skip to main content
10.1145/989459.989462acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Does topology control reduce interference?

Published:24 May 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Topology control in ad-hoc networks tries to lower node energy consumption by reducing transmission power and by confining interference, collisions and consequently retransmissions. Commonly low interference is claimed to be a consequence to sparseness of the resulting topology. In this paper we disprove this implication. In contrast to most of the related work claiming to solve the interference issue by graph sparseness without providing clear argumentation or proofs, we provide a concise and intuitive definition of interference. Based on this definition we show that most currently proposed topology control algorithms do not effectively constrain interference. Furthermore we propose connectivity-preserving an spanner constructions that are interference-minimal.

References

  1. K. Alzoubi, P.-J. Wan, and O. Frieder. Message-Optimal Connected Dominating Sets in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Int. Symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing (MOBIHOC), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Bao and J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Topology Management in Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of the 4th ACM Int. Symposium on Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking and Computing (MOBIHOC), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Blough, M. Leoncini, G. Resta, and P. Santi. The K-Neigh Protocol for Symmetric Topology in Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of the 4th ACM Int. Symposium on Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking and Computing (MOBIHOC), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Bose, P. Morin, I. Stojmenovic, and J. Urrutia. Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in ad hoc Wireless Networks. In Proc. of the 3rd International Workshop on Discrete Algorithms and Methods for Mobile Computing and Communications (DIAL-M), pages 48--55, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Cormen, C. Leiserson, and R. Rivest. Introduction to Algorithms, chapter 24.2. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Gabriel and R. Sokal. A New Statistical Approach to Geographic Variation Analysis. Systematic Zoology, 18:259--278, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Hou and V. Li. Transmission Range Control in Multihop Packet Radio Networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 34(1):38--44, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. L. Hu. Topology Control for Multihop Packet Radio Networks. IEEE Trans. on Communications, 41(10), 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Jia, R. Rajaraman, and R. Suel. An Efficient Distributed Algorithm for Constructing Small Dominating Sets. In Proc. of the 20th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pages 33--42, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B. Karp and H. Kung. GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks. In Proc. of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 243--254, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. V. Kawadia and P. Kumar. Power Control and Clustering in Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. F. Kuhn and R. Wattenhofer. Constant-Time Distributed Dominating Set Approximation. In Proc. of the 22nd ACM Symposium on the Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. Kuhn, R. Wattenhofer, Y. Zhang, and A. Zollinger. Geometric Routing: Of Theory and Practice. In Proc. of the 22nd ACM Symposium on the Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. N. Li, C.-J. Hou, and L. Sha. Design and Analysis of an MST-Based Topology Control Algorithm. In Proc. of the 22nd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. X.-Y. Li, G. Calinescu, and P.-J. Wan. Distributed Construction of Planar Spanner and Routing for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. In Proc. of the 21st Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. F. Meyer auf der Heide, C. Schindelhauer, K. Volbert, and M. Grünewald. Energy, Congestion and Dilation in Radio Networks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, 10-13 Aug. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Peleg. Distributed Computing, A Locality-Sensitive Approach, chapter 5.5. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. Prakash. Unidirectional Links Prove Costly in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks. In Proc. of the 3rd International Workshop on Discrete Algorithms and Methods for Mobile Computing and Communications (DIAL-M), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Ramanathan and R. Rosales-Hain. Topology Control of Multihop Wireless Networks Using Transmit Power Adjustment. In Proc. of the 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. V. Rodoplu and T. H. Meng. Minimum energy mobile wireless networks. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Communications, 17(8), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Takagi and L. Kleinrock. Optimal Transmission Ranges for Randomly Distributed Packet Radio Terminals. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 32(3):246--257, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Toussaint. The Relative Neighborhood Graph of a Finite Planar Set. Pattern Recognition, 12(4):261--268, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Y. Wang and X.-Y. Li. Localized Construction of Bounded Degree Planar Spanner. In Proc. of the DIALM-POMC Joint Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computing, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. R. Wattenhofer, L. Li, P. Bahl, and Y.-M. Wang. Distributed Topology Control for Power Efficient Operation in Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of the 20th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), pages 1388--1397, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Does topology control reduce interference?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiHoc '04: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing
          May 2004
          276 pages
          ISBN:1581138490
          DOI:10.1145/989459

          Copyright © 2004 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 May 2004

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          MobiHoc '04 Paper Acceptance Rate24of275submissions,9%Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader