skip to main content
10.1145/941350.941367acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsnaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The coverage problem in a wireless sensor network

Published:19 September 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

One fundamental issue in sensor networks is the coverage problem, which reflects how well a sensor network is monitored or tracked by sensors. In this paper, we formulate this problem as a decision problem, whose goal is to determine whether every point in the service area of the sensor network is covered by at least k sensors, where k is a predefined value. The sensing ranges of sensors can be unit disks or non-unit disks. We present polynomial-time algorithms, in terms of the number of sensors, that can be easily translated to distributed protocols. The result is a generalization of some earlier results where only k=1 is assumed. Applications of the result include: (i) positioning applications, (ii) situations which require stronger environmental monitoring capability, and (iii) scenarios which impose more stringent fault-tolerant capability.

References

  1. P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 775--784, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. Braginsky and D. Estrin. Rumor routing algorithm for sensor networks. In ACM Int'l Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Commun., 7(5):28--34, Oct. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. J. Pottie and W. J. Kaiser. Wireless integrated network sensors. Commun. ACM, 43(5):51--58, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Ganesan, R. Govindan, S. Shenker, and D. Estrin. Highly resilient, energy efficient multipath routing in wireless sensor networks. ACM Mobile Comput. and Commun. Review, 5(4):11--25, Oct. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan. Energy-efficient communication protocols for wireless microsensor networks. In Hawaii Int'l Conf. on Systems Science (HICSS), 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. O'Rourke. Computational geometry column 15. Int'l Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications, 2(2):215--217, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Meguerdichian, F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, and M. B. Srivastava. Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1380--1387, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Meguerdichian, F. Koushanfar, G. Qu, and M. Potkonjak. Exposure in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In ACM Int'l Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), pages 139--150, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Meguerdichian, S. Slijepcevic, V. Karayan, and M. Potkonjak. Localized algorithms in wireless ad-hoc networks: location discovery and sensor exposure. In ACM Int'l Symp. on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHOC), pages 106--116, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Nicules and B. Nath. Ad-hoc positioning system (APS) using AoA. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Savvides, C.-C. Han, and M. B. Strivastava. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In ACM Int'l Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), pages 166--179, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. E. Shih, S.-H. Cho, N. Ickes, R. Min, A. Sinha, A. Wang, and A. Chandrakasan. Physical layer driven protocol and algorithm design for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks. In ACM Int'l Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), pages 272--287, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Slijepcevic and M. Potkonjak. Power efficient organization of wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Int'l Conf. on Communications (ICC), pages 472--476, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Sohrabi, J. Gao, V. Ailawadhi, and G. J. Pottie. Protocols for self-organization of a wireless sensor network. IEEE Personal Commun., 7(5):16--27, Oct. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. Tian and N. D. Georganas. A coverage-preserving node scheduling scheme for large wireless sensor networks. In ACM Int'l Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y.-C. Tseng, S.-P. Kuo, H.-W. Lee, and C.-F. Huang. Location tracking in a wireless sensor network by mobile agents and its data fusion strategies. In Int'l Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Woo and D. E. Culler. A transmission control scheme for media access in sensor networks. In ACM Int'l Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), pages 221--235, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. F. Ye, G. Zhong, S. Lu, and L. Zhang. PEAS: A robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks. In Int'l Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1567--1576, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The coverage problem in a wireless sensor network

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WSNA '03: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international conference on Wireless sensor networks and applications
        September 2003
        178 pages
        ISBN:1581137648
        DOI:10.1145/941350

        Copyright © 2003 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 September 2003

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate15of60submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader