skip to main content
article

The sensor spectrum: technology, trends, and requirements

Published:01 December 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Though physical sensing instruments have long been used in astronomy, biology, and civil engineering, the recent emergence of wireless sensor networks and RFID has spurred a renaissance in sensor interest in both academia and industry. In this paper, we examine the spectrum of sensing platforms, from billion dollar satellites to tiny RF tags, and discuss the technological differences between them. We show that battery powered sensor networks, with low-power multihop radios and low-cost processors, occupy a sweet spot in this spectrum that is rife with opportunity for novel database research. We briefly summarize some of our research work in this space and present a number of examples of interesting sensor network-related problems that the database community is uniquely equipped to address.

References

  1. R. Alonso and S. Ganguly. Query optimization in mobile environments. In Workshop on Foundations of Models and Languages for Data and Objects, pages 1--17, September 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Avnur and J. M. Hellerstein. Eddies: Continuously adaptive query processing. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, pages 261--272, Dallas, TX, May 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. S. S. Benchmark. Michael stonebraker and jim frew and kenn gardels and jeff meredith. In Proceedings of SIGMOD, pages 2--11, June 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Bonfils and P. Bonnet. Adaptive and decentralized operator placement for in-network query processing. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), April 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Brooke and J. Burrell. From ethnography to design in a vineyard. In Proceedings of the Design User Experiences (DUX) Conference, June 2003. Case Study.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Campbell Scientific. Campbell Scientific Inc. Measurement and Control Systems. Web Page. http:// www.capbellsci.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell Scientific, Inc. Datalogger comparison table. Technical report, 2003. http://www.campebellscientific.com/compare.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Cerpa, J. Elson, D. Estrin, L. Girod, M. Hamilton, and J. Zhao. Habitat monitoring: Application driver for wireless communications technology. In ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Data Communications in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Chu, H. Haussecker, and F. Zhao. Scalable information-driven sensor querying and routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks. In International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 2002., 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Corporation. CC1000 Single Chip Very Low Power RF Transceiver Datasheet. http://www.chipcon.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. O. C. Corporation. HOBO/Stow Away Data Loggers and Shuttles. Web Site, September 2003. http://www.onsetcomp.com/Commerce_Pages/product.ccm1?6, 0, ck0365980adb90ef33a9cf632748bc4bad,oc2_170836, hobo.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. O. C. Corporation. Onset computer: Battery-operated data loggers and controllers. Web Page, 2003. http://www.onsetcomputer.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Cowley, B. Farrell, P. Gilna, and L. Russel. Scientific data management: Real-world issues and requirements. SIGMOD Panel and Abstract, June 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Crossbow, Inc. Wireless Sensor Networks (Mica Motes). http://www.oxbow.com/Products/Wireless_Sensor_Networks.htm.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. F. Davis, W. Farrell, J. Gray, R. Meches, R. Moore, S. Sides, and M. Stonebraker. Eosdis alternative architecture. Web Site, January 1995. http://research.microsoft.com/~gray/EOS_DIS/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Dawson. Fog in the california redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecologia, 117(4): 476--485, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. Dozier. Access to data in nasa's earth observing system. SIGMOD Keynote Address and Abstract, June 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. I. Duracell. MX1500, September 2003. Available from http://www.duracell.com/oem/Pdf/MX1500.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. I. Duracell. Ultra CR-V3, September 2003. Available from http://www.duracell.com/oem/Pdf/CRV3.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dust Inc. Company Web Site. http://www.dust-inc.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Forester. 170 controller. Technical report, California Department of Transportation, 2003. See http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/ttsb/electrical/170c.htm.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Hellerstein, W. Hong, S. Madden, and K. Stanek. Beyond average: Towards sophisticated sensing with queries. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), April 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, and D. C. K. Pister. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In ASPLOS, November 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. T. Imielinski and B. Badrinath. Querying in highly mobile distributed environments. In VLDB, Vancouver, Canada, 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. K. Inc. Khoral Inc: Khoros Pro 2001 Integrated Development Environment. Web Page. http://www.khoral.com/khoros/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In MobiCOM, Boston, MA, August 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. P. Juang, H. Oki, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L. Pehand, and D. Rubenstein. Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: Design tradeoffs and early experiences with zebranet. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), October 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Kibler. CERES Science Team Meeting. Technical report, NASA Langley Research Center, May 2001. Available from http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/ceres/science_team/ST_Mtg.0105.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Kwon, P. Varaiya, and A. Skabardonis. Estimation of truck traffic volume from single loop detector using lane-to-lane speed correlation. In National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Meeting, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. TAG: A Tiny AGgregation Service for Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks. In OSDI, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. The design of an acquisitional query processor for sensor networks. In ACM SIGMOD, 2003. To Appear.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. S. Madden, W. Hong, J. M. Hellerstein, and M. Franklin. TinyDB web page. http://telegraph.cs.berkeley.edu/tinydb.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and D. Culler. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In ACM Workshop on Sensor Networks and Applications, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. NASA. Ceres info. Web page, September 2003. http://eosdatainfo.gsfc.nasa.gov/eosdata/terraceres/ceres.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. S. Oh, S. G. Ritchie, and C. Oh. An improved travel-time estimation algorithm using dual loop detectors. In National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Meeting, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. J. Rabaey, J. Ammer, T. Karalar, S. Li, B. Otis, M. Sheets, and T. Tuan. PicoRadios for Wireless Sensor Networks: The Next Challenge in Ultra-Low-Power Design. In Proceedings of the International Solid State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, Feburary 2002. Also see: http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Publications/2002/presentations/isscc2000/ISSCCslides.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. S. Sastry, S. Schaffert, L. Schenato, S. Simic, B. Sinopoli, E. Brewer, D. Culler, and D. Wagner. Development of the NEST Challenge Application: Distributed Pursuit Evasion Games, 2002. Presentation. webs.cs.berkeley.edu/weekly/Berkeley_challenge_app.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sensorial Corporation. sGate wireless sensor gateway. Data Sheet. http://www.sensoria.com/downloads/sGate%20Brochure%2003217-01%20Rev%%20A.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. SPSS, Inc. SPSS- Home. Web Page, 2003. http://www.spss.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. J. W. C. van Lint and N. J. van der Zjipp. An improved travel-time estimation algorithm using dual loop detectors. In National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Meeting, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Washington State Department of Transportation. SR520 Ramp Metering at Montlake and Lake Washington Boulevards. Web page, 2002. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR520RampMeters/loopdetector.htm.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. The cougar approach to in-network query processing in sensor networks. In SIGMOD Record, September 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGMOD Record
    ACM SIGMOD Record  Volume 32, Issue 4
    December 2003
    112 pages
    ISSN:0163-5808
    DOI:10.1145/959060
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2003 Authors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 December 2003

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader