skip to main content
10.1145/778415.778432acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Topology management in ad hoc networks

Published:01 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

The efficiency of a communication network depends not only on its control protocols, but also on its topology. We propose a distributed topology management algorithm that constructs and maintains a backbone topology based on a minimal dominating set (MDS) of the network. According to this algorithm, each node determines the membership in the MDS for itself and its one-hop neighbors based on two-hop neighbor information that is disseminated among neighboring nodes. The algorithm then ensures that the members of the MDS are connected into a connected dominating set (CDS), which can be used to form the backbone infrastructure of the communication network for such purposes as routing. The correctness of the algorithm is proven, and the efficiency is compared with other topology management heuristics using simulations. Our algorithm shows better behavior and higher stability in ad hoc networks than prior algorithms.

References

  1. A. Amis, R. Prakash, T. Vuong, and D.T. Huynh. MaxMin D-Cluster Formation in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Mar. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A.D. Amis and R. Prakash. Load-balancing clusters in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings 3rd IEEE Symposium on Application-Specific Systems and Software Engineering Technology, pages 25--32, Los Alamitos, CA, Mar. 24--25 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D.J. Baker and A. Ephremides. The architectural organization of a mobile radio network via a distributed algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-29(11):1694--701, Nov. 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Banerjee and S. Khuller. A Clustering Scheme for Hierarchical Control in Multi-hop Wireless Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Anchorage, Alaska, Apr. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. Bao and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. A New Approach to Channel Access Scheduling for Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. ACM Seventh Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and networking, Rome, Italy, Jul. 16--21 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Bao and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Transmission Scheduling in Ad Hoc Networks with Directional Antennas. In Proc. ACM Eighth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and networking, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Sep. 23--28 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Basu, N. Khan, and T. D.C. Little. A Mobility Based Metric for Clustering in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. In International Workshop on Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing (WNMC2001), Scottsdale, Arizona, Apr. 16--19 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. B. Chen, K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Morris. Span: an Energy-Efficient Coordination Algorithm for Topology Maintenance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. In Proc. 7th ACM MOBICOM, Rome, Italy, Jul. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C.C. Chiang, H.K. Wu, W. Liu, and M. Gerla. Routing in clustered multihop, mobile wireless networks with fading channel. In IEEE Singapore International Conference on Networks SICON'97, pages 197--211, Singapore, Apr. 14--17 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Clausen, P. Jacquet, A. Laouiti, P. Muhlethaler, a. Qayyum, and L. Viennot. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol. In IEEE INMIC, Pakistan, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Ephremides, J. E. Wieselthier, and D. J. Baker. A design concept for reliable mobile radio networks with frequency hopping signaling. Proc. of IEEE, 75(1):56--73, Jan. 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson. Computers and intractability. A guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, Oxford, UK, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Gerla and J.T.C. Tsai. Multicluster, mobile, multimedia radio network. Wireless Networks, 1(3):255--65, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Guha and S. Khuller. Approximation algorithms for connected dominating sets. Algorithmica, 20, (no.4):374--87, Apr. 1998. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. L. Hu. Topology control for multihop packet radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 41(10):1474--81, Oct. 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. L. Jia, R. Rajaraman, and T. Suel. An Efficient Distributed Algorithm for Constructing Small Dominating Sets. In Twentieth ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing PODC'01, Newport, Rhode Island, Aug. 26--29 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. Krishna, N. Vaidya, M. Chatterjee, and D. Pradhan. A cluster-based approach for routing in dynamic networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, pages 49--65, Apr. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. Li, V. Bahl, Y.M. Wang, and R. Wattenhofer. Distributed Topology Control for Power Efficient Operation in Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Apr. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C.R. Lin and M. Gerla. Adaptive Clustering for Mobile Wireless Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15(7):1265--75, Sep. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Narayanaswamy, V. Kawadia, R. S. Sreenivas, and P. R. Kumar. Power Control in Ad-Hoc Networks: Theory, Architecture, Algorithm and Implementation of the COMPOW Protocol. In Proceedings of the European Wireless Conference -- Next Generation Wireless Networks: Technologies, Protocols, Services and Applications, pages 156--162, Florence, Italy, Feb. 25--28 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. R. Prakash. Unidirectional links prove costly in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks. In Proceedings of the Discrete Algorithms and Methods for Mobile Computing and Communications -- DialM, Seattle, WA, Aug. 20 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Ramanathan and R. Rosales-Hain. Topology Control of Multihop Wireless Networks using Transmit Power Adjustment. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), page N.A. IEEE, Mar. 26--30 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. R. Ramanathan and M. Steenstrup. Hierarchically-organized, multihop mobile wireless networks for quality-of-service support. Mobile Networks and Applications, 3(1):101--19, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. P. Sinha, R. Sivakumar, and V. Bharghavan. Enhancing ad hoc routing with dynamic virtual infrastructures. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 1763--72, Anchorage, AK, USA, Apr. 22--26 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. Sivakumar, P. Sinha, and V. Bharghavan. CEDAR: a core-extraction distributed ad hoc routing algorithm. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(8):1454--65, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Takagi and L. Kleinrock. Optimal transmission ranges for randomly distributed packet radio terminals. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 32(3):246--57, Mar. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Topology management in ad hoc networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiHoc '03: Proceedings of the 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
          June 2003
          324 pages
          ISBN:1581136846
          DOI:10.1145/778415

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 June 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          MobiHoc '03 Paper Acceptance Rate27of192submissions,14%Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader