Abstract
Though physical sensing instruments have long been used in astronomy, biology, and civil engineering, the recent emergence of wireless sensor networks and RFID has spurred a renaissance in sensor interest in both academia and industry. In this paper, we examine the spectrum of sensing platforms, from billion dollar satellites to tiny RF tags, and discuss the technological differences between them. We show that battery powered sensor networks, with low-power multihop radios and low-cost processors, occupy a sweet spot in this spectrum that is rife with opportunity for novel database research. We briefly summarize some of our research work in this space and present a number of examples of interesting sensor network-related problems that the database community is uniquely equipped to address.
- R. Alonso and S. Ganguly. Query optimization in mobile environments. In Workshop on Foundations of Models and Languages for Data and Objects, pages 1--17, September 1993.]]Google Scholar
- R. Avnur and J. M. Hellerstein. Eddies: Continuously adaptive query processing. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, pages 261--272, Dallas, TX, May 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. S. S. Benchmark. Michael stonebraker and jim frew and kenn gardels and jeff meredith. In Proceedings of SIGMOD, pages 2--11, June 1993.]]Google Scholar
- B. Bonfils and P. Bonnet. Adaptive and decentralized operator placement for in-network query processing. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), April 2003.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Brooke and J. Burrell. From ethnography to design in a vineyard. In Proceedings of the Design User Experiences (DUX) Conference, June 2003. Case Study.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Campbell Scientific. Campbell Scientific Inc. Measurement and Control Systems. Web Page. http:// www.capbellsci.com.]]Google Scholar
- Campbell Scientific, Inc. Datalogger comparison table. Technical report, 2003. http://www.campebellscientific.com/compare.html.]]Google Scholar
- A. Cerpa, J. Elson, D. Estrin, L. Girod, M. Hamilton, and J. Zhao. Habitat monitoring: Application driver for wireless communications technology. In ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Data Communications in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2001.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Chu, H. Haussecker, and F. Zhao. Scalable information-driven sensor querying and routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks. In International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 2002., 2002.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Corporation. CC1000 Single Chip Very Low Power RF Transceiver Datasheet. http://www.chipcon.com.]]Google Scholar
- O. C. Corporation. HOBO/Stow Away Data Loggers and Shuttles. Web Site, September 2003. http://www.onsetcomp.com/Commerce_Pages/product.ccm1?6, 0, ck0365980adb90ef33a9cf632748bc4bad,oc2_170836, hobo.html.]]Google Scholar
- O. C. Corporation. Onset computer: Battery-operated data loggers and controllers. Web Page, 2003. http://www.onsetcomputer.com.]]Google Scholar
- P. Cowley, B. Farrell, P. Gilna, and L. Russel. Scientific data management: Real-world issues and requirements. SIGMOD Panel and Abstract, June 1992.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crossbow, Inc. Wireless Sensor Networks (Mica Motes). http://www.oxbow.com/Products/Wireless_Sensor_Networks.htm.]]Google Scholar
- F. Davis, W. Farrell, J. Gray, R. Meches, R. Moore, S. Sides, and M. Stonebraker. Eosdis alternative architecture. Web Site, January 1995. http://research.microsoft.com/~gray/EOS_DIS/.]]Google Scholar
- T. Dawson. Fog in the california redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecologia, 117(4): 476--485, 1998.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Dozier. Access to data in nasa's earth observing system. SIGMOD Keynote Address and Abstract, June 1992.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Duracell. MX1500, September 2003. Available from http://www.duracell.com/oem/Pdf/MX1500.pdf.]]Google Scholar
- I. Duracell. Ultra CR-V3, September 2003. Available from http://www.duracell.com/oem/Pdf/CRV3.pdf.]]Google Scholar
- Dust Inc. Company Web Site. http://www.dust-inc.com.]]Google Scholar
- J. Forester. 170 controller. Technical report, California Department of Transportation, 2003. See http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/ttsb/electrical/170c.htm.]]Google Scholar
- J. Hellerstein, W. Hong, S. Madden, and K. Stanek. Beyond average: Towards sophisticated sensing with queries. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), April 2003.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, and D. C. K. Pister. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In ASPLOS, November 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Imielinski and B. Badrinath. Querying in highly mobile distributed environments. In VLDB, Vancouver, Canada, 1992.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Inc. Khoral Inc: Khoros Pro 2001 Integrated Development Environment. Web Page. http://www.khoral.com/khoros/.]]Google Scholar
- C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In MobiCOM, Boston, MA, August 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Juang, H. Oki, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L. Pehand, and D. Rubenstein. Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: Design tradeoffs and early experiences with zebranet. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS), October 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Kibler. CERES Science Team Meeting. Technical report, NASA Langley Research Center, May 2001. Available from http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/ceres/science_team/ST_Mtg.0105.pdf.]]Google Scholar
- J. Kwon, P. Varaiya, and A. Skabardonis. Estimation of truck traffic volume from single loop detector using lane-to-lane speed correlation. In National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Meeting, 2003.]]Google Scholar
- S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. TAG: A Tiny AGgregation Service for Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks. In OSDI, 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. The design of an acquisitional query processor for sensor networks. In ACM SIGMOD, 2003. To Appear.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Madden, W. Hong, J. M. Hellerstein, and M. Franklin. TinyDB web page. http://telegraph.cs.berkeley.edu/tinydb.]]Google Scholar
- A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and D. Culler. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In ACM Workshop on Sensor Networks and Applications, 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- NASA. Ceres info. Web page, September 2003. http://eosdatainfo.gsfc.nasa.gov/eosdata/terraceres/ceres.html.]]Google Scholar
- S. Oh, S. G. Ritchie, and C. Oh. An improved travel-time estimation algorithm using dual loop detectors. In National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Meeting, 2002.]]Google Scholar
- J. Rabaey, J. Ammer, T. Karalar, S. Li, B. Otis, M. Sheets, and T. Tuan. PicoRadios for Wireless Sensor Networks: The Next Challenge in Ultra-Low-Power Design. In Proceedings of the International Solid State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, Feburary 2002. Also see: http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/Publications/2002/presentations/isscc2000/ISSCCslides.pdf.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Sastry, S. Schaffert, L. Schenato, S. Simic, B. Sinopoli, E. Brewer, D. Culler, and D. Wagner. Development of the NEST Challenge Application: Distributed Pursuit Evasion Games, 2002. Presentation. webs.cs.berkeley.edu/weekly/Berkeley_challenge_app.pdf.]]Google Scholar
- Sensorial Corporation. sGate wireless sensor gateway. Data Sheet. http://www.sensoria.com/downloads/sGate%20Brochure%2003217-01%20Rev%%20A.pdf.]]Google Scholar
- SPSS, Inc. SPSS- Home. Web Page, 2003. http://www.spss.com.]]Google Scholar
- J. W. C. van Lint and N. J. van der Zjipp. An improved travel-time estimation algorithm using dual loop detectors. In National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Meeting, 2003.]]Google Scholar
- Washington State Department of Transportation. SR520 Ramp Metering at Montlake and Lake Washington Boulevards. Web page, 2002. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR520RampMeters/loopdetector.htm.]]Google Scholar
- Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. The cougar approach to in-network query processing in sensor networks. In SIGMOD Record, September 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive wireless sensor networks
Special issue on Collaborative Wireless Sensor Networks and ApplicationsCognitive wireless sensor network (CWSN) is a combination of cognitive radio and wireless sensor networks (WSNs), which can effectively solve spectrum resource scarcity problem in WSNs. As one of the key technologies in CWSNs, spectrum sensing enables ...
Sensor scheduling for p-percent coverage in wireless sensor networks
We study sensor scheduling problems of p-percent coverage in this paper and propose two scheduling algorithms to prolong network lifetime due to the fact that for some applications full coverage is not necessary and different subareas of the monitored ...
Energy Efficient Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Sensor Network Using FPGA: a Survey
FRUCT'21: Proceedings of the 21st Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCTCognitive Radio Sensor Network (CRSN) is a network of deployed wireless sensor nodes integrated with Cognitive Radio (CR) capability. It is a most promising technology to resolve spectrum scarcity resources, coexistence with another network in ISM band, ...
Comments