skip to main content
10.1145/984622.984647acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Reliability vs. efficiency in distributed source coding for field-gathering sensor networks

Published:26 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

The tradeoff between reliability and efficiency in distributed source coding for field-gathering sensor networks is examined. In the considered networks, sensors measure some underlying random field, quantize their measurements, encode the quantized values into bits and transmit these directly, or via relays, to a collector that reconstructs the field. The bits from one sensor's encoder are regarded as a packet. The minimum achievable coding rate can be attained if the sensors are ordered and each applies Slepian-Wolf distributed coding to its data assuming the decoder knows the data from all prior sensors. However, with such a coding scheme, losing even one sensor's packet would cause decoding failure for all subsequent sensors' values. Therefore, one might consider other ways of applying Slepian-Wolf coding, where in trade for increased coding rate, fewer sensor values are lost when a packet is lost. In this paper, the tradeoff between efficiency, i.e. coding rate, and reliability, characterized by a loss factor, is considered for several different Slepian-Wolf based coding schemes as a function of the packet error probability and the size of the network.

References

  1. D. Slepian and J. Wolf, "Noiseless coding of correlated information sources," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 19, pp. 471--480, Jul. 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. J. Park and R. Sivakumar, "Sink-to-Sensors Reliability in Sensor Networks," Poster Presentation, Mobile Add Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), Annapolis, MD., pp. 27--28, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Shakkottai, R. Srikant, and N. B. Shroff, "Unreliable Sensor Grids: Coverage, Connectivity and Diameter," CSL Technical Report., June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Ishwar, R. Puri, S. S. Pradhan and K. Ramchandran, "On Rate-Constrained Estimation in Unreliable Sensor Networks," Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), Palo Alto, CA., pp. 178--192, Apr. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Marco and D. L. Neuhoff, "On the Entropy of Quantized Data at High Sampling Rates," In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Marco, E. Duarte-Melo, M. Liu and D. L. Neuhoff, "On the Many-to-One Transport Capacity of a Dense Wireless Sensor Network and the Compressibility of Its Data," Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), Palo Alto, CA., pp. 1--16, Apr. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reliability vs. efficiency in distributed source coding for field-gathering sensor networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IPSN '04: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks
        April 2004
        464 pages
        ISBN:1581138466
        DOI:10.1145/984622

        Copyright © 2004 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2004

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader