skip to main content
article

Using lab exams to ensure programming practice in an introductory programming course

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 June 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The high variability of students' backgrounds typically found in introductory programming courses creates additional difficulties to foster motivation and ensure the desired competency and retention rates. This paper presents and discusses the results of applying an assessment methodology strongly based upon lab exams (or on-computer exams) with the objective of ensuring programming pratice competency while maintaining students' motivation. It discusses the difficult balances of several assessment methods, details the used assessment methodology and finally presents students results and views. These show that lab exams, although more demanding then group assignments, can be made popular among students if they perceived them as fairer.

References

  1. T. Beaubouef, R. Lucas, and J. Howatt. The UNLOCK System: Enhancing Problem Solving Skills in CS-1 Students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(2):43--46, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mary Elaine Califf and Mary Goodwin. Testing Skills and Knowledge: Introducing a Laboratory Exam in CSI. In Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 217--221. ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. B. Henderson, D. Baldwin, V. Dasigi, M. Dupras, J. Fritz, D. Ginat, D. Goelman, J. Hamer, L. Hitchner, W. Lloyd, J. Bill Marion, C. Ridesel, and H. Walker. Striving for Mathematical Thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(4):114--124, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Norman Jacobson. Using On-Computer Exams to Ensure Beginning Students' Programming Competency. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(4):53--56, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Michael Kölling and John Rosenberg. Guidelines for Teaching Object Orientation with Java. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pages 33--36. ACM Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eric Roberts. Strategies for Encouraging Individual Achievement in Introductory Computer Science Courses. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 295--299. ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Matt Roddan. The Determinants of Student Failure and Attrition in First Year Computing Science. http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~roddanmc/Report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mack Thweatt. CS1 Closed Lab vs. Open Lab Experiment. In Selected Papers of the Twenty-Fifth Annual SIGCSE Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 80--82. ACM Press, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Using lab exams to ensure programming practice in an introductory programming course

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
        ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 35, Issue 3
        Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
        September 2003
        277 pages
        ISSN:0097-8418
        DOI:10.1145/961290
        Issue’s Table of Contents
        • cover image ACM Conferences
          ITiCSE '03: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
          June 2003
          291 pages
          ISBN:1581136722
          DOI:10.1145/961511

        Copyright © 2003 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 June 2003

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader