skip to main content
10.1145/956750.956759acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Adaptive duplicate detection using learnable string similarity measures

Published:24 August 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

The problem of identifying approximately duplicate records in databases is an essential step for data cleaning and data integration processes. Most existing approaches have relied on generic or manually tuned distance metrics for estimating the similarity of potential duplicates. In this paper, we present a framework for improving duplicate detection using trainable measures of textual similarity. We propose to employ learnable text distance functions for each database field, and show that such measures are capable of adapting to the specific notion of similarity that is appropriate for the field's domain. We present two learnable text similarity measures suitable for this task: an extended variant of learnable string edit distance, and a novel vector-space based measure that employs a Support Vector Machine (SVM) for training. Experimental results on a range of datasets show that our framework can improve duplicate detection accuracy over traditional techniques.

References

  1. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, New York, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Bilenko and R. J. Mooney. Learning to combine trained distance metrics for duplicate detection in databases. Technical Report AI 02-296, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Feb. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. W. W. Cohen, H. Kautz, and D. McAllester. Hardening soft information sources. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2000), Boston, MA, Aug. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. W. Cohen and J. Richman. Learning to match and cluster large high-dimensional data sets for data integration. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2002), Edmonton, Alberta, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. J. Cook and L. B. Holder. Substructure discovery using minimum description length and background knowledge. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1:231--255, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Durbin, S. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. Mitchison. Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. I. P. Fellegi and A. B. Sunter. A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64:1183--1210, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. Freund and L. Mason. The alternating decision tree learning algorithm. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99), Bled, Slovenia, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Gusfield. Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. A. Hernández and S. J. Stolfo. The merge/purge problem for large databases. In Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD-95), pages 127--138, San Jose, CA, May 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Joachims. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In B. Schölkopf, C. J. C. Burges, and A. J. Smola, editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, pages 169--184. MIT Press, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Joachims. Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99), Bled, Slovenia, June 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. K. McCallum, K. Nigam, and L. Ungar. Efficient clustering of high-dimensional data sets with application to reference matching. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2000), pages 169--178, Boston, MA, Aug. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. E. Monge and C. Elkan. The field matching problem: Algorithms and applications. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96), pages 267--270, Portland, OR, Aug. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. E. Monge and C. P. Elkan. An efficient domain-independent algorithm for detecting approximately duplicate database records. In Proceedings of the SIGMOD 1997 Workshop on Research Issues on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 23--29, Tuscon, AZ, May 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. U. Y. Nahm and R. J. Mooney. Using information extraction to aid the discovery of prediction rules from texts. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2000) Workshop on Text Mining, Boston, MA, Aug. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. B. Needleman and C. D. Wunsch. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequences of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 48:443--453, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. H. B. Newcombe, J. M. Kennedy, S. J. Axford, and A. P. James. Automatic linkage of vital records. Science, 130:954--959, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. C. Platt. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In A. J. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Schölkopf, and D. Schuurmans, editors, Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pages 185--208. MIT Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. L. R. Rabiner. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2):257--286, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. E. S. Ristad and P. N. Yianilos. Learning string edit distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(5), 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Sarawagi and A. Bhamidipaty. Interactive deduplication using active learning. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2002), Edmonton, Alberta, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Tejada, C. A. Knoblock, and S. Minton. Learning domain-independent string transformation weights for high accuracy object identification. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2002), Edmonton, Alberta, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. V. N. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. W. E. Winkler. The state of record linkage and current research problems. Technical report, Statistical Research Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Wachington, DC, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. B. Zadrozny and C. Elkan. Obtaining calibrated probability estimates from decision trees and naive bayesian classifiers. In Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2001), Williamstown, MA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive duplicate detection using learnable string similarity measures

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '03: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
        August 2003
        736 pages
        ISBN:1581137370
        DOI:10.1145/956750

        Copyright © 2003 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 August 2003

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '03 Paper Acceptance Rate46of298submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader