1932

Abstract

This article reviews recent research in fiscal sociology. We specifically examine contributions to the study of taxation that illuminate core issues in the sociology of contemporary capitalism, including the causes of poverty and inequality in rich countries and of inequality between rich and poor countries. Research on developed countries suggests that tax policy changes are important for explaining rising income inequality, tax policies may structure durable inequalities of race and gender, and earnings-conditional tax subsidies may alleviate poverty more effectively and with less stigma than means-tested social spending. Scholars also find the most generous welfare states rely the most heavily on regressive taxes, although there is disagreement over how this association arises. Comparative research on developing countries shows consumption taxes are more conducive to growth than taxes on income, tax-financed spending benefits growth if it is spent on productive investments, and taxation strengthened democracy and state building in medieval and early modern Europe. However, there is disagreement as to whether taxation contributes to state building in contemporary developing countries and whether foreign aid undermines democracy by undermining taxation. These questions are the focus of considerable current research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043229
2014-07-30
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/40/1/annurev-soc-071913-043229.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043229&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abelin M. 2012. “Entrenched in the BMW”: Argentine elites and the terror of fiscal obligation. Public Cult. 24:2329–56 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adam CS, Bevan DL. 2005. Fiscal deficits and growth in developing countries. J. Public Econ. 89:4571–97 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alm J, Wallace S. 2000. Are the rich different?. See Slemrod 2000 165–87
  4. Altunbas Y, Thornton J. 2011. Does paying taxes improve the quality of governance? Cross-country evidence. Poverty Public Policy 3:31–17 [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkinson AB, Leigh A. 2013. The distribution of top incomes in five Anglo-Saxon countries over the long run. Econ. Rec. 89:S131–47 [Google Scholar]
  6. Atkinson AB, Piketty T, Saez E. 2011. Top incomes in the long run of history. J. Econ. Lit. 49:13–71 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baskaran T, Bigsten A. 2013. Fiscal capacity and the quality of government in sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev. 45:192–107 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bearce DH, Tirone DC. 2010. Foreign aid effectiveness and the strategic goals of donor governments. J. Polit. 72:3837–51 [Google Scholar]
  9. Beramendi P, Rueda D. 2007. Social democracy constrained: indirect taxation in industrialized democracies. Br. J. Pol. Sci. 37:4619–41 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bergman M. 2009. Tax Evasion and the Rule of Law in Latin America: The Political Culture of Cheating and Compliance in Argentina and Chile University Park: Penn State Univ. Press
  11. Bose N, Haque ME, Osborn DR. 2007. Public expenditure and economic growth: a disaggregated analysis for developing countries. Manch. Sch. 75:5533–56 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brandolini A. 2010. Political economy and the mechanics of politics. Polit. Soc. 38:2212–26 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bräutigam D. 2008. Contingent capacity: export taxation and state-building in Mauritius. See Bräutigam et al. 2008 135–59
  14. Bräutigam D, Fjeldstad O, Moore M. 2008. Taxation and State-Building in Developing Countries Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  15. Bräutigam D, Knack S. 2004. Foreign aid, institutions and governance in sub-Saharan Africa. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 52:2255–86 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown DA. 1999. Race, class, and gender essentialism in tax literature: the joint return. Wash. Lee Law Rev. 54:41469–512 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown DA. 2007. Race and class matters in tax policy. Columbia Law Rev. 107:3790–831 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cain PA. 2000. Heterosexual privilege and the Internal Revenue Code. Univ. San Franc. Law Rev. 34:465–96 [Google Scholar]
  19. Campbell JL. 1993. The state and fiscal sociology. Annu. Rev. Soc. 19:163–85 [Google Scholar]
  20. Campbell JL, Allen MP. 1994. The political economy of revenue extraction in the modern state: a time-series analysis of U.S. income taxes, 1916–1986. Soc. Forces 72:3643–69 [Google Scholar]
  21. Caputo RK. 2010. Family characteristics, program participation, and civic engagement. J. Sociol. Soc. Welfare 37:235–61 [Google Scholar]
  22. Carrère C, de Melo J. 2012. Fiscal spending and economic growth: some stylized facts. World Dev. 40:91750–61 [Google Scholar]
  23. Centeno M. 1997. Blood and debt: war and taxation in nineteenth-century Latin America. Am. J. Sociol. 102:61565–605 [Google Scholar]
  24. Centeno M. 2003. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-State in Latin America University Park: Penn State Univ. Press
  25. Chaudhry KA. 1997. The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  26. Collier P, Elliott VL, Hegre H, Hoeffler A, Reynal-Querol M, Sambanis N. 2003. Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy Washington, DC: Int. Bank Reconstr. Dev.
  27. Dahl GB, Lochner L. 2012. The impact of family income on child achievement: evidence from the earned income tax credit. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:51927–56 [Google Scholar]
  28. Dickert-Conlin S, Houser S. 2002. The EITC and marriage. Nat. Tax J. 55:125–40 [Google Scholar]
  29. Djankov S, Montalvo JG, Reynal-Querol M. 2008. The curse of aid. J. Econ. Growth 13:3169–94 [Google Scholar]
  30. Draper T. 1997. A Struggle for Power: The American Revolution New York: Vintage
  31. Durkheim E. 1984 (1893). The Division of Labor in Society transl. WD Halls New York: MacMillan
  32. Easterly W, Rebelo S. 1993. Fiscal policy and economic growth: an empirical investigation. J. Monet. Econ. 32:3417–58 [Google Scholar]
  33. Eissa N, Hoynes H. 2006. Behavioral responses to taxes: lessons from the EITC and labor supply. Tax Policy and the Economy MP James 2073–110 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Eissa N, Hoynes H. 2011. Redistribution and tax expenditures: the earned income tax credit. Nat. Tax J. 64:2689–729 [Google Scholar]
  35. Eissa N, Kleven HJ, Kreiner CT. 2008. Evaluation of four tax reforms in the United States: labor supply and welfare effects for single mothers. J. Public Econ. 92:3–4795–816 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ellwood DT. 2000. The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage, and living arrangements. Nat. Tax J. 53:41063–106 [Google Scholar]
  37. Fairfield T. 2013. Going where the money is: strategies for taxing economic elites in unequal democracies. World Dev. 47:42–57 [Google Scholar]
  38. Fischer CS, Hout M, Sánchez-Jankowski M, Lucas SR, Swidler A, Voss K. 1996. Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  39. Fjeldstad O-H, Heggstad KK. 2011. The tax systems in Mozambique, Tanzania and Zambia: Capacity and constraints CMI Rep. R 2011:3, Chr. Michelsen Inst., Bergen, Norway. http://www.cmi.no/publications/file/4045-taxation-mozambique-tanzania-zambia.pdf
  40. Fjeldstad O-H, Therkildsen O. 2008. Mass taxation and state-society relations in East Africa. See Bräutigam et al. 2008 114–34
  41. Gallo C. 2008. Tax bargaining and nitrate exports: Chile, 1880–1930. See Bräutigam et al. 2008 160–82
  42. Ganghof S. 2005. Globalization, tax reform ideals and social policy financing. Glob. Soc. Policy 5:177–95 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ganghof S. 2006. The Politics of Income Taxation: A Comparative Analysis Colchester, UK: ECPR
  44. Ganghof S, Genschel P. 2008. Taxation and democracy in the EU. J. Eur. Public Policy 15:158–77 [Google Scholar]
  45. Genschel P, Schwarz P. 2011. Tax competition: a literature review. Socio-Econ. Rev. 9:2339–70 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gordon RH, Slemrod JB. 2000. Are “real” responses to taxes simply income shifting between corporate and personal tax bases?. See Slemrod 2000 240–80
  47. Gruber J, Saez E. 2002. The elasticity of taxable income: evidence and implications. J. Public Econ. 84:11–32 [Google Scholar]
  48. Grusky D. 2008. Social Stratification: Race, Class and Gender in Sociological Perspective Boulder, CO: Westview, 3rd ed..
  49. Gupta S, Clements BJ, Inchauste G. 2004. Helping Countries Develop: The Role of Fiscal Policy Washington, DC: Int. Monet. Fund
  50. Hallerberg M, Basinger S. 1998. Internationalization and changes in tax policy in OECD countries: the importance of domestic veto players. Comp. Polit. Stud. 31:3321–52 [Google Scholar]
  51. Hauser RM, Warren JR. 1997. Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: a review, update, and critique. Sociol. Methodol. 27:1177–298 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hays JC. 2003. Globalization and capital taxation in consensus and majoritarian democracies. World Polit. 56:179–113 [Google Scholar]
  53. Herb M. 2005. No representation without taxation? Rents, development, and democracy. Comp. Polit. 37:3297–316 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hobson J. 1997. The Wealth of States: A Comparative Sociology of International Economic and Political Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  55. Hoffman PT. 1994. Early modern France, 1450–1700. Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450–1789 PT Hoffman, K Norberg 226–52 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Hotz VJ, Scholz JK. 2003. The earned income tax credit. Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States R Moffitt 141–198 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Hout M. 1997. Inequality at the margins: the effects of welfare, the minimum wage, and tax credits on low-wage labor. Polit. Soc. 25:4513–24 [Google Scholar]
  58. Jorgenson DW, Yun K. 1986. Tax policy and capital allocation. Scand. J. Econ. 88:2355–77 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kato J. 2003. Regressive Taxation and the Welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Kelly NJ. 2005. Political choice, public policy, and distributional outcomes. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49:4865–80 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kenworthy L. 2011. Progress for the Poor Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  62. Kiser E, Laing AM. 2001. Have we overestimated the effects of neoliberalism and globalization? Some speculations on the anomalous stability of taxes on business. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis JL Campbell, OK Pedersen 51–68 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Kneller R, Bleaney MF, Gemmell N. 1999. Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD countries. J. Public Econ. 74:2171–90 [Google Scholar]
  64. Leigh A. 2010. Who benefits from the earned income tax credit? Incidence among recipients, coworkers and firms. Berkeley Electron. J. Econ. Anal. Policy 10:145 [Google Scholar]
  65. Levi M. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  66. Lichter DT, Jayakody R. 2002. Welfare reform: How do we measure success?. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28:117–41 [Google Scholar]
  67. Lindert P. 2004. Growing Public 1 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  68. Mann M. 1980. State and society, 1130–1815: an analysis of English state finances. Political Power and Social Theory M Zeitlin 165–208 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Martin IW, Gabay N. 2013. Fiscal protest in thirteen welfare states. Socio-Econ. Rev. 11:107–30 [Google Scholar]
  70. Martin IW, Mehrotra AK, Prasad M. 2009. The New Fiscal Sociology: Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  71. Marx K, Engels F. 2012 (1848). The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition London: Verso Books
  72. McCaffery EJ. 2007. Taxing Women Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  73. McCaffery EJ. 2009. Where's the sex in fiscal sociology?. See Martin et al. 2009 216–36
  74. McCall L, Percheski C. 2010. Income inequality: new trends and research directions. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:329–47 [Google Scholar]
  75. Melo MA. 2007. Institutional weakness and the puzzle of Argentina's low taxation. Lat. Am. Polit. Soc. 49:4115–48 [Google Scholar]
  76. Mendenhall R, Edin K, Crowley S, Sykes J, Tach L. et al. 2012. The role of the earned income tax credit in the budgets of low-income households. Soc. Serv. Rev. 86:3367–400 [Google Scholar]
  77. Mettler S, Stonecash J. 2005. Government program usage and political voice. Soc. Sci. Q. 89:2273–93 [Google Scholar]
  78. Miller SM, Russek FS. 1997. Fiscal structures and economic growth: international evidence. Econ. Inq. 35:3603–13 [Google Scholar]
  79. Moffitt RA, Wilhelm MO. 2000. Taxation and labor supply decisions. See Slemrod 2000 193–234
  80. Mollick AV. 2012. Economic inequality in the U.S.: the Kuznets hypothesis revisited. Econ. Syst. 36:1127–44 [Google Scholar]
  81. Moore M. 2004. Revenues, state formation, and the quality of governance in developing countries. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 25:3297–319 [Google Scholar]
  82. Moran B, Whitford W. 1996. A black critique of the Internal Revenue Code. Wisc. Law Rev. 1996:751–820 [Google Scholar]
  83. Morris M, Western B. 1999. Inequality in earnings at the close of the twentieth century. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25:623–57 [Google Scholar]
  84. Newman KS, O'Brien RL. 2011. Taxing the Poor: Doing Damage to the Truly Disadvantaged Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  85. Nijkamp P, Poot J. 2004. Meta-analysis of the effect of fiscal policies on long-run growth. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 20:191–124 [Google Scholar]
  86. Noonan MC, Smith SS, Corcoran ME. 2007. Examining the impact of welfare reform, labor market conditions, and the Earned Income Tax Credit on the employment of black and white single mothers. Soc. Sci. Res. 36:195–130 [Google Scholar]
  87. North D, Weingast BR. 1989. Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. J. Econ. Hist. 49:803–32 [Google Scholar]
  88. Oliver M, Shapiro T. 2006. Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality New York: Routledge
  89. Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev. (OECD) 2008. Governance, Taxation and Accountability: Issues and Practices DAC Guidelines and Reference Series Paris: Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev http://www.oecd.org/dac/governance-development/40210055.pdf
  90. Pecorino P. 1993. Tax structure and growth in a model with human capital. J. Public Econ. 52:2251–71 [Google Scholar]
  91. Pecorino P. 1994. The growth rate effects of tax reform. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 46:3492–501 [Google Scholar]
  92. Piketty T, Saez E. 2003. Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Q. J. Econ. 118:11–41 [Google Scholar]
  93. Piketty T, Saez E. 2007. How progressive is the U.S. federal tax system? A historical and international perspective. J. Econ. Perspect. 21:13–24 [Google Scholar]
  94. Piketty T, Saez E, Stantcheva S. 2014. Optimal taxation of top labor incomes: a tale of three elasticities. Am. Econ. Rev. 6:230–71 [Google Scholar]
  95. Prasad M. 2012. The Land of Too Much Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  96. Prasad M. 2013. Avoiding the aid curse? Taxation and development in Japan. The Political Economy of Transnational Tax Reform: The Shoup Mission to Japan in Historical Context WE Brownlee, E Ide, Y Fukagai 289–305 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  97. Prasad M, Deng Y. 2009. Taxation and the worlds of welfare. Socio-Econ. Rev. 7:431–57 [Google Scholar]
  98. Prichard W. 2010. Taxation and state building: towards a governance focused tax reform agenda IDS Work. Pap. 341, Inst. Dev. Stud., Univ. Sussex
  99. Rainwater L, Smeeding TM. 2003. Poor Kids in a Rich Country: America's Children in Comparative Perspective New York: Russell Sage Found.
  100. Rodriguez-Franco D. 2012. Internal wars, state building, and taxation Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Sociol. Assoc., Aug. 17–20, Denver, CO
  101. Roine J, Vlachos J, Waldenström D. 2009. The long-run determinants of inequality: What can we learn from top income data?. J. Public Econ. 93:7–8974–88 [Google Scholar]
  102. Romich JL. 2006. Difficult calculations: low-income workers and marginal tax rates. Soc. Serv. Rev. 80:127–66 [Google Scholar]
  103. Romich JL, Simmelink J, Holt S. 2007. When working harder does not pay: low-income working families, tax liabilities, and benefit reductions. Fam. Soc. 88:3418–26 [Google Scholar]
  104. Romich JL, Weisner T. 2000. How families view and use the EITC: advance payment versus lump sum delivery. Nat. Tax J. 53:41245–66 [Google Scholar]
  105. Ross ML. 2004. Does taxation lead to representation?. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 34:2229–49 [Google Scholar]
  106. Rothstein J. 2008. The unintended consequences of encouraging work: tax incidence and the EITC CEPS Work. Pap. No. 165, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ
  107. Rothstein J. 2010. Is the EITC as good as an NIT? Conditional cash transfers and tax incidence. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 2:1177–208 [Google Scholar]
  108. Scheve K, Stasavage D. 2010. The conscription of wealth: mass warfare and the demand for progressive taxation. Int. Organ. 64:4529–61 [Google Scholar]
  109. Scheve K, Stasavage D. 2012. Democracy, war and wealth: lessons from two centuries of inheritance taxation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 106:181–102 [Google Scholar]
  110. Schumpeter JA. 1991 (1919). The crisis of the tax state. The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism R Swedberg 99–140 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  111. Slemrod J. 2000. Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich New York: Russell Sage Found.
  112. Smeeding TM. 2006. Poor people in rich nations: the United States in comparative perspective. J. Econ. Perspect. 20:169–90 [Google Scholar]
  113. Smeeding TM, Phillips KR, O'Connor M. 2000. The EITC: expectation, knowledge, use, and economic and social mobility. Nat. Tax J. 53:41187–210 [Google Scholar]
  114. Steinmo S. 1993. Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  115. Summers LH. 1981. Capital taxation and accumulation in a life cycle growth model. Am. Econ. Rev. 71:4533–44 [Google Scholar]
  116. Swank D. 1998. Funding the welfare state: globalization and the taxation of business in advanced market economies. Polit. Stud. 46:4671–92 [Google Scholar]
  117. Swank D. 2006. Tax policy in an era of internationalization: explaining the spread of neoliberalism. Int. Organ. 60:4847–82 [Google Scholar]
  118. Swank D, Steinmo S. 2002. The new political economy of taxation in advanced capitalist democracies. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:3642–55 [Google Scholar]
  119. Thies CG. 2004. State building, interstate and intrastate rivalry: a study of post-colonial developing country extractive efforts, 1975–2000. Int. Stud. Q. 48:153–72 [Google Scholar]
  120. Thies CG. 2005. War, rivalry, and state building in Latin America. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49:3451–65 [Google Scholar]
  121. Thies CG. 2007. The political economy of state building in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Polit. 69:3716–31 [Google Scholar]
  122. Thurston NK. 2002. Physician behavioural responses to variation in marginal income tax rates: longitudinal evidence. Appl. Econ. 34:162093–104 [Google Scholar]
  123. Tilly C. 2007. Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  124. Timmons JF. 2005. The fiscal contract: states, taxes, and public services. World Polit. 57:4530–67 [Google Scholar]
  125. Timmons JF. 2010a. Taxation and credible commitment: left, right, and partisan turnover. Comp. Polit. 42:2207–27 [Google Scholar]
  126. Timmons JF. 2010b. Taxation and representation in recent history. J. Polit. 72:1191–208 [Google Scholar]
  127. Tomaskovic-Devey D, Lin K. 2011. Income dynamics, economic rents, and the financialization of the U.S. economy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:4538–59 [Google Scholar]
  128. Volscho TW, Kelly NJ. 2012. The rise of the super-rich: power resources, taxes, financial markets, and the dynamics of the top 1 percent, 1949 to 2008. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77:5679–99 [Google Scholar]
  129. Weber M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology transl. G Roth, K Wittich Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  130. Weeden KA, Grusky DB. 2014. Inequality and market failure. Am. Behav. Sci. 583473–91
  131. Widmalm F. 2001. Tax structure and growth: Are some taxes better than others?. Public Choice 107:3–4199–219 [Google Scholar]
  132. Wilensky HL. 1976. The “New Corporatism,” Centralization, and the Welfare State Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  133. Wilensky HL. 2002. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and Performance Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  134. Young C, Varner C. 2011. Millionaire migration and state taxation of top incomes: evidence from a natural experiment. Nat. Tax J. 64:2255–84 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043229
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error