11:393--418, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Noga Alon, Imre Barany, Zoltan Füredi, and Daniel Kleitman. Point selections and weak e-nets for convex hulls. Combin. Probab. Comput., 1(3):103--112, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Noga Alon and Daniel J. Kleitman. Piercing convex sets and the Hadwiger-Debrunner (p,q)-problem. Adv. Math., 96(1):103--112, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Boris Aronov, Marco Pellegrini, and Micha Sharir. On the zone of a surface in a hyperplane arrangement. Discrete Comput. Geom., 9(2):177--186, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jacek Bochnak, Michel Coste, and Marie Françoise Roy. Real Algebraic Geometry. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bernard Chazelle, Herbert Edelsbrunner, David Eppstein, Michelangelo Grigni, Leonidas Guibas, Micha Sharir, and Emo Welzl. Algorithms for weak epsilon-nets. Manuscript, 1995, available at http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/24190.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard Chazelle, Herbert Edelsbrunner, Michelangelo Grigni, Leonidas J. Guibas, Micha Sharir, and Emo Welzl. Improved bounds on weak e-nets for convex sets. Discrete Comput. Geom., 13:1--15, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bernard Chazelle, Herbert Edelsbrunner, Leonidas Guibas, and Micha Sharir. A singly-exponential stratification scheme for real semi-algebraic varieties and its applications. In Proc. 16th Internat. Colloq. Automata Lang. Program., volume 372 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., pages 179--192. Springer-Verlag, Berlin etc., 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. David Haussler and Emo Welzl. e-Nets and Simplex Range Queries. Discrete Comput. Geom., 2:127--151, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Vladlen Koltun. Almost tight upper bounds for vertical decompositions in four dimensions. In Proc. 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 56--65, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jivri Matouaek. Efficient partition trees. Discrete Comput. Geom., 8(3):315--334, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jivri Matouaek. Lectures on Discrete Geometry. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jivri Matouaek. A lower bound for weak e-nets in high dimension. Discrete Comput. Geom., 28:45--48, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. New constructions of weak epsilon-nets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SCG '03: Proceedings of the nineteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry
      June 2003
      398 pages
      ISBN:1581136633
      DOI:10.1145/777792

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2003

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      SCG '03 Paper Acceptance Rate42of118submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader