Steven Poltrock
Jonathan Grudin
Susan Dumais
Raya Fidel
ABSTRACT
Information retrieval is generally considered an individual activity, and information retrieval research and tools reflect this view. As digitally mediated communication and information sharing increase, collaborative information retrieval merits greater attention and support. We describe field studies of information gathering in two design teams that had very different products, disciplinary backgrounds, and tools. We found striking similarities in the kinds of information they sought and the methods used to get it. For example, each team sought information about design constraints from external sources. A common strategy was to propose ideas and request feedback, rather than to ask directly for recommendations. Some differences in information seeking and sharing reflected differences in work contexts. Our findings suggest some ways that existing team collaboration tools could support collaborative information retrieval more effectively.
- Agostini, A., De Michelis, G., and Grasso, M. A. Rethinking CSCW systems: the architecture of MILANO, Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 1997), Kluwer, pp. 33--48. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Allen, T. J. Managing the Flow of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1977.Google Scholar
- Belkin, N. Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval, Canadian Journal of Information Science, Vol. 5, 1980, pp. 133--143.Google Scholar
- Büscher, M., Mogensen, P., and Shapiro, D. Spaces of practice, Proc. ECSCW 2001, Kluwer , pp. 139--158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dervin, B. From the mind's eye of the user: the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology, in J.D. Glazier & R.R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Information Management. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, Colorado, 1992, pp. 61--84.Google Scholar
- Fidel, R., Bruce, H., Pejtersen, A. Dumais, S., Grudin, J., and Poltrock, S. Collaborative information retrieval, in L. Höglund (Ed.), The New Review of Information Behavior Research: Studies of Information Seeking in Context. Graham Taylor, 2000.Google Scholar
- Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A. M., Cleal, B. & Bruce, H. A multi-dimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction: A case study of collaborative information retrieval. Unpublished paper, 2003.Google Scholar
- Groth, K. & Bowers, J. On finding things out: Situating organizational knowledge in CSCW, Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2001), Kluwer, pp. 279--298. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McDonald, D. W. & Ackerman, M. S. Expertise recommender: A flexible recommendation system and architecture, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, December 2000, pp. 231--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McGrath, J. E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1984.Google Scholar
- Mortensen, M. & Hinds, P. Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams, in P. J. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002.Google Scholar
- Pejtersen, A. M., Sonnenwald, D. H., Buur, J., Govindarej, T., and Vicente, K. Using cognitive engineering theory to support knowledge exploration in design, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference in Engineering Design (Praha, August 1995).Google Scholar
- Poltrock, S. E., and Engelbeck, G. Requirements for a virtual collaboration environment', Information and Software Technology, Vol. 41, No. 6, 1999, pp. 331--340.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., and Goodstein, L. P. Cognitive Systems Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reddy, M. C., & Dourish, P. A finger on the pulse: Temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 2002, pp. 344--353. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reddy, M. C., Dourish, P., and Pratt, W. Coordinating heterogeneous work: Information and representation in medical care. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2001), Kluwer, pp. 239--258. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schmidt, K, and Bannon, L. Taking CSCW seriously: supporting articulation work, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 1, 1992, pp. 7--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonnenwald, D. H., and Lievrouw, L. A. Collaboration during the design process: a case study of communication, information behavior, and project performance, Proceedings of ISIC '96 (Tampere, Finland, August 1996), Taylor Graham, pp. 179--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sonnenwald, D. H., and Pierce, L. G. Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks, and contested collaboration in command and control, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2000, pp. 461--479. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taylor, R. S. Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 29, 1968, pp. 178--194.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vicente, K. Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-based Work, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1999. Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Information seeking and sharing in design teams
Recommendations
Information seeking and sharing in design teams[27] (abstract only)
Information retrieval is generally considered an individual activity, and information retrieval research and tools reflect this view. As digitally mediated communication and information sharing increase, collaborative information retrieval merits ...
Collaborative Information Retrieval in an information-intensive domain
In this article we investigate the expressions of collaborative activities within information seeking and retrieval processes (IS&R). Generally, information seeking and retrieval is regarded as an individual and isolated process in IR research. We ...
Collaborative information seeking: The combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding
Since common ground is pivotal to collaboration, this paper proposes to define collaborative information seeking as the combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding. While information-seeking activities are necessary for ...
Comments