skip to main content
10.1145/984622.984649acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Multi-hop communication is order-optimal for homogeneous sensor networks

Published:26 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

The main goal of this paper is to show that multi-hop single-user communication achieves the per node transport capacity of Θ(ln N<over>N) in homogeneous sensor networks, making it order-optimal. Our contributions in this paper are three-fold. First, we construct a route-discovery and scheduling scheme based on spatial TDMA for sensor networks. Second, we show that our schedule achieves a per node transport capacity of Θ(lnN<over>N), the same as that achievable by beamforming. Third, we compare multi-hop communication and beamforming based methods in terms of the network power consumption required to attain a fixed throughput. Based on our power calculations, we conclude that if the channel attenuation is above a certain threshold (which we calculate), then multi-hop communication performs better, whereas below the threshold, beamforming is preferable.

References

  1. E. Arikan. Some complexity results about packet radio networks. IEEE Trans. Info. Th., 30:681--685, July 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Benzel. The capacity region of a class of discrete additive degraded interference channels. IEEE Trans. Info. Th., 25(2):228--231, March 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Chakrabarti, A. Sabharwal, and B. Aazhang. Using predictable observer mobility for power efficient design of sensor networks. In IPSN 2003, pages 129--145, April 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. H. M. Costa. On the Gaussian interference channel. IEEE Trans. Info. Th., 31(5):607--615, September 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. M. Cover and A. A. El Gamal. Capacity theorems for the relay channel. IEEE Trans. Info. Th., 25:572--584, September 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. El Gamal. On the scaling laws of dense wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Info. Th., April 2003. submitted. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Elson and D. Estrin. Time synchronization for wireless sensor networks. In Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, pages 1965--1970, April 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Gastpar and M. Vetterli. On the capacity of wireless networks: The relay case. In IEEE INFOCOM., June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Grossglauser and D. Tse. Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks. In IEEE INFOCOM., volume 3, pages 1360--1369, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar. Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks. In Stochastic Analysis, Control, Optimization and Applications, Boston., pages 1106--1110, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar. Towards an information theory of large networks: An achievable rate region. IEEE Trans. Info. Th., 49:1877--1894, August 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. A. Khojastepour, A. Sabharwal, and B. Aazhang. Bounds on achievable rates for general multi-terminal networks with practical constraints. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science - 2634, pages 146--161, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. N. Laneman and G. W. Wornell. Energy-efficient antenna sharing and relaying for wireless networks. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, volume 1, pages 7--12, September 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Marco, E. J. Duarte-Melo, M. Liu, and D. L. Neuhoff. On the many-to-one transport capacity of a dense wireless sensor network and the compressibility of its data. In IPSN 2003, pages 1--16, April 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Min and A. Chandrakasan. Energy-efficient communication for ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. In Conference Record of the Thirty-Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, volume 1, pages 139--143, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. J. Quirk, M. Srinivasan, and J. R. Agre. Cooperative modulation techniques for long haul relay in sensor networks. In GLOBECOM, volume 2, pages 1171--1175, November 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Schein and R. Gallager. The gaussian parallel relay network. In IEEE ISIT 2000, page 22, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Sendonaris, E. Erkip, and B. Aazhang. Increasing uplink capacity via user cooperation diversity. In IEEE ISIT 1998, page 156, August 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Sichitiu and C. Veerarittiphan. Simple, accurate time synchronization for wireless sensor networks. In Wireless Communications and Networking, pages 1266--1273, March 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D. Slepian and J. Wolf. Noiseless coding of correlated information sources. IEEE Trans. Info. Th., 19:471--480, July 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. E. Uysal-Biyikoglu and A. Keshavarzian. Throughput achievable with no relaying in a mobile interference network. In IEEE ISCC, pages 641--645, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Wang and N. Ansari. Optimal broadcast scheduling in packet radio networks using mean field annealing. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15:250--260, February 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-hop communication is order-optimal for homogeneous sensor networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IPSN '04: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks
        April 2004
        464 pages
        ISBN:1581138466
        DOI:10.1145/984622

        Copyright © 2004 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2004

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader