skip to main content
10.1145/938985.939000acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing

Published:14 September 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the expected transmission count metric (ETX), which finds high-throughput paths on multi-hop wireless networks. ETX minimizes the expected total number of packet transmissions (including retransmissions) required to successfully deliver a packet to the ultimate destination. The ETX metric incorporates the effects of link loss ratios, asymmetry in the loss ratios between the two directions of each link, and interference among the successive links of a path. In contrast, the minimum hop-count metric chooses arbitrarily among the different paths of the same minimum length, regardless of the often large differences in throughput among those paths, and ignoring the possibility that a longer path might offer higher throughput.This paper describes the design and implementation of ETX as a metric for the DSDV and DSR routing protocols, as well as modifications to DSDV and DSR which allow them to use ETX. Measurements taken from a 29-node 802.11b test-bed demonstrate the poor performance of minimum hop-count, illustrate the causes of that poor performance, and confirm that ETX improves performance. For long paths the throughput improvement is often a factor of two or more, suggesting that ETX will become more useful as networks grow larger and paths become longer.

References

  1. The Network Simulator --- ns-2, 2003. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruch Awerbuch, David Holmer, and Herbert Rubens. High throughput route selection in multi-rate ad hoc wireless networks. Technical report, Johns Hopkins University, Computer Science Department, March 2003. Version 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hari Balakrishnan, Venkata N. Padmanabhan, Srinivasan Seshan, and Randy H. Katz. A comparison of mechanisms for improving TCP performance of wireless links. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 6(5), December 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brahim Bensaou, Yu Wang, and Chi Chung Ko. Fair medium access in 802.11 based wireless ad-hoc networks. In First Annual IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), August 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Josh Broch, David A. Maltz, David B. Johnson, Yih-Chun Hu, and Jorjeta Jetcheva. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In Proc. ACM/IEEE MobiCom, pages 85--97, October 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shigang Chen and Klara Nahrstedt. Distributed quality-of-service routing in ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communcations, 17(8), August 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T.-W. Chen, J.T. Tsai, and M. Gerla. QoS routing performance in multihop, multimedia, wireless networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICUPC '97, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kwan-Wu Chin, John Judge, Aidan Williams, and Roger Kermode. Implementation experience with MANET routing protocols. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, 32(5), November 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Brian H. Davies and T. R. Davies. The application of packet switching techniques to combat net radio. Proceedings of the IEEE, 75(1), January 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Rohit Dube, Cynthia D. Rais, Kuang-Yeh Wang, and Satish K. Tripathi. Signal stability-based adaptive routing (SSA) for ad hoc mobile networks. IEEE Personal Communications, February 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tom Goff, Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh, Dhananjay S. Phatak, and Ridvan Kahvecioglu. Preemptive routing in ad hoc networks. In Proc. ACM/IEEE MobiCom, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan. Energy-efficient Communication Protocols for Wireless Microsensor Networks. In Proceedings of the Hawaiian International Conference on Systems Science, January 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yu-Ching Hsu, Tzu-Chieh Tsai, Ying-Dar Lin, and Mario Gerla. Bandwidth routing in multi-hop packet radio environment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Mobile Computing Workshop, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yih-Chun Hu and David B. Johnson. Design and demonstration of live audio and video over multihop wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the MILCOM 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. David B. Johnson. Routing in ad hoc networks of mobile hosts. In Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pages 158--163, December 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. David B. Johnson, David A. Maltz, and Yih-Chun Hu. The Dynamic Source Routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks (DSR). Internet draft (work in progress), IETF, April 2003. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-dsr-09.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. John Jubin and Janet D. Tornow. The DARPA packet radio network protocols. Proceedings of the IEEE, 75(1), January 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Eun-Sun Jung and Nitin Vaidya. A power control MAC protocol for ad hoc networks. In Proc. ACM/IEEE MobiCom, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Eddie Kohler, Robert Morris, Benjie Chen, John Jannotti, and M. Frans Kaashoek. The Click modular router. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 18(4), November 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jinyang Li, Charles Blake, Douglas S. J. De Couto, Hu Imm Lee, and Robert Morris. Capacity of ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 61--69, Rome, Italy, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Chunhung Richard Lin. On-demand QoS routing in multihop mobile networks. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, April 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Henrik Lundgren, Erik Nordstrom, and Christian Tschudin. Coping with comunication gray zones in IEEE 802.11b based ad hoc networks. In 5th ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile multimedia (WoWMoM 2002), September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Anastassios Michail and Anthony Ephremides. Algorithms for routing session traffic in wireless ad-hoc networks with energy and bandwidth limitations. In Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Christina Parsa and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. TULIP: A link-level protocol for improving TCP over wireless links. In Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 1999 (WCNC 99), September 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Charles E. Perkins and Pravin Bhagwat. Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM '94), pages 234--244, August 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Charles E. Perkins and Elizabeth M. Royer. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rice Monarch Project. Wireless and mobility extensions to ns-2. http://www.monarch.cs.rice.edu/cmu-ns.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ratish J. Punnoose, Pavel V. Nitkin, Josh Broch, and Daniel D. Stancil. Optimizing wireless network protocols using real-time predictive propagation modeling. In Radio and Wireless Conference (RAWCON), August 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ram Ramanathan and Regina Rosales-Hain. Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, March 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Samarth H. Shah and Klara Nahrstedt. Predictive location-based QoS routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Prasum Sinha, Raghupathy Sivakumar, and Vaduvur Bharghavan. CEDAR: A core-extraction distributed ad hoc routing algorithm. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, March 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Audun Tornquist. Modular and adaptive ad hoc routing in Click. Master's thesis, University of Colorado, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mark Yarvis, W. Steven Conner, Lakshman Krishnamurthy, Jasmeet Chhabra, Brent Elliott, and Alan Mainwaring. Real-world experiences with an interactive ad hoc sensor network. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ad Hoc Networking, August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Chenxi Zhu and M. Scott Corson. QoS routing for mobile ad hoc networks. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, June 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiCom '03: Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
          September 2003
          376 pages
          ISBN:1581137532
          DOI:10.1145/938985

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 September 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          MobiCom '03 Paper Acceptance Rate27of281submissions,10%Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader