skip to main content
10.1145/93597.98726acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Performance evaluation of semantics-based multilevel concurrency control protocols

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 May 1990Publication History

ABSTRACT

For next generation information systems, concurrency control mechanisms are required to handle high level abstract operations and to meet high throughput demands. The currently available single level concurrency control mechanisms for reads and writes are inadequate for future complex information systems. In this paper, we will present a new multilevel concurrency protocol that uses a semantics-based notion of conflict, which is weaker than commutativity, called recoverability. Further, operations are scheduled according to relative conflict, a conflict notion based on the structure of operations.

Performance evaluation via extensive simulation studies show that with our multilevel concurrency control protocol, the performance improvement is significant when compared to that of a single level two-phase locking based concurrency control scheme or to that of a multilevel concurrency control scheme based on commutativity alone. Further, simulation studies show that our new multilevel concurrency control protocol performs better even with resource contention.

References

  1. 1.Agrawal, tt, Carey, M J , and Lzvny, M Concurrency control performance modehng AlternaUves and ,mphcatlons A CM Transactsons on Database Systems, 12(4)'609-654, December 1987 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Astrahan, M M, Blasgen, M W, Chamberhn, D D, Eswaran, K P, Gray, J N, Gnffiths, P P, King, W F , Lone, It A, Jones, P tt, Mehl, J W, Putzolu, G tt, Trmger, I L , Wade, B , and Watson, V System It A Itelatxonal approach to Database Management A CM Transachons on Database Systems, 1(2) 97-137, June 1976 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Badnnath, B It and Ramamntham, K Semanticsbased concurrency control Beyond Commutatxvxty In Fourth IEEE Conference on Data Engmeemng, pages 132-140, February 1987 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Badnnath, B It. and Ramamrltham, K Performance evaluat,on of semant,cs-based multilevel concurrency control protocols Techmcal Report DCS-TR-261, Rutgets Umvermty, Department of Computer Sc,ence, December 1989Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Badnnath, B It and Ramamritham, K Semant,csbased concurrency control Beyond Commutat,v, ty Subm,tted to A CM Transactwns on Database Systems, November 1989 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Been, C , Bernstem, P A, and Goodman, N A Model for Concurrency m Nested T~ansactlon Systems Techmeal Iteport CS-86-1, Hebrew Umvers, ty, Jerusalem, Israel, January 1986Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Beeri, C., Bernstem, P A, Goodman, N, Lat, M Y, and Shasha, D E Concurrency control theory for nested transactmns In Proceedings of the Second Annual A CM Sympossum on Prtnc~ples of Dzstr, buted Computing, pages 45-62, August 1983 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Been, C , Schek, H , and We,kum, G Mults-level Transaction Management, Theoretscal art or practscal need ~, volume 303 of Lecture Notes sn Computer scsence, pages 134-154 Spnnger-Verlag, 1988 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Bernstem, P A, Hadzdacos, V, and Goodman, N Concurrency Control and recovery m database systems Addxson-Wesley, Iteadmg, MA, 1987 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Hadzxlacos, T and Hadzflacos, V T~ansactmn synchromzatlon m ob2ect bases In Proceedings of the 7th A CM Sympossum on Pmncsples of Database Systems, March 1988 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Hadz,lacos, V Issues of fault tolerance ,n concurrent computatmns Techmcal Iteport 11-84, Harvard Umversity, Axken Computatmn laboratory, Cambridge, MA 02138, June 1984Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Herhhy, M P Opt,mxst,c concurrency control for abstract data types In Fzflh Annual A CM sympossum on Pr~ncsples of Dsstmbuted Computmg, pages 206-217, August 1986 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Herhhy, M P Extending multxversmn txmestampmg protocols to explmt type mformatmn /{/gEE Transactwns on Computers, 35(4) 443-449, April 1987 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Kung, H and Robinson, J. On opt,mlstxc methods for concurrency control A CM Transactsons on Database Systems, 6(2) 213-226, June 1981 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Martin, B E Modehng concurrent act,wt,es wlth nested objects In Proceedings of the 7th raternarwhal conference on d,str~buted computing systems, pages 432-439, Berhn, Germany, September 1987Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Mart,n, B E Scheduhng protocols for nested objects Techmcal Iteport CS-094, Department of Computer Sczence and Engmeenng, Umverslty of Cahforma, San Dxego, Calfforma, 1988Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Moss, J E B, Gnffeth, N, and Graham, M Abstract,on ,n recovery management In Proceedings of the A CM SIGMOD snternat, onal con}erence on management of data, pages 72-83, May 1986 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Papadamltnou, C H The senalxzabxhty of concurrent database updates Journal of the A CM, 26(4) 631-653, October 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Papadanntnou, C H The theory of database concur. rency control Computer Science Press, 1986 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Petal, P, Iteuter, A, and Sammer, H H,gh contentmn m a stock trading database A case study In Proceedsngs of the A CM SIGMOD enternatwnal conference on management of data, pages 260-268, Chicago, Ilhnms, June 1988 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Itozen, S and Shasha, D Us,ng a relatxonal system on wall street The good~ the bad, the ugly, and the ,deal Commun,catwns o/ the A CM, 32(8)988-994, August 1989 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Sehnger, P, Gawhck, D , Gray, J , Krause, 3 , and Schrager, P Panel Discussion Issues m bmldmg large database systems In Proceedings of the A GM SIG- MOD international con/erence on management o} data, page 6, Chicago, Ilhnom, June 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Stonebraker, M., Katz, R., Patterson, D., and Ousterhout, J. The Deslgn of XPRS. In Proceedings of the 14th VLDB conferenc~ Los Angeles, Gahfornsa, pages 318-330, September 1988 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Tay, Y, Goodman, N, and Sun, R. Loclang performance m centrahzed databases. A CM ~,ansacttons on Database S~lstems, 10(4) 415-462, December 1985 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.Weakum, G A theoretxcal foundataon of Multdevd concurrency control. In Proceedings of the Ftflh A GM S~nposzurn on Principles of Database ~ysterns, pages 31- 42, March 1986 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Performance evaluation of semantics-based multilevel concurrency control protocols

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SIGMOD '90: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
                May 1990
                398 pages
                ISBN:0897913655
                DOI:10.1145/93597

                Copyright © 1990 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 May 1990

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader