Aim: To obtain direct evidence for the cochlear travelling wave in humans by performing electrocochleography from within the cochlea in subjects implanted with an auditory prosthesis. Background: Sound induces a travelling wave that propagates along the basilar membrane, exhibiting cochleotopic tuning with a frequency-dependent phase delay. To date, evoked potentials and psychophysical experiments have supported the presence of the travelling wave in humans, but direct measurements have not been made. Methods: Electrical potentials in response to rarefaction and condensation acoustic tone bursts were recorded from multiple sites along the human cochlea, directly from a cochlear implant electrode during, and immediately after, its insertion. These recordings were made from individuals with residual hearing. Results: Electrocochleography was recorded from 11 intracochlear electrodes in 7 ears from 6 subjects, with detectable responses on all electrodes in 5 ears. Cochleotopic tuning and frequency-dependent phase delay of the cochlear microphonic were demonstrated. The response latencies were slightly shorter than those anticipated which we attribute to the subjects' hearing loss. Conclusions: Direct evidence for the travelling wave was observed. Electrocochleography from cochlear implant electrodes provides site-specific information on hair cell and neural function of the cochlea with potential diagnostic value.

Keywords:
Cochlear microphonic, Auditory nerve neurophonic, Electrocochleography, Intra-operative monitoring, Sensorineural hearing loss
1.
Abdala C, Guérit F, Luo P, Shera CA: Distortion-product otoacoustic emission reflection-component delays and cochlear tuning: estimates from across the human lifespan. J Acoust Soc Am 2014;135:1950-1958.
2.
Adunka O, Roush P, Grose J, Macpherson C, Buchman CA: Monitoring of cochlear function during cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1017-1020.
3.
Boëx C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Pelizzone M: Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006;7:110-124.
4.
Campbell L, Kaicer A, Briggs R, O'Leary S: Cochlear response telemetry: intracochlear electrocochleography via cochlear implant neural response telemetry pilot study results. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:399-405.
5.
Campbell L, Kaicer A, Sly D, Iseli C, Wei B, Briggs R, O'Leary S: Intraoperative real-time cochlear response telemetry predicts hearing preservation in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:332-338.
6.
Choudhury B, Fitzpatrick DC, Buchman CA, Wei BP, Dillon MT, He S, Adunka OF: Intraoperative round window recordings to acoustic stimuli from cochlear implant patients. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1507-1515.
7.
Cohen LT, Xu J, Xu SA, Clark GM: Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. Otol Neurotol 1996;17:859-865.
8.
Dong W, Olson ES: Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation. Biophys J 2013;105:1067-1078.
9.
Eggermont JJ: Analysis of compound action potential responses to tone bursts in the human and guinea pig cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1976;60:1132-1139.
10.
Eggermont JJ: Narrow-band AP latencies in normal and recruiting human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1979;65:463-470.
11.
Eggermont JJ, Brown DK, Ponton CW, Kimberley BP: Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) traveling wave delay measurements suggests frequency-specific synapse maturation. Ear Hear 1996;17:386-394.
12.
Evans EF: The sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. Audiology 1975;14:419-442.
13.
Greenwood DD: A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592-2605.
14.
Gummer AW, Johnstone BM: Group delay measurement from spiral ganglion cells in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1984;76:1388-1400.
15.
Gundersen T, Skarstein Ø, Sikkeland T: A study of the vibration of the basilar membrane in human temporal bone preparations by the use of the Mössbauer effect. Acta Otolaryngol 1978;86:225-232.
16.
Harte JM, Pigasse G, Dau T: Comparison of cochlear delay estimates using otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;126:1291-1301.
17.
Henry KR: Auditory nerve neurophonic recorded from the round window of the Mongolian gerbil. Hear Res 1995;90:176-184.
18.
Honrubia V, Ward PH: Longitudinal distribution of the cochlear microphonics inside the cochlear duct (guinea pig). J Acoust Soc Am 1968;44:951-958.
19.
Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM: Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: measurement of the lengths of organ of Corti, outer wall, inner wall and Rosenthal's canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:701-709.
20.
Kupperman R: The dynamic DC potential in the cochlea of the guinea pig (summating potential). Acta Otolaryngol 1966;62:465-480.
21.
Moleti A, Sisto R: Comparison between otoacoustic and auditory brainstem response latencies supports slow backward propagation of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;123:1495-1503.
22.
O'Connell BP, Hunter JB, Gifford RH, Rivas A, Haynes DS, Noble JH, Wanna GB: Electrode location and audiologic performance after cochlear implantation: a comparative study between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:1032-1035.
23.
Olson ES, Duifhuis H, Steele CR: Von Békésy and cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 2012;293: 31-43.
24.
Pamulova L, Linder B, Rask-Andersen H: Innervation of the apical turn of the human cochlea: a light microscopic and transmission electron microscopic investigation. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:270-275.
25.
Parker DJ, Thornton AR: Cochlear travelling wave velocities calculated from the derived components of the cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system. Scand Audiol 1978;7:67-70.
26.
Patuzzi RB, Yates GK, Johnstone BM: Changes in cochlear microphonic and neural sensitivity produced by acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1989;139:189-202.
27.
Robles L, Ruggero MA: Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 2001;81:1305-1352.
28.
Ruggero MA: Comparison of group delays of 2f1−f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear travel times. Acoust Res Lett Online 2004;5:143-147.
29.
Russell IJ, Nilsen KE: The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:2660-2664.
30.
Schoonhoven R, Prijs VF, Schneider S: DPOAE group delays versus electrophysiological measures of cochlear delay in normal human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;109:1503-1512.
31.
Şerbetçioğlu MB, Parker DJ: Measures of cochlear travelling wave delay in humans. I. Comparison of three techniques in subjects with normal hearing. Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:537-543.
32.
Snyder RL, Schreiner CE: The auditory neurophonic: basic properties. Hear Res 1984;15:261-280.
33.
Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA: Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:220.
34.
Stenfelt S, Puria S, Hato N, Goode RL: Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli. Hear Res 2003;181:131-143.
35.
Teas DC, Eldredge DH, Davis H: Cochlear responses to acoustic transients: An interpretation of whole-nerve action potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1962;34(9B):1438-1459.
36.
Verpy E, Weil D, Leibovici M, Goodyear RJ, Hamard G, Houdon C, Lefèvre GM, Hardelin JP, Richardson GP, Avan P, Petit C: Stereocilin-deficient mice reveal the origin of cochlear waveform distortions. Nature 2008;456:255-258.
37.
Von Békésy G: Description of some mechanical properties of the organ of Corti. J Acoust Soc Am 1953;25:770-785.
38.
Wilson JP, Johnstone JR: Basilar membrane and middle-ear vibration in guinea pig measured by capacitive probe. J Acoust Soc Am 1975;57:705-723.
39.
Zerlin S: Traveling-wave velocity in the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1969;46(4B):1011-1015.
40.
Zheng XY, Ding DL, McFadden SL, Henderson D: Evidence that inner hair cells are the major source of cochlear summating potentials. Hear Res 1997;113:76-88.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.