skip to main content
article

Self-configuring localization systems: Design and Experimental Evaluation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 February 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Embedded networked sensors promise to revolutionize the way we interact with our physical environment and require scalable, ad hoc deployable and energy-efficient node localization/positioning.This paper describes the motivation, design, implementation, and experimental evaluation (on sharply resource-constrained devices) of a self-configuring localization system using radio beacons. We identify beacon density as an important parameter in determining localization quality, which saturates at a transition density. We develop algorithms to improve localization quality by (i) automating placement of new beacons at low densities (HEAP) and (ii) rotating functionality among redundant beacons while increasing system lifetime at high densities (STROBE).

References

  1. Aurenhammer, F. 1991. Voronoi diagrams---a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Computing Surveys 23, 345--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bahl, P. and Padmanabhan, V. N. 2000. Radar: An in-building user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2000, vol. 2. IEEE, New York, 775--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2000. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 7, 5 (Oct.), 28--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2001. Adaptive beacon placement. In Proceedings of ICDCS-21. IEEE Computer Society, Phoenix, Arizona, 489--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cerpa, A. and Estrin, D. 2002. Ascent: Adaptive self-configuring network topologies. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2002, vol. 2. IEEE, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Charikar, M., Guha, S., Shmoys, D., and Tardos, E. 1999. A constant-factor approximation algorithm for the k median problem. In Proceedings of ACM STOC 1999. ACM, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cox, I. J. 1991. Blanche---an experiment in guidance and navigation of an autonomous robot vehicle. IEEE Tracsactions on Robotics and Automation 7, 2, 193--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Doherty, L., Pister, K. S., and Ghaoui, L. E. 2001. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2001, vol. 3. IEEE, Anchorage, Alaska, 1655--1663.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Heidemann, J., and Kumar, S. 1999. Next century challenges: Scalable coordination in sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM '99. ACM, Seattle, WA, USA, 263--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Girod, L. 2000. Development and Characterization of an Acoustic Rangefinder. Tech. Rep. USC-CS-TR-00-728, University of Southern California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Girod, L. and Estrin, D. 2001. Robust range estimation for localization in ad hoc sensor networks. http://lecs.cs.ucla.edu/ girod/papers/NLOS.ps.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Guibas, L., Lin, D., Latombe, J. C., LaValle, S., and Motwani, R. 2000. Visibility-based pursuit evasion in a polygonal environment. International Journal of Computational Geometry Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., and Balakrishnan, H. 2000. Energy-efficient communication protocols for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the HICSS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hightower, J., Want, R., and Borriello, G. 2000. Spoton: An indoor 3d location sensing technology based on rf signal strength. UW CSE 2000-02-02, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. February.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D., and Pister, K. 2000. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In Proceedings of ASPLOS-IX. ACM, Cambridge, MA, USA, 93--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hofmann-Wellenhoff, B., Lichtenegger, H., and Collins, J. 1997. Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 4th ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Intanagonwiwat, C., Govindan, R., and Estrin, D. 2000. Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In Proceedings of MobiCom 2000. ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kaiser, W. J. 2000. Wins ng 1.0 transceiver power dissipation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Karp, B. and Kung, H. 2000. GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of MobiCom 2000. ACM, New York, 243--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Krishnamachari, B., Bejar, R., and Wicker, S. 2002. Distributed problem solving and the boundaries of self-configuration in multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02). IEEE, Big Island, Hawaii, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. US Wireless Corporation. http://www.uswcorp.com/USWCMainPages/our.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Potkonjak, M., and Srivastava, M. B. 2001. Coverage problems in wireless ad hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2001. IEEE, Anchorage, Alaska.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pottie, G. J. and Kaiser, W. J. 2000. Wireless integrated network sensors. Communications of the ACM 43, 5 (May), 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Priyantha, N., Chakraborty, A., and Balakrishnan, H. 2000. The cricket location support system. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2000. ACM, Boston, MA, 32--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Rappaport, T. S. 1996. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. RF Monolitithics, I. http://www.rfm.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Royer, E. and Toh, C. 1999. A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE. Personal Communications. April 1999. Citeseer.ng.nec.com/royer99review.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Savvides, A., Boulis, A., Kaushanafar, F., Potkonjak, M., Karavas, V., and Srivastava, M. B. 2000. Dynamic location discovery in ad-hoc wireless networks. Tech. Rep. TM-UCLA-NESL-2000-07-001, University of California at Los Angeles. July.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Savvides, A., Han, C., and Srivastava, M. B. 2001. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM '01. ACM, Rome, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Schurgers, C., Tsiatsis, V., and Srivastava, M. B. 2002. Stem: Topology management for eneregy efficient sensor networks. In IEEE Aerospace Conference 2002, Big Sky, MT, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Thrun, S., Fox, D., Burgard, W., and Dellaert, F. 2001. Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots. Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. VOR. Very high frequency omnirange. http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/VOR.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Ward, A., Jones, A., and Hopper, A. 1997. A new location technique for the active office. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 4, 5 (October), 42--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Welch, G., Bishop, G., Vicci, L., Brumback, S., Keller, K., and Colucci, D. 1999. The HiBall tracker: High-performance wide-area tracking for virtual and augmented environments. In Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Xu, Y., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2001. Geography-informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM 2001. ACM, Rome, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2002. An energy efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2002, vol. 2. IEEE, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Ye, W., Vaughan, R. T., Sukhatme, G. S., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D., and Mataric, M. J. 2001. Evaluating control strategies for wireless-networked robots using an integrated robot and network simulation. In Proceedings of ICRA-2001, Seoul, Korea.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Self-configuring localization systems: Design and Experimental Evaluation

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
                  ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems  Volume 3, Issue 1
                  February 2004
                  232 pages
                  ISSN:1539-9087
                  EISSN:1558-3465
                  DOI:10.1145/972627
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 2004 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 February 2004
                  Published in tecs Volume 3, Issue 1

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • article

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader