Robotic Micromanipulation: Fundamentals and Applications

Literature Cited

1. 1.  Fukuda T, Fujiyoshi M, Arai F, Matsuura H 1991. Design and dextrous control of micromanipulator with 6 DOF. Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation1628–33 New York: IEEE
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.  Arai F, Ando D, Fukuda T, Nonoda Y, Oota T 1995. Micro manipulation based on micro physics-strategy based on attractive force reduction and stress measurement. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems: Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots 2236–41 New York: IEEE
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.  Fearing RS 1995. Survey of sticking effects for micro parts handling. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems: Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots 2212–17 New York: IEEE
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.  Rembold U, Fatikow S 1997. Autonomous microrobots. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 19:375–91
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.  Kallio P, Zhou Q, Koivo HN 1998. Control issues in micromanipulation. Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science135–41 New York: IEEE
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.  Nelson BJ, Zhou Y, Vikramaditya B 1998. Sensor-based microassembly of hybrid MEMS devices. IEEE Control Syst 18:35–45
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.  Bohringer K-F, Donald BR, MacDonald NC 1999. Programmable force fields for distributed manipulation, with applications to MEMS actuator arrays and vibratory parts feeders. Int. J. Robot. Res. 18:168–200
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.  Sun Y, Nelson BJ 2002. Biological cell injection using an autonomous microrobotic system. Int. J. Robot. Res. 21:861–68
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.  Dreyfus R, Baudry J, Roper ML, Fermigier M, Stone HA, Bibette J 2005. Microscopic artificial swimmers. Nature 437:862–65
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.  Donald BR, Levey CG, McGray CG, Paprotny I, Rus D 2006. An untethered, electrostatic, globally controllable MEMS micro-robot. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 15:1–15
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.  Yesin KB, Vollmers K, Nelson BJ 2006. Modeling and control of untethered biomicrorobots in a fluidic environment using electromagnetic fields. Int. J. Robot. Res. 25:527–36
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.  Ghosh A, Fischer P 2009. Controlled propulsion of artificial magnetic nanostructured propellers. Nano Lett 9:2243–45
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.  Martel S, Tremblay CC, Ngakeng S, Langlois G 2006. Controlled manipulation and actuation of micro-objects with magnetotactic bacteria. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89:233904
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.  Magdanz V, Sanchez S, Schmidt OG 2013. Development of a sperm-flagella driven micro-bio-robot. Adv. Mater. 25:6581–88
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.  Agnus J, Chaillet N, Clévy C, Dembélé S, Gauthier M et al. 2013. Robotic microassembly and micromanipulation at FEMTO-ST. J. Micro-Bio Robot. 8:91–106
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.  Lu Z, Zhang X, Leung C, Esfandiari N, Casper RF, Sun Y 2011. Robotic ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection). IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58:2102–8
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.  Sitti M, Ceylan H, Hu W, Giltinan J, Turan M et al. 2015. Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proc. IEEE 103:205–24
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.  Felfoul O, Mohammadi M, Taherkhani S, De Lanauze D, Zhong Xu Y et al. 2016. Magneto-aerotactic bacteria deliver drug-containing nanoliposomes to tumour hypoxic regions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11:941–47
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.  Yan X, Zhou Q, Vincent M, Deng Y, Yu J et al. 2017. Multifunctional biohybrid magnetite microrobots for imaging-guided therapy. Sci. Robot. 2:eaaq1155
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.  Li J, Esteban-Fernández de Ávila B, Gao W, Zhang L, Wang J 2017. Micro/nanorobots for biomedicine: delivery, surgery, sensing, and detoxification. Sci. Robot. 2:eaam6431
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.  Abbott JJ, Nagy Z, Beyeler F, Nelson BJ 2007. Robotics in the small, part I: microbotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14:92–103
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.  Diller E, Sitti M 2011. Micro-scale mobile robotics. Found. Trends Robot. 2:143–259
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.  Dong L, Nelson BJ 2007. Robotics in the small, part II: nanorobotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14:111–21
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.  Shi C, Luu DK, Yang Q, Liu J, Chen J et al. 2016. Recent advances in nanorobotic manipulation inside scanning electron microscopes. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2:16024
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.  Li M, Dang D, Xi N, Wang Y, Liu L 2018. A review of nanoscale characterizing individual DNA behaviors using atomic force microscopy. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 17:920–33
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.  Liu J, Siragam V, Gong Z, Chen J, Fridman MD et al. 2015. Robotic adherent cell injection for characterizing cell-cell communication. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62:119–25
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.  Kodandaramaiah SB, Flores FJ, Holst GL, Singer AC, Han X et al. 2018. Multi-neuron intracellular recording in vivo via interacting autopatching robots. eLife 7:e24656
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.  Das AN, Murthy R, Popa DO, Stephanou HE 2012. A multiscale assembly and packaging system for manufacturing of complex micro-nano devices. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 9:160–70
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.  Xu Q 2015. Design, fabrication, and testing of an MEMS microgripper with dual-axis force sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 15:6017–26
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.  Wang F, Liang C, Tian Y, Zhao X, Zhang D 2016. Design and control of a compliant microgripper with a large amplification ratio for high-speed micro manipulation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 21:1262–71
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.  Zeman MJF, Bordatchev EV, Knopf GK 2006. Design, kinematic modeling and performance testing of an electro-thermally driven microgripper for micromanipulation applications. J. Micromech. Microeng. 16:1540
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.  Nikdel N, Nikdel P, Badamchizadeh MA, Hassanzadeh I 2014. Using neural network model predictive control for controlling shape memory alloy-based manipulator. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61:1394–401
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.  Xu Q, Li Y 2011. Analytical modeling, optimization and testing of a compound bridge-type compliant displacement amplifier. Mech. Mach. Theory. 46:183–200
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.  Yun Y, Li Y 2011. Optimal design of a 3-PUPU parallel robot with compliant hinges for micromanipulation in a cubic workspace. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27:977–85
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.  Li Y, Xu Q 2009. Design and analysis of a totally decoupled flexure-based XY parallel micromanipulator. IEEE Trans. Robot. 25:645–57
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.  Yang S, Xu Q 2017. A review on actuation and sensing techniques for MEMS-based microgrippers. J. Micro-Bio Robot. 13:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.  Verotti M, Dochshanov A, Belfiore NP 2017. A comprehensive survey on microgrippers design: mechanical structure. J. Mech. Des. 139:60801–26
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.  Zhang XP, Leung C, Lu Z, Esfandiari N, Casper RF, Sun Y 2012. Controlled aspiration and positioning of biological cells in a micropipette. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59:1032–40
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.  Anis YH, Holl MR, Meldrum DR 2010. Automated selection and placement of single cells using vision-based feedback control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 7:598–606
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.  Shojaei-Baghini E, Zheng Y, Sun Y 2013. Automated micropipette aspiration of single cells. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41:1208–16
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.  Wang Z, Latt WT, Tan SYM, Ang WT 2015. Visual servoed three-dimensional cell rotation system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62:2498–507
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.  Xie H, Régnier S 2011. Development of a flexible robotic system for multiscale applications of micro/nanoscale manipulation and assembly. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 16:266–76
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.  Xie H, Zhang H, Song J, Meng X, Wen Y, Sun L 2018. High-precision automated micromanipulation and adhesive microbonding with cantilevered micropipette probes in dynamic probing mode. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 23:1425–35
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.  Guillaume-Gentil O, Potthoff E, Ossola D, Franz CM, Zambelli T, Vorholt JA 2014. Force-controlled manipulation of single cells: from AFM to FluidFM. Trends Biotechnol 32:381–88
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.  Chen BK, Zhang Y, Sun Y 2009. Active release of microobjects using a MEMS microgripper to overcome adhesion forces. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 18:652–59
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.  Vasudev A, Jagtiani A, Du L, Zhe J 2009. A low-voltage droplet microgripper for micro-object manipulation. J. Micromech. Microeng. 19:075005
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.  Fan Z, Rong W, Wang L, Sun L 2015. A single-probe capillary microgripper induced by dropwise condensation and inertial release. J. Micromech. Microeng. 25:115011
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.  Eric D, Metin S 2014. Three-dimensional programmable assembly by untethered magnetic robotic micro-grippers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24:4397–404
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.  Ghosh A, Yoon C, Ongaro F, Scheggi S, Selaru FM et al. 2017. Stimuli-responsive soft untethered grippers for drug delivery and robotic surgery. Front. Mech. Eng. 3:7
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.  Wang X, Luo M, Wu H, Zhang Z, Liu J et al. 2018. A three-dimensional magnetic tweezer system for intraembryonic navigation and measurement. IEEE Trans. Robot. 34:240–47
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.  Vonthron M, Lalande V, Bringout G, Tremblay C, Martel S 2011. A MRI-based integrated platform for the navigation of microdevices and microrobots. 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems1285–90 New York: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.  Kummer MP, Abbott JJ, Kratochvil BE, Borer R, Sengul A, Nelson BJ 2010. OctoMag: an electromagnetic system for 5-DOF wireless micromanipulation. IEEE Trans. Robot. 26:1006–17
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.  Schuerle S, Erni S, Flink M, Kratochvil BE, Nelson BJ 2013. Three-dimensional magnetic manipulation of micro- and nanostructures for applications in life sciences. IEEE Trans. Magn. 49:321–30
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.  Ryan P, Diller E 2017. Magnetic actuation for full dexterity microrobotic control using rotating permanent magnets. IEEE Trans. Robot. 33:1398–409
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.  Zhang J, Onaizah O, Sadri A, Diller E 2017. A generic label-free microfluidic microobject sorter using a magnetic elastic diverter. Biomed. Microdevices 19:43
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.  Wang X, Luo M, Ho C, Zhang Z, Zhao Q et al. 2018. Robotic intracellular manipulation: 3D navigation and measurement inside a single cell. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation2716–21 New York: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.  Mair LO, Evans BA, Nacev A, Stepanov PY, Hilaman R et al. 2017. Magnetic microkayaks: propulsion of microrods precessing near a surface by kilohertz frequency, rotating magnetic fields. Nanoscale 9:3375–81
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.  Chen XZ, Jang B, Ahmed D, Hu C, De Marco C et al. 2018. Small-scale machines driven by external power sources. Adv. Mater. 30:1705061
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.  Zhang L, Abbott JJ, Dong L, Kratochvil BE, Bell D, Nelson BJ 2009. Artificial bacterial flagella: fabrication and magnetic control. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94:064107
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.  Peters C, Hoop M, Pané S, Nelson BJ, Hierold C 2016. Degradable magnetic composites for minimally invasive interventions: device fabrication, targeted drug delivery, and cytotoxicity tests. Adv. Mater. 28:533–38
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.  Qiu F, Fujita S, Mhanna R, Zhang L, Simona BR, Nelson BJ 2015. Magnetic helical microswimmers functionalized with lipoplexes for targeted gene delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25:1666–71
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.  Wang B, Chan KF, Yu J, Wang Q, Yang L et al. 2018. Reconfigurable swarms of ferromagnetic colloids for enhanced local hyperthermia. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28:1705701
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.  Zhang J, Onaizah O, Middleton K, You L, Diller E 2017. Reliable grasping of three-dimensional untethered mobile magnetic microgripper for autonomous pick-and-place. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2:835–40
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.  Arai F, Yoshikawa K, Sakami T, Fukuda T 2004. Synchronized laser micromanipulation of multiple targets along each trajectory by single laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85:4301–3
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.  Alam MK, Koomsoon E, Zou H, Yi C, Li C-W et al. 2018. Recent advances in microfluidic technology for manipulation and analysis of biological cells (2007–2017). Anal. Chim. Acta 1044:29–65
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.  Chen T, Shi LZ, Zhu Q, Chandsawangbhuwana C, Berns MW 2011. Optical tweezers and non-ratiometric fluorescent-dye-based studies of respiration in sperm mitochondria. J. Opt. 13:044010
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.  Leach J, Howard D, Roberts S, Gibson G, Gothard D et al. 2009. Manipulation of live mouse embryonic stem cells using holographic optical tweezers. J. Mod. Opt. 56:448–52
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.  Neuman KC, Abbondanzieri EA, Landick R, Gelles J, Block SM 2003. Ubiquitous transcriptional pausing is independent of RNA polymerase backtracking. Cell 115:437–47
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.  Li X, Liu C, Chen S, Wang Y, Cheng SH, Sun D 2017. In vivo manipulation of single biological cells with an optical tweezers-based manipulator and a disturbance compensation controller. IEEE Trans. Robot. 33:1200–12
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.  Banerjee AG, Pomerance A, Losert W, Gupta SK 2010. Developing a stochastic dynamic programming framework for optical tweezer-based automated particle transport operations. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 7:218–27
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.  Wu Y, Sun D, Huang W, Xi N 2013. Dynamics analysis and motion planning for automated cell transportation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 18:706–13
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.  Rabaud D, Thibault P, Raven JP, Hugon O, Lacot E, Marmottant P 2011. Manipulation of confined bubbles in a thin microchannel: drag and acoustic Bjerknes forces. Phys. Fluids 23:042003
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.  Samandari M, Abrinia K, Sanati-Nezhad A 2017. Acoustic manipulation of bio-particles at high frequencies: an analytical and simulation approach. Micromachines 8:290
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.  Guo F, Mao Z, Chen Y, Xie Z, Lata JP et al. 2016. Three-dimensional manipulation of single cells using surface acoustic waves. PNAS 113:1522–27
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.  Li P, Mao Z, Peng Z, Zhou L, Chen Y et al. 2015. Acoustic separation of circulating tumor cells. PNAS 112:4970–75
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.  Naseer SM, Manbachi A, Samandari M, Walch P, Gao Y et al. 2017. Surface acoustic waves induced micropatterning of cells in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biofabrication 9:015020
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.  Ding X, Lin S-CS, Kiraly B, Yue H, Li S et al. 2012. On-chip manipulation of single microparticles, cells, and organisms using surface acoustic waves. PNAS 109:11105–9
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.  Velev OD, Bhatt KH 2006. On-chip micromanipulation and assembly of colloidal particles by electric fields. Soft Matter 2:738–50
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.  Urbano RL, Clyne AM 2016. An inverted dielectrophoretic device for analysis of attached single cell mechanics. Lab Chip 16:561–73
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.  Kumemura M, Collard D, Sakaki N, Yamahata C, Hosogi M et al. 2011. Single-DNA-molecule trapping with silicon nanotweezers using pulsed dielectrophoresis. J. Micromech. Microeng. 21:054020
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.  Valley JK, Ohta AT, Neale SL, Hsu H-Y, Neale SL et al. 2009. Optoelectronic tweezers as a tool for parallel single-cell manipulation and stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 3:424–31
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.  Liu X, Shi Q, Lin Y, Kojima M, Mae Y et al. 2018. Hydrodynamic tweezers: trapping and transportation in microscale using vortex induced by oscillation of a single piezoelectric actuator. Sensors 18:2002
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.  Pieters RS, Tung HW, Sargent DF, Nelson BJ 2014. Non-contact manipulation for automated protein crystal harvesting using a rolling microrobot. IFAC Proc. Vol. 19:7480–85
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.  Leung C, Lu Z, Zhang XP, Sun Y 2012. Three-dimensional rotation of mouse embryos. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59:1049–56
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.  Zhang Z, Liu J, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhou C et al. 2017. Robotic pick-and-place of multiple embryos for vitrification. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2:570–76
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.  Chaumette F, Hutchinson S 2006. Visual servo control. I. Basic approaches. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 13:82–90
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.  Hu S, Sun D 2011. Automatic transportation of biological cells with a robot-tweezer manipulation system. Int. J. Robot. Res. 30:1681–94
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.  Tamadazte B, Piat NLF, Dembélé S 2011. Robotic micromanipulation and microassembly using monoview and multiscale visual servoing. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 16:277–87
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.  Vikramaditya B, Nelson BJ 1997. Visually guided microassembly using optical microscopes and active vision techniques. Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Robotics and Automation3172–77 New York: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.  Benhimane S, Malis E 2003. Vision-based control with respect to planar and nonplanar objects using a zooming camera. Proceedings of ICAR 2003: The 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics991–96 New York: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.  Zhou Y, Nelson BJ 1999. Calibration of a parametric model of an optical microscope. Opt. Eng. 38:1989–95
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.  Ammi M, Frémont V, Ferreira A 2009. Automatic camera-based microscope calibration for a telemicromanipulation system using a virtual pattern. IEEE Trans. Robot. 25:184–91
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.  Jiang W, Yin Z 2016. Seeing the invisible in differential interference contrast microscopy images. Med. Image Anal. 34:65–81
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.  Obara B, Roberts MAJ, Armitage JP, Grau V 2013. Bacterial cell identification in differential interference contrast microscopy images. BMC Bioinform 14:134
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.  Heise B, Sonnleitner A, Klement EP 2005. DIC image reconstruction on large cell scans. Microsc. Res. Tech. 66:312–20
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.  Sariola V, Jääskelinen M, Zhou Q 2010. Hybrid microassembly combining robotics and water droplet self-alignment. IEEE Trans. Robot. 26:965–77
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.  Chung SE, Dong X, Sitti M 2015. Three-dimensional heterogeneous assembly of coded microgels using an untethered mobile microgripper. Lab Chip 15:1667–76
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.  Steager EB, Selman Sakar M, Magee C, Kennedy M, Cowley A, Kumar V 2013. Automated biomanipulation of single cells using magnetic microrobots. Int. J. Robot. Res. 32:346–59
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.  Jonkman J, Brown CM 2015. Any way you slice it—a comparison of confocal microscopy techniques. J. Biomol. Tech. 26:54–65
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.  Wang WH, Liu XY, Sun Y 2007. Contact detection in microrobotic manipulation. Int. J. Robot. Res. 26:821–28
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101.  Liu J, Zhang Z, Wang X, Liu H, Zhao Q et al. 2017. Automated robotic measurement of 3-D cell morphologies. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2:499–505
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.  Sun Y, Duthaler S, Nelson BJ 2004. Autofocusing in computer microscopy: selecting the optimal focus algorithm. Microsc. Res. Tech. 65:139–49
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.  Taute KM, Gude S, Tans SJ, Shimizu TS 2015. High-throughput 3D tracking of bacteria on a standard phase contrast microscope. Nat. Commun. 6:8776
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.  Baek YM, Tanaka S, Harada K, Sugita N, Morita A et al. 2014. Robust visual tracking of robotic forceps under a microscope using kinematic data fusion. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 19:278–88
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105.  Tamadazte B, Marchand E, Dembélé S, Le Fort-Piat N 2010. CAD model-based tracking and 3D visual-based control for MEMS microassembly. Int. J. Robot. Res. 29:1416–34
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.  Zhang Z, Dai C, Huang JY, Wang X, Liu J et al. 2019. Robotic immobilization of motile sperm for clinical intracytoplasmic sperm injection. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 66:444–52
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.  Diller E, Giltinan J, Sitti M 2013. Independent control of multiple magnetic microrobots in three dimensions. Int. J. Robot. Res. 32:614–31
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108.  Wei Y, Xu Q 2015. An overview of micro-force sensing techniques. Sens. Actuators A 234:359–74
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.  Jing W, Cappelleri D 2014. A magnetic microrobot with in situ force sensing capabilities. Robotics 3:106–19
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.  Gou X, Yang H, Fahmy TM, Wang Y, Sun D 2014. Direct measurement of cell protrusion force utilizing a robot-aided cell manipulation system with optical tweezers for cell migration control. Int. J. Robot. Res. 33:1782–92
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.  Jun L, Leung C, Zhe L, Yu S, Liu J et al. 2013. Quantitative analysis of locomotive behavior of human sperm head and tail. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60:390–96
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.  Zhou Y, Nelson BJ, Vikramaditya B 1998. Fusing force and vision feedback for micromanipulation. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 21220–25 New York: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.  Dario P 2001. PI force control of a microgripper for assembling biomedical microdevices. IEE Proc. Circuits Devices Syst. 148:348–52
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.  Huang H, Sun D, Mills JK, Li WJ, Cheng SH 2009. Visual-based impedance control of out-of-plane cell injection systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 6:565–71
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.  Seifabadi R, Rezaei SM, Ghidary SS, Zareinejad M 2013. A teleoperation system for micro positioning with haptic feedback. Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst. 11:768–75
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.  Onda K, Arai F 2012. Multi-beam bilateral teleoperation of holographic optical tweezers. Opt. Express 20:3633–41
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117.  Fatikow S, Seyfried J, Fahlbusch S, Buerkle A, Schmoeckel F 2000. Flexible microrobot-based microassembly station. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. Theory Appl. 27:135–69
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118.  Yang G, Gaines JA, Nelson BJ 2003. A supervisory wafer-level 3D microassembly system for hybrid MEMS fabrication. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. Theory Appl. 37:43–68
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.  Kim S, Wu J, Carlson A, Jin SH, Kovalsky A et al. 2010. Microstructured elastomeric surfaces with reversible adhesion and examples of their use in deterministic assembly by transfer printing. PNAS 107:17095–100
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.  Lee CH, Kim DR, Zheng X 2010. Fabricating nanowire devices on diverse substrates by simple transfer-printing methods. PNAS 107:9950–55
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.  Mastrangeli M, Abbasi S, Varel C, Van Hoof C, Celis JP, Böhringer KF 2009. Self-assembly from milli- to nanoscales: methods and applications. J. Micromech. Microeng. 19:083001
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.  Chang B, Shah A, Zhou Q, Ras RHA, Hjort K 2015. Self-transport and self-alignment of microchips using microscopic rain. Sci. Rep. 5:14966
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123.  Donald BR, Levey CG, Paprotny I, Rus D 2013. Planning and control for microassembly of structures composed of stress-engineered MEMS microrobots. Int. J. Robot. Res. 32:218–46
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124.  Wang H, Huang Q, Shi Q, Yue T, Chen S et al. 2015. Automated assembly of vascular-like microtube with repetitive single-step contact manipulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62:2620–28
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125.  Xu F, Wu CAM, Rengarajan V, Finley TD, Keles HO et al. 2011. Three-dimensional magnetic assembly of microscale hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 23:4254–60
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126.  Tasoglu S, Diller E, Guven S, Sitti M, Demirci U 2014. Untethered micro-robotic coding of three-dimensional material composition. Nat. Commun. 5:3124
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127.  Roberts KP, Bischof JC, Nelson BJ 2003. Mechanical property characterization of mouse zona pellucida. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 2:279–86
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128.  Pillarisetti A, Member S, Pekarev M, Brooks AD, Desai JP, Member A 2007. Evaluating the effect of force feedback in cell injection. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 4:322–31
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129.  Liu X, Kim K, Zhang Y, Sun Y 2009. Nanonewton force sensing and control in microrobotic cell manipulation. Int. J. Robot. Res. 28:1065–76
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130.  Xie Y, Sun D, Liu C, Tse HY, Cheng SH 2010. A force control approach to a robot-assisted cell microinjection system. Int. J. Robot. Res. 29:1222–32
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131.  Xu Q 2015. Robust impedance control of a compliant microgripper for high-speed position/force regulation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62:1201–9
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132.  Arcese L, Fruchard M, Ferreira A 2013. Adaptive controller and observer for a magnetic microrobot. IEEE Trans. Robot. 29:1060–67
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133.  Kallio P, Ritala T, Lukkari M, Kuikka S 2007. Injection guidance system for cellular microinjections. Int. J. Robot. Res. 26:1303–13
     [Google Scholar]
134. 134.  Wang W, Sun Y, Zhang M, Anderson R, Langille L, Chan W 2008. A system for high-speed microinjection of adherent cells. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79:104302
     [Google Scholar]
135. 135.  Liu J, Siragam V, Chen J, Fridman MD, Hamilton RM, Sun Y 2014. High-throughput measurement of gap junctional intercellular communication. AJP Hear. Circ. Physiol. 306:H1708–13
     [Google Scholar]
136. 136.  Liu J, Wen J, Zhang Z, Liu H, Sun Y 2015. Voyage inside the cell: microsystems and nanoengineering for intracellular measurement and manipulation. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 1:15020
     [Google Scholar]
137. 137.  Esteban-Fernández de Ávila B, Angsantikul P, Li J, Lopez-Ramirez MA, Ramírez-Herrera DE et al. 2017. Micromotor-enabled active drug delivery for in vivo treatment of stomach infection. Nat. Commun. 8:272
     [Google Scholar]
138. 138.  Yim S, Gultepe E, Gracias DH, Sitti M 2014. Biopsy using a magnetic capsule endoscope carrying, releasing, and retrieving untethered microgrippers. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61:513–21
     [Google Scholar]
139. 139.  Filgueiras-Rama D, Estrada A, Shachar J, Castrejón S, Doiny D et al. 2013. Remote magnetic navigation for accurate, real-time catheter positioning and ablation in cardiac electrophysiology procedures. J. Vis. Exp. 74:e3658
     [Google Scholar]
140. 140.  Li J, Li X, Luo T, Wang R, Liu C et al. 2018. Development of a magnetic microrobot for carrying and delivering targeted cells. Sci. Robot. 3:eaat8829
     [Google Scholar]
141. 141.  Sahari A, Traore MA, Scharf BE, Behkam B 2014. Directed transport of bacteria-based drug delivery vehicles: bacterial chemotaxis dominates particle shape. Biomed. Microdevices 16:717–25
     [Google Scholar]
142. 142.  Alapan Y, Yasa O, Schauer O, Giltinan J, Tabak AF et al. 2018. Soft erythrocyte-based bacterial microswimmers for cargo delivery. Sci. Robot. 3:eaar4423
     [Google Scholar]
143. 143.  Dournes G, Menut F, Macey J, Fayon M, Chateil JF et al. 2016. Lung morphology assessment of cystic fibrosis using MRI with ultra-short echo time at submillimeter spatial resolution. Eur. Radiol. 26:3811–20
     [Google Scholar]
144. 144.  Burghardt AJ, Link TM, Majumdar S 2011. High-resolution computed tomography for clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 469:2179–93
     [Google Scholar]
145. 145.  Untenberger M, Tan Z, Voit D, Joseph AA, Roeloffs V et al. 2016. Advances in real-time phase-contrast flow MRI using asymmetric radial gradient echoes. Magn. Reson. Med. 75:1901–8
     [Google Scholar]
146. 146.  Fei C, Chiu CT, Chen X, Chen Z, Ma J et al. 2016. Ultrahigh frequency (100 MHz–300 MHz) ultrasonic transducers for optical resolution medical imagining. Sci. Rep. 6:28360
     [Google Scholar]
147. 147.  Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK 2017. Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7:1303–29
     [Google Scholar]
148. 148.  Wang LV, Yao J 2016. A practical guide to photoacoustic tomography in the life sciences. Nat. Methods 13:627–38
     [Google Scholar]
149. 149.  Masubuchi S, Morimoto M, Morikawa S, Onodera M, Asakawa Y et al. 2018. Autonomous robotic searching and assembly of two-dimensional crystals to build van der Waals superlattices. Nat. Commun. 9:1413
     [Google Scholar]