Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Should we delight the customer?

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critics have suggested that delighting the customer “raises the bar” of customer expectations, making it more difficult to satisfy the customer in the next purchase cycle and hurting the firm in the long run. The authors explore this issue by using a mathematical model of delight, based on assumptions gathered from the customer satisfaction literature. Although delighting the customer heightens repurchase expectations and makes satisfying the customer more difficult in the future, and the delighting firm is injured by raised customer expectations, the (nondelighting) competition is hurt worse through customer attrition to the delighting firm. If customers forget delighting incidents to some degree from occasion to occasion, the delighting firm suffers if it is in a position to take customers from the competition. If taking customers from the competition is difficult, the delighting firm actually benefits from customer forgetting, because the same delighting experience can be repeated again, with the same effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Eugene W., Claes Fornell, and Donald R. Lehmann. 1994. “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and Roland T. Rust. 1997. “Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services.”Marketing Science 16 (2): 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Mary W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms.”Marketing Science 12 (Spring): 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayus, Barry L., Vincent P. Carroll, and Ambar G. Rao. 1986. “Harnessing the Power of Word of Mouth.” InInnovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance. Eds. Vijay Mahajan and Yoram Wind. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Charles Robert Blauth, David Boger, Christopher Bolster, Gary Burchill, William DuMouchel, Fred Pouliot, Reinhart Richter, Allan Rubinoff, Diane Shen, Mike Timko, and David Walden. 1993. “Kano's Methods for Understanding Customer-Defined Quality.”Center for Quality Management Journal 2 (Fall): 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, William, Ajay Kalra, Richard Staelin, and Valarie A. Zeithaml. 1993. “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (February): 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte, Ernest R., Robert B. Woodruff, and Roger L. Jenkins. 1987. “Expectations and Norms in Models of Consumer Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (August): 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Colby H. 1989. “Quality: Beyond Customer Satisfaction.”Quality Progress 22 (February): 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmer, Jim. 1990. “The Three Rings of Perceived Value.”Canadian Manager 15 (Summer): 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J. and Roland T. Rust. 1996. “Indirect Financial Benefits From Service Quality.”Quality Management Journal 3 (2): 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rivera, Joseph, Lois Possell, Julie A. Verette, and Bernard Weiner. 1989. “Distinguishing Elation, Gladness, and Joy.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (December): 1015–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. Edwards. 1986.Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, Wayne, Lenard Huff, Marcello Rolandelli, and Jungwhan Choi. 1994. “On the Measurement of Perceived Service Quality: A Conjoint Measurement Approach.” InService Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice. Eds. Roland T. Rust and Richard L. Oliver Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, Sunil and Clark Leavitt. 1992. “A Comparison of Current Models of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction.”Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior 5: 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • File, Karen Maru, Dianne S. P. Cermak, and Russ Alan Prince. 1994. “Word-of-Mouth Effects in Professional Services Buyer Behaviour.”Service Industries Journal 14 (July): 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, T. Scott. 1994.Positively Outrageous Service. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Karnal and David W. Stewart. 1996. “Customer Satisfaction and Customer Behavior: The Differential Role of Brand and Category Expectations.”Marketing Letters 7 (July): 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman, J. Jeffrey, James S. Dyer, and Jianmin Jia. 1997. “A Generalized Utility Model of Disappointment and Regret Effects on Post-Choice Valuation.”Marketing Science 16 (2): 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Michael D., Eugene W. Anderson, and Claes Fornell. 1995. “Rational and Adaptive Performance Expectations in a Customer Satisfaction Framework.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (March): 695–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Noriaki, Nobuhiko Seraku, Fumio Takahashi, and Shinichi Tsuji. 1984. “Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality.”Quality: The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 14 (April): 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopalle, Praveen K. and Donald R. Lehmann. 1995. “The Effects of Advertised and Observed Quality on Expectations About New Product Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (August): 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Scott Neslin, and Medini Singh. 1999. “The Economic Viability of Frequency Reward Programs in a Strategic Competitive Environment.” Working paper. Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Anand and Richard Olshavsky. 1996. “Distinguishing Satisfaction From Delight: An Appraisals Approach.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Consumer Research, Tucson, Arizona.

  • Levine, Linda J. 1997. “Reconstructing Memory for Emotions.”Journal of Experimental Psychology; General 126 (June): 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Theodore. 1983.The Marketing Imagination. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mano, Haim, and Richard L. Oliver. 1993. “Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction.”Journal of Consumer Research 20 (December): 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, K. Sridhar. 1985. “Using Game Theory to Model Competition.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (August): 262–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. 1977. “Effect of Expectation and Disconfirmation on Postexposure Product Evaluations: An alternative Interpretation.”Journal of Applied Psychology 62 (August): 480–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.”Journal of Marketing Research 17 (November): 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Roland T. Rust, and Sajcev Varki. 1997. “Customer Delight: Foundations, Findings, and Managerial Insight.”Journal of Retailing 73 (Fall): 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert A. Westbrook. 1993. “Profiles of Consumer Emotions and Satisfaction in Ownership and Usage.”Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior 6: 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Russell S. Winer. 1987. “A Framework for the Formation and Structure of Consumer Expectations: Review and Propositions.”Journal of Economic Psychology 8 (December): 469–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardee, William J. 1996.To Satisfy and Delight Your Customer: How to Manage for Customer Value. New York: Dorset House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, Robert. 1980.Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, James A. 1980. “A Circuplex Model of Affect.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (December): 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, Roland T., Anthony J. Zahorik, and Timothy L. Keiningham. 1994.Return on Quality: Measuring the Finacial Impact of Your Company's Quest for Quality. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and —. 1995. “Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service Quality Financially Accountable.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Peter J. Danaher, and Sajeev Varki. 1999. “Comparative Service Quality and Business Outcomes” Working paper, Center for Service Marketing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, J. Jeffrey Inman, Jianmin Jia, and Anthony Zahorik. 1999. “What You Don't Know About Customer-Perceived Quality: The Role of Customer Expectation Distributions.”Marketing Science 18 (1): 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberg, Howard. 1990. “Satisfying Customers Is a Minimum; You Really Have to ‘Delight” Them.”Marketing News 24 (May 28): 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Richard L. 1980. “The Opponent Process Theory of Acquired Motivation: The Costs of Pleasure and the Benefits of Pain.”American Psychologist 35 (August): 713–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, David L. and Ed Diener. 1990. “Memory Accuracy in the Recall of Emotion.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (August): 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, David K., Franco M. Nicosia, and Peter C. Wilton. 1990. “Consumer Satisfaction as a Process.”Psychology & Marketing 7 (Fall): 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, David and Auke Tellegen. 1985. “Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood.”Psychological Bulletin 98 (September): 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, Robert A. and Richard L. Oliver. 1991. “The Dimensionality of Consumption Emotion Patterns and Consumer Satisfaction.”Journal of Consumer Research 18 (June): 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, Robert B., Ernest R. Cadotte, and Roger L. Jenkins. 1983. “Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Processes Using Experience-Based Norms.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (August): 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Youjae. 1990. “A Critical Review of Consumer Satisfaction.” InReview of Marketing 1990. Ed. Valarie A. Zeithaml. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 68–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA

    Roland T. Rust & Richard L. Oliver

Authors
  1. Roland T. Rust
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard L. Oliver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Roland T. Rust (Ph.D., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) is the Madison S. Wigginton Professor of Management and Director of the Center for Service Marketing at the Owen Graduate School of Management at Vanderbilt University. His publication record includes more than 60 journal articles and five books. His 1997Marketing Science article, “Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services,” won the Best Services Article Award from the American marketing Association, for the best services article in any journal, and his 1995 article, “Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service Quality Financially Accountable,” won theJournal of Marketing's Alpha Kappa Psi Award for the article with the greatest impact on marketing practice. He has also won best article awards from theJournal of Advertising and theJournal of Retailing. His honors include career achievement awards from the American Statistical Association and the American Academy of Advertising, as well as the Henry Latané Distinguished Doctoral Alumnus Award from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. His work has been covered widely in the media and has resulted in aBusiness Week cover story and an appearance onABC World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. He is the founder and chair of the American Marketing Association (AMA) Frontiers in Services Conference and serves as founding editor of theJournal of Service Research. He also serves on the editorial review boards of theJournal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing, andMarketing Science.

Richard L. Oliver (Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison) is the Valere Blair Potter Professor of Management at the Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt, University. His research interests include consumer psychology with a special focus on customer satisfaction and postpurchase processes. He holds the position of Fellow of the American Psychological Association for his extensive writings on the psychology of the satisfaction response. He is the author ofSatisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer (Irwin/McGraw-Hill) and coeditor ofService Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice (Sage). He previously served on the boards of theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, and theJournal of Retailing and has published articles in theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Applied Psychology, Psychology & Marketing, Behavioral Science, theJournal of Economic Psychology, Applied Psychological Measurement, Psychometrika, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Advances in Consumer Research, theJournal of Retailing, theJournal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, theJournal of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction & Complaining Behavior, theJournal of Advertising, theJournal of Consumer Affairs, and others. He previously taught at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, and at Washington University in St. Louis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rust, R.T., Oliver, R.L. Should we delight the customer?. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 28, 86–94 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281008

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281008

Keywords

Search

Navigation